エピソード

  • The Shed, the Tape, and the Dealer Who Lied About Three Paintings

    The Shed, the Tape, and the Dealer Who Lied About Three Paintings
    2026/09/10
    The Shed, the Tape, and the Dealer Who Lied About Three Paintings

    A mud-sealed shed, a museum accession tape with handwriting, and three paintings reported stolen years earlier-what looks like a routine boundary check uncovers a fraud that ran for eight years and touched a nonprofit foundation, insurance records, and federal filings. Who placed those paintings into a private foundation, and where had Susan Baker obtained them in the first place?

    In this episode, we follow the chain of discovery from a surveyor’s latch to the foundation files, detailing how donor control, repeated “donor privacy” notes, and altered framing masked the provenance problems-so how did three mid-century works end up reframed and sitting in a regional foundation’s collection?

    Person: Susan Baker
    Person: Paul Weir
    Person: Carol Kowalski
    Event: Three paintings confirmed stolen and found in foundation collection
    Status: Seven counts proven in court

    - The painting found in the shed had a museum accession number linking it to a foundation forty minutes north.
    - Susan Baker wrote “donor privacy” in emails eleven times across three years instructing not to pursue provenance.
    - Paul Weir was hired as the Foundation’s executive director in 2005 and was 61 in 2011.
    - Three stolen paintings dated from the 1960s-70s had their original carved gilt, period walnut, and hand-joined oak frames removed and replaced with modern commercial moldings and foam-core backing.
    - Marie Price discovered the wrapped landscape in the shed ten days after the donor had moved it there, after the shed door hadn’t been opened in weeks.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    23 分
  • Forger Plants a Dead Painter: The Calverton Museum Hoax

    Forger Plants a Dead Painter: The Calverton Museum Hoax
    2026/09/09
    Forger Plants a Dead Painter: The Calverton Museum Hoax

    A convincing seventeenth-century Flemish panel appears overnight in a museum receiving corridor with a label printed in the Calverton’s exact internal font - but the museum has no record of owning it. Who placed a gilt-framed painting attributed to a nonexistent "Vrancken" where staff would think it was a routine loan return, and why?

    In this episode, we follow the staff reactions and early documentary trail at the Calverton Museum as they log the unexpected panel, consult conservators, and uncover puzzling access records - leading to a single suspicious visitor and a label that matches the museum’s printer exactly. Could a short, deliberate visit six months earlier explain how a museum was made to believe it owned a masterpiece?

    Person: Emily Coleman
    Person: Robert Vance
    Person: Bruce Marshall
    Person: Sandra Petit
    Person: William Stein

    - The painting was discovered at 7:14 AM on a Tuesday in April 2019 in the Calverton Museum receiving corridor.
    - Emily Coleman was 22 years old and had worked at the museum for eight months when she handled the panel.
    - The adhesive label read "VRANCKEN ATTR - LOAN RETURN - HOLD FOR ASSESSMENT" in Courier font matching the Calverton’s internal labels exactly.
    - Conservator Sandra Petit, with 30 years’ experience, described the surface as "among the most convincing" but could not declare it real and sent paint samples to a laboratory.
    - Access logs show William Stein, a frame conservator, entered the collections office on a Tuesday in October 2018 at 11:43 AM and left at 12:08 PM - a 25-minute visit.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    24 分
  • The Day the Painting Turned: How a Neighbor Spotted a Swap

    The Day the Painting Turned: How a Neighbor Spotted a Swap
    2026/09/08
    The Day the Painting Turned: How a Neighbor Spotted a Swap

    Fear and fascination collide in a small Ohio town when a retired hawk-watching neighbor notices a familiar painting she has seen through her kitchen window for two years suddenly mirrored - the figure in the yellow slicker now faces left. How could a hundred-and-forty-piece gallery hang the same framed canvas in the same place while the image itself had been swapped without forced entry or motion-sensor alerts?

    In this episode, we follow the timeline from a 6:53 a.m. sighting to the arrival of an art crime liaison and a conservator, tracing the evidence that turned a routine morning into a three-month inquiry into a subtle swap. What did a binocular-equipped neighbor’s certainty, museum installation logs, and a conservator’s loupe reveal about who prepared this forgery and how they pulled it off?

    Person: Monica Barnes
    Date: March 14, 2019
    Location: Owenfield Cultural Center
    Director: Douglas Hale
    Conservator: Patricia Sung

    - Monica Barnes first noticed the change at 6:53 a.m. while cleaning binocular lenses at her kitchen window.
    - Low Water, Owenfield had hung on the east wall of the center for at least six years per Douglas Hale’s hand-kept installation records.
    - The center’s permanent collection totals about 140 works.
    - Conservator Patricia Sung spent 40 minutes with raking light and a loupe and found the craquelure was too uniform.
    - Michael Williams, art crime liaison, arrived at the center at 9:40 a.m. the same day.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    21 分
  • A Teenager Finds a $240,000 Painting on a Loading Dock: The Holloway Deaccession

    A Teenager Finds a $240,000 Painting on a Loading Dock: The Holloway Deaccession
    2026/09/07
    A Teenager Finds a $240,000 Painting on a Loading Dock: The Holloway Deaccession

    A $240,000 Harold Ness canvas was found leaning on a museum loading dock at 6:06 AM by a fourteen-year-old paperboy, and the piece on the gallery wall had been a convincing copy for three years. How did a hairline crack in a gilt slip and a routine inventory note become the missing clues that exposed a deaccession scheme?

    In this episode, we trace the sequence of events from the first discovery through the personnel, transactions, and paperwork that allowed two identical canvases to circulate undetected, and ask how a director’s financial transfers, a craftsman’s reproduction, and an archivist’s single-line note intersected to create the scandal.

    Person: Terry Evans
    Date: February 2019
    Location: Holloway Museum loading dock
    Person: Conrad Beal
    Value: $240,000

    - The painting was discovered at 6:06 AM by fourteen-year-old Terry Evans during his paper route.
    - Non-emergency police arrived at 6:31 AM and within the hour a museum staffer confirmed the painting was the original Harold Ness.
    - Harold Ness’s Low Ground, Late Season was painted in 1941, approximately 30 inches by 40 inches, oil on canvas.
    - The canvas was appraised at $240,000 in 2014 and arrived at Holloway as a gift in 1978.
    - Director Conrad Beal made unauthorized transfers from restricted gift funds totaling approximately $380,000 by 2014.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    22 分
  • Forger Plants a Fake to Launder the Fakes: The Pelham Prints Case

    Forger Plants a Fake to Launder the Fakes: The Pelham Prints Case
    2026/09/06
    Forger Plants a Fake to Launder the Fakes: The Pelham Prints Case

    A perfectly convincing lithograph was found wedged outside a regional arts center at 6:40 AM on January 9, 2011, glass iced over and a museum inventory sticker still on the frame - but the print on the wall was actually a near-flawless forgery with vertical chain lines where horizontal ones should have been. Who slipped a counterfeit into a small Ohio museum, swapped it with the authentic number 12 of 200, and why leave the one tiny structural clue only a paper specialist would notice?

    In this episode, we follow the discovery at the Pelham Regional Arts Center and the staff who uncover it, from the roads worker who first spotted the frozen frame to the collections assistant whose academic focus on mid-century lithographic paper spots the error - what happened, who handled the print, and what that single paper detail might reveal about the swap?

    Person: Roger Sharp
    Date: January 9, 2011
    Location: Pelham Regional Arts Center service access lane
    Person: Patricia Engel
    Person: Judith Moore

    - The discovery occurred at 6:40 AM with outside temperature at four degrees.
    - The print found frozen was number 12 of an edition of 200, made in 1961.
    - Patricia Engel had been director of the Pelham Regional Arts Center for 18 years at the time.
    - Judith Moore was 26 years old and 14 months into her job in authentication and collections when the swap was discovered.
    - Expert Warren Schell identified the hanging print as a forgery due to chain lines running vertically instead of the expected horizontal direction.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    23 分
  • How a Junior Cataloguer Painted a False Provenance - and Got $14K

    How a Junior Cataloguer Painted a False Provenance - and Got $14K
    2026/09/05
    How a Junior Cataloguer Painted a False Provenance - and Got $14K

    A small ochre number, painted in the lower right corner of a modest canvas, convinced every expert who saw it that the work had an earlier auction history - and for months that false history added $14,000 to the sale price. Who painted that number, why did it match the signature and pigment so perfectly, and how did one four-hour window at intake change the fate of two paintings?

    In this episode, we follow the timeline from the painting’s arrival at Pelham Fine Arts to the December sale and the aftermath, tracing the actions taken in the annex, the people involved, and the moment that made the painting’s provenance seem settled. What did a junior cataloguer do in those four hours that no one noticed until months later?

    Person: Philip Carter
    Date: December 2, 2019
    Location: Pelham Fine Arts annex, west of Dunmore, Pennsylvania
    Value difference: $14,000
    Work title: Morning, Bucks County

    - Philip Carter was thirty-one and a junior cataloguer at Pelham Fine Arts with a bachelor’s degree in art history and a conservation certificate.
    - The painting arrived at Pelham on December 2, 2019 and was logged by Philip, who was alone for four hours in intake.
    - Philip’s tool case contained a small brush, a jeweler’s loupe, a printed lot-numbering card for the December sale, and pre-matched ochre oil pigment.
    - Four years earlier Pelham had sold a different painting in a December auction whose legitimate five-digit catalog number Philip accessed and photographed in spring 2019.
    - Philip resigned the morning after the December sale; Frances Dodd reviewed the catalog entry for the painting the following morning and spent four minutes on it.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    24 分
  • A Jogger Finds the Wrong Bronze: The Resting Figure No. 4 Heist

    A Jogger Finds the Wrong Bronze: The Resting Figure No. 4 Heist
    2026/09/04
    A Jogger Finds the Wrong Bronze: The Resting Figure No. 4 Heist

    A jogger noticed a subtle difference in a familiar bronze at Kellner Botanical Park and what followed was a quiet, elaborate swap: the piece on the plinth was a recently cast reproduction while the original sat in a Columbus conservation facility. How did a man with a rented workshop, 47 photographs, a silicone impression and $60,000 in casting equipment swap a decades-old sculpture without anyone noticing until a runner slowed down?

    In this episode, we lay out the timeline, the people involved, and the physical evidence that reveal how the replacement was planned and executed, closing on the central question of motive and method that started with a morning run.

    Person: Crystal Ford
    Date: November 14, 2019
    Location: Kellner Botanical Park, Mossfield, Ohio
    Weight recorded by crane operator: 410 pounds
    Declared reproduction value at border: $4,200

    - The jogger, Crystal Ford, first noticed something wrong at 6:40 a.m, on November 14, 2019.
    - The original Resting Figure No. 4 had been purchased by Frank Gebhardt in 1989 and kept privately for about 30 years.
    - Duane Holmes took 47 photographs of the sculpture during landscaping visits in summer 2018 and pressed a silicone impression into a 12-inch section of the torso.
    - Holmes invested roughly $60,000 in casting equipment over four years and worked 18 months in a rented workshop outside Chillicothe.
    - Crane operator Kevin Sparr logged the sculpture's weight as 410 pounds while the Marsh estate record listed the original at 458 pounds (a 48-pound difference).

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    23 分
  • The Abandoned Masterpiece: How a Corridor Painting Toppled a Museum's Pruett

    The Abandoned Masterpiece: How a Corridor Painting Toppled a Museum's Pruett
    2026/09/03
    The Abandoned Masterpiece: How a Corridor Painting Toppled a Museum's Pruett

    A gilded-frame oil canvas was found leaning against a cinder block wall in a restricted utility corridor - no tag, no crate, no provenance - yet technical analysis later showed it was more authentic than the museum's prized Pruett. If a painting made to look sixty years old was actually placed recently and outperformed the catalogued masterpiece, what else in the museum could be a forgery or a setup?

    In this episode, we detail the discovery, the key personnel and the forensic tests that shifted a routine conservator review into a museum crisis, and we ask how a single corridor painting could upend decades of attribution and value.

    Person: Elias Pruett
    Location: Maren County Museum of Fine and Decorative Arts, Kellum, Pennsylvania
    Date: discovery on the fourteenth of the month (found by Curtis Riley) after Lisa Gardner's report in June 2008 and fourteen months later
    Case: comparison between corridor painting and Gallery Seven's "Farmstead, Stark County"
    Examiner: Frank Osei, technical examiner from a Pittsburgh lab

    - The museum's Farmstead, Stark County had hung for 32 years and was valued up to $140,000.
    - Curtis Riley walked the utility corridor on the 14th of every month for six years and found the painting there.
    - Lisa Gardner submitted a condition report in June 2008; her nine-year record included only one vague annotation without a photograph.
    - The corridor behind the storage annex ran at 55°F and 45% relative humidity year-round; the corridor painting showed no humidity signatures.
    - Frank Osei noted the stretcher wood was "chemically dry" and uniformly dry in a way inconsistent with 60 years of organic aging.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    22 分