Vought's Return to OMB Sparks Debate Over Fiscal Restraint, Executive Power
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
ご購入は五十タイトルがカートに入っている場合のみです。
カートに追加できませんでした。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
Vought's Return to OMB Sparks Debate Over Fiscal Restraint, Executive Power
-
ナレーター：
-
著者：
このコンテンツについて
Vought’s confirmation signals a continuation of his well-known philosophy of shrinking government and strengthening executive power over federal agencies. He has been a principal architect of the Project 2025 policy agenda, which advocates for extensive budget cuts to social programs, regulatory rollbacks, and granting the executive branch more control over federal operations. Among his most controversial stances is support for “Schedule F,” a policy designed to reclassify thousands of federal employees to make them easier to remove, a move that has drawn significant concern from both current and former civil servants.
Recently, Vought and the Office of Management and Budget released the President’s fiscal year 2026 “skinny budget,” outlining major priorities for the administration. Vought emphasized that the budget aims to redirect federal resources toward the president’s top priorities, calling for significant cuts to federal spending, particularly in areas such as climate research, low-income assistance, and housing programs. The budget proposal includes a notable 25% cut to NOAA, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and the proposed elimination of its Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research, prompting strong objections from the scientific community and some members of Congress who argue these reductions would harm weather forecasting and public safety.
Vought’s approach to federal budgeting is closely tied to legal debates over executive authority. He has advocated for greater OMB oversight in apportioning federal funds, sometimes drawing on historic laws such as the Anti-Deficiency Act to assert presidential control over agency spending. He has also indicated support for challenging the Impoundment Control Act of 1974, which restricts the president’s ability to unilaterally withhold or freeze congressionally appropriated funds. Recent OMB actions to freeze significant portions of federal funding before court intervention have sparked heated debates on the balance of power among the branches of government.
Additionally, Vought’s policy influence extends into major cultural and social issues. The administration has moved to bar federal funds for gender-affirming care for minors, and Vought’s Project 2025 policy recommendations have included restricting federal spending in areas related to diversity, equity, and inclusion programs.
As a driving force behind current conservative policy and budget strategy, Vought’s leadership at OMB is marked by efforts to radically reshape federal spending, tighten executive control, and pursue an agenda that privileges deregulation and reduced government intervention. These moves have earned the support of the administration’s allies while uniting opponents who warn of the risks such changes pose to democratic institutions and vulnerable populations. The coming budget cycle will offer the first clear test of how Vought’s vision translates into the daily operations of the federal government.