エピソード

  • The alabastron poured a year's wages and cost him the road to death

    The alabastron poured a year's wages and cost him the road to death
    2026/11/04
    A woman in Bethany broke open an alabastron and poured a year's wages of nard on a rabbi's feet - what did it cost her?

    The alabastron poured a year's wages and cost him the road to death

    In this episode, we follow the moment a sealed flask of spikenard is broken six days before Passover and poured over a rabbi's feet in a house near Jerusalem. The episode traces who Mary of Bethany was, the cost and origin of the perfume, and the charged context that made one gesture consequential; what question does that single act leave hanging?

    Person: Mary of Bethany
    Location: Bethany, eastern slope of the Mount of Olives
    Date: six days before Passover
    Item: alabastron of nard worth three hundred denarii
    Event: anointing of Jesus' feet; wiped with her hair

    - A sealed alabastron of spikenard, imported from northern India, sat in the household until Mary broke the stopper and poured it out.
    - The perfume's value is identified as three hundred denarii-roughly a year's wages for a laborer-indicating deliberate long-term saving.
    - Mary sits at the rabbi's feet in the posture of a disciple while her sister Martha handles hospitality, a socially unconventional scene.
    - The timing-six days before Passover, after Lazarus's raising and amid rising priests' opposition-places the act in a politically tense moment.
    - John introduces Mary by the very act she will perform, signaling the anointing as central to her identity before the gesture unfolds.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    20 分
  • The seal, staff and cord that cost Judah his family line

    The seal, staff and cord that cost Judah his family line
    2026/11/03
    A veiled Tamar forces Judah into a deal at a crossroads, taking his seal, staff and cord as collateral for a goat-what will reclaiming them cost him?

    The seal, staff and cord that cost Judah his family line

    In this episode, we follow the scene on the dusty road near Timnath where Tamar and Judah meet and exchange three objects that change both their fates. The episode traces the legal and personal stakes of levirate obligations and asks what it meant for a widow to press a claim in a patriarchal household.

    Person: Judah
    Person: Tamar
    Location: Timnath / crossroads of Enaim
    Event: Judah gives seal, staff and cord as surety
    Topic: levirate obligation and widowhood

    - Judah, still grieving and preoccupied, travels north to Timnath for sheep-shearing when he encounters a veiled woman at Enaim.
    - Tamar, twice-widowed and legally bound to Judah’s household, sits in widow’s garments and disguises herself with a veil.
    - She negotiates payment for a young goat and demands Judah’s seal, staff and cord to hold until the goat arrives.
    - Judah hands over the cylinder seal (his legal signature), his staff (household rank) and the cord that held the seal, then departs.
    - Those three objects function as concrete proof of identity and obligation in the ancient Near Eastern legal system.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    18 分
  • The curse he spoke aloud cost him Rachel's years and her stolen teraphim

    The curse he spoke aloud cost him Rachel's years and her stolen teraphim
    2026/11/02
    A man curses anyone who hides his household gods - and he doesn't know the woman's name in the sentence; what did it cost him?

    The curse he spoke aloud cost him Rachel's years and her stolen teraphim

    In this episode, we follow the tense moments when Jacob's shouted curse collides with Rachel's secret as Laban searches the tent. The story traces their journey from the well to the wedding deception to the flight, asking whether Rachel heard the words that might seal her fate.

    Person: Rachel
    Person: Jacob
    Person: Laban
    Event: Laban's search for the teraphim
    Location: a tent in Paddan-Aram

    - Jacob arrives at a well in a foreign land, falls instantly in love with Rachel, a shepherdess who leads her flock.
    - Jacob agrees to seven years' service to Laban for Rachel's hand; the marriage night ends with Leah substituted beneath the veil.
    - Rachel and Leah tell Jacob their father sold them and withheld the bride-price that should have formed their inheritance.
    - When Jacob flees with his household and goods, Rachel secretly takes Laban's household teraphim and hides them in a saddle cushion.
    - Standing outdoors and unaware of Rachel's action, Jacob declares, "With whoever you find your gods, he will not live," as Laban rides in to search.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    20 分
  • The crown's absence cost Ahasuerus a queen and a kingdom's decree

    The crown's absence cost Ahasuerus a queen and a kingdom's decree
    2026/11/01
    Ahasuerus sent chamberlains to fetch his queen - she refused, and a crown taken from Susa set laws in motion. What did it cost him?

    The crown's absence cost Ahasuerus a queen and a kingdom's decree

    In this episode, we follow the moment a king's command met a queen's refusal inside the palace at Susa and trace how that single act catalyzed legal and political decisions across an empire. We keep to the biblical text and its gaps to ask: what did Vashti actually refuse, and why did her silence spark a constitutional crisis?

    Person: Vashti, Queen of Persia
    Person: Ahasuerus, King
    Location: Susa
    Event: royal banquets (180 days public display; 7-day public feast)
    Person: Memucan, royal adviser

    - Seven chamberlains carried a crown through marble pillars and linen-lined corridors to summon the queen.
    - The king had spent 180 days staging a public display of power, then held a seven-day open feast where wine flowed freely.
    - On the seventh day, heart "merry with wine," Ahasuerus ordered Vashti to appear wearing her royal crown before the assembled nobles.
    - The biblical text records only Vashti's refusal without any words, reasons, or surviving explanation.
    - Memucan argued the refusal would become precedent across provinces from India to Ethiopia, prompting a formal response to prevent imitation.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    17 分
  • Zerubbabel carried a Babylonian name-and paid exile's seed of kingship

    Zerubbabel carried a Babylonian name-and paid exile's seed of kingship
    2026/10/31
    Zerubbabel returns from Babylon to a ruined Jerusalem with a Persian name, Davidic blood, and a prophetic seal-what did it cost him?

    Zerubbabel carried a Babylonian name-and paid exile's seed of kingship

    In this episode, we follow Zerubbabel's return from exile, the logistics of a mass migration, and the political-religious paradox of a Davidic heir bearing a Babylonian name. How did a man both Persian-appointed governor and prophetic signet navigate rebuilding a ruined Temple and a shattered province?

    Person: Zerubbabel
    Date: 539-circa 520s BCE
    Location: Jerusalem / Yehud province
    Event: Return from Babylon and Temple rebuilding efforts
    Source texts: Book of Ezra, prophets Haggai and Zechariah

    - Born in exile as grandson of Jehoiachin, Zerubbabel's name in Akkadian meant "seed of Babylon," reflecting integration into imperial life.
    - He led a migration counted as 42,360 people plus thousands of servants and singers across the Syrian desert to a city of rubble.
    - Persian authority legitimized his commission; Sheshbazzar briefly precedes him in the record and receives temple vessels to be returned.
    - Prophets used the signet-ring metaphor-Jeremiah had it removed from Jehoiachin; Haggai promises it back to Zerubbabel, framing messianic expectation.
    - Tatnai the governor later writes to Darius I about halted construction: stones and timber lay ready but work on the house of God had stopped.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    21 分
  • The one-eyed kandake who marched to Rome lost her name

    The one-eyed kandake who marched to Rome lost her name
    2026/10/30
    A one-eyed kandake marched her army to the Roman border and toppled statues of Augustus - what did it cost her and Kush's rule?

    The one-eyed kandake who marched to Rome lost her name

    In this episode, we trace how Rome recorded an attack by a one-eyed queen yet refused to write her name, mistaking a royal title for a personal name. We outline the political power of the kandakes, their role in succession, and the archaeological evidence that reclaims who they were - but what was erased by that single line in a Roman report?

    Person: one-eyed kandake (unnamed)
    Date: 25 BCE
    Location: Syene and the island of Elephantine
    Period: Kingdom of Kush, c. 260 BCE-320 CE
    Event: Kandake-led attack; statues of Augustus pulled down

    - Roman reports describe the attack, losses, and counterattack but list only the title kdke (kandake), never her name.
    - Kandake (kdke) in Meroitic denoted a queen or king’s mother with court, lands, and succession authority, not merely an honorific.
    - Some kandakes also held the title qore, ruling as sovereigns; Shanakdakheto governed alone around 170 BCE and commissioned monuments in her name.
    - Archaeology at El Kurru and Nuri (excavated by George Reisner, 1917-1919) found royal women’s pyramids and burial inscriptions linking kandakes to succession.
    - Visual and inscriptional evidence shows kandakes present at coronations and central to royal legitimacy, a system Rome recorded but misnamed.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    23 分
  • The sprinting Philip stole a lifetime of exile from a nameless eunuch

    The sprinting Philip stole a lifetime of exile from a nameless eunuch
    2026/10/29
    A treasury eunuch from the Kingdom of Kush reads Isaiah aloud on a road to Gaza - a man sprints to meet him, and everything he carries is at stake.

    The sprinting Philip stole a lifetime of exile from a nameless eunuch

    In this episode we follow a treasurer from Meroë traveling over two thousand miles to Jerusalem who reads a scroll he cannot comprehend. We trace his role, origin, and condition as the text frames them, and ask how a single encounter on a desert road reframed the object in his hands.

    Person: Treasurer (no personal name given)
    Location: Road between Jerusalem and Gaza
    Origin: Meroë, Kingdom of Kush
    Text: Isaiah 53 (scroll being read aloud)
    Condition: Eunuch (excluded from assembly under Deuteronomy 23:1)

    - He was set over all the treasure of a queen called Kandake and journeyed from Meroë to Jerusalem.
    - He possessed a copied or obtained scroll of Isaiah 53 and read it aloud while riding in a carriage.
    - The Greek text labels him Aithiops, situating him in the ancient Mediterranean category for people from south of Egypt.
    - Luke emphasizes his eunuch status repeatedly, noting legal exclusion from the assembly yet recording his pilgrimage and worship.
    - Philip is described as sprinting across the desert road to catch up with the moving carriage carrying the treasurer.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    20 分
  • The accent mark that cost Junia her name and twelve centuries of fame

    The accent mark that cost Junia her name and twelve centuries of fame
    2026/10/28
    A single accent mark in a Greek New Testament turns Junia - named by Paul as “outstanding among the apostles” - into a man; what did it cost her?

    The accent mark that cost Junia her name and twelve centuries of fame

    In this episode, we follow how one editorial choice altered a name in the Greek New Testament and shifted twelve centuries of reading. The episode traces the textual, manuscript, and cultural steps that changed Junia’s gender in the record and asks what was lost when that change took hold.

    Person: Junia
    Text: Romans 16:7
    Date: 1928 (editorial change noted)
    Period: First millennium consensus vs. medieval alterations
    Scholar: Bernadette Brooten (1977)

    - Paul greets Junia alongside Andronicus and calls them both “outstanding among the apostles,” noting Junia was “in Christ” before Paul.
    - The oldest Greek manuscripts are majuscules with no accents; the name’s ending matches a common Roman female name found 250+ times in antiquity.
    - Early commentators and native Greek speakers from the second to the eleventh century (Origen, John Chrysostom, Jerome, Theophylact) read Junia as a woman and praised her status.
    - A document misattributed to Epiphanius and a 13th-14th century scholar Aegidius of Rome introduce a masculine reading that later scribes copied into medieval manuscripts.
    - In 1928 an editorial accenting choice in the standard Greek New Testament finalized the masculine form in modern editions, shifting centuries of interpretation.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    21 分