Gianluca Alimonti discusses three “climate matrix” papers: a 2022 review of extreme weather time series and response indicators that found no clear worsening trends (later retracted, which he argues lacked specific scientific grounds and reflected political pressure); a 2023 analysis of EM-DAT natural-disaster records concluding the post-1970 rise is largely improved reporting, with trends stable since about 2000 and disaster deaths decreasing; and a recent framework proposing 43 IPCC-aligned impact-driver and response indicators to assess “climate crisis,” finding most show no worsening, many improve, and few worsen. He criticizes media/official claims of rapidly rising disasters and emphasizes adaptation and prevention.

00:00 Meet Gianluca Alimonti

00:02 Climate Matrix Trilogy Overview

01:31 Paper One Extreme Events

03:11 Hurricanes Rain Tornado Data

05:31 Retraction Controversy

09:50 Paper Two Disaster Claims

12:36 EM-DAT Reporting Bias

17:27 Stable Trends Since 2000

21:42 Paper Three Defining Crisis

23:12 Media Term And Search Trends

27:05 Building A Crisis Framework

28:20 Drivers Floods Cyclones Fires

31:53 Response Indicators Scorecard

35:59 Adaptation Beats Mitigation

37:49 Conclusions Media Distortion

39:38 Q&A Retraction And Outreach

41:40 Where To Find Work

44:05 Closing Thanks And Farewell

Home page: https://www0.mi.infn.it/~alimonti/homepage/indexEn.htm

Pielke Jr on “The Alimonti Addendum”: https://rogerpielkejr.substack.com/p/the-alimonti-addendum

=========

Slides, summaries, references, and transcripts of my podcasts: https://tomn.substack.com/p/podcast-summaries

My Linktree: https://linktr.ee/tomanelson1

Nicola Scafetta discusses his book, "The Frontier of Climate Science," a review based on about 650 peer‑reviewed papers arguing that IPCC global climate models have serious limitations because they fail to capture multi‑scale natural variability (oceanic, solar, astronomical, and tidal cycles). He says model claims that nearly all warming since 1850 is anthropogenic are not experimentally validated, climate sensitivity remains highly uncertain, and many models run too hot, with possible surface-record warm bias from urban heat islands. He cites past warm periods and correlations between climate and solar/cosmic-ray proxies, proposes empirical/semi‑empirical cycle-based modeling, and concludes warming risk is moderate, SSP2 could meet Paris targets, net zero is unnecessary, and adaptation should be prioritized.

00:00 Introducing Scafetta’s New Book

06:03 Earth’s Deep-Time Climate Swings

11:06 IPCC Attribution to Humans

14:44 Why Model Proof Falls Short

17:27 Paris Targets and Net Zero Logic

24:33 Are IPCC Scenarios Realistic

29:04 Model Uncertainty and Sensitivity

34:57 Satellites vs Surface Warming

38:42 Missing Past Warm Periods

43:21 Millennial Solar Climate Cycles

46:00 Forests Beneath Glaciers

46:59 Solar Records vs Climate

49:18 TSI Reconstructions Debate

52:09 Cosmic Rays and Clouds

56:07 Empirical Models Challenge IPCC

59:18 Policy Implications and Adaptation

01:01:12 Planetary Cycles Climate Theory

01:05:37 Matching Climate Spectral Cycles

01:12:51 Future Hiatus and Sensitivity

01:19:43 Next Glaciation Long View

01:24:01 Book Wrap Up and Thanks

The Frontier of Climate Science: Solar variability, natural cycles and model uncertainty: https://a.co/d/0flzOYJ3

=========

Brochure for Nicola’s “The Frontier of Climate Science” book, along with slides, summaries, references, and transcripts of my podcasts: https://tomn.substack.com/p/podcast-summaries

My Linktree: https://linktr.ee/tomanelson1

Anika Sweetland argues the IPCC was created through politics, funding, and elite influence, tracing its origins to the 1985 Villach Conference and alleging it advances centralized global governance. She says media-driven fear shifted from 1970s “ice age” stories to 1988 “global warming,” citing sea-level warnings that did not occur. Sweetland claims climate finance and clean-energy investment incentives benefit IPCC-linked officials. She highlights Climategate emails as evidence of strategic data presentation (“hide the decline”), message management, and peer-review gatekeeping (“PAL review”), plus an alleged journal blacklist. She says her climate studies education omitted Climategate, emphasized policy “solutions,” and discouraged debate.

00:00 IPCC Exposed Intro

01:01 Ice Age Media Panic

02:06 Fear as Control Tool

03:36 Global Warming Rebrand

05:23 Sea Level Scare Claims

07:28 Villach Birth of IPCC

09:31 Global Governance Agenda

10:31 Trillions and Incentives

12:20 Climategate Data Tricks

18:57 Peer Review Gatekeeping

21:44 Blacklists and Ideology

23:31 Personal Wake Up Call

25:16 Who Controls Science

26:34 What We Can Do Next

27:23 Host Reacts and Questions

27:36 Climategate Not Taught

30:10 Policy Impacts UK Europe

33:15 Witch Hunts Parallel

37:22 Climate Degree Brainwashing

40:42 Only Graduate Story

43:15 Today’s Model Driven Teaching

45:19 Books and IPCC Origins

46:17 Closing Thanks and Wrap

https://x.com/anika_climate

=========

Slides, summaries, references, and transcripts of my podcasts: https://tomn.substack.com/p/podcast-summaries

My Linktree: https://linktr.ee/tomanelson1