Analysis: A Macat Analysis of G. E. M. Anscombe's "Modern Moral Philosophy"
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
カートに追加できませんでした。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
プレミアムプラン4か月 月額99円キャンペーン開催中。 聴き放題対象外タイトルです。Audibleプレミアムプラン登録で、非会員価格の30％OFFで購入できます。
Analysis: A Macat Analysis of G. E. M. Anscombe's "Modern Moral Philosophy"
￥1,100 で購入
-
ナレーター：
-
Macat.com
In her 1958 article "Modern Moral Philosophy", British philosopher Elizabeth (G. E. M.) Anscombe does nothing less than challenge the very foundations of moral philosophy, the discipline that tries to understand right and wrong action. The article sets out three main ideas. First, that moral philosophy should not be explored until a philosophy of psychology is already in place. Second, that philosophers who do not believe in God should not use ideas about "obligation" and "duty". Why? Because they are a hangover from an earlier, more religious time, when moral philosophy was based on our relation to God. Last, that modern philosophers had been unoriginal and had been united in their belief that only consequences matter to morality.
Anscombe's article helped to promote virtue ethics, which considers a person's moral character when evaluating ethical behavior. This provided an important alternative to the dominant schools of thought at the time, schools that focused on judgments about ethics based on set rules (deontology) or on actions that produced the best outcome for the most people (utilitarianism).
©2016 Macat Inc (P)2016 Macat Inc