Catherine McBride talks about her paper “Premeditated Industrial Destruction,” arguing UK net-zero policies have driven deindustrialization without lowering global emissions by shifting production and emissions to countries like China. They discuss UK energy reliance on fossil fuels (about 75–80%), gas backup for wind, bans and legal obstacles to new North Sea and shale projects while importing gas, and high industrial electricity costs from wind-related grid and balancing costs plus multiple carbon taxes. McBride criticizes EV mandates and fines, insufficient charging and grid capacity, and policies pushing carmakers and firms like BP away. She says EU net-zero rules hurt farming and industry, notes coal’s role and storage advantages, questions activist funding (including alleged Russian support), and contrasts Norway’s hydro and state oil strategy with UK decisions.

00:00 Meet Catherine McBride

00:11 How Net Zero Killed Industry

02:37 Fossil Fuels Reality Check

04:19 Importing Gas While Banning Drilling

07:05 Norway Hydro And LNG

09:33 Hybrids Versus Pure EVs

11:54 EV Mandates And Car Industry Exit

15:38 China EVs And Charging Limits

19:05 Grid Can’t Handle Electrification

35:33 BP Profits Politics And US Option

37:37 Free Speech Shift And Chris Wright Wish

38:54 UK Cabinet Energy Illiteracy

41:29 Coal Mines Versus Activists

43:44 Europe’s Coal Reality Check

47:50 Batteries and Load Shedding

51:45 Why Solar Fails in Britain

53:48 Subsidies Warp Farming

57:16 Tariffs and Media Blind Spots

01:03:29 NGO Funding and Anti-Fracking

01:06:29 Russia Gas Markets and Nord Stream

01:08:52 Norway’s Oil Wealth Playbook

01:10:27 UK Bets on Carbon Capture

01:11:37 Trees Beat Tech Wrap-Up

https://x.com/CeeMacBee

https://catherinemcbride.substack.com/

Premeditated Industrial Destruction?: https://gbbc.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/Premeditated-Industrial-Destruction-Final-6th-April-2026-with-added-security-issue-v2.pdf

=========

Slides, summaries, references, and transcripts of my podcasts: https://tomn.substack.com/p/podcast-summaries

My Linktree: https://linktr.ee/tomanelson1

Tom interviews investigative journalist Sonia Elijah about her book 3/11 Viral Takeover, a five-year, evidence-based chronicle of the COVID era with 941 citations drawn from FOIA releases, emails, and leaked documents. Elijah argues COVID policy reflected a coordinated, censorship-driven response, tracing a timeline of pre-2020 pandemic exercises, media/government coordination, and conflicts of interest. She discusses the WHO’s March 11, 2020 pandemic declaration, alleged suppression of lab-origin discussion, flawed modeling used to justify lockdowns, and problems with PCR testing. The conversation covers propaganda and censorship networks (including the Trusted News Initiative), suppression of early treatments, harms from ventilators and drugs, and allegations of misclassified vaccine trial and safety data, including pregnancy and myocarditis concerns, urging accountability and preparedness against repetition.

00:00 Meet Sonia Elijah

00:18 Book Thesis and Censorship

01:17 Research Depth and Purpose

02:49 Will It Happen Again

04:40 Why 3 11 Matters

06:01 Pandemic Drills and mRNA Push

10:53 Bat Database Goes Dark

12:18 FOIA Emails and Lab Leak

15:04 Cracks and Conflicts

18:10 Lockdowns Driven by Models

19:19 PCR Testing Anomalies

25:31 Harms and Care Homes

26:37 Testing Kit Profiteering

29:40 Fear Messaging and Propaganda

32:10 Dancing Nurses and Empty Wards

33:39 Trusted News Initiative

37:17 Natural Immunity Censored

38:17 Lancet Study Fallout

40:13 Ivermectin Smear Campaign

41:57 Silencing Doctors Online

43:30 Hospital Protocol Controversies

45:09 Redefining Vaccinated Data

46:38 Retracted Myocarditis Research

48:46 Missing Safety Reports

53:31 Pfizer Papers Deep Dive

58:13 Vaccine Injured Silenced

59:52 Pregnancy Harms Revealed

01:04:40 Justice and Accountability

01:07:32 Closing Thoughts on the Book

https://x.com/sonia_elijah

https://linktr.ee/SoniaElijah

Book Review by Robert Malone— 3/11: Viral Takeover: https://www.malone.news/p/book-review-311-viral-takeover

Order it at Amazon here: https://www.malone.news/p/book-review-311-viral-takeover

=========

Slides, summaries, references, and transcripts of my podcasts: https://tomn.substack.com/p/podcast-summaries

My Linktree: https://linktr.ee/tomanelson1

Thomas Kurz discusses his upcoming book, Why There Is No Climate Crisis (Kindle in May, print in June), and argues modest warming is largely natural, claiming the IPCC obscures evidence of past climate variability. He explains paleoclimate proxies (oxygen isotopes, carbon-14, beryllium-10) and links climate shifts to Milankovitch cycles, solar cycles, galactic cosmic rays influencing clouds, and ocean oscillations (AMO/PDO). Using temperature reconstructions, glacier, treeline, sea-level, historical freeze, agriculture, insect, and civilization records, he says warm periods brought prosperity while cold periods drove drought, famine, disease, and upheaval. He concludes about half of post-1850 warming is natural, warming is generally beneficial, and future cooling is likely.

00:00 Guest And Book Intro

00:24 Why He Dug In

01:46 Focus On Climate Cycles

03:44 Paleoclimate Proxies

04:57 Isotopes And Temperature

06:48 Cosmic Rays And Solar

07:56 Milky Way Climate Cycle

12:17 Milankovitch Ice Ages

14:28 CO2 Follows Temperature

17:10 Holocene Cooling Trend

19:29 Schwabe Solar Cycles

21:42 Millennial Solar Cycles

23:14 Temperature Reconstructions

25:04 Glaciers Treelines Seas

28:44 Historical Freeze Evidence

32:27 Farming And Wildlife Clues

37:06 Warm Vs Cold Impacts

41:28 Storm Evidence In Proxies

44:44 Civilizations And Climate

45:48 Holocene Optimum Prosperity

47:42 2200 BC Collapse Event

48:18 Minoan Warm Period Boom

50:47 Greek Dark Ages Breakdown

52:53 Roman Warm Period Growth

54:23 Late Antique Cooling Plagues

56:50 Medieval Warm Period Golden Age

59:11 Little Ice Age Hardship

01:06:46 Witch Hunts Climate Blame

01:09:16 Modern Warming Attribution Debate

01:12:17 Ocean Oscillations AMO PDO

01:15:44 No Climate Crisis Wrap Up

=========

Slides, summaries, references, and transcripts of my podcasts: https://tomn.substack.com/p/podcast-summaries

My Linktree: https://linktr.ee/tomanelson1

Brenda Shaffer discusses her Wall Street Journal piece arguing that current renewable-driven policies undermine energy security by making Western systems less reliable, more expensive, and dependent on concentrated supply chains, often tied to China. She says maritime security failures (Red Sea, Russia-Ukraine, Strait disruptions) show poor preparation, and argues fossil fuels still dominate the global energy mix (87%) despite decades of subsidies, while wind/solar remain limited and require backup baseload. She criticizes restricting fossil-fuel finance, especially in Africa, for worsening energy access and development. Shaffer claims UN climate institutions are political, seek taxation power withouBt representation, and that climate movements often oppose both fossil fuels and nuclear. She highlights Germany’s costly energy transition, emphasizes operational energy in warfare, and calls to restore energy security as national security and enable open debate.

00:00 Renewables and Crisis

00:57 Energy Security Failures

03:04 Emperor New Clothes

05:36 China and Methane Politics

10:32 Climate Narratives vs Reality

12:33 Myths of Transition

16:26 Cutting Supply Hurts Poor

19:50 Africa Needs Real Power

26:36 Germany Energiewende Fallout

29:21 Climate Activism and Anti West

30:33 Hydrocarbon Roadmap Skepticism

31:19 UN Climate Taxes and Power Grabs

33:18 Transparency and Budget Secrecy

34:39 Trump Era Workarounds and Lawfare

38:08 Gatekeepers and Speaking Freely

39:13 Languages and Middle East Shifts

44:07 Operational Energy in Warfare

47:53 Military Electrification Limits

51:52 IPCC Politics and Carbon Markets

55:27 Extreme Weather Narratives

58:01 Energy Realism Closing Message

https://x.com/ProfBShaffer

=========

Slides, summaries, references, and transcripts of my podcasts: https://tomn.substack.com/p/podcast-summaries

My Linktree: https://linktr.ee/tomanelson1

Former European Commission energy official Samuel Furfari recounts COPs from the 1992 UN climate convention through recent meetings, arguing the process became propaganda-heavy, expensive, and ineffective as global CO2 emissions rose 66% since 1992. He cites Glasgow as a turning point when China and India blocked anti-coal language, and notes recent COPs hosted by fossil-fuel producers and growing pushback from Africa and others seeking development. He criticizes “technology transfer,” NGO influence (especially in the EU), and anti-nuclear sentiment, discusses synthetic fuels as too costly until oil/gas decline, and describes shifts at the IEA and oil firms like BP back toward oil and gas.

00:00 Meet Samuel Furfari

01:02 COP Zero Origins

02:38 Berlin COP and Merkel

04:14 Glasgow Turning Point

06:11 Fossil Fuel Host COPs

09:39 Brazil COP Contradictions

10:46 Money and Degrowth Agenda

12:49 Nuclear and Synthetic Fuels

15:03 Cuckoo Takes the Nest

17:19 COP Spectacle and Emissions

20:07 Africa and Tech Transfer

22:44 Papua New Guinea Shifts

24:09 Polar Bear Messaging Fades

25:40 IEA From Oil to Renewables

29:03 US Pressures IEA

30:05 Oil Chokepoints Reality

31:08 Inside IEA Ideology

32:00 BP Retreats to Oil

35:21 Subsidy Driven Renewables

35:57 NGOs Power Shift

38:04 UN Leadership After Guterres

40:32 Africa Needs Electrification

43:06 Leaders Doubt Climate Agenda

46:57 China Emissions Outsourcing

49:31 COP Hosting Politics

53:39 COP15 Failure and Wrap

The Truth About the COPs: 30 years of illusions: https://a.co/d/05AuqsJE

https://x.com/FurfariSamuele

=========

Slides, summaries, references, and transcripts of my podcasts: https://tomn.substack.com/p/podcast-summaries

My Linktree: https://linktr.ee/tomanelson1

Andy May discusses how Earth’s energy imbalance and ocean heat content relate to solar radiation versus greenhouse-gas downwelling IR. He argues IR photons are lower energy and absorbed in the ocean’s top micrometers–millimeter (thermal/electromagnetic skin), so it cannot directly heat the mixed layer; instead it may reduce upward heat loss by altering the skin-layer temperature gradient, while sunlight penetrates meters to greater than 100 m and warms the bulk ocean. He critiques NASA-style energy-flow diagrams for confusing one-way radiative fluxes (e.g., 340 W/m²) with net heat (e.g., 58 W/m²). He highlights large uncertainties in EEI and OHC due to sparse, inconsistent datasets, cool-skin effects, short Argo-era records, and oscillations like AMO/ENSO, making partitioning of causes uncertain.

00:00 Sun vs CO2 Setup

00:35 Why IR Differs

02:52 Ocean Skin Layers

05:48 Photon Energy Debate

07:55 Cool Skin Impacts

10:01 Energy Diagram Myths

13:33 EEI and OHC Limits

18:17 Ocean Data Disagreements

23:55 Surface EEI Variability

26:38 IR Cannot Heat Deep

29:51 Bottom Line Uncertainty

31:18 Q&A and Critiques

34:52 Modeling and Coverage

36:41 Regional Trend Map

41:21 Closing Takeaways

https://x.com/Andy_May_Writer

https://andymaypetrophysicist.com/

=========

Slides, summaries, references, and transcripts of my podcasts: https://tomn.substack.com/p/podcast-summaries

My Linktree: https://linktr.ee/tomanelson1

Kevin Mooney discusses his book “Climate Pxrn,” inspired by climate propaganda in classrooms and a push to restore the scientific method. He critiques polar-bear and other climate messaging, argues funding and politics suppress skeptics, and describes threats to prosecute dissent via RICO-style lawfare. He highlights Trump-era moves such as leaving the Paris Agreement and efforts to reverse the EPA’s 2009 endangerment finding on CO2, calling it a major deregulatory change. Mooney cites Canada’s carbon tax costs and bureaucracy as warnings, alleges Russian and Chinese money influences anti-fracking activism, and raises national-security concerns about China-linked energy supply chains and offshore wind. He also criticizes EV lithium-battery fire risks, climate activism in healthcare, carbon-tracking credit cards, and argues AI power demand is undermining wind/solar claims.

00:00 Meet Kevin Mooney

01:13 Acorn to Green Groups

01:54 Polar Bear Myth

03:27 NASA vs Climate Models

06:57 Solar System Climate Clues

07:50 Silencing Skeptics

09:39 Criminalizing Dissent

11:36 Paris Deal and Lawfare

12:24 EPA Endangerment Fight

15:00 Canada Carbon Tax Reality

17:53 Foreign Money and Fracking

21:14 China Grid Security Risks

22:17 Offshore Wind and Security

24:29 Wind Groups vs Locals

24:54 EV Battery Fire Risks

26:21 Climate Policies in Healthcare

28:36 Carbon Tracking Credit Cards

29:56 Second Amendment Backstop

31:08 ESG Retreat and BlackRock

32:37 COVID and Classroom Climate Push

34:23 Young Men Shift and Faith

35:23 Climate Agenda and Marxism

36:41 Herding Rural America to Cities

38:16 Union of Concerned Scientists

39:46 Government Science Funding Distortion

40:46 AI Power Demand and RGGI

43:28 Greenwashing and Energy Reality

44:28 Offshore Wind and Whale Deaths

45:58 Heartland Conference Takeaways

48:36 Closing Thoughts and Book Plug

https://x.com/KevinMooneyDC

https://kevinmooney.info/

Climate Pxrn: How and Why Anti-Population Zealots Fabricate Science, while Targeting American Capitalism, Freedom, and Independence: https://a.co/d/05Cd61cX

=========

Slides, summaries, references, and transcripts of my podcasts: https://tomn.substack.com/p/podcast-summaries

My Linktree: https://linktr.ee/tomanelson1

Vlad Bogorov talks about Glasgow City Council’s plans to spend tens of billions to pursue net zero and Bogorov’s three YouTube videos from public meetings where officials gave vague, cliché answers, asked for written questions, and objected to being filmed. Bogorov argues such environmentalism is “low resolution thinking,” primarily about power and public money, and claims renewables and policies like EVs can increase CO2 when accounting for grid losses, mining, and transmission. He cites Germany closing nuclear and burning more coal, contends nuclear is safest and necessary for net zero, and urges critics to focus on whether environmentalism raises or lowers CO2 rather than debating global warming itself.

00:00 Glasgow Net Zero Meetings

01:07 YouTube Complaint Fallout

02:00 Vague Answers No Details

03:54 Renewables And Public Trough

04:35 Low Resolution Thinking

05:02 History Slavery Nuclear Examples

09:36 Sahara Solar Fantasy

11:53 Environmentalism Blocks Nuclear

14:24 Wrong Conversation On Costs

16:31 Electric Vehicles Emit More

20:06 Germany Coal After Nuclear

24:34 Politics Is About Power

27:31 Debating CO2 And Focus

28:45 Environmentalism Backfires

30:11 EV Batteries and Tradeoffs

31:15 Glasgow Council Push

32:28 Power Without Accountability

34:29 Why Facts Dont Persuade

39:23 Placards and Public Reactions

41:15 Change the Battlefield

42:04 Anti Nuclear Contradiction

46:46 Winning and the Real Cost

47:48 Social Movements End Hard

49:45 Closing Thanks

His YouTube channel, “Buchanan Street is my pub.”: https://www.youtube.com/@Buchanan1111

When History Had Other Plans, 2025: https://a.co/d/4ykoJrJ

=========

Slides, summaries, references, and transcripts of my podcasts: https://tomn.substack.com/p/podcast-summaries

My Linktree: https://linktr.ee/tomanelson1