『Wizard of Ads Monday Morning Memo』のカバーアート

Wizard of Ads Monday Morning Memo

Wizard of Ads Monday Morning Memo

著者: Roy H. Williams
無料で聴く

このコンテンツについて

Thousands of people are starting their workweeks with smiles of invigoration as they log on to their computers to find their Monday Morning Memo just waiting to be devoured. Straight from the middle-of-the-night keystrokes of Roy H. Williams, the MMMemo is an insightful and provocative series of well-crafted thoughts about the life of business and the business of life.℗ & © 2006 Roy H. Williams マネジメント マネジメント・リーダーシップ マーケティング マーケティング・セールス リーダーシップ 経済学
エピソード
  • Reject Orthodoxy in Advertising
    2025/09/08

    The weakness of our current version of AI is that it extracts its knowledge only from what we have taught it.

    Things that are rarely done are difficult for AI to imitate.

    AI has confidence in things that are repeated online ad infinitum.*

    Predictable ads follow the orthodox guidelines taught in every college in America. AI can find countless examples of these ads online. This is why AI can write predictable ads that look, feel, sound and smell like all those other predictable ads.

    Predictability is a thief that robs you in broad daylight.

    If you want your ads to remarkably outperform the predictable ads written by AI; if you want your ads to be noticed and remembered; you must do what is rarely done.

    1. Enter your subject from a new angle, a surprising angle, a different angle.
    2. Write an opening line that makes no sense.
    3. Cause that opening line to make perfect sense in less than 30 seconds.

    This technique is known as Random Entry and almost no one ever uses it.

    “I’m John Hayes and I’m talking today with GoGo Gecko.”

    “I was a 10-year-old boy holding a flashlight for my father.”

    “Mr. Jenkins?”

    “Yes, Bobby.”

    “How much should a hamster weigh?”

    “There’s Elmer Fudd, Elmer’s Glue, and me, Elmer Zubiate.”

    Random Entry is not orthodox. Random Entry is not predictable.

    “What makes our company, our product, our service different from our competitors?”

    If you ask yourself that question, you will come up with the same 3 or 4 opening lines that each of your competitors will come up with when they ask those same questions. Your ads, and their ads, will look, feel, sound and smell like ads.

    When you begin in a predictable way, it is hard to be unpredictable.

    AI ads feel like ads because AI cannot (1.) identify, (2.) justify, or (3.) rectify Random Entry.

    1. Identify.
    2. AI cannot find examples of what does not exist. But you can create it.
    3. Justify.
    4. AI cannot bridge a random opening line into an unrelated subject. But you can build that bridge.
    5. Rectify.
    6. AI cannot reconcile a random opening line so that it makes perfect sense. But you can create a metaphor out of thin air.

    When a novel becomes a bestselling book that gets made into a movie, you can be certain that it was built upon a weird and unexpected – but highly engaging – opening line.

    “Call me Ishmael.”

    – Herman Melville, Moby-Dick

    “Where’s Papa going with that axe?”

    – E.B. White, Charlotte’s Web

    “Many years later, as he faced the firing squad, Colonel Aureliano Buendía was to remember that distant afternoon when his father took him to discover ice.”

    – Gabriel García Márquez, One Hundred Years of Solitude

    “It was a bright cold day in April, and the clocks were striking thirteen.”

    – George Orwell, 1984

    “Happy families are all alike; every unhappy family is unhappy in its own way.”

    – Leo Tolstoy, Anna Karenina

    Choose any one of those opening lines and tell your favorite AI to write an ad for your business using EXACTLY that line as the opening line. If your AI is successful, it will be due to the fact that you gave it a series of extremely insightful prompts. (Probably based on some of the things you learned in this Monday Morning Memo.)

    Srinivas Rao recently wrote, “Confessions of a Master Bullshit Artist, aka ChatGPT.”

    You think I’m a genius. I’m not. I’m an overconfident parrot in a lab coat.

    I don’t know anything, check anything...

    続きを読む 一部表示
    9 分
  • The Reason History Repeats Itself
    2025/09/01

    The advantage of being an old man is that you can remember the past. This gives you a different perspective on current events. But if that old man is foolish enough to share his thoughts, the average person will smile tolerantly and pat him on his head and tell him that he is just “a lovable old dinosaur who is out-of-touch and living in the past.”

    Screw it. I’m going to go ahead say what I’m thinking.

    A few years ago, Big Data was going to change the world. Big Data came and went.

    Then we got excited about ideas that were “disruptive.” Slash-and-burn disruption by a bunch of young pirates was going to change everything.

    The Blockchain was going to change everything. You couldn’t go anywhere without someone blathering about Crypto and NFT’s.

    Now AI is going change everything. And it definitely will, for awhile.

    Technology saves money by reducing labor costs, which is just a fancy way of saying that technology allows you to replace people with machines. Unemployment will increase, and Trump will blame Obama.

    And so it goes.

    I had an appointment in 1977 to meet with a loan officer at First National Bank in Broken Arrow, Oklahoma, to borrow $1,000.

    The greeter at the bank sat me in a chair in the waiting room. I was 19 years old.

    Smart phones did not exist. My only option was to paw through the pile of old magazines on the coffee table in front of me. Can you believe that every one of those magazines was about banking? The banker puts his banking magazines on the coffee table in his lobby when he is finished reading them. And the dentist puts his dental magazines on the coffee table in his lobby. This is how the Business Titans of Smallville keep their costs under control.

    And they do it for our convenience.

    I began reading a magazine about banking and it catapulted my brain into a tumbling somersault from which I have never recovered. The feature article was about ATM’s, but it didn’t call them ATM’s. It referred to them as automated teller machines.

    “The modern bank executive can now reduce his payroll significantly because these new automated teller machines work without pay 24 hours a day, and they never make mistakes.”

    My eyes were jacked open so wide that I was unable to blink.

    ATM’s were not invented for our convenience! They were invented so that banks could fire 60% of their bank tellers!

    “These new tellers require no health insurance, no air-conditioned offices, no telephones, no sick days, and they take no vacations. Your customers will thank you for giving them the ability to make deposits and withdrawals 24 hours a day from a variety of convenient locations.”

    The man I saw in my mind was the banker in the old Monopoly game by Parker Brothers. The way to win the game of Monopoly is to gobble up all the things that people cannot avoid, then take everything they own when an unlucky roll of the dice puts them at your mercy. It’s perfectly legal.

    I played Monopoly when I was young, but I don’t play it anymore.

    Parker Brothers began selling Monopoly in 1935. But that game’s origins trace back to an earlier version called “The Landlord’s Game” created by Elizabeth Magie. She crafted her game back in 1904, when Teddy Roosevelt was making his mark on history by curbing the excesses of the richest and most powerful men in America.

    Google, Apple and Meta still play Monopoly. As do the insurance companies, the oil companies, the pharmaceutical companies and the medical corporations that control virtually all the doctors. But the version of Monopoly they play isn’t sold by Parker Brothers.

    To win, all you have to do is gobble up the things that people cannot avoid, then take everything they own when an unlucky roll of the dice puts them at your mercy. It’s perfectly legal.

    Abraham Lincoln and Teddy Roosevelt are the Republicans on

    続きを読む 一部表示
    6 分
  • What Writers Think
    2025/08/25

    Some Writers Think Life is Overrated

    William Shakespeare wrote, “This life… is but a walking shadow; a poor player that struts and frets his hour upon the stage, and then is heard no more: it is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.”

    Songwriter K.D. Lang put it more simply, “Life is a sexually transmitted disease and the mortality rate is one hundred percent.”

    Some Writers Think Life is an Adventure

    Joseph Campbell wrote, “The big question is whether you are going to be able to say a hearty yes to your adventure.”

    Susan Ryan said, “We get to show up. We get to step into this story.”

    Some Writers Think Life is Simple

    Songwriter John Lennon said, “When I was 5 years old, my mom always told me that happiness was the key to life. When I went to school, they asked me what I wanted to be when I grew up. I wrote down ‘happy.’ They told me I didn’t understand the assignment, and I told them they didn’t understand life.”

    Business writer Tom Peters said, “Life is pretty simple: You do some stuff. Most fails. Some works. You do more of what works.”

    Some Writers Think Life is About Writing

    Nobel-Prizewinning author Gabriel García Márquez wrote, “Life is not what one lived, but what one remembers and how one remembers it in order to recount it.”

    Anne Lamott, the author of Bird by Bird says, “Becoming a writer is about becoming conscious. When you’re conscious and writing from a place of insight and simplicity and real caring about the truth, you have the ability to throw the lights on for your reader. He or she will recognize his or her life and truth in what you say, in the pictures you have painted, and this decreases the terrible sense of isolation that we have all had too much of.”

    Some Writers Think Life is Transformative

    Wes Jackson said, “If your life’s work can be accomplished in your lifetime, you’re not thinking big enough.”

    Studs Terkel wrote, “Work is about a search for daily meaning as well as daily bread, for recognition as well as cash, for astonishment rather than torpor; in short, for a sort of life rather than a Monday through Friday sort of dying.”

    Some Writers Think Life is Service

    Dr. Albert Schweitzer wrote, “I don’t know what your destiny will be, but one thing I know: the only ones among you who will be really happy are those who will have sought and found how to serve.”

    Dave Wolverton said, “When you grow up, you have to give yourself away. Sometimes you give your life all in a moment, but mostly you have to give yourself away laboring one minute at a time.”

    Some Writers Think Life is Contemplation

    A Blackfoot warrior named Crowfoot wrote, “What is life? It is the flash of a firefly in the night. It is the breath of a buffalo in the wintertime. It is the little shadow which runs across the grass and loses itself in the sunset.”

    The Welsh hobo-poet W.H. Davies said, “What is this life if, full of care, we have no time to stand and stare?”

    Some Writers Think Life is Connectedness

    John Donne famously wrote, “No man is an island, entire of itself; every man is a piece of the continent, a part of the main. If a clod be washed away by the sea, Europe is the less… Any man’s death diminishes me, because I am involved in mankind; and therefore never send to know for whom the bell tolls; it tolls for thee.”

    My friend Vess Barnes has his own definition of our purpose in life, “To encourage, to comfort, to awaken, and to stretch those who find themselves riding this big ball as it screams thru time in the silence of space. To be a bridge, not a barricade. To be a link, not a lapse. To be a beacon and a bolster; not a bragger or a bummer. To help bring the corners of life’s lips to their...

    続きを読む 一部表示
    8 分
まだレビューはありません