エピソード

  • Summer Break - Programming Note
    2026/07/15
    With the first 12 episodes in the bank, I’m taking a summer break to spend time with my family on extended travel. I’ll be back with a fresh batch of episodes in late August. Enjoy your summer, and if you haven’t done so, please tell a friend or colleague about the show!
    続きを読む 一部表示
    1分未満
  • Running for Office, by Ronald Faucheux
    2026/07/01
    The Permanent Campaign Across the Desk Masters in Public Affairs, Episode 12 You bring the official a clean brief and a sound argument. The meeting's warm. Nothing moves. Here's why: the elected official across your desk is a candidate — right now, every day until they leave the seat — and they're running your ask through one question. Does this help me, or hurt me, with the people who can take this seat away? Running for Office (Ronald Faucheux, 2002) is a candidate's field manual. Read from where we sit, it's the source code for the person across the desk. In this one: Why campaigning professionalized and what "strategy" actually means The three plays an official runs — the voter database, inoculation (FDR, Clinton, Dole), and the pincer (Gilmore's "no car tax" trap) Three portable models — the Message Box, the One-Third Rule, and the Allocation Where the book gets misread How to put all of it to work in public affairs, starting with the unglamorous advice I keep giving clients — build your own database. The professional prepares the contest. The amateur shows up to it. From the canon: How to Win Campaigns The Election Game Good Strategy Bad Strategy Positioning Public Opinion A five-star review and a word to a colleague go a long way. One follower at a time.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    1 時間 1 分
  • How to Win Campaigns by Chris Rose
    2026/06/17
    Joseph Lavoie works through Chris Rose's How to Win Campaigns — the most practical book in the canon so far, and the one he's returned to more than almost any other in his own campaign work. It's a manual: checklists, tools, tests. Which makes it easy to skim and hard to read well. So instead of running the steps, this episode digs for the ideas underneath them — the ones that don't date. It's built around two real campaigns. Greenpeace's Brent Spar fight, which they won while being wrong on the central fact. And WWF's chemicals-and-health campaign, which helped shape EU law by turning a grey, technical issue into a single question a grandmother could put to a politician: are these chemicals in my blood — yes or no? In this episode: — Why being right is rarely what wins — Locating the decision, and the "photo test" for a real objective — The point of irreducibility: finding the black and white in the grey — Choosing an antagonist, and turning the question upside down — Sequencing a campaign backwards from the win — The speaking victim, and the manufactured antagonist — Where Rose gets misread, and what it takes to master his lessons "Pundits comment on change; campaigners make it happen." — Chris Rose 📚 How to Win Campaigns by Chris Rose (2nd edition, Earthscan, 2010) If the show's useful to you, a five-star rating helps new listeners find it. Subscribe so you don't miss the next book.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    48 分
  • Victory Lab by Sasha Issenberg
    2026/06/03
    Most of what a campaign does has never actually been tested. Sasha Issenberg is a journalist, not an operative — which is why he could follow the evidence instead of defending a tactic. His 2012 book, The Victory Lab, is an incredibly clear account of how campaigning became experimental: the moment a profession that had run for a century on folklore finally borrowed the clinical trial from medicine and started measuring what actually moves a voter. In this episode: Why two Yale professors knocking on New Haven doors in 1998 was the first field experiment of its kind in 70 years The door-knock that beat the phone bank by seven points — bigger than the margin in most races that matter Hal Malchow's polling flip: learning less about what voters think and more about who they are, to find your swing voters by name "You mean you don't do this in politics?" — how a venture capitalist exposed a field that had fallen behind the companies selling credit cards The single most effective piece of mail ever tested — and the reason no campaign can actually use it Why most public affairs dashboards count motion instead of movement, and the one cheap habit that tells you which tactics actually work The mastery lesson: why the best operators are the ones willing to be proven wrong Book: Sasha Issenberg, The Victory Lab: The Secret Science of Winning Campaigns (Crown, 2012). More: mastersinpublicaffairs.com
    続きを読む 一部表示
    31 分
  • The Election Game & How to Win It by Joseph Napolitan
    2026/05/20
    The operator's job isn't to inform the voter. It's to trigger what's already in them. Joseph Napolitan figured this out in the field by 1968 — a generation before the academic research caught up. His 1972 book, The Election Game and How to Win It, is the founding manual of political consulting and still the clearest working theory we have of how mass communication actually moves people. In this episode: - Why a 60-second TV spot that never named Goldwater ended his presidential campaign - Napolitan's three-step method, and why almost every campaign falls apart at step one - The poll finding that voters choose honest by four or five to one over policy-aligned - Controlled vs uncontrolled media, and the reason campaigns blow up after one bad interview - The one-day sale — and why corporate communications teams are structurally unprepared for it - The CEO as candidate, the 24/7 series, and Foreign Affairs as a domestic platform - The mastery lesson: why the best operators don't look like operators Book: Joseph Napolitan, The Election Game and How to Win It (Doubleday, 1972). More: mastersinpublicaffairs.com
    続きを読む 一部表示
    54 分
  • Good Strategy Bad Strategy, by Richard Rumelt
    2026/05/06
    Most documents called "strategy" aren't strategies at all. They're political artifacts produced when no one in the room was willing to inflict the pain of choice. Richard Rumelt's Good Strategy Bad Strategy (2011) takes a structural question seriously that almost no other strategy book takes seriously: what makes something a strategy at all. This episode walks through Rumelt's diagnosis of bad strategy as a political artifact, the three-part structure underneath every real strategy (the kernel), and the four mechanisms that translate most directly to public affairs work. We close with the move that goes beyond what Rumelt wrote about: that for audiences drowning in information, simplicity is the biggest gift you can give them, and articulating thinking with simplicity is harder than producing the wall of appendices. IN THIS EPISODE • Why Rumelt wrote the book — four decades watching organisations produce political artifacts dressed up in strategy language • DEC's one-sentence consensus statement and what it cost the company • The core idea — a coherent response to an important challenge — and Schwarzkopf's left hook as the worked case • The kernel: diagnosis, guiding policy, coherent actions • Concentration, the threshold effect, and why pulsing beats spreading • The proximate objective and Rumelt's counter-intuitive case for SHORTER planning horizons under high uncertainty • The asymmetry move — Andy Marshall and James Roche's 1976 Pentagon memo — and how it applies to industry-vs-NGO regulatory fights today • Four mental models: the kernel, the pivot point, the long clock, the dog's dinner • Four common misreadings of the book — the most consequential being that bad strategy is a failure of effort, when it's actually active avoidance • Four modern applications including the consultant's dog's dinner (Joseph's own confession), pulsing in regulatory work, proximate objectives in the legislative cycle, and the asymmetry move under the long clock • The mastery lesson: a strategy is a hypothesis, not a destination If you've ever sat through a coalition session that drifted toward a document everyone could sign and that committed to nothing, this episode names what was happening. ABOUT THE SHOW Masters in Public Affairs goes back to the foundational books in this field and extracts the principles the best practitioners return to again and again. The best performers work the fundamentals — in sports, in music, in every craft. It's true in public affairs too. One book at a time. BOOK Richard Rumelt, Good Strategy Bad Strategy: The Difference and Why It Matters (Crown Business, 2011).
    続きを読む 一部表示
    1 時間
  • Influence, by Robert Cialdini
    2026/04/22
    Robert Cialdini's Influence was published in 1984. Forty years later, it remains by some distance the cleanest taxonomy ever written of how ordinary people get moved to say yes—and why, most of the time, they're not being persuaded. They're being triggered. Cialdini's word for it is click-run. Press a button, the cassette plays. Expensive—click, must be good. Expert said so—click, must be right. Everyone's doing it—click, must be the thing to do. The shortcuts are adaptive most of the time: expensive things usually are better, experts usually are expert, crowds usually know something. The problem is the counterfeits. Any trigger that reliably maps to something good can be faked. Once you know how the machinery works, you can fire the click without providing the run. The book identifies seven of these triggers—reciprocity, commitment and consistency, social proof, liking, authority, scarcity, and unity. This episode goes deep on four, extracts three mental models, names three common misreadings, and lands four applications for public affairs today. Influence is the companion to Episode 5 on Pre-Suasion. Same author, same research program, adjacent questions. Pre-Suasion is about what should happen before the ask. Influence is about what makes the ask land. In public affairs, you need both. In this episode Why Cialdini wrote the book (three years undercover inside compliance industries) The core idea: most influence works by pulling a trigger, not by winning an argument The four principles this episode goes deep on—reciprocity, commitment, social proof, and scarcity Three mental models: the ledger, the granted freedom, and the authority shortcut Three ways Influence gets misread by practitioners—and why treating it as a playbook is the worst of them Four modern applications: the modern lobbyist problem, signatory inflation, the dashboard problem, and the politics of withdrawn benefits The mastery lesson: why you don't graduate out of this book Key Quotes Although there are thousands of different tactics that compliance practitioners employ to produce yes, the majority fall within seven basic categories. Each of these categories is governed by a fundamental psychological principle that directs human behavior and in so doing gives the tactics their power. Although an obligation to repay constitutes the essence of the reciprocity rule, it's the obligation to receive that makes the rule so easy to exploit. Other studies have documented the unintended negative consequences of trying to move people away from a detrimental action by lamenting its frequency. People see a thing as more desirable when it recently has become less available to them than when it has been scarce all along. About this show Masters in Public Affairs goes back to the foundational books in this field and extracts the principles that the best practitioners return to again and again. The best performers work the fundamentals. That's true in sports, in music, in every craft. It's true in public affairs too. This show is about identifying those fundamentals—the mental models and first principles that remain true even as tactics and technology change. One book at a time. Book Robert Cialdini, Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion (revised and expanded edition, 2021; original 1984)
    続きを読む 一部表示
    1 時間 9 分
  • Positioning, by Al Ries and Jack Trout
    2026/04/08
    Most people file Positioning under marketing. I think that's a mistake. So much of what we do in public affairs is positioning — positioning an issue, positioning your organisation as a stakeholder, positioning a specific policy ask. The discipline that Ries and Trout describe is core to what we do. But it's a discipline most practitioners have never been formally trained in. In this episode, I break down the 1981 book that changed how we think about communication. We cover: Why communication itself became the communication problem Outside-in vs. inside-out thinking — and why practitioners default to the wrong one How the mind filters, ranks, and anchors information Four mental models: The Ladder, The Créneau, The Teeter-Totter, and Sacrifice Why leading with your cognitive argument is the most common mistake in the field Naming as a strategic weapon — lessons from the PMO The coalition dilution trap Why audiences filter your issues through their own self-identity Connections to Lippmann, McRaney, Luntz, and Centola Key quote from the book: "Positioning is not what you do to a product. Positioning is what you do to the mind of the prospect." Book: Positioning: The Battle for Your Mind by Al Ries and Jack Trout (McGraw-Hill, 1981) The Canon So Far: Walter Lippmann — Public Opinion David McRaney — How Minds Change Frank Luntz — Words That Work Damon Centola — Change Robert Cialdini —Pre-suasion Al Ries & Jack Trout — Positioning Masters in Public Affairs is a podcast about the fundamentals of public affairs — one book at a time. Hosted by Joseph Lavoie.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    41 分