エピソード

  • Hope Is Not A Strategy In Sales

    Hope Is Not A Strategy In Sales
    2026/10/06
    Every sales organisation has targets. The uncomfortable truth is that many of those targets contain a fair amount of hope disguised as strategy. Sales leaders work with imperfect information, incomplete data and assumptions about what customers, competitors and markets will do next. Then something changes. The economy slows, budgets are frozen, decision-making takes longer or an unexpected global event completely rewrites the commercial landscape. We cannot eliminate uncertainty from sales. What we can do is reduce our dependence on hope by increasing the quality, speed and intensity of the actions we control. Why is hope dangerous in a sales strategy? Hope becomes dangerous when sales targets depend on assumptions that the sales team cannot influence or validate. Forecasting is necessary, but a forecast is not the same thing as a strategy. Every sales organisation has incomplete information. We extrapolate from previous results, pipeline data, market conditions and what customers tell us. Unfortunately, circumstances can change very quickly. The COVID-19 pandemic demonstrated how suddenly established assumptions could become irrelevant. Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022 created another major shock affecting supply chains, energy costs and business confidence. The problem isn't having assumptions. We cannot run a business without them. The danger comes when assumptions quietly become expectations and expectations become targets without enough attention being paid to what could derail them. Do now: Identify which parts of your sales target are supported by evidence and which depend mainly on favourable assumptions. What should sales leaders focus on when external conditions cannot be controlled? Sales leaders should concentrate less on telling people to "focus on what you can control" and more on identifying the specific activities that can still influence revenue. Salespeople need practical direction, not motivational slogans. Revenue targets don't disappear because the economy becomes difficult. Numbers still have to be generated even when buyers become cautious, budgets shrink or approval processes lengthen. This creates a psychological problem. Set targets that salespeople regard as completely unrealistic and they may mentally check out. They probably won't announce, "I have given up". Instead, activity gradually declines. Prospecting falls, follow-up becomes less persistent and fewer new conversations are created. The salesperson starts protecting themselves psychologically from a target they no longer believe is achievable. Sales management therefore has to connect targets with credible actions: number of prospecting conversations, dormant clients contacted, proposals advanced and decision-makers reached. Do now: Translate the revenue target into measurable weekly sales activities that people believe can actually influence the outcome. How should sales teams respond when deals are taking longer to close? When sales cycles slow down, sales teams should search aggressively for sectors, clients and opportunities where purchasing decisions can still happen faster. The objective is to improve deal velocity rather than simply adding more opportunities to the pipeline. Not every industry is affected equally by an economic downturn, geopolitical disruption or changing market conditions. Some sectors continue spending while others freeze budgets. Some companies make decisions quickly; others introduce additional approval layers. This distinction matters because sales teams often run out of time rather than opportunities. A deal sitting in the pipeline for six months may look reassuring in the CRM, but it contributes nothing to this quarter's revenue. Sales managers therefore need to examine the pipeline for velocity as well as value. Where are customers still investing? Which problems have become more urgent? Which opportunities have fewer approval hurdles? Which prospects have budgets that must be used within the current financial year? Do now: Review the pipeline by both probability and speed. Prioritise opportunities where genuine customer urgency can shorten the sales cycle. Should sales managers increase supervision when sales results decline? Yes, but the answer is more coaching and information-sharing rather than simply more pressure. Difficult markets expose experience gaps that can remain hidden when business conditions are strong. When targets are being achieved, experienced salespeople can often be given considerable freedom. When results deteriorate, managers need greater visibility into what is happening in prospecting, customer conversations, proposals and follow-up. Smaller teams, more frequent roundtables and structured coaching sessions can help. Salespeople can compare what customers are saying, identify emerging objections and share approaches that are working. Experience becomes especially valuable during difficult periods. Salespeople who have previously worked through severe...
    続きを読む 一部表示
    12 分
  • Reducing Friction In The Sales In Japan

    Reducing Friction In The Sales In Japan
    2026/09/29
    Inertia is one of the most powerful forces slowing sales in Japan. The buyer may already have a regular supplier. Or we may be introducing a solution they have never used before. In either case, buying from us requires change on their side. And in many Japanese buying situations, change is viewed first as risk, not opportunity. Doing nothing is easy. Staying with the existing supplier is easy. Changing systems, processes, vendors, internal responsibilities, budgets or routines is much harder. That is why salespeople in Japan need to stop thinking only about getting the first deal done. A better mindset is to think about the re-order. If we concentrate only on winning the initial sale, the slow pace and internal obstacles can become enormously frustrating. If we concentrate on creating a relationship that will generate repeated business, we are more likely to do the patient work required to reduce friction and make the first purchase successful. Why is buyer inertia such a major issue in Japanese sales? Buyer inertia is powerful in Japan because remaining with the familiar option usually feels safer than introducing change. The salesperson therefore has to overcome not only competitors, but also the buyer's preference for avoiding unnecessary risk. If the client already has a supplier, switching to us means disrupting an established arrangement. Someone has to approve the change. Someone may have to explain why the existing supplier is no longer sufficient. Processes may need to change. People may need to learn something new. Other divisions may be affected. If our solution is completely new, the uncertainty becomes even greater because the buyer has no internal history to rely on. The current situation may not be ideal, but at least it is known. That is a powerful psychological advantage. This is why the familiar expression, "better the Devil you know than the Angel you don't", applies particularly well to sales. We are the Angel they don't know. Our job is therefore not merely to prove that our solution is better. We have to make changing to our solution feel manageable, practical and sufficiently low risk. Do now: Before your next proposal, ask yourself: "What changes will the buyer have to make internally if they say yes to us?" Why can trying to speed up a Japanese sales process actually slow it down? Speed is not always interpreted positively in Japanese B2B sales. If the buyer believes a decision is being rushed before all risks have been examined, moving quickly can make the proposal feel more dangerous rather than more attractive. Salespeople naturally want momentum. We have targets. We have forecasts. We have reporting deadlines. We want the client to make the decision now. The buyer does not care about our schedule. As I remind myself, the buyer in Japan is never on your schedule. The buyer is concerned with what happens inside their organisation after they make the purchase. The salesperson may be talking to one section, but the consequences of that buying decision can spread across multiple divisions. Operations may be affected. Finance may need to alter payment arrangements. IT may have integration issues. Procurement may have procedures to follow. Managers may need to explain the change to employees. The faster we push, the more uncomfortable the buyer may become if those internal questions have not been resolved. Do now: Instead of asking, "How can I make them decide faster?", ask, "What is making this decision difficult to progress?" How can salespeople identify the internal stakeholders creating friction? The salesperson needs to use the client contact to map which sections will be affected by the change and which stakeholders are likely to support or resist the proposal. This is not always easy. We may never meet the people in the other sections. We may never hear their objections directly. Our contact therefore becomes enormously important. We need to ask them for the lay of the land inside their organisation. One useful question is: "I really appreciate all of your guidance and I understand that buying from us would be a new thing inside the company. I am sure there are many sections which would be directly impacted by making this change and based on your expert knowledge of the organisation, who would you say would be those most affected?" Then stop talking. This is important. Salespeople often ruin good questions because they become uncomfortable with silence and start talking again. Do not dilute the power of the question. Ask it. Then shut up. Give the buyer time to think. Their answer starts giving us a map of the internal decision-making landscape. Do now: Identify the sections most affected by the purchase, not just the people formally approving it. What should salespeople ask about each stakeholder's concerns? Once the affected sections have been identified, the salesperson should explore what each group is worried about and what information could reduce those concerns...
    続きを読む 一部表示
    14 分
  • Pitching Preferred In The Japanese Sales Call

    Pitching Preferred In The Japanese Sales Call
    2026/09/22
    In most modern sales environments, asking the buyer questions to understand their needs would be considered one of the most basic skills a professional salesperson should possess. Yet in Japan, questioning the buyer is often far less common than you might expect. Instead, many salespeople launch straight into the pitch. They explain the company, introduce the product, run through the features and hope something catches the buyer's interest. Why? It isn't simply poor technique. There are cultural, organisational and training reasons why pitching can feel safer than questioning in Japanese sales. Here are six of the biggest reasons. Why do Japanese salespeople often pitch instead of asking questions? Many Japanese salespeople pitch because they have never been systematically trained to conduct a consultative sales conversation. Pitching feels familiar, predictable and socially safer. Most salespeople everywhere receive far less professional sales training than they should. Japan has traditionally relied heavily on OJT — On-the-Job Training. In theory, that sounds reasonable. The experienced boss takes the younger salesperson along, demonstrates how professional selling works and gradually develops their skills. The problem is that today's managers are busy. OJT can easily become a couple of accompanied sales calls followed by, "Off you go." That model only works if the manager is already an excellent salesperson. Often, they aren't. From what we see in our own sales training programmes with Japanese employees, and from my own experience as a buyer, sophisticated needs-based questioning is not consistently well developed. The default is often feature pitching. Do now: Don't assume your salespeople know how to ask good questions simply because they have been selling for years. Observe their actual sales conversations and coach the questioning process deliberately. Does Japanese buyer-seller hierarchy discourage sales questions? Yes. The traditional power imbalance between buyer and seller in Japan can make questioning feel presumptuous, while pitching feels consistent with the salesperson's expected role. There is a saying in Japanese business that the customer is not King. The customer is God. That mindset changes the sales conversation. A relatively junior employee working for a huge corporation may be treated with tremendous deference by the President of a much smaller supplier. Company size matters. Rank matters. That is one reason business cards are so important in Japan. You need to understand who the other person is and where they sit in the hierarchy. Within that mindset, the roles can become very clear. The salesperson's job is to explain the offer. The buyer's job is to examine it, challenge it and eliminate risk. The idea that the salesperson should start interrogating "God" with a list of probing questions can therefore feel uncomfortable. Pitching looks safer. Do now: Reframe questioning as professional diagnosis rather than interrogation. You are not challenging the buyer's authority; you are gathering the information required to help them properly. Why are Japanese salespeople worried about embarrassing the buyer? A salesperson may avoid asking questions because the buyer might not know the answer, potentially causing embarrassment or loss of face. This is a genuine concern. Senior people don't always have detailed operational information. Ask them a question they cannot answer in front of colleagues and you may unintentionally put them in an awkward position. I have experienced this myself. We deal with many HR professionals who are sourcing training programmes on behalf of line managers. On one occasion, I asked the HR team my very first needs-based question. Silence. And Japanese silence can be impressively long. It became obvious they didn't know the answer. Then they abruptly asked me to give them my "pitch". What they actually wanted was vendor pricing. I innocently asked whether I could speak directly with the line manager whose people would receive the training. That didn't go well. I was bundled straight out of the opportunity. Goodbye sale. Do now: Ask questions in ways that allow the buyer to answer comfortably. If detailed information may sit elsewhere, ask, "Who would be best placed to help us understand that aspect?" Are direct sales questions too confrontational for Japan? They can be. Highly specific questions about problems, failures and weaknesses may clash with Japan's preference for indirect communication and social harmony. Consultative sales questions can sound brutally direct. "What is going wrong?" "Where are you failing?" "Why haven't you fixed the problem?" "What are the consequences?" In some sales cultures, those questions may be perfectly acceptable. In Japan, communication is often more indirect. Ambiguity can be deliberate. People may communicate difficult messages through nuance, implication and context rather than blunt statements. Direct questioning can...
    続きを読む 一部表示
    15 分
  • Boosting Our Champions In The Sale

    Boosting Our Champions In The Sale
    2026/09/15
    Getting a buyer interested in our solution is only the beginning of a B2B sale. In many organisations — and particularly in Japan — the person sitting across from us may have very little authority to make the final decision. Instead, we need that person to become our internal champion. They have to take our idea back into their organisation, explain it, defend it, overcome resistance and put their own reputation behind recommending us. That creates an important responsibility for salespeople. We are not merely asking someone to help us win a deal. We are asking them to take a professional risk on our behalf. What is an internal champion in B2B sales? An internal champion is someone inside the buyer organisation who believes in your solution strongly enough to advocate for it when you are not in the room. Usually, we meet our initial contact through a cold call, referral or networking. We explain what we do, perhaps mention another client we have helped and then ask permission to explore their situation. If we are doing professional consultative selling, we ask questions and go deeply into the issues facing the organisation. Eventually, we start suggesting solutions matched to those needs. That is often when reality appears. Our contact may be enthusiastic about solving the problem but discover that managers, executives, Finance, Procurement or other divisions are not nearly as enthusiastic. We cannot personally attend every internal conversation. Our contact therefore becomes our representative. They have to carry the sale forward for us. Do now: Identify who inside the client genuinely wants the change to happen. Interest alone isn't enough — you need someone willing to advocate internally. Why are internal champions particularly important when selling in Japan? Japanese corporate buying often involves multiple stakeholders, so the salesperson's original contact may be only one participant in a much larger decision-making process. In traditional Japanese organisations, a proposal can move through several layers of internal review. Divisions affected by the purchase may conduct their own due diligence. Section Heads may approve the proposal before it moves to Division Heads. Depending on the scale and nature of the decision, senior executives may then become involved. The traditional ringi process illustrates why internal consensus matters so much in Japan. That can mean a tremendous number of people are involved. Meanwhile, we may only know one of them. The person sitting opposite us may not even have final approval authority, yet we depend upon them to help navigate the proposal through the organisation. This is why Japanese B2B selling cannot simply be about persuading one individual. We need to help that individual persuade everyone else. Do now: Ask, "Who else will be involved in evaluating or approving this decision?" Then help your champion prepare for each stakeholder's concerns. What risk does an internal champion take when recommending a supplier? Your champion puts their credibility and sometimes their career reputation behind your solution, because if your company fails, they may be blamed for recommending you. This is something salespeople can easily underestimate. We naturally think about our own risk. Will we win the contract? Will we achieve our sales target? Will we earn the commission? The buyer's champion is considering something completely different. "If I recommend these people and it goes badly, what happens to me?" Their colleagues are unlikely to say, "Well, that supplier made an unfortunate operational decision." They may say: "Why did you choose them?" That makes trust central to the sale. Our champion has to believe we are credible, reliable and capable of delivering what we promise. They also need confidence that supporting us won't make them look foolish in front of senior management. When viewed from their perspective, choosing a new supplier can be a significant personal risk. Do now: Before asking a champion to advocate for you, ask yourself, "What professional risk am I asking this person to accept?" What can go wrong when a salesperson fails to protect the champion? If the supplier fails after an internal champion has fought to get the deal approved, the damage can extend far beyond the contract — it can damage the champion's standing inside the organisation. I learned this lesson painfully while selling imported mobile telephone antenna steel towers in Japan. The towers were sourced from Australia, and we could install them for around 30% of the price being offered by local suppliers. Imported towers were new, however, so getting agreement wasn't straightforward. The buyer was a joint venture whose executives had come from several shareholder companies. Some arrived with relationships with preferred Japanese suppliers. My champions had to fight internally to get the Australian solution accepted. There was even resistance from the local supplier group, ...
    続きを読む 一部表示
    12 分
  • What About The Deals We Lost

    What About The Deals We Lost
    2026/09/08
    Salespeople spend enormous amounts of time thinking about the deals they won and the deals they lost to competitors. But there is another, potentially much larger category we often ignore: the buyers who didn't buy from anybody. That group should be fascinating to us. If the client didn't choose us but also didn't choose a rival, perhaps our problem wasn't the competition at all. Maybe the real competitor was doing nothing. That changes how we should think about selling. Why do so many sales opportunities end with no decision? The biggest competitor in many sales situations may not be another supplier. It may be the client's decision to do absolutely nothing. I am a big fan of American sales coach Victor Antonio and his Sales Influence Podcast. In one episode, he discussed research suggesting salespeople close around 40% of the deals they pursue. That leaves 60% which don't close. The interesting part was his breakdown of that 60%. Only around 20% of the total opportunities were reportedly lost to competitors. Another 10% stalled because the price frightened the buyer into doing nothing. That still leaves a substantial group who didn't buy from us, didn't buy from the competition and didn't stop purely because of price. So what happened? For salespeople, this is an important distinction. We tend to conduct win-loss reviews based around, "Why did they choose the competitor?" Maybe we need another question: Why did the buyer decide that changing anything wasn't worth the trouble? Do now: When reviewing lost opportunities, separate competitive losses from genuine "no decision" outcomes. They are different sales problems and require different solutions. Is a lost sale really a price problem? Price matters, but price and value are not the same thing. A buyer can afford your solution and still decide the gain isn't sufficiently attractive to justify taking action. Victor Antonio's argument was that some stalled buyers simply didn't see enough value. That makes sense. Value depends entirely on what the client considers important. The gain might involve reducing costs, increasing revenue, accelerating delivery, saving employee time, improving integration with existing systems, reducing risk or making the client's own offer more attractive to its customers. Unfortunately, salespeople often decide for themselves what the client should value. We become enormously excited about our solution's features and benefits. We explain what it can do. We show the data. We provide evidence. Meanwhile, the buyer is quietly thinking, "So what?" The question isn't whether our solution has value. The question is whether the client perceives enough value according to their own criteria to justify changing their current situation. Do now: Ask clients explicitly, "When you assess a solution like this, what would represent significant value for you?" Why do salespeople struggle to discover what clients really value? Many salespeople don't discover value because their questioning is too shallow. They collect information without uncovering what really matters to the buyer. I see this regularly when we teach salespeople from Japanese companies. When we reach the question-design portion of the training, the idea of deliberately constructing questions to uncover needs, motivations and value can be surprisingly new. The traditional approach is often to get quickly into specifications, data and product features. That is basically throwing mud against the wall and hoping something sticks. Professional sales training is still not as deeply established in Japan as it is in some other markets. A lot of development happens through OJT — On-the-Job Training. The danger is obvious: inexperienced salespeople can inherit the habits of other salespeople who were never formally taught consultative selling themselves. Even salespeople who ask questions often miss opportunities to go deeper. The buyer gives them a hint. A flag appears saying DIG HERE. They ignore it and move mechanically to their next prepared question. That is where enormous amounts of useful information disappear. Do now: When a buyer reveals an important issue, temporarily abandon your question list. Probe it with "Why is that important?" and "What impact is that having?" Can implementation effort kill an otherwise attractive sale? Yes. Buyers don't evaluate only the potential gain from a solution; they also evaluate how difficult achieving that gain will be. I have experienced this myself. I teach in the Japan Market Expansion Competition, or JMEC, a non-profit programme where teams of young businesspeople work with companies and develop business plans for them. I have also been a paying JMEC client. In our case, I received the team's finished business plan — and threw it away. Why? Not because the ideas were necessarily bad. The problem was the amount of effort required to implement the recommendations. When I compared that effort with the likely gain, the equation ...
    続きを読む 一部表示
    14 分
  • Trust Is Everything In Sales

    Trust Is Everything In Sales
    2026/09/01
    Trust is not one element of a successful sale. Trust is the foundation supporting every other part of the sales process. A customer may like your product, appreciate your expertise and even agree that your price is reasonable. However, when they begin to doubt your reliability, judgement or integrity, the opportunity can disappear very quickly. This is particularly important when selling financial services, consulting, technology or any solution where the customer must accept uncertainty and place something valuable in the salesperson's hands. A small error can create a much larger question: "If they cannot manage this simple detail, can I trust them with the important work?" Salespeople make mistakes. The decisive issue is whether they recognise the damage, adapt their approach and deliberately rebuild the buyer's confidence. Why is trust so important in sales? Trust allows the customer to believe that the salesperson will keep promises, protect their interests and respond responsibly when something goes wrong. Without it, even a strong proposal becomes difficult to accept. Most purchases involve some degree of risk. The buyer cannot know with absolute certainty whether the product will perform, the project will finish on time or the promised support will actually appear. The salesperson therefore becomes part of the product. Their accuracy, preparation, consistency and behaviour give the buyer clues about what working with the company will be like after the contract is signed. This is especially true in professional services, financial advice and business-to-business sales. The customer may be placing money, confidential information, organisational credibility or career reputation at risk. A minor mistake does not always destroy the opportunity. However, an unexplained mistake can cause the customer to question everything else the salesperson says. Do now: Treat every meeting detail, follow-up promise and factual claim as evidence the buyer will use to judge your overall reliability. How can a small sales mistake damage credibility? A seemingly minor error can damage credibility when it contradicts the image of competence and attention to detail that the salesperson is trying to create. Imagine inviting a potential client to your office and then sending them the wrong building address. The client arrives, discovers that your company is not located there and must search for the correct location. The practical inconvenience may only involve ten or fifteen minutes. The psychological damage can be much larger. If the conversation involves investing the client's money, managing a critical project or advising senior management, the customer may reasonably wonder whether the same carelessness could affect something more significant. This is how buyers think. They rarely judge an error in isolation. They use the visible mistake to predict future behaviour. A salesperson may think, "It was only a typo." The buyer may think, "What else will they get wrong?" Do now: When an error conflicts with the competence you are selling, address the larger concern—not merely the inconvenience it caused. Is an apology enough to restore trust? An apology is necessary, but it is rarely sufficient when the mistake has caused the customer to question the salesperson's competence or judgement. Saying "I'm sorry" acknowledges the problem. It does not explain why it happened, whether it reflects a wider pattern or why the customer should continue believing in you. The salesperson must close that credibility gap. A useful recovery contains four elements: A clear acknowledgement of the errorA credible explanation without making excusesEvidence that the problem is unusual rather than normalA practical reason the customer can still trust the salesperson and the company The explanation should be concise and authentic. A long, defensive speech can make the situation worse. However, trying to brush past the incident and continue with the standard presentation can leave the customer mentally stuck on the unresolved doubt. The buyer needs help making sense of the mistake before they can properly listen to the rest of the proposal. Do now: Apologise, explain, reassure and provide evidence. Do not expect the word "sorry" to perform all four jobs. How should a salesperson rebuild trust during the meeting? After a credibility-damaging mistake, the salesperson should adapt the meeting and deliberately front-load evidence of reliability, experience and organisational strength. This is not the moment to deliver the same canned sales presentation used in every other meeting. The salesperson should briefly explain the mistake and then transition into the strongest reasons the customer should trust the company. These might include its history, regulatory standing, client base, specialised expertise, service standards, financial stability or documented results. A corporate brochure should not simply be handed over at the end with the suggestion ...
    続きを読む 一部表示
    13 分
  • The Japanese Business Glass Permanently Half-Empty

    The Japanese Business Glass Permanently Half-Empty
    2026/08/25
    Japanese companies are often described as slow, conservative or resistant to change. That description misses the deeper point. In many Japanese business settings, the central question is not, "How exciting is this opportunity?" It is, "What could go wrong, and what will happen to us if it does?" This risk-sensitive mindset can frustrate overseas companies accustomed to selling through enthusiasm, innovation and ambitious promises. Yet once you understand how Japanese buyers assess reliability, reputation and organisational exposure, their caution becomes much easier to navigate. The lesson is straightforward: in Japan, reducing perceived risk is often more persuasive than promoting potential upside. Why are Australian and Japanese business attitudes so different? Australian business culture traditionally rewards optimism, improvisation and a belief that problems can be solved as they arise. Japanese corporate culture generally places greater emphasis on caution, preparation and avoiding preventable failure. Australia's early European settlers operated across an enormous continent with limited infrastructure and long supply lines. When equipment broke, a replacement might take months to arrive from Britain. People had to repair, adapt or invent something locally. Over time, this helped reinforce the Australian "can-do" attitude. Japan also developed amid earthquakes, typhoons, floods, landslides, volcanic activity and fires. However, Japan's response was often to value preparedness, durability and collective stability. In a densely populated society, one failure can affect customers, suppliers, colleagues and the organisation's reputation. These are broad cultural tendencies rather than rules applying to every individual. Nevertheless, they help explain why an enthusiastic Australian seller and a cautious Japanese buyer can view the same proposal very differently. Do now: Do not assume that your customer shares your excitement. First determine what risks, disruptions and internal consequences they are considering. Why do Japanese buyers appear pessimistic about new proposals? Japanese buyers are not necessarily pessimistic; they are frequently conducting a more defensive assessment of the proposal than overseas sellers expect. An optimistic salesperson may concentrate on revenue growth, innovation, speed and competitive advantage. The Japanese buyer may simultaneously be thinking about implementation failures, customer complaints, operational disruption, internal criticism and damage to the company's reputation. This is why a presentation filled with superlatives may have limited impact. Claims such as "revolutionary", "game-changing" or "market-leading" do not remove the buyer's exposure. In some cases, aggressive enthusiasm can increase suspicion because it appears that the seller is concentrating on the upside while avoiding difficult questions. Japanese executives often need enough evidence to explain and defend a decision internally. They may need to satisfy procurement, legal, compliance, information technology, finance, operational teams and senior management before proceeding. Do now: Balance every benefit claim with evidence, safeguards, implementation details and a credible response plan for foreseeable problems. Why is Japan difficult for minimum viable products? Japan can be a challenging market for a minimum viable product because many corporate customers expect a solution to be highly reliable before they adopt it. The startup concept of launching an early version, collecting feedback and repairing problems through repeated iterations is accepted in many technology ecosystems. In Japanese business-to-business markets, however, customers may view an unfinished product as an unnecessary operational risk. Early adopters exist in Japan, particularly in technology, digital services and innovation-focused divisions. Nevertheless, the number of corporate buyers prepared to expose their organisations to an unproven supplier can be relatively small. The seller may say, "Help us improve the product." The buyer may hear, "Accept the risk of our product failing inside your organisation." That is not an attractive offer when the buyer's own customers, employees or reputation could be affected. A successful pilot therefore needs clear boundaries, strong support and measurable success criteria. It cannot simply be an experiment conducted at the customer's expense. Do now: Present a pilot as a controlled proof of reliability, with limited exposure, defined responsibilities, rapid support and agreed evaluation measures. Why do Japanese companies avoid being the first customer? Many Japanese organisations prefer to see evidence that a product has already worked successfully for comparable customers before adopting it themselves. Becoming the first customer can create personal and organisational exposure. When an innovation succeeds, the decision-maker may receive some recognition. When it fails, the same...
    続きを読む 一部表示
    14 分
  • The Final Five Of Your Sales Call

    The Final Five Of Your Sales Call
    2026/08/18
    A miraculous thing often happens just as I am preparing to leave a client meeting. The formal discussion is over. I have closed my organiser, packed away my pen and mentally moved on to the next appointment. Then the client casually drops a major insight, hidden concern or vital piece of information on me. Naturally, this creates a small panic. The meeting is obviously finished, I am already packed up and I cannot easily reopen everything and start scribbling furiously without looking slightly ridiculous. I have to hold the information in my head until I am out of sight and can record it before it disappears. This kept happening until I finally realised the problem was not the client. The problem was me. I was ending the sales call too efficiently. I was not creating enough space for the buyer's brain to catch up with the conversation. The final five minutes of a sales meeting are not dead time. They are often where the truth finally turns up. Why do buyers reveal important information at the end of a sales meeting? Buyers often reveal the best information at the end because their brains are still processing the meeting long after the salesperson thinks the discussion is finished. We salespeople do this all day. We ask questions, uncover needs, identify gaps, explore consequences and navigate toward the next step. We are familiar with the process. The buyer is not. Most buyers spend far more time being assaulted by amateur pitch merchants than speaking with professional salespeople. They are used to suppliers battering them with slides, data, features, company history and product propaganda. When they finally meet someone who asks intelligent questions, they have to think. That thinking takes time. In Japan, buyers may also avoid expressing concerns too directly during the formal part of the meeting. Once the pressure drops and everyone starts preparing to leave, they may finally mention the real obstacle. It could be an internal opponent, a budget issue, a failed previous attempt or a decision-maker who has not yet appeared. Do now: Do not mentally check out when the meeting appears to be over. The most valuable comment may still be coming. What is the difference between a pitch person and a professional salesperson? Pitch people talk at buyers. Professional salespeople help buyers think. There is a vast difference between the two. Pitch people believe selling means doing all the talking. Their strategy is to smash the buyer with enough information, enthusiasm and verbal force to wrestle them to the ground and get the order form signed. They talk about their company. They talk about their solution. They talk about their technology. They talk about themselves. Then they wonder why the buyer says, "We will think about it." Professional salespeople ask intelligent questions and listen carefully to the answers. They are looking for the gap between where the buyer is now and where the buyer wants to be. More importantly, they help the buyer discover why remaining in the current situation is dangerous, expensive or strategically foolish. If I simply tell the buyer that life will be grim unless they buy my solution, they will naturally think, "Of course he would say that. He is trying to sell me something." But when the buyer reaches that conclusion personally, the idea has far greater power. Do now: Stop trying to overpower buyers with information. Ask questions that help them recognise the problem for themselves. How can sales questions create urgency? Strong sales questions make the cost of delay visible, because buyers rarely act until doing nothing begins to look more dangerous than taking action. During the sales conversation, we are exploring where the buyer is now, where they want to be and what is blocking the path between those two points. The buyer may already know there is a gap. That does not mean they feel any urgency. They may believe they can solve the problem internally. Perhaps they can. Given a hundred years, almost anyone can eventually reach a goal. The real questions are how long it will take, what it will cost and what opportunities will be lost while they are fumbling around trying to do it themselves. Suppose the buyer is struggling to retain key employees. I might ask: "If there was a way to prevent your key people being poached by the current horde of ravenous recruiters constantly scouring firms like yours for bodies to move to your competitors, would that help protect the stability of your business?" That language is deliberate. "Poached." "Horde." "Ravenous." "Competitors." "Instability." I am painting a word picture. I want the buyer to see the commercial danger clearly. Do now: Ask what happens if the buyer leaves the problem untouched for another six or twelve months. Why should salespeople explore the buyer's personal interest? Every business decision has a personal dimension, because the buyer's reputation, career and internal credibility may rise or fall with the ...
    続きを読む 一部表示
    19 分