Ray Sanders updates his Surface Stations project to classify all 385 UK Met Office weather stations using WMO siting classes, claiming 88% are class 3–5 and 112 meet no regulations, including many in walled or private gardens and car parks. He argues poor siting, degraded maintenance after automation, and rapid platinum resistance thermometers in Stevenson screens create spikes and non-comparable records versus older liquid-in-glass methods. He alleges rounding/conversion issues, data from non-existent “climate averages” sites, refusals under FOI, and deletion of queried webpages. He presents analyses of stable long-term records at Wye and effects from a solar farm at RAF Lyneham, and plans more reconstructions with helpers.

00:00 Project Update Intro

01:49 WMO Siting Classes Explained

03:23 Most Stations Fail Standards

05:54 Walled Gardens Hotspots

11:55 Car Parks and Heat Sources

13:58 Thermometers and Response Time

18:27 Stevenson Screen Meets PRT

20:36 Sampling Rates and Spikes

24:45 Fahrenheit to Celsius Rounding

28:00 Maintenance and Automation Decay

32:30 Phantom Stations and FOI Fight

37:59 Allies and Data Deletions

42:16 Searching for Good Stations

42:30 Best Station Locations

43:39 Wye Data Deep Dive

44:59 Anomalies And Baselines

46:36 Manual Records Reveal 1930s

50:00 Solar Farm Heat Jump

51:19 Dyce Vs Craibstone

55:06 Met Office Classification Errors

59:53 Questionable Data Practices

01:02:21 US Climate Reference Network

01:07:38 Why He Started The Crusade

01:13:53 Focus On Great Britain

01:14:51 Thanks And Wrap Up

https://x.com/RaySand17710097

=========

Slides, summaries, references, and transcripts of my podcasts: https://tomn.substack.com/p/podcast-summaries

My Linktree: https://linktr.ee/tomanelson1

Willie Soon and Jonathan Cohler argue the rise in atmospheric CO2 is mostly natural, challenging claims it is 100% manmade from hydrocarbon burning. They cite analyses using bomb-produced carbon-14 showing a single-exponential decay and a short CO2 atmospheric residence time (~3.8 years), contrasting with IPCC claims of thousands of years and criticizing undefined terms like “adjustment time.” They say their work falsifies the Suess effect and that delta-13C of atmospheric change stays near -13‰ from 1978–2022 and in proxies over 500 years, inconsistent with a dominant fossil-fuel signature (~-28‰). They discuss ocean/land cycling, solar/energy imbalance hypotheses, and skepticism of ice-core CO2 constancy claims.

00:00 Big CO2 Claim Questioned

01:30 Decades of Doubt

02:16 Researchers Who Challenged It

04:13 Natural Rise Hypothesis

05:14 Suess Effect Origins

07:35 Bomb Pulse Carbon-14

12:39 Short Residence Time

14:22 Word Games vs Definitions

16:44 3.8 Years Explained

21:21 Bridge Equation Breakthrough

25:34 Peer Pushback and Talks

29:43 Physical Tether Theorem

34:01 Koutsoyiannis Delta13C Test

42:46 Why Delta13C Still Drops

44:23 Lineage and Credit

45:43 Cycle Time vs IPCC

49:14 Debunking Net Sink

51:06 Biosphere Expansion Idea

51:48 Satellite Imbalance Fraud

56:17 Outgassing Explains CO2 Rise

01:01:40 Proxy Limits and Ice Cores

01:09:26 Future CO2 and Benefits

01:13:18 C14 Tracers and Dating

01:15:02 Suez Effect Model Critique

01:21:15 Wrapping Up and Links

Jonathan Cohler – “The IPCC Circle of Lies: Five Papers Falsify the Entire Framework”

https://x.com/cohler/status/2081407310493081791

Willie Soon – “From Demon to Dinner: The Scientific Case for CO₂ and Fossil Fuels”

https://x.com/cohler/status/2081408758308077952

Slides:

Jonathan Cohler: https://x.com/cohler/status/2081410426147938599

Willie Soon: https://x.com/cohler/status/2081410908392133048

CERES-Science: https://www.ceres-science.com/

=========

Slides, summaries, references, and transcripts of my podcasts: https://tomn.substack.com/p/podcast-summaries

My Linktree: https://linktr.ee/tomanelson1

Steve Milloy reviews Trump’s fossil-fuel agenda, EPA rollback of the 2009 endangerment finding, and concerns that litigation delays and Justice Department staffing could let a future Democratic administration reverse course. The speaker attacks the National Academy of Sciences as climate activists, cites a climate chapter in a judges’ science manual, notes Elena Kagan said she didn’t read it, and urges cutting NAS funding. They praise Matt Wielicki’s appointment to lead the U.S. Global Change Research Program. They argue wildfire-smoke PM2.5 health scares lacked NYC hospital spikes, criticize linear no-threshold regulation (radiation, PFAS), and discuss Yucca Mountain standards. They describe shareholder activism against corporate ESG (Netflix, Exxon), criticize carbon capture subsidies, and praise young “climate realist” advocates.

00:00 Trump EPA Rollbacks

01:37 NAS Versus Trump

04:16 Defunding NAS Push

06:30 Kagan Foreword Controversy

08:24 Climate Realist Appointment

09:43 Democrats And Green Money

11:59 Big Tech Climate Censorship

13:21 X Algorithms And Reach

16:10 Viral Tweet No Warming

18:20 Wildfire Smoke Reality Check

22:30 EPA PM2.5 Experiments

26:12 LNT Model And Hormesis

30:18 Yucca Mountain Absurdity

32:37 PFAS And Low Dose Effects

33:37 Forever Chemicals Are Inert

34:41 Dose Makes the Poison

36:34 Parts Per Trillion Panic

37:31 Why Fear Spreads

38:06 Conservative Shareholder Activism

41:07 Exxon and ESG Battles

42:23 Carbon Capture Reality Check

43:53 Subsidies and Nanny Government

45:31 Next Gen Climate Realists

47:43 Awards and Staying the Course

50:31 NASA Names and Media Retreat

56:01 Debate Challenge and Wrap Up

Steve on X: https://x.com/JunkScience

Web: https://junkscience.com/

=========

Slides, summaries, references, and transcripts of my podcasts: https://tomn.substack.com/p/podcast-summaries

My Linktree: https://linktr.ee/tomanelson1