Glass-Steagall: The Firewall That Separated Banking from Speculation
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
ご購入は五十タイトルがカートに入っている場合のみです。
カートに追加できませんでした。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
-
ナレーター:
-
著者:
This episode examines the structural logic that Carter Glass and Henry Steagall built into law. Glass, a former Treasury Secretary, had warned for years that commercial banks were corrupting their core function by entangling themselves in investment markets. Steagall, a populist from Alabama, wanted something concrete protecting working people's savings when those banks failed. What they produced together drew a hard line: commercial banks could take deposits and make loans; investment banks could underwrite and trade securities. No institution could do both.
The firewall logic was precise. If commercial banks are walled off from securities markets, a collapse in those markets cannot drain depositors' accounts through hidden affiliates and subsidiaries. The two sides of banking could coexist — they simply could not be the same institution.
This episode traces the origins of that separation through the bank failures, entangled conflicts of interest, and speculative wreckage of the late nineteen twenties and early nineteen thirties. It explains what the wall was designed to prevent, how deposit insurance completed the architecture, and why the act's eventual repeal in 1999 would carry consequences that felt, to anyone paying attention to history, entirely familiar.
This episode includes AI-generated content.
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
まだレビューはありません