エピソード

  • Impact of Perioperative Ketamine on Enhanced Recovery After Abdominal Surgery
    2025/12/14

    Citation (Vancouver):

    Raymond BL, Allen BFS, Freundlich RE, McEvoy MD, Parrish CG, Ruble SR, et al. IMpact of PerioperAtive KeTamine on Enhanced Recovery After abdominal Surgery (IMPAKT ERAS): a pragmatic randomised single-cluster trial. Br J Anaesth. 2025;135(6):1770–1778. doi:10.1016/j.bja.2025.08.001.

    Study at a glance

    - Design and setting: Pragmatic, double-blind, placebo-controlled single-centre cluster RCT by week (Vanderbilt, USA) in adults ≥18 yr undergoing elective major abdominal ERAS surgery (colorectal, surgical oncology, complex ventral hernia; N=1,522 analysed ITT).

    - Interventions: Ketamine arm received 0.5 mg kg−1 i.v. bolus at induction, then 5 μg kg−1 min−1 intraoperatively and 2.5 μg kg−1 min−1 for 48 h postoperatively; placebo arm received volume- and rate-matched saline. Both arms followed an intensive multimodal ERAS analgesic pathway (regional block, lidocaine, NSAIDs, gabapentin, opioids as needed).

    - Primary outcome (hospital length of stay): Median LOS 5 days in both arms (ketamine IQR 4–8; placebo 3–7). Cluster- and covariate-adjusted OR for longer stay with ketamine 1.21 (95% CI 1.00–1.47) – no reduction in LOS, possible small increase; moderate-certainty evidence.

    - Key secondary (opioids and recovery): Total in-hospital opioid use was similar (median 82.5 vs 90 MME; adjusted OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.71–1.01). Fewer patients on ketamine met early discharge milestones by 48 h (12.5% vs 17.3%; adjusted OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.50–0.93), suggesting no functional recovery benefit.

    - Safety: Ketamine increased adverse effects and early infusion discontinuation (any early stop for side-effects 32.3% vs 13.3%; OR ≈2). Debilitating hallucinations (2.7% vs 0.9%; OR 2.69) and debilitating dizziness (8.3% vs 1.5%; adjusted OR 6.05) were more frequent; ICU transfer was also higher with ketamine (5.7% vs 2.9%; adjusted OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.14–3.63). Thirty-day readmissions were similar.

    - Certainty and take-home: Well-conducted, double-blind cluster RCT with objective EHR outcomes and low attrition; overall RoB 2 judgement “some concerns” (selective reporting of some exploratory outcomes) but generally robust. Moderate-certainty evidence that adding a 48 h ketamine infusion to high-intensity ERAS multimodal analgesia does not improve LOS or opioid use and increases neuropsychiatric and other adverse effects.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    10 分
  • Comparative effects of remimazolam and propofol on hemodynamic stability during sedation for painless gastroscopy
    2025/12/07

    Comparative effects of remimazolam and propofol on hemodynamic stability during sedation for painless gastroscopy: a randomized clinical trial

    Citation (Vancouver):

    Gong F, Gui Q, Lan L, Zhou G, Wen Q, Wei Y, Li X, Cao X. Comparative effects of remimazolam and propofol on hemodynamic stability during sedation for painless gastroscopy: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2025;25:587. doi:10.1186/s12871-025-03484-2.


    Study at a glance

    - Design and setting: Single-centre, prospective, randomized, single-blind parallel-group trial (n=300) in adults undergoing painless gastroscopy in China.

    - Population: Low-risk outpatients, 18–65 years, BMI 18–30 kg/m², ASA I–II; all received topical lidocaine, butorphanol, and nasal oxygen.

    - Interventions: Remimazolam tosilate 0.2 mg/kg IV (0.1 mg/kg top-ups; propofol rescue allowed) versus propofol 2 mg/kg IV (0.5 mg/kg top-ups) for gastroscopy sedation.

    - Primary hemodynamics: Remimazolam maintained higher MAP at the start and end of endoscopy (T1 MD ≈ +7.5 mmHg, T2 MD ≈ +5.0 mmHg; both statistically significant) with similar or slightly higher cardiac output (no clear difference at T1; small increase at T2).

    - Safety: Compared with propofol, remimazolam markedly reduced hypotension (37/150 vs 8/150), bradycardia (22/150 vs 0/150), hypoxia (8/150 vs 0/150), and injection pain (38/150 vs 10/150).

    - Recovery profile: Endoscopy duration was similar (~5 min), but remimazolam had slower onset and longer recovery (time to MOAA/S 5 median 10 vs 6 minutes).

    - Risk of bias and certainty: Overall RoB 2 judgment “some concerns” (mainly unclear allocation concealment and reporting of prespecified analyses); GRADE certainty for key hemodynamic and safety outcomes rated moderate.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    11 分