『The Dirty Verdict』のカバーアート

The Dirty Verdict

The Dirty Verdict

著者: Kyle Herbert
無料で聴く

概要

Get all the dirty details and legal insights from Houston Lawyers, Kyle Herbert and Peter Taffe, as they explore exciting cases. Kyle Herbert: https://herberttrial.com Peter Taaffe: https://comeauxmediation.com/attorney/peter-taaffe/ Bill Ogden: https://fbtrial.com/attorneys/bill-ogden/2022 世界 社会科学
エピソード
  • S4 Eps 5: Cordt Akers Interview
    2026/02/26

    Hosts Peter Taaffe, Kyle Herbert, and Bill Ogden sit down with Houston trial lawyer Cordt Akers, who lives at the intersection of criminal defense, white collar, and a bit of PI—all while carrying one of the more unusual origin stories you'll hear on the show.

    Cordt walks through growing up in Houston, heading to Tulane (where Hurricane Katrina hit on his first day), and spending his early years as a working musician—until a brutal moment of "natural talent vs. hard work" forced a career pivot. That pivot led to South Texas College of Law, mock trial, and a fast, intense run through the Harris County DA's Office, where a terrifying in-flight emergency and an unexpected moment of humanity reshaped how he viewed prosecution—and ultimately why he left.

    From there, Cordt breaks down his path into the Dan Cogdell orbit, building a reputation in federal white collar, and what it's like to carry the emotional weight of trial work—especially when the outcome is literally life-changing. He also shares two major acquittals from the year, including a high-emotion murder trial in San Jacinto County and a public corruption case that went sideways for the prosecution in the best way possible.

    Funny, serious, and very "Dirty Verdict"—this one moves from My Little Pony headgear to murder trials to the reality of justice, ego, and what makes a great trial lawyer.

    Episode Highlights (with timestamps)

    • 00:00:41 – 00:01:36 — Christmas edition energy, jokes flying, and Bill's back in the studio
    • 00:01:36 – 00:03:14 — Meet Cordt Akers: criminal defense + some PI, and the "multiple practice areas" intro
    • 00:03:14 – 00:06:16 — The legend of Brock Akers (Cordt's dad): verdict history, reputation, and the TLA membership banter
    • 00:06:16 – 00:11:08 — Houston → Saint Michael's/Jesuit → Tulane… and the jazz musician era (plus Katrina on day one)
    • 00:11:08 – 00:12:46 — South Texas Law: dreams of entertainment law die in Contracts I
    • 00:12:46 – 00:15:29 — Mock trial war stories: Golden Gate tandem bike terror + "they changed the rules after us"
    • 00:15:29 – 00:18:02 — The mock trial culture: training under pressure (and sometimes with a hangover)
    • 00:18:02 – 00:20:06 — DA's Office stint (about 20 months) + the brutal elevator moment with Rusty Hardin
    • 00:20:06 – 00:22:23 — Working for Dan Cogdell: mentorship, white collar exposure, and leveling up fast
    • 00:22:23 – 00:27:14 — The turning point: in-flight engine fire, a stranger's prayer, and Cordt's realization about prosecutorial impact
    • 00:27:14 – 00:29:22 — "How do you teach young prosecutors emotional intelligence?" + the ego vs. justice conflict
    • 00:29:22 – 00:33:51 — Leaving Dan's shop: taking the "take over the muffler repair center" option and building his own lane
    • 00:36:01 – 00:37:08 — Two major acquittals this year: murder case + public corruption case
    • 00:37:08 – 00:41:53 — San Jacinto County murder trial breakdown: alleged facts, accident defense, and the emotional verdict moment
    • 00:42:10 – 00:44:12 — The "weird" public corruption case: daring the State to call the defendant first… and it backfiring on them
    • 00:44:12 – 00:45:24 — Why he usually doesn't talk to juries afterward (and a wild "we thought you were fake" jury comment)
    • 00:47:44 – 00:50:34 — Where the DA's office and federal prosecution are headed + why white collar cases feel like they're dwindling
    • 00:52:16 – 00:55:30 — Wrap-up: possible Father's Day episode with Brock, where to find Cordt (acresfirm.com), and final laughs
    続きを読む 一部表示
    55 分
  • S4 Eps 4: Andrew Cobos Interview
    2026/02/17
    The crew kicks off the holiday episode in peak Dirty Verdict fashion: festive sweaters, friendly roasting, and a proposed "punishment" that somehow turns into high-stakes Trivial Pursuit. Then repeat guest Andrew Cobos jumps in and the conversation shifts from jokes to jaw-dropping: Ironman distances, brutal open-water swims, and why Andrew's next "goal" is somehow even crazier—climbing Mount Everest. From there, the episode turns serious as Andrew breaks down his firm's work in major mass tort litigation, including PFAS "forever chemical" exposure, firefighting foam, and what those cases mean for veterans and industrial firefighters. The hosts also dig into the realities of taking on the government, how these claims are being built, and the bigger idea behind it all: using litigation to force real-world accountability and policy change—then somehow landing the plane back in Dirty Verdict land with talk of lawyer boxing matches and black-tie fight night. Timestamps & Highlights 00:00:15 – Holiday chaos begins — Peter, Kyle, and Bill trade greetings, jokes, and sweater-season banter.00:00:40 – "Punishment" ideas — the crew floats leprechaun makeup and even retaking the SAT as consequences for missing the memo.00:01:14 – High-stakes Trivial Pursuit — $100 per person, teams allowed… and trash talk immediately escalates.00:02:11 – Andrew Cobos returns — repeat guest is back, and the guys immediately notice he's in serious shape.00:02:33 – Ironman résumé revealed — Andrew details completing two half Ironmans and a full (and clarifies the year).00:02:53 – Ironman distances explained — swim/bike/run breakdown, plus the "it's longer than it sounds" reality.00:03:08 – Galveston + Cozumel swim stories — calm water vs brutal open-ocean conditions.00:04:34 – Full Ironman in Florida — Andrew talks Panama City Beach and why "flat" can still feel brutal.00:05:36 – Next goal: Everest — Andrew explains he's transitioning from endurance racing to mountain climbing.00:06:09 – Everest risk talk — crowding, danger, and the harsh reality of summit attempts.00:06:47 – Andrew's practice growth — the hosts talk about how well his firm is doing and why he keeps it lean.00:09:05 – Lean firm philosophy — small team, low overhead, and staying intentional about growth.00:09:45 – Mass tort focus — Andrew gets into the 3M earplug litigation and the scale of bellwether outcomes.00:10:38 – PFAS explained ("forever chemicals") — what it is, where it came from, and why it's a major national litigation front.00:11:15 – Firefighting foam + cancer discussion — exposure pathways, firefighters, and what makes these cases so serious.00:12:16 – C8 vs C6 — the distinction, the "PR shift," and why it still matters in litigation.00:13:23 – Dose + duration challenge — why proving exposure over time becomes a battlefield in these cases.00:15:03 – Legal-movie sidebar — the crew riffs on classic litigation films and how realistic negotiation scenes can be.00:16:12 – 3M earplug case scale — why it's one of the biggest MDLs and what makes it uniquely massive.00:17:08 – Transition to Fort Hood/Cavazos topic — the conversation turns to a major new, troubling set of allegations.00:18:07 – Andrew's military background + context — West Point, Fort Hood experience, and systemic concerns.00:20:15 – "Floodgates opened" moment — the scope expands quickly once the case becomes public.00:22:22 – Power dynamics + policy failures — Andrew explains why structural safeguards matter in military medical settings.00:24:22 – Moving beyond litigation — emphasis on policy reform and conversations with lawmakers.00:26:48 – Volume of clients referenced — Andrew discusses the scale of representation and coordination.00:31:52 – Intake + mental health support — the firm's workflow and why trauma counseling is a priority.00:34:38 – Broader military context — comparisons to other cases and how these situations escalate institutionally.00:36:17 – Andrew's MP deployments — route security, IED reality, and what that job actually looked like.00:41:07 – Army–Navy tradition — library pushups, West Point culture, and Houston's West Point club.00:43:24 – Why Andrew keeps the firm small — travel, retreats, and culture as a deliberate strategy.00:46:55 – Lawyer boxing idea returns — the crew starts fantasy-booking "Dirty Verdict Fight Night."00:48:10 – White-collar boxing memory — black-tie vibe, big money, and how it could work as an event.00:50:32 – Wrap-up — thanks, shout-outs, and where to follow/listen.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    52 分
  • S4 Eps 3: Chi Nguyen Interview
    2026/02/06
    In this episode of The Dirty Verdict, Peter Taaffe and Kyle Herbert sit down with Houston branding powerhouse Chi Nguyen to unpack the real story behind one of the most recognizable legal marketing campaigns in the city: "We Push. You Win." Chi shares his Houston roots, the wild origin story that pushed him toward law (yes—he got hit with a Nike cease & desist as a teenager), and how a marketing brain + personal injury law became the foundation for a firm built to scale. Then the conversation turns into a full-blown masterclass on billboards, repetition, commuter psychology, emotional decision-making, and building a brand that stays top-of-mind. They also dive into the less-glamorous side of growth—systems, operations, HR headaches, and maintaining quality while scaling fast—before Chi shares what's next: launching The Nguyen Law Firm and building a legal tech / AI platform designed to help lawyers run leaner and serve clients better. YouTube-style highlights (with timestamps) 00:00:39 — Intro + Chi Nguyen joins the show00:00:53 — Why Chi is one of the most recognizable legal brands in Houston00:02:15 — Chi's Houston upbringing + immigrant family background00:03:13 — "I got sued by Nike for $1,000,000 in 9th grade." 😳00:05:44 — The "Gucci monogram Jordan" moment… and realizing they were fake00:06:23 — How Chi found a China supplier + created a dropship operation00:08:04 — Early Google PPC: "Air Jordan" clicks were $0.1000:08:30 — Scaling from 20 orders/day to 100+ orders/day as a teenager00:08:50 — Nike demand letter hits: fear, panic, and the moment that changed his life00:10:09 — Using the money to help family (not flexing shoes) + why he chose law00:12:40 — U of H marketing + sales program (why it matters)00:14:04 — Why personal injury: watching Jim Adler commercials as a kid00:15:13 — South Texas College of Law + meeting Anthony + starting the firm00:19:04 — The "biggest in Houston" vision + hitting goals early00:22:42 — Spotting a funeral home "For Sale" sign… and turning it into the office00:23:18 — Target audience strategy: why he focused on specific Houston pockets00:25:03 — Billboard strategy begins: planning in 2021, executing in early 202200:26:34 — Google PPC got wrecked: $500–$600 per click for PI terms00:28:00 — Why billboards still work in Houston (if you do it right)00:29:39 — "You don't have to be everywhere—just be undeniable somewhere."00:30:27 — Repetition math: 250,000 cars/day + stacking boards for 100% capture00:31:21 — People buy emotionally, then justify logically (jury + marketing crossover)00:33:06 — "Your logo is your face." Branding with faces > logos00:35:37 — The psychological hack behind We Push / You Win00:37:18 — Early boards were too busy → simplifying to face + website only00:39:03 — Why they went all-in on branding instead of lead-gen00:40:33 — Timeline expectations: committing to a full year with no panic pivot00:41:52 — Starting budget: around $100K/month for the initial billboard run00:43:31 — The iconic "viral" square board location off 45 & Telephone00:43:58 — Scale: ~50 "permed" boards + building the inventory over time00:46:27 — Scaling operations: bringing in a CEO to systematize and streamline00:49:28 — The hardest part of growth: managing people + protecting culture00:51:12 — What's next: The Nguyen Law Firm + launching a legal tech company00:53:32 — AI thesis: the biggest flex is building lean with small teams00:56:17 — AI for law: case management, comms, virtual depos/mediations00:57:22 — Claude vs ChatGPT + "make the AIs argue" strategy00:59:24 — What lawyers should fear: surveillance, not productivity01:00:27 — Wrap-up + where to find Chi + beta testing timeline01:01:28 — Outro + socials
    続きを読む 一部表示
    1 時間 1 分
まだレビューはありません