『Glitch of History』のカバーアート

Glitch of History

Glitch of History

著者： Pastime Agency
無料で聴く

概要
 'Glitch of History' is a counterfactual history podcast with a rule: change one thing, and follow only what the evidence can carry. Each episode takes a single documented moment — a council interrupted by soldiers, an order that arrived late, a draft treaty left unsigned — and introduces one explicit divergence. Not a different world. One decision, reversed. From there, Rowan attends to the record and Maren examines what could have gone differently, tracing the consequences through the mechanisms history actually runs on: a chain of command, a succession rule, a supply route, a season, a delay in the post. What makes the show unusual is where it stops. Every step is weighted by how much the evidence supports it, and that confidence falls as the scenario travels further from the fork. When the record can no longer tell us which path would have prevailed, the episode says so instead of inventing an ending. There is no alternate world, and no 'everything would have changed' — the point is analytical, not speculative. Every episode returns to what actually happened, and asks what the road not taken reveals about the road that was: a missed opportunity, an overestimated individual, a logistical limit, a fragile alliance, the gaps in a surviving archive. New episodes every Tuesday.Copyright 2026 Pastime Agency 世界
エピソード
  • What if A/L.633 had been adopted in 1971

    What if A/L.633 had been adopted in 1971
    2026/10/20
    On 25 October 1971 at the General Assembly’s 1976th plenary meeting, A/L.632 failed, the attempt to split A/L.630 failed, and A/L.630 became Resolution 2758, expelling Chiang Kai-shek’s representatives and recognizing the PRC representatives as China. 🕰️📜 The episode departs at that last vote: instead of A/L.630, the Assembly adopts A/L.633, the already-filed dual-representation draft sponsored by the United States and others, including Japan and Australia, which was on the table but never put to a vote. The most plausible next step is a contested institutional process, with the General Assembly’s recommendation moving through the Security Council and specialized agencies under their own procedures. The ROC could remain formally represented, but the Council seat and Beijing’s acceptance would still be unresolved or disputed. What cannot be known is whether Beijing or Taipei would have accepted the formula, or how far the arrangement would have functioned beyond the next General Assembly cycle. Glitch of History examines representation, institutional limits, and the consequences of one vote that never happened.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    11 分
  • What if Mack coordinated the Ulm breakout with Ferdinand

    What if Mack coordinated the Ulm breakout with Ferdinand
    2026/10/13
    On 14 October 1805, Ney defeated Riesch at Elchingen while French forces were closing around Ulm after crossing the Danube. Ferdinand got out with cavalry, Werneck moved north with heavy artillery, and Mack signed capitulation on 17 October. 🪖🌉 The episode’s divergence is Mack coordinating the forces still at Ulm for a breakout toward the northern and northeastern roads. That was genuinely available because separate Austrian movements were already under way on 13 and 14 October, including Riesch, Werneck, and Ferdinand. The most plausible result is a larger but still uneven escape attempt, with French corps such as Ney, Lannes, and Murat reallocating to block crossings and roads. The Elchingen bridge, bad roads, and artillery movement would likely keep the breakout constrained. Beyond that point, the episode says certainty stops: the record cannot show whether a stronger Austrian concentration would open a wider route or simply produce more prisoners outside Ulm, nor what it would mean for Vienna, the Russian army, or a later battle. Glitch of History examines whether one coordinated order could have changed Ulm, why Elchingen mattered, and where command unity ran into roads, bridges, and baggage.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    10 分
  • Seized Register Interrupts the Wuchang Uprising

    Seized Register Interrupts the Wuchang Uprising
    2026/10/06
    On 9 October 1911, an accidental bomb explosion at a revolutionary headquarters in Hankou exposed a network inside the New Army. Qing authorities raided the site, seized the membership register and papers, arrested several revolutionaries, and executed Liu Fuji, Peng Chufan, and Yang Hongsheng. 💥📜 The divergence begins if the seized papers lead to the arrest of the exposed plotters before the evening of 10 October. That alternative was genuinely available because the register identified names and links, and Ruicheng, the Viceroy of Huguang, already had authority and warning of a possible mutiny. Most plausibly, the documented 10 October sequence is interrupted: the Eighth Engineer Battalion cannot launch the planned seizure of the ammunition depot, and Qing forces keep Wuhan’s arsenal and offices. A security sweep through exposed links across the three cities is the likeliest mechanism, though only as a temporary disruption. Beyond that point, the episode says certainty stops: the record cannot establish whether a delayed mutiny, another unit, or another province would rise. Glitch of History examines how the register was seized, how the first move was interrupted, and what could or could not follow from arrests in Hankou.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    10 分
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
まだレビューはありません