エピソード

  • Black Thursday: The Three Days That Broke American Capitalism
    2026/10/12
    (00:00:00) Black Thursday: The Three Days That Broke American Capitalism
    (00:00:38) The Machinery of Speculation
    (00:02:35) Black Thursday, Black Monday, Black Tuesday
    (00:03:28) The Federal Reserve's Fatal Contraction
    (00:05:12) Deflation and the Debt Trap
    (00:06:59) Roosevelt, the New Deal, and the Regulatory Revolution
    (00:08:58) The Eight-Year Wait
    (00:09:43) 2008 and the Return of Familiar Patterns
    (00:11:58) What the Crash Still Tells Us

    On the morning of October 24, 1929, sell orders arrived faster than clerks could process them. Within hours, nearly thirteen million shares had changed hands and the financial architecture of the 1920s had begun to crack. Black Thursday was only the opening act. By the time Black Tuesday closed on October 29th, sixteen million shares had traded in a single session and billions in paper wealth had ceased to exist.

    This episode unpacks the machinery that made the crash possible — and inevitable. Ordinary Americans had flooded into the market on margin, borrowing nine dollars for every one they owned, creating a self-reinforcing liquidation spiral the moment prices turned. Bucket shops had seeded a culture of leveraged gambling. Charles Merrill had warned his clients as early as 1928 to reduce exposure. Almost nobody listened.

    But the crash itself didn't cause the Great Depression. What turned a financial crisis into a decade-long catastrophe was the Federal Reserve's decision to contract the money supply by thirty-one percent between 1929 and 1933 — precisely when the economy needed liquidity. Ten thousand bank suspensions erased ninety-two percent of the money supply, which existed only as deposits. When the banks failed, the money simply stopped existing.

    Deflation then made everything worse. Prices fell twenty-five percent in aggregate, meaning every dollar of debt became twenty-five percent heavier in real terms. Farmers, businesses, and households found their revenues collapsing while their obligations held rigid — a debt trap that paralysed the economy for years.

    This is the chapter where the numbers stop being abstract and the human cost comes into focus.

    This episode includes AI-generated content.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    15 分
  • Twenty-Five Years: Why the Market Took a Generation to Recover
    2026/10/11
    (00:00:00) Twenty-Five Years: Why the Market Took a Generation to Recover
    (00:01:05) The Setup: A Market Built on Air
    (00:03:05) Black Thursday to Black Tuesday
    (00:04:08) The Federal Reserve's Fatal Choice
    (00:05:16) Ten Thousand Banks
    (00:06:22) The Human Cost
    (00:07:38) Roosevelt and the New Deal
    (00:09:27) Why the Recovery Took So Long
    (00:11:29) The Lessons That Had to Be Relearned
    (00:12:53) Closing

    The standard story says Roosevelt saved capitalism. Glass-Steagall passed, the SEC was created, banks stabilised, order restored. So why did it take twenty-five years — until Eisenhower's second year in office — for the stock market to claw back to where it stood on the eve of Black Thursday? That gap is what this episode is about.

    To understand the distance, you first have to understand the height. Throughout the 1920s, the American market became a machine for speculation. Ordinary investors bought on margin, controlling a hundred dollars of stock with ten of their own money. Bucket shops — legal, unregulated, ubiquitous — let people bet on price movements without ever owning a share. Charles Merrill spent years warning that the market had decoupled from reality. Nobody listened.

    When Black Thursday struck on October 24, 1929, followed by Black Monday and Black Tuesday, the cascade was mechanical: margin calls forced selling, selling drove prices lower, lower prices triggered more margin calls. From the September 1929 peak to the 1932 trough, stocks fell eighty-seven percent.

    But the crash didn't have to become the Great Depression. That transformation was the Federal Reserve's choice. Between 1929 and 1933, the money supply contracted by thirty-one percent. Ninety-two percent of that money supply existed as bank deposits — and when ten thousand banks failed in three waves of panic, those deposits simply vanished. No federal deposit insurance. No safety net. Savings gone.

    This episode traces the full arc from leveraged euphoria to institutional collapse, asking the question that the tidy recovery narrative never quite answers: how broken does a system have to be for a generation to pay the price?

    This episode includes AI-generated content.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    15 分
  • Before the SEC: Bucket Shops, Fraud, and the Market Reform That Saved Capitalism
    2026/10/10
    (00:00:00) Before the SEC: Bucket Shops, Fraud, and the Market Reform That Saved Capitalism
    (00:02:06) The Collapse and Its Causes
    (00:04:54) The New Deal Framework
    (00:06:42) The SEC and What It Changed
    (00:08:48) Lessons Learned and Forgotten
    (00:10:43) What the SEC Actually Meant

    Before the Securities and Exchange Commission existed, American markets were, in the most literal sense, an unregulated wilderness. Bucket shops operated openly in cities across the country. Margin buying ran at ten percent down. Ordinary Americans poured borrowed money into stocks they didn't understand, in companies they hadn't examined. Charles Merrill saw the danger and warned his clients. Almost no one listened.

    Then came October 1929. Black Thursday. Black Monday. Black Tuesday. The cascade of margin calls and forced selling drove the stock market down eighty-seven percent from its September 1929 peak to its 1932 trough. But the crash alone didn't create the Great Depression. The Federal Reserve's catastrophic decision to contract the money supply by thirty-one percent turned a severe market collapse into a decade-long economic catastrophe. Three banking panics swept the country. Ten thousand banks failed. Unemployment hit twenty-five percent. Hoovervilles filled the parks. The Dust Bowl stripped the Great Plains bare.

    Roosevelt arrived in 1933 with the capitalist system itself in question. The New Deal's answer was structural: Glass-Steagall erected a firewall between commercial and investment banking. Federal deposit insurance gave ordinary savers protection they had never had. And the SEC changed the foundational relationship between markets and the public — making disclosure mandatory, fraud prosecutable, and investor protection a federal responsibility for the first time.

    This episode examines what existed before the SEC, why the crash happened, how the Depression deepened, and what the New Deal reforms actually achieved — and what they left unfinished, as 2008 would eventually prove.

    This episode includes AI-generated content.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    14 分
  • Glass-Steagall: The Firewall That Separated Banking from Speculation
    2026/10/09
    In 1933, a Virginia senator and an Alabama congressman rewrote American banking from the rubble of the Great Depression. The Glass-Steagall Act — formally the Banking Act of 1933 — was their answer to a system that had allowed commercial banks to gamble with ordinary depositors' savings, underwrite speculative stock offerings, and funnel customer funds into the same markets that had just lost eighty-seven percent of their value.

    This episode examines the structural logic that Carter Glass and Henry Steagall built into law. Glass, a former Treasury Secretary, had warned for years that commercial banks were corrupting their core function by entangling themselves in investment markets. Steagall, a populist from Alabama, wanted something concrete protecting working people's savings when those banks failed. What they produced together drew a hard line: commercial banks could take deposits and make loans; investment banks could underwrite and trade securities. No institution could do both.

    The firewall logic was precise. If commercial banks are walled off from securities markets, a collapse in those markets cannot drain depositors' accounts through hidden affiliates and subsidiaries. The two sides of banking could coexist — they simply could not be the same institution.

    This episode traces the origins of that separation through the bank failures, entangled conflicts of interest, and speculative wreckage of the late nineteen twenties and early nineteen thirties. It explains what the wall was designed to prevent, how deposit insurance completed the architecture, and why the act's eventual repeal in 1999 would carry consequences that felt, to anyone paying attention to history, entirely familiar.

    This episode includes AI-generated content.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    13 分
  • Did the New Deal Work? The Evidence, the Limits, and the Legacy
    2026/10/08
    (00:00:00) Did the New Deal Work? The Evidence, the Limits, and the Legacy
    (00:00:45) Where We Left Off
    (00:01:53) What the New Deal Actually Was
    (00:03:44) The Case That It Worked
    (00:05:11) The Case Against
    (00:07:17) The Historians' Divide
    (00:08:19) The Permanent Transformation
    (00:09:45) The Eight-Year Gap and What It Tells Us
    (00:11:10) Closing

    By 1933, Franklin Roosevelt inherited an economy in ruins: twenty-five percent unemployment, ten thousand failed banks, and a stock market down eighty-seven percent from its 1929 peak. The New Deal that followed was not a single programme but a cascade of relief, structural reform, and institutional reinvention — the Civilian Conservation Corps, Social Security, the Wagner Act, Glass-Steagall, and the SEC among them. But did it work?

    This episode sits in the harder, slower question that follows the drama of Black Thursday and the shuttered banks: what did government do next, and was it enough? The case for the New Deal is substantial. Unemployment fell from twenty-five to fourteen percent by 1937. Deposit insurance ended the bank-run dynamic that had destroyed the money supply. Roosevelt's bank holiday of March 1933 restored confidence where Hoover had failed entirely. Glass-Steagall held for sixty-six years.

    But the critique is serious. The Roosevelt Recession of 1937 — triggered by premature fiscal tightening and the Federal Reserve raising reserve requirements — sent unemployment surging again, exposing the fragility beneath the recovery. The Depression didn't end until wartime spending in the early 1940s. Some economists argue the New Deal's interventions prolonged uncertainty and suppressed private investment. The debate is not academic: it directly shaped the policy responses to the 2008 financial crisis, and the argument is still alive today.

    This is Episode 10 of the series tracing the full arc of the 1929 Wall Street Crash — from the margin calls and bucket shops of October 1929, through the Federal Reserve's catastrophic contraction, to the eight-year climb back and the lessons that had to be relearned seventy years later.

    This episode includes AI-generated content.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    13 分
  • Roosevelt's Court-Packing Gambit: The Constitutional Crisis of 1937
    2026/10/07
    (00:00:00) Roosevelt's Court-Packing Gambit: The Constitutional Crisis of 1937
    (00:01:30) The First Hundred Days
    (00:02:54) The Nine Old Men
    (00:04:12) The Gambit
    (00:05:37) The Switch in Time
    (00:06:57) The Stakes Behind the Gambit
    (00:08:21) Glass-Steagall and the SEC
    (00:09:41) What the New Deal Actually Did
    (00:11:14) The Lesson That Had to Be Relearned

    By February 1937, Franklin Roosevelt had steered America through the worst of the Great Depression. The banks were open, the Dust Bowl refugees had federal relief, and the New Deal had rewritten the relationship between government and citizen. But the Supreme Court — nine justices, four of them implacably hostile to federal intervention — had been systematically tearing his programmes apart. The NIRA. The AAA. The Bituminous Coal Act. One by one, the pillars fell.

    So Roosevelt did something no president had done before. Flush from a landslide re-election, he announced a plan to reshape the judiciary itself. For every justice over seventy who declined to retire, he would appoint a new one — up to six additional seats. The court could grow from nine to fifteen. He called it efficiency reform. The country called it what it was: court-packing.

    The political backlash was immediate and bipartisan. Even loyal Democrats broke with him. The Senate Judiciary Committee called the bill 'a needless, futile, and utterly dangerous abandonment of constitutional principle.' And then, before the Senate had even voted, something extraordinary happened — Justice Owen Roberts shifted his position, and the course of American constitutional law shifted with him.

    This chapter of the 1929 crash story examines how the New Deal's legislative ambition collided head-on with the Constitution's architecture, and what it reveals about the fragile balance of power that underpins American capitalism — a balance nearly destroyed by the crash, and tested again in ways few history books fully reckon with.

    This episode includes AI-generated content.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    14 分
  • When the Soil Gave Out: How the Dust Bowl Deepened the Depression
    2026/10/06
    (00:00:00) When the Soil Gave Out: How the Dust Bowl Deepened the Depression
    (00:00:54) What the Plains Were Before the Dust
    (00:01:49) Drought Arrives as the Economy Collapses
    (00:02:48) How the Dust Bowl Amplified the Depression's Damage
    (00:04:06) The Human Cost on the Road
    (00:05:20) Federal Response and the Limits of Hoover's Framework
    (00:06:22) What Roosevelt Inherited
    (00:07:42) The Long Economic Shadow
    (00:09:01) What the Dust Bowl Changed Permanently
    (00:10:16) The Lesson That Keeps Needing to Be Relearned

    The Great Depression didn't arrive from one direction. By 1931, two catastrophes were converging — the financial collapse that had started on Wall Street and a slow-motion environmental disaster unfolding across the southern and central plains. This chapter of the 1929 story asks the question that stumped economists at the time: did the Depression make the Dust Bowl worse, or did the Dust Bowl make the Depression worse? The answer is both, and the mechanism is one of the most devastating feedback loops in American economic history.

    When drought stripped the plowed plains of their topsoil, it didn't just destroy crops — it destroyed the entire economic fabric of rural communities. Farm banks that had lent against land values collapsed. Local merchants lost their customers. County tax bases evaporated. Whole towns unravelled because the surrounding farms stopped producing.

    The mass migration that followed — hundreds of thousands of families heading west in cars packed with everything they owned — became one of the largest internal population movements in American history. The 'Okies' who arrived in California found labour markets overwhelmed, wages crushed, and hostility where they hoped for refuge.

    But the Dust Bowl did something the urban unemployment statistics alone could not: it made visible, undeniably, that this was not a crisis of personal failure. The drought buried careful farmers and reckless ones equally. That moral clarity reshaped the political argument for government intervention and accelerated the collapse of Herbert Hoover's voluntary-cooperation framework — clearing the path for Roosevelt's New Deal.

    This is the episode that connects soil, banking, migration, and politics into a single coherent disaster.

    This episode includes AI-generated content.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    12 分
  • The Geography of Ruin: Hoovervilles and the Human Cost of Collapse
    2026/10/05
    (00:00:00) The Geography of Ruin: Hoovervilles and the Human Cost of Collapse
    (00:00:51) How the Ground Shifted
    (00:03:17) The Cities of Cardboard
    (00:04:57) The Weight of Visible Suffering
    (00:06:27) The Roosevelt Turn
    (00:08:06) The Arithmetic of Recovery
    (00:09:31) The Lessons That Had to Be Relearned
    (00:10:56) What the Shantytowns Actually Said

    Before the Depression, homelessness was seen as personal failure. After it, homelessness became a political fact — made visible in thousands of improvised settlements that sprang up in city parks, along riverbanks, and on empty lots from New York to Seattle. They were called Hoovervilles, and the name was an accusation.

    Episode 7 of The 1929 Wall Street Crash descends from the ledger sheets and into the lived consequences of financial catastrophe. We've already traced how Black Thursday triggered cascading margin calls, how bucket shops amplified leverage beyond any sustainable limit, how Charles Merrill alone among Wall Street's major figures warned that the speculation had gone too far. We've examined how the Federal Reserve's contraction of the money supply — shrinking by 31 percent between 1929 and 1933 — didn't merely fail to contain the crash but actively deepened it. We've followed the three waves of bank failures that erased deposits and collapsed credit across the country.

    Now we ask: what did all of that produce at street level?

    The answer is settlements built from packing crates, tin cans, and salvaged lumber, housing workers who had held steady jobs, paid their bills, and kept savings in banks that no longer existed. Unemployment reached 25 percent. Deflation made existing debts more crushing in real terms. The spiral kept turning.

    This episode examines how visible, physical suffering rewrote the political terms of American life — and laid the moral groundwork for everything Roosevelt and the New Deal would attempt to build.

    This episode includes AI-generated content.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    13 分