Short Lesson Plan: STOP Strategy

Grade Level: Middle School, High School, families or Community Workshop Duration: 30–45 minutes Audience: Youth, Parents, Educators, Community Leaders

🧠 Learning Objectives (with examples)

• Identify personal warning signs that signal rising conflict Example: A student recognizes that when their hands clench and their heart races, they’re about to lose control.
• Practice the STOP → THINK → CONSEQUENCES sequence in role-play scenarios Example: A youth worker guides a student through a mock hallway conflict using the strategy.
• Reflect on the impact of behavioral choices in real-life situations Example: A parent shares a story about walking away from a heated argument and how it changed the outcome.

🎯 Learning Outcomes (with examples)

• Students will describe their physical, emotional, and cognitive warning signs Example: “When I feel disrespected, my chest tightens and I want to yell. That’s my STOP signal.”
• Students will demonstrate the NIC STOP sequence through role-play Example: In a classroom skit, a student pauses, steps back, and calmly explains their feelings after THINKING.
• Students will evaluate consequences of behavior using real or hypothetical examples Example: “If I had shouted back, I might’ve been suspended. But because I walked away, I got praised for maturity.”

Mr. Positive: educatorsocialscience@gmail.com or 773-809-8594

Welcome to Hometown Tire & Service

Are your tires bald? Is your car pulling to the right? Have you gone 3,000 miles since your last oil change? Home Town Tire & Service in St. Paul, Minnesota offers all the auto services and tires you need, right here under one roof. We are a certified dealer of Michelin®, BFGoodrich®, Uniroyal®, and other trusted brands, and we stock tires for cars, trucks, SUVs, vans, ATVs, and more. Don't know what size tire your vehicle needs? Let us help—call (651) 450-0535 or use our easy online Tire Fitment Guide. In need of vehicle repair or maintenance? We offer oil changes, brake inspections and service, tire repair, and other valuable automotive services at affordable prices. For the complete list of repairs we offer, view our Services page. We have been serving customers from St. Paul, Minneapolis, Woodbury, and Mendota Heights for years. Stop in and see why Home Town Tire & Service is the area's leading auto service provider.

To be a guest on Positive People USA call 773-809-8594

This content provides a clear overview of legal doctrines used to determine fault and compensation in auto accidents. It explains:

Learning Objectives (with Examples)

By the end of this lesson, learners will be able to:

• Define and distinguish between negligence per se, comparative negligence, and contributory negligence. Example: Learners will explain how running a red light qualifies as negligence per se.
• Analyze fault and compensation using real-world scenarios. Example: Learners will calculate damages when a driver is 40% at fault in a two-car collision.
• Identify jurisdictional differences in negligence rules. Example: Learners will compare Minnesota’s modified comparative rule to Virginia’s contributory rule.

✅ Learning Outcomes (with Examples)

Learners will demonstrate:

• Accurate definitions of each doctrine. Example: “Negligence per se occurs when a driver violates a traffic law and causes harm.”
• Application of fault percentages to determine compensation. Example: “If a driver is 25% at fault and suffers $10,000 in damages, they can recover $7,500.”
• Jurisdictional awareness of legal doctrines. Example: “In Maryland, a pedestrian who jaywalks and is hit by a speeding car may receive no compensation due to contributory negligence.”

📝 Assessment Activities

• Quick Quiz: Match each doctrine to its definition.
• Scenario Analysis: Learners evaluate fault and compensation in sample cases (e.g., a texting driver hitting a cyclist).
• Discussion Prompt: “Should contributory negligence still be legal? Why or why not?”

🧪 Teaching Examples

• Negligence Per Se: A driver runs a stop sign and hits a pedestrian. This is negligence per se because the driver violated a traffic law.
• Comparative Negligence: A speeding driver hits another who failed to signal. Under comparative negligence, fault is shared—if Driver A is 60% at fault and Driver B is 40%, Driver B can recover 60% of their damages.
• Contributory Negligence: A jaywalking pedestrian is hit by a distracted driver. In contributory negligence states, the pedestrian may be barred from recovering damages—even if the driver was mostly at fault.

Comments: educatorsocialscience@gmail.com or call 773-809-8594

“The Talk” is a vital conversation in Black families that prepares children—especially boys—for encounters with police, emphasizing survival, restraint, and observation over argument. It teaches youth to comply calmly, keep hands visible, avoid escalation, and document the moment so they can challenge injustice later. It’s not just advice—it’s a legacy of protection passed down through generations.

Lesson Plan: “The Talk” — Survival, Strategy, and Civic Clarity

Audience: Parents and youth (ages 12+) Duration: 30–45 minutes Format: Community workshop, classroom module, or family discussion

🎯 Learning Objective

Equip youth and parents with survival-first strategies for routine police encounters, emphasizing observation, restraint, and post-encounter documentation.

📚 Key Concepts & Examples

• Survival over argument Example: A teen is pulled over for a broken taillight. They keep their hands visible, comply calmly, and leave safely. The family later files a complaint about the officer’s tone.
• Mouth gets you in trouble Example: A youth stopped for jaywalking begins arguing. The officer runs a warrant check and arrests them for an unrelated issue. The original stop could’ve ended in a warning.
• Observation as power Example: A 15-year-old memorizes the badge number, squad car ID, and time of a tense stop. Their parent uses that info to file a formal complaint the next day.
• Post-encounter strategy Example: A family documents the location and officer involved in a stop. They consult a lawyer and submit a complaint with supporting evidence the next day.

✅ Outcomes with Examples

• Youth understand their primary duty is to survive the encounter. Example: After the workshop, a 14-year-old tells their sibling, “We don’t argue—we survive. We speak tomorrow.”
• Parents gain tools to reinforce restraint and strategy at home. Example: A mother creates a checklist for her kids: “Hands visible. No sudden moves. Eyes open. Badge number. Time. Location.”
• Families leave with a shared language and plan for handling future encounters with clarity and dignity. Example: A father and son rehearse a traffic stop scenario together, using phrases like “I’m complying” and “I’ll speak tomorrow.”

🧭 Conclusion: Legacy and the Gault Decision

In 1967, the Supreme Court ruled in In re Gault that youth are entitled to due process. That ruling wasn’t symbolic—it was a demand for dignity, for voice, for legal recognition. But due process begins after the encounter. You must live to invoke it.

Your silence, your observation, your restraint—that’s not weakness. That’s legacy. That’s strategy. That’s how you turn a moment of vulnerability into a record of accountability.

Comments: educatorsocialscience@gmail.com or 773-809-8594

Dr. King delivered this message during a speech titled “What Is Your Life’s Blueprint?” at Barratt Junior High School in Philadelphia in 1967. He was urging students to pursue excellence regardless of their circumstances or societal expectations. Street Sweeper

Lesson Plan: Do Not Let Others Define Your Limits

Learning Objective

Participants will internalize and apply the principles of perspicacity and alacrity of thought to confront challenges, refine their messaging, and pursue endeavors with purpose and velocity.

Learning Outcomes & Examples

By the end of the lesson, participants will be able to:

• Define perspicacity and alacrity of thought in civic and creative contexts Example: A participant explains that perspicacity is the ability to see through political doublespeak, while alacrity of thought is the readiness to respond with a clear, dignified message in any public-facing effort.
• Identify moments in history, media, or personal experience where these traits shaped outcomes Example: Participants analyze how Fannie Lou Hamer’s testimony at the 1964 DNC showed perspicacity in exposing injustice and alacrity in seizing the moment to speak truth to power.
• Compose a short motivational message or public statement that embodies these principles Example: A participant writes: “This is your moment. Move with perspicacity. Act with alacrity. The world isn’t waiting—it’s listening.”
• Reflect on how asking “What can I do?” transforms their approach to challenge and legacy Example: In a journal entry, a participant writes: “Instead of freezing when I saw the problem in our community, I asked what I could do. I organized a weekly gathering to amplify local voices. That shift—from fear to action—was everything.”

Three Examples of Not Being Defined by Limits

1. Temple Grandin Diagnosed with autism at a time when institutionalization was common, Grandin used her unique cognitive style to revolutionize humane livestock handling. She didn’t ask what she couldn’t do—she asked how her mind could solve problems others overlooked.

2. The Montgomery Bus Boycott Sparked by Rosa Parks’ refusal to give up her seat, this movement wasn’t defined by the limits imposed by segregation—it was defined by the collective decision to walk, organize, and persist. The boycott lasted over a year, reshaping civil rights history.

3. Community Organizers in Underserved Areas With limited access to funding or formal platforms, organizers have turned living rooms, sidewalks, and social media into spaces for truth-telling and transformation. They didn’t wait for permission or perfect conditions—they built legacy with what they had.

Assessment

• Formative: Group discussion analyzing examples of perspicacity and alacrity in action (e.g., historical speeches, civic movements, public statements)
• Summative: Participants submit a 60-second motivational message or public service announcement using the main message and conclusion above, adapted to their voice and audience
• Optional Extension: Peer review and refinement of messages for clarity, impact, and emotional resonance.

To be a guest on the podcast: educatorsocialscience@gmail.com or 773-809-8594

Dr. King delivered this message during a speech titled “What Is Your Life’s Blueprint?” at Barratt Junior High School in Philadelphia in 1967. He was urging students to pursue excellence regardless of their circumstances or societal expectations. Street Sweeper

Lesson Plan: Do Not Let Others Define Your Limits

Learning Objective

Participants will internalize and apply the principles of perspicacity and alacrity of thought to confront challenges, refine their messaging, and pursue endeavors with purpose and velocity.

Learning Outcomes & Examples

By the end of the lesson, participants will be able to:

• Define perspicacity and alacrity of thought in civic and creative contexts Example: A participant explains that perspicacity is the ability to see through political doublespeak, while alacrity of thought is the readiness to respond with a clear, dignified message in any public-facing effort.
• Identify moments in history, media, or personal experience where these traits shaped outcomes Example: Participants analyze how Fannie Lou Hamer’s testimony at the 1964 DNC showed perspicacity in exposing injustice and alacrity in seizing the moment to speak truth to power.
• Compose a short motivational message or public statement that embodies these principles Example: A participant writes: “This is your moment. Move with perspicacity. Act with alacrity. The world isn’t waiting—it’s listening.”
• Reflect on how asking “What can I do?” transforms their approach to challenge and legacy Example: In a journal entry, a participant writes: “Instead of freezing when I saw the problem in our community, I asked what I could do. I organized a weekly gathering to amplify local voices. That shift—from fear to action—was everything.”

Three Examples of Not Being Defined by Limits

1. Temple Grandin Diagnosed with autism at a time when institutionalization was common, Grandin used her unique cognitive style to revolutionize humane livestock handling. She didn’t ask what she couldn’t do—she asked how her mind could solve problems others overlooked.

2. The Montgomery Bus Boycott Sparked by Rosa Parks’ refusal to give up her seat, this movement wasn’t defined by the limits imposed by segregation—it was defined by the collective decision to walk, organize, and persist. The boycott lasted over a year, reshaping civil rights history.

3. Community Organizers in Underserved Areas With limited access to funding or formal platforms, organizers have turned living rooms, sidewalks, and social media into spaces for truth-telling and transformation. They didn’t wait for permission or perfect conditions—they built legacy with what they had.

Assessment

• Formative: Group discussion analyzing examples of perspicacity and alacrity in action (e.g., historical speeches, civic movements, public statements)
• Summative: Participants submit a 60-second motivational message or public service announcement using the main message and conclusion above, adapted to their voice and audience
• Optional Extension: Peer review and refinement of messages for clarity, impact, and emotional resonance.

To Be a Guest on Positive People USA call: 773-809-8594

Copy and paste the link to this encouraging episode to friends, family and other social media platforms. KEEP THIS message moving forward.

"If you go to a problem expecting to lose, if you wake up thinking the worst and failure— why wake up at all? Wake up in power. Say it. Say it out loud: I did not wake up to fail." Mr. Positive

Some where I read. If you see 10 problems coming down the road, keep watching, 9 will fall into a ditch.

To be a guest on the podcast call 507-593-9775

Email Your Outcomes and/or Comments To: educatorsocialscience@gmail.com