In this episode of Dirty Verdict, hosts Peter Taaffe, Bill Ogden, and Kyle Herbert sit down with returning guest Marty Lancton, president of the Houston firefighters’ union and now an announced 2026 candidate for Harris County Judge.

Marty opens up about why he’s running, what he’s learned from decades of front-line public service, and how his experience leading Houston’s firefighters has shaped his vision for Harris County’s future. The conversation covers everything from public safety, disaster response, and infrastructure to transparency, county budgets, and rebuilding public trust.

With a firefighter’s candor and a mediator’s mindset, Marty explains why leadership starts with listening—and why local government should focus less on politics and more on solving real problems. Of course, this wouldn’t be Dirty Verdict without humor, sidebars about the Astrodome, Harris County Toll Road Authority, and Taylor Swift, and a few good-natured lawyer jabs along the way.

• Marty’s Big Announcement – Houston Firefighters Union President Marty Lancton officially announces his 2026 run for Harris County Judge.

• Why He’s Running – Marty shares what inspired his decision to enter the race, focusing on leadership, accountability, and rebuilding trust in county government.

• Inside Harris County Government – A clear explanation of how the county judge and commissioners court operate—and why that structure matters for taxpayers.

• Public Safety First – Marty outlines his top priorities: emergency response, disaster preparedness, flood mitigation, and infrastructure.

• Fixing the Budget Mess – A deep dive into deficits, hidden funds, and the lack of transparency in Harris County’s multibillion-dollar budget.

• Fighting Corruption and Waste – Marty discusses how small lapses in oversight can snowball into serious integrity problems—and how he plans to restore accountability.

• Crossing Party Lines – Why local leadership shouldn’t be partisan, and how collaboration leads to better results for residents.

• Lessons from the Firehouse – How decades of firefighting shaped Marty’s leadership style: stay calm, adapt quickly, and always put people first.

• Disaster Management Reality Check – How emergency agencies really coordinate in a crisis, and why trust and teamwork save lives.

• The Astrodome Debate – The hosts pitch tongue-in-cheek ideas for repurposing Houston’s landmark—from a Rainforest Café to a football showdown on concrete.

• Government Red Tape – How lawsuits, politics, and delay tactics keep Harris County from solving real problems efficiently.

• The Dirty Verdict Banter – Plenty of laughs as Peter Taaff, Bill Ogden, and Kyle Herbert keep things lively with jokes about waivers, Taylor Swift, smoking bans, and local politics.

• Closing Thoughts – Marty ends on a note of service, transparency, and trust: “If you can’t tell the truth, you can’t lead.”

It’s an episode packed with insight, laughs, and a genuine look at one of the most consequential local races ahead.

https://Martyforharriscountyjudge.com

Houston PI attorney Anthony Pusch joins Peter Taaffe, Kyle Herbert, and Bill Ogden for a wild, wide-open conversation about building a law brand that actually cuts through the noise—plus boxing gyms, tasers, and… cobras. Anthony traces the path from seven high schools and a hot-headed teen to launching Pusch & Nguyen, shares the hard lessons behind PPC, TV, radio, and those viral billboards (including the infamous Step Brothers and “Brokeback” creatives), and gets candid about ethics complaints, attribution, and why authentic social content beats canned “10 things after an accident” posts every time. We also detour into tort reform, San Antonio expansion, trial wins, and the surprising stress relief of… a tortoise sanctuary.

Highlights

• Growing up in Houston, seven high schools and a near-fight with a drill instructor
• Parents, aunts, uncles all lawyers—swore he’d never practice, then found his lane
• Early years grinding cases, learning PPC vs. brand the hard way
• The origin of “Pusch & Nguyen,” why the name became the brand, and billboard repetition that works
• Step Brothers shoot, the “Brokeback” billboard, going viral, and handling Pushback without crossing the line
• Bar/ethics dust-ups over the word “win,” and how they navigated it
• Tracking ROI: billboard + radio/TV + referrals = top-of-mind math
• Why most lawyer content flops and what genuine, useful posts could look like (dash-cam breakdowns, real rehab tips)
• Boxing/Jiu-Jitsu at the office, the COVID gym era, and a (hilarious) taser story
• Snakes & tortoises: from gaboon vipers and cobras to a calmer sanctuary
• On tort reform and why capping liability makes roads less safe
• Trial talk: recent seven-figure verdicts, hiring hungry lawyers, and avoiding predatory financing

Follow/Subscribe: YouTube, Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Amazon Music, LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram & TikTok (@DirtyVerdict).
Guest: Anthony Pusch — Pusch & Nguyen.

Defense trial lawyer Jeff Davis joins Peter, Kyle, and Bill for a fast-moving hour that hops from a wild “mosh pit” case at Cynthia Woods Mitchell Pavilion to the nuts and bolts of catastrophic oilfield litigation. Jeff shares early-career war stories with Peter, breaks down indemnity and Chapter 95 fights, and explains why stipulating to liability can defang a jury’s anger. You’ll hear candid takes on focus groups, witness prep disasters, New Mexico’s hedonic damages, and how juries “send a message” without blowing up numbers. We wrap on golf: Bandon trips, Pebble magic, Muirfield Village perfection, Big Cedar surprises—and a Houston muni tale you won’t forget.

Highlights

• Throwback trial: The Pavilion “mosh pit” case, early use of responsible third party, and a conservative jury’s $20k punitive “message.”
• Oilfield 101: Catastrophic injury (≈80%) vs. commercial down-hole disputes; indemnity/knock-for-knock dynamics; Chapter 95 control issues.
• From rig to courtroom: Day-one callouts, OSHA interactions, Permian & New Mexico venues, and why site visits matter.
• Strategy that moves numbers: How stipulating liability and smart focus groups cool juror anger—and when plaintiffs’ detailed demand letters help resolution.
• Witness prep—good, bad, ugly: The peril of over-coaching, “I don’t know” discipline, and the depo pause heard ’round the mediation.
• Venue quirks: New Mexico wrongful-death hedonic damages and RTP practice to get all actors on the form.
• Verdicts & lessons: A seven-figure Oklahoma verdict, why “ask” matters, and the anti-reptile effect of accountability.
• Golf cooldown: Bandon plans, Pebble as #1 played, Muirfield Village conditions, Big Cedar/Payne’s Valley cabins, and the Lions/Hermann Park debate.

🎧 Follow and watch: Spotify • YouTube • Apple Podcasts • Amazon Music • TikTok • LinkedIn • Instagram • Facebook.

Solo-hosting this week, Peter Taaffe welcomes trial lawyer Thomas Frashier of AZA Law to unpack a first-of-its-kind lawsuit between two Austin influencers—the viral “sad beige” copyright/trade dress case. Thomas explains how the Amazon Influencer/Associates ecosystem really works, why “stealing a vibe” isn’t the same as stealing IP, and how his team defended creator Alyssa Scheele to a decisive win. From pleading standards and the DMCA to likeness rights, PR strategy (yes, including a Beyoncé-quoting answer), and the three-month copyright registration rule, this is a masterclass in modern IP litigation for the social media era. The case ended with the plaintiff dropping all claims—no payment, no gag clauses—and Alyssa preserving her right to tell the story. If you care about creators, brands, and the law colliding online, you’ll love this one.

Episode Highlights

• What the “sad beige” aesthetic is—and what IP law actually protects
• Inside the Amazon Influencer Program: links, commissions, and Prime Day playbooks
• The claims: copyright (direct/vicarious), DMCA CMI, trade dress, likeness, and the “kitchen-sink” torts
• Why “you copied my style” ≠ protectable IP (and where trade dress does apply)
• The Twombly/Iqbal plausibility bar and why early dismissal is tough in social media cases
• The three-month rule for statutory damages—and how late registrations undercut the case
• Damages theories vs. reality: statutory vs. actual and the proof plaintiffs need
• PR as strategy: a speaking answer, media outreach, and reframing the narrative
• Deepfakes, NIL, celebrity voice rights, and where likeness law is heading
• Trial culture at AZA: early responsibility, nationwide cases, and learning from the courtroom
• Why the case ended: non-suit, no payment, no non-disparagement, and a clean defense win
• Takeaways for creators: document timing/metadata, avoid monopoly-style demands, and know the ecosystem you’re in

• Kicking off the fall season with a college football–themed episode.
• Drew Shirley’s Duke basketball days during the Christian Laettner, Bobby Hurley, and Grant Hill era.
• The wild life of a small-market sportscaster: from $18k salaries to hauling cameras solo.
• Drew’s career pivots from law → sportscasting → law again.
• His best interview (Roger Clemens and President George H.W. Bush) and worst (awkward kids’ ice skating team).
• The hosts debate Arch Manning vs. Quinn Ewers and the future of Texas football.
• Predictions and hot takes on the Texas vs. Ohio State showdown.
• Notre Dame fandom (by marriage), Duke hoops, and adjusting to rooting for OU.
• A breakdown of the top 10 college football teams heading into the season.

In this gripping episode of The Dirty Verdict Podcast, hosts Peter Taaffe and Kyle Herbert take a deep dive into one of Houston’s most shocking criminal cases—the trial of Ryan Smith, accused and convicted of murdering his father. Joining the discussion are seasoned criminal defense attorneys Todd DuPont and Gianpaolo “GP” Macerola, who served as Smith’s defense team.

Together, they unpack the twists and turns of the case—from Ryan’s sudden mental breakdown and bizarre behavior, to the role of Zoloft, conflicting psychiatric evaluations, and the legal battle over whether Smith was insane at the time of the killing. The conversation sheds light on the complexities of mental health in criminal law, the strategies behind defending high-stakes cases, and the challenges of presenting insanity defenses in Texas courts.

With candid insight, Todd and GP reveal how they built their case, the uphill battle they faced against the prosecution, and what this trial says about the justice system. Whether you’re fascinated by true crime, mental health issues, or the inner workings of criminal defense, this is an episode you won’t want to miss.

In this episode of The Dirty Verdict, host Peter Taaffe sits down with attorney Steeves Hopson, founder of Hopson Injury Attorneys, to talk about his bold move from working at top firms to launching his own law practice. Steeves shares his path from growing up in a family full of lawyers, to prosecuting serious cases in Webb County, to landing multiple impressive verdicts just before and after starting his firm.

They cover the realities of going solo—from financial preparation and building a personal brand, to grassroots marketing, mentorship, and standing out in a crowded personal injury market. Steeves also walks us through three recent trials, including a tough Texas Tort Claims Act case, a bench trial against a shady defendant, and a dog bite trial with pro se opponents—proving that even “impossible” cases can be worth fighting.

This episode is packed with practical advice for young lawyers, candid stories from the courtroom, and insight into what it really takes to make the leap into running your own firm.

Show Notes

• Steeves Hopson’s Background – From Laredo roots to a family of lawyers, including his mother’s career in big law and his uncle’s time as DA in Webb County.
• Early Legal Career – Stint in employment law, shift to the Webb County DA’s office, and work in the Special Victims Unit during COVID.
• Transition to Personal Injury – Moves to Houston, working at respected PI firms before deciding to go solo.
• Why Start Your Own Firm? – Independence, entrepreneurial family influence, and the ability to attract clients.
• Practical Advice for Going Solo –
• • Save 9–12 months of expenses.
  • Have a clear client acquisition plan.
  • Define your unique brand and niche.
  • Build strong mentorship relationships.
• Lean Startup Approach – Using co-working spaces, low overhead, and free tools like social media to compete with larger firms.
• Grassroots Marketing – Authenticity, LinkedIn networking, community engagement, and becoming the “go-to lawyer” for everyone you meet.
• Case 1: TCA Car Crash Verdict – $265k jury award (capped at $100k), retried after a mistrial due to interpreter issue, strategic use of jury selection themes.
• Case 2: Bench Trial Negligence Case – $625k judgment for a client blinded by unlicensed stem cell treatments; challenges with judgment-proof defendants.
• Case 3: Dog Bite Trial in Austin – $198k verdict against pro se defendants; courtroom theater, controlling narrative, and thematic storytelling (“series of bad choices”).
• Why Try Hard Cases – Even with caps or no insurance, cases can have value for the client and the lawyer’s reputation.
• Giving Back – Donating a portion of every fee to nonprofit causes as part of the firm’s mission.

In this episode of The Dirty Verdict, hosts Peter Taaffe, Bill Ogden, and Kyle Herbert sit down with one of Texas’s most successful trial lawyers, Randy Sorrels. With over four decades of experience, Randy shares the highs, lows, and lessons learned from building his firm, serving the Texas legal community, and securing some of the biggest verdicts in the state. From his early days at Fulbright to leading the Sorrels Law firm to national recognition, this episode dives deep into trial strategy, damages innovation, mentorship, and the importance of giving back to the profession.

Episode Highlights:

• 🚀 Building a Legacy: How Randy launched his own firm and grew it to 28 lawyers across multiple cities in just five years.
• ⚖️ Damages Innovation: The strategies behind his groundbreaking approach to arguing damages and why believing in your client’s story is key.
• 🏆 Record-Breaking Verdicts: Inside the $352 million Cruz case and the Casey Clemens trial, plus lessons learned from high-stakes litigation.
• 🎓 Mentorship & Service: Randy’s contributions to the State Bar of Texas and South Texas College of Law, including 23 clinics for aspiring lawyers.
• 🌎 Diversity in Law: Building one of the most diverse law firms in the country and why it’s critical for connecting with juries.
• 💡 Advice for Young Lawyers: Randy’s take on work ethic, branding, and the importance of stepping outside your comfort zone to grow your career.
• ⚽ From Soccer Field to Courtroom: How his time playing soccer at Houston Baptist shaped his competitive edge as a trial lawyer.
• 🔥 Verdict Stories: Behind-the-scenes tales from legendary Texas cases, unexpected trial twists, and the mentors who shaped his path.

This episode is packed with wisdom for trial lawyers, law students, and anyone interested in the art of advocacy.