『When to Hire Your Contractor: The 3 Risk Profiles That Protect Your Project』のカバーアート

When to Hire Your Contractor: The 3 Risk Profiles That Protect Your Project

When to Hire Your Contractor: The 3 Risk Profiles That Protect Your Project

無料で聴く

ポッドキャストの詳細を見る

このコンテンツについて

Your construction documents are complete. You've reviewed them. You've approved them. Now you face a critical strategic decision: When do you hire your contractor? When do you submit for building permits? Does the order matter?

This isn't just paperwork and scheduling—this timing decision affects your project timeline, budget certainty, and financial risk in profound ways. Get it right, and you'll break ground with complete cost certainty and zero financial exposure. Get it wrong, and you could waste thousands on permits for a project you can't afford to build.

For years, homeowners have made this decision based on whoever shouts the loudest—whether that's the architect saying "Submit immediately," friends saying "Never hire before permits," or internet forums offering conflicting advice. But you have three distinct strategic approaches, each with different risk levels, timelines, and outcomes.

In Episode 28, Bill Reid breaks down the complete framework for making this decision strategically, not reactively. You'll discover the three risk profile approaches—Low Risk (Certainty First), Moderate Risk (Parallel Process), and High Risk (Permits First)—along with honest explanations of timelines, trade-offs, and who each approach protects best.

The right approach for YOU depends on six critical factors: your budget confidence after completing design checkpoints, your financial flexibility to absorb cost surprises, your specification completeness, your timeline priorities, your project complexity, and your experience level. There's no universal "right" answer—only the right answer for your specific situation.

This episode provides the strategic landscape you need to choose the approach that matches your budget confidence, financial flexibility, and comfort level. Whether you need maximum protection with zero financial risk (Low Risk), want the fastest timeline to breaking ground (Moderate Risk), or have exceptional certainty allowing permits-first consideration (High Risk), you'll know exactly which path serves your interests.

Bill explains how thorough budget checkpoints during schematic design and design development position you to make better timing choices with greater confidence. The homeowners who invested in Budget Checkpoint One and Budget Checkpoint Two during the design process have significantly more options and less risk than those who skipped this critical work.

🎯 In This Episode You'll Discover:

✅ Why the contractor timing decision affects five critical aspects: timeline to breaking ground, budget certainty, financial risk, flexibility for changes, and construction readiness

✅ The complete breakdown of Low Risk approach (Certainty First): Get contractor pricing and sign contract BEFORE submitting for permits—longest timeline but maximum cost certainty and zero financial risk

✅ How the Moderate Risk approach (Parallel Process) achieves the fastest timeline to breaking ground by running permit submission and contractor selection simultaneously during the 8-16 week permit review period

✅ When the High Risk approach (Permits First) might work—and why it's counterintuitively often the slowest timeline to breaking ground despite submitting for permits immediately

✅ The 6 critical factors that determine your best approach: budget confidence, financial flexibility, specification completeness, timeline priority, project complexity, and experience level

✅ The simple "one question test" that cuts through complexity: "If bids come 15-20% high, can I afford it or does my project fall apart?"—your honest answer reveals everything

✅ How each approach handles the scenario of contractor bids coming in higher than expected: adjustment options, timeline implications, and financial exposure

✅ Why homeowners at maximum budget with zero financial flexibility MUST use Low Risk approach regardless of other factors—no exceptions

✅ How...

まだレビューはありません