Green amendments are emerging as an effective and essential tool in the quest for environmental justice, ensuring that citizens have the constitutional right to a healthy environment, which is intricately linked to their rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

In our conversation with Maya Van Rossem, the founder of Green Amendments for the Generations, we discuss how these amendments provide the necessary legal framework to protect our natural resources from industrial harm and pollution, safeguarding both current and future generations.

With 19 states already taking steps towards drafting such amendments, we explore the tangible benefits experienced by states like Montana, New York, and Pennsylvania, where citizens enjoy cleaner air, water, and healthier communities. The discussion also highlights the ongoing challenges, including opposition from industries that benefit from environmental degradation, and how grassroots movements can effectively overcome these hurdles.

Exploring the strategic roadmap for achieving widespread adoption of Green Amendments across the United States, Van Rossem outlines the tactical approach of building momentum at the state level before advancing towards a federal amendment.

The movement aims to create a robust foundation for a national constitutional amendment that acknowledges and protects environmental rights by fostering awareness and support within individual states. We explore the diverse pathways through which citizens can advocate for Green Amendments, from legislative proposals to citizen initiatives, emphasizing the importance of grassroots involvement.

Join us as we unpack the bold vision behind the Green Amendment movement and its potential to transform environmental rights into enforceable legal standards nationwide.

• The concept of Green Amendments emphasizes the need for constitutional rights to a healthy environment alongside life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
• As of now, 19 states have proposed Green Amendment initiatives, with notable successes in Montana, New York, and Pennsylvania.
• Green Amendments empower citizens to challenge environmental harm and demand accountability from government officials and corporations alike.
• The recent Held v. Montana case showcases the power of Green Amendments in protecting environmental rights against legislative negligence.
• Green Amendments are not just about current generations; they also ensure the protection of natural resources for future generations.
• Advocacy for Green Amendments is a grassroots movement, urging individuals to take action in states lacking such protections.

Links referenced in this episode:

• globalwarmingisreal.com
• cagreenamendment.org
• greenamendment.org

Reviewing A City on Mars by Kelly and Zach Weinersmith

The notion of colonizing Mars often sounds like a thrilling adventure, but let’s hit the brakes on that rocket ship for a moment. Right off the bat, we tackle the idea that Elon Musk’s vision of a bustling Martian colony is, to put it mildly, a touch delusional.

As we delve into the complexities of what it would actually mean to settle on another planet, we confront the sobering reality that space isn't just a hop, skip, and jump away; it’s a harsh environment where every human function must be rethought.

We explore whether escaping a troubled Earth is viable or if our human flaws will simply accompany us to the red planet. Ultimately, our discussion highlights the pressing need to learn how to live sustainably and peacefully here on Earth, our true home, before we think about packing our bags for Mars.

Takeaways:

• Colonizing Mars is not just a technical challenge but a profound philosophical question.
• Elon Musk's timeline for colonization seems overly optimistic given the myriad obstacles ahead.
• Humans tend to carry their societal issues with them, questioning the idea of a utopian colony.
• To escape Earth’s problems by colonizing Mars is a flawed perspective; the challenges remain the same.
• Living sustainably on Earth should be our priority; if we can't manage here, why would it be better elsewhere?
• Space exploration is essential, but we must first learn to thrive on our home planet.

Links referenced in this episode:

• globalwarmingisreal.com
• Kelly Weinersmith
• Zach Weinersmith

Global warming is a long history spent in the hall of ironies, a statement that resonates throughout our discussion today. We delve into the fascinating yet troubling journey of climate science, tracing back to Svante Arrhenius, who first calculated the impact of accumulating greenhouse gases over a century ago, to the alarming forecasts of the 1950s that continue to haunt us. Amidst this, we uncover the unsettling tactics of climate denial, echoing the tobacco industry's playbook, where for-hire scientists sowed doubt to stall progress.

Lipsky shares his extraordinarily well-researched insights on how this narrative unfolded, revealing how the merchants of doubt have clouded our collective response to an existential crisis. Join us as we explore the paradoxes of our climate reality, where the awareness of impending crisis often clashes with a lack of decisive action, leaving us to wonder: How did we end up here?

This episode is a witty and thought-provoking discussion revealing the intricate relationship between science, politics, and public perception.

Takeaways:

• Svante Arrhenius's early calculations of greenhouse gases highlight a century-long understanding of climate science.
• The irony of climate denial mirrors the tobacco industry's playbook, using misinformation to sway public opinion.
• David Lipski's 'The Parrot and the Igloo' reveals the long history of climate change awareness and its frustrating denial.
• Our discussions on global warming reflect a tragicomedy, emphasizing the urgent necessity for action in a delayed response.
• The historical context of climate science illustrates how public understanding has evolved yet remained stagnant in action.
• Despite awareness since the 1950s, global warming remains contentious, showcasing our collective failure to act decisively.

About David Lipsky

Visit GlobalWarmingisReal