エピソード

  • How Doctors Turned a Survivable Bullet into a Deadly Infection

    How Doctors Turned a Survivable Bullet into a Deadly Infection
    2026/09/10
    How Doctors Turned a Survivable Bullet into a Deadly Infection

    A president was shot in a crowded train station yet missed his spine and every major organ - and still died weeks later from pus, collapsed lungs, and sepsis. How did eleven doctors, unwashed hands, and repeated probe-and-open wound care turn a survivable bullet wound into a fatal infection?

    In this episode, we tell the sequence of events from the shooting at a Washington train depot to the medical decisions that followed, describing who was present, how the wound was treated, and why his death certificate listed sepsis rather than the gunshot - could better sterile technique have saved him?

    Person: James Garfield
    Date: July 2, 1881
    Location: Baltimore and Potomac Railroad depot on Sixth Street
    Status: Died after 79 days
    Cause: Sepsis and a ruptured artery

    - The bullet entered Garfield's back at 9:30 AM on July 2, 1881, four inches to the right of his spine and stopped behind the pancreas.
    - Garfield missed his 51st birthday by two months and weighed 210 pounds at the time of the shooting.
    - Within one hour of the shooting, eleven doctors had inserted their unsterilized fingers into Garfield's back.
    - Seventy-nine days after the shooting Garfield's body weighed 130 pounds and was riddled with abscesses and pus throughout his torso.
    - The attending physician Dr. Willard Bliss assumed charge that morning; the autopsy found both lungs collapsed into pneumonia.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    20 分
  • The Draize eye drop that kept rabbits blind for lipstick

    The Draize eye drop that kept rabbits blind for lipstick
    2026/09/10
    A technician applies a chemical to a rabbit's held-open eye-how did the Draize eye drop expose regulators' trust in animal tests?

    The Draize eye drop that kept rabbits blind for lipstick

    In this episode, we follow the history behind a single cruel lab procedure and the decades-long mismatch between scientific practice and consumer language. What gap between the Three R's and a shelf label allowed the Draize test to endure?

    Person: Charles Hume
    Person: W.M.S. Russell
    Person: Lady Dowding
    Date: 1957
    Date: 1959

    - A rabbit's head was restrained and eyelids held open while technicians applied chemicals directly to its eye with no anesthesia.
    - Regulators accepted the Draize ocular toxicity test because rabbit eyes' low tear production produced longer contact times, seen as a conservative safety margin.
    - The Three R's-Replacement, Reduction, Refinement-were proposed in 1957 as a scientific framework to reduce animal suffering without ideological confrontation.
    - Lady Dowding coined and deployed the consumer label "cruelty-free" in 1959 to mark non-animal products and founded Beauty Without Cruelty to promote it.
    - By the 1970s the "cruelty-free" label crossed to the U.S., carried by Marcia Pearson and Fashion With Compassion, even as institutional testing practices remained entrenched.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    16 分
  • They Killed the President Twice: How Doctors Finished Garfield

    They Killed the President Twice: How Doctors Finished Garfield
    2026/09/09
    They Killed the President Twice: How Doctors Finished Garfield

    The thought that the American president survived an assassination only to be undone by his physicians is chilling: James A. Garfield lingered 79 days after being shot, and when the autopsy finally occurred the pathologist found that the bullet was almost beside the point. How did a .442 Webley British Bulldog and a room by the ocean become a political and medical catastrophe?

    In this episode, we tell the life of James A. Garfield from his log cabin childhood through his presidency, the motives of Charles J. Guiteau, and the seventy-nine-day decline that followed the shooting - raising the question of whether the doctors, not the assassin, sealed Garfield’s fate.

    Person: James Abram Garfield
    Date: July 2, 1881 (shooting) / November 19, 1831 (birth)
    Location: Baltimore and Potomac Railroad Station, Washington
    Weapon: .442 Webley British Bulldog revolver with ivory grip
    Duration: 79 days between shooting and death

    - Garfield served 17 consecutive years in Congress before becoming president at age 49.
    - Guiteau arrived in Washington on March 5, 1881, and was banned from the White House waiting room by May 13, 1881.
    - Guiteau bought the revolver with a $15 loan from George Maynard and paid $1 extra for an ivory grip.
    - Garfield’s inauguration speech on March 4, 1881, advocated civil service reform and angered a faction of his party.
    - Garfield never reached his train on July 2, 1881, and died 79 days later in a room by the ocean.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    22 分
  • The bee droppings that proved the yellow rain was pollen, not poison

    The bee droppings that proved the yellow rain was pollen, not poison
    2026/09/09
    A U.S. secretary says Soviets sprayed sticky "yellow rain" over Laos-poison or pollen?

    The bee droppings that proved the yellow rain was pollen, not poison

    In this episode, we present the sequence of events, testimony, and scientific tests that turned a Cold War chemical-weapons claim into a decades-long controversy. It traces who the Hmong were, the U.S. diplomatic accusation, and the competing lab analyses that raised the central question: what was really falling from the sky?

    Person: Alexander Haig
    Person: C. J. Mirocha
    Person: Matthew Meselson
    Date: 1981-1983
    Location: Laos; Thailand refugee camps

    - Alexander Haig declared in September 1981 that a sticky yellow liquid falling from aircraft over Laos and Cambodia was Soviet chemical warfare.
    - University of Minnesota biochemist C. J. Mirocha reported finding trichothecene mycotoxins in blood, urine, and tissue from alleged victims within months of the announcement.
    - British, French, and Swedish laboratories analyzed samples and reported pollen rather than trichothecene toxins.
    - Matthew Meselson collected yellow deposits in Laos and showed bee-dropping samples to Hmong refugees in a Thai camp, noting immediate identifications and an instance of a changed testimony.
    - Meselson’s leaf-collected drops each contained local-plant pollen mixtures, varying from drop to drop, challenging the idea of a uniform manufactured munition.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    15 分
  • How Doctors Killed a President: The Bullet They Couldn't Find

    How Doctors Killed a President: The Bullet They Couldn't Find
    2026/09/08
    How Doctors Killed a President: The Bullet They Couldn't Find

    A sitting president survived two gunshots on July 2, 1881, yet lost eighty pounds over seventy-nine days while surgeons probed and failed to locate a bullet that lay behind his pancreas; how did the men sworn to save him end up doing the damage? Who made the crucial choices that turned a survivable wound into a fatal decline?

    In this episode, we follow the timeline from the Baltimore and Potomac Railroad Station shooting through the subsequent seventy-nine days of care and decline, tracing the actions of the arresting officer, the attending physicians, and inventors who tried to help - and asking whether medical choices, not the bullet, were the real cause of death.

    Person: James Abram Garfield
    Date: July 2, 1881
    Location: Baltimore and Potomac Railroad Station, Washington
    Event: Two gunshots; one bullet lodged behind the pancreas
    Person: Charles Guiteau

    - The shooting occurred at 9:30 AM on July 2, 1881, when Charles Guiteau fired two shots at President Garfield.
    - One bullet grazed Garfield’s shoulder; the second passed the first lumbar vertebra and lodged behind the pancreas.
    - Garfield lost eighty pounds over the seventy-nine days after he was shot.
    - Policeman Patrick Kearney arrested Guiteau but initially forgot to take the revolver from him.
    - Charles Guiteau borrowed $15 to buy an ivory-handled revolver he said he chose because it would look good in a museum; that revolver later disappeared from the Smithsonian.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    19 分
  • The word "homosexual" claimed jurisdiction over bodies

    The word "homosexual" claimed jurisdiction over bodies
    2026/09/08
    A medical practice linked to Dr. [Name] caused harm for over a century, repeatedly renaming itself to evade bans. How did it persist?

    The word "homosexual" claimed jurisdiction over bodies

    This episode explores the history of conversion therapy, a practice that has taken many forms over more than a hundred years. It delves into how medical and governmental bodies enabled its continuation despite evidence of its ineffectiveness and the devastating impact it had on thousands of people.

    Topic: Conversion therapy
    Period: 19th to 21st Century
    Key figure: Karl Maria Kertbeny
    Study: American Medical Association, 2025
    Suicide attempt rate (conversion therapy): 42%

    - The term "homosexual" was coined in the 1880s by Karl Maria Kertbeny as a neutral descriptor, but its widespread adoption allowed medicine to claim jurisdiction over same-sex attraction.
    - Sigmund Freud's theory of homosexuality as "arrested development" provided a framework for practitioners, suggesting it could be reversed.
    - Sándor Rádo further developed this, attributing homosexuality to inadequate parenting based on biased clinical samples.
    - Early 20th-century surgeons in Germany attempted unilateral orchiectomy and testicle transplants, and later surgical castration, on gay men, sometimes as young as sixteen.
    - During WWII, Carl Vaernet implanted testosterone-releasing pellets into prisoners in Buchenwald, most of whom died shortly after the procedure.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    18 分
  • The Surgeon Who Maimed Dozens: Anatomy of a Medical Monster

    The Surgeon Who Maimed Dozens: Anatomy of a Medical Monster
    2026/09/07
    The Surgeon Who Maimed Dozens: Anatomy of a Medical Monster

    A spine surgeon with a twelve‑page CV harmed thirty‑three patients across Dallas between 2011 and 2013, leaving two dead and many paralyzed, incontinent, or in permanent agony - and hospitals repeatedly let him walk into the next operating room. How did institutions with the tools to stop him fail to act, and what single email finally put him away?

    In this episode, we lay out the sequence of events, the victims’ stories, the medical reviews, and the institutional decisions that allowed Christopher Daniel Duntsch to continue operating - culminating in the email that led to his life sentence. What do the records reveal about responsibility and system failure?

    Person: Christopher Daniel Duntsch
    Date: 2011-2013
    Location: Dallas, Texas
    Number harmed: 33
    Deaths: 2

    - Duntsch was born April 3, 1971, in Montana and grew up in Memphis, Tennessee, as the eldest of four children.
    - He held an MD and PhD from the University of Tennessee and completed residency and fellowship at Semmes‑Murphey Clinic.
    - Surgeries by Duntsch between 2011 and 2013 resulted in 33 harmed patients, including paralysis, incontinence, and chronic pain.
    - Veteran reviewers noted Duntsch “had to have known how to do it right” yet repeatedly performed operations that were described as the opposite.
    - A surgical sponge was found inside patient Jeff Glidewell during emergency reoperation by Randall Kirby, and Baylor Plano allowed Duntsch to resign without reporting him to the National Practitioner Data Bank.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    21 分
  • The 75‑cent excise tax that funded $4.6 billion in payouts

    The 75‑cent excise tax that funded $4.6 billion in payouts
    2026/09/07
    A 75-cent vaccine tax funded huge payouts; one small court and a flood of MMR autism claims force the system to answer-what happens next?

    The 75‑cent excise tax that funded $4.6 billion in payouts

    In this episode, we trace how a 75-cent per-dose tax created a no-fault compensation system and how that structure handled thousands of claims alleging vaccine harm. What happens when a program designed to be faster and fairer faces a massive, singular challenge that tests its procedures and assumptions?

    Person: Special Masters (appointed attorneys)
    Date: 1988 (program start), 2008-2009 (key filings and ruling)
    Location: United States Court of Federal Claims
    Topic: National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, MMR autism claims
    Event: 5,263 petitions alleging MMR caused autism

    - Congress created a no-fault vaccine compensation system in 1986 and the program began in 1988, funded by a 75-cent excise tax per vaccine dose.
    - Claims were heard by Special Masters in the Court of Federal Claims with a preponderance-of-evidence standard and no juries.
    - The program reimbursed legal fees even for unsuccessful petitioners who met filing thresholds and used a Vaccine Injury Table to presume causation in certain time windows.
    - Between 1988 and January 2008, the program received 8,128 petitions; 925 were compensated and 5,263 alleged MMR caused autism.
    - The concentration of thousands of similar MMR autism claims culminated in a pivotal federal ruling in February 2009 that reshaped how the system handled those cases.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    18 分