『ThursdAI - The top AI news from the past week』のカバーアート

ThursdAI - The top AI news from the past week

ThursdAI - The top AI news from the past week

著者： From Weights & Biases Join AI Evangelist Alex Volkov and a panel of experts to cover everything important that happened in the world of AI from the past week
無料で聴く

概要

 Every ThursdAI, Alex Volkov hosts a panel of experts, ai engineers, data scientists and prompt spellcasters on twitter spaces, as we discuss everything major and important that happened in the world of AI for the past week. Topics include LLMs, Open source, New capabilities, OpenAI, competitors in AI space, new LLM models, AI art and diffusion aspects and much more.

sub.thursdai.newsAlex Volkov 政治・政府
エピソード
  • ThursdAI - Mar 5 - OpenAI's GPT-5.4 Solves a 20-Year Math Problem, Anthropic Gets Designated a Supply Chain Risk, Qwen Drama Unfolds

    ThursdAI - Mar 5 - OpenAI's GPT-5.4 Solves a 20-Year Math Problem, Anthropic Gets Designated a Supply Chain Risk, Qwen Drama Unfolds
    2026/03/06
    Hey folks, Alex here, let me catch you up! Most important news about this week came today, mid-show, OpenAI dropped GPT 5.4 Thinking (and 5.4 Pro), their latest flagship general model, less autistic than Codex 5.3, with 1M context, /fast mode and the ability to steet it mid-reasoning. We tested it live on the show, it’s really a beast. Also, since last week, Anthropic said no to Department of War’s ultimatum and it looks like they are being designated as supply chain risk, OpenAI swooped in to sign a deal with DoW and the internet went ballistic (Dario also had some .. choice words in a leaked memo!) On the Open Source front, the internet lost it’s damn mind when a friend of the pod Junyang Lin, announced his departure from Qwen in a tweet, causing an uproar, and the CEO of Alibaba to intervene. Wolfram presented our new in-house wolfbench.ai and a lot more! P.S - We acknowledge the war in Iran, and wish a quick resolution, the safety of civilians on both sides. Yam had to run to the shelter multiple times during the show. ThursdAI - Highest signal weekly AI news show is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.OpenAI drops GPT 5.4 Thinking and 5.4 Pro - heavy weight frontier models with 1M context, /fast mode, SOTA on many evalsOpenAI actually opened this week with another model drop, GPT 5.3-instant, which... we can honestly skip, it was fairly insignificant besides noting that this is the model that most free users use. It is supposedly “less cringe” (actual words OpenAI used). We all wondered when 5.4 will, and OpenAI once again proved that we named the show after the right day. Of course it drops on a ThursdAI. GPT 5.4 Thinking is OpenAI latest “General” model, which can still code, yes (they folded most of the Codex 5.3 coding breakthroughs in here) but it also shows an incredible 83% on GDPVal (12% over Codex), 47% on Frontier Math and an incredible ability to use computers and browsers with 82% on BrowseComp beating Claude 4.6 at lower prices than Sonnet! GPT 5.4 is also ... quite significantly improved at Frontend design? This landing page was created by GPT 5.4 (inside the Codex app, newly available on Windows) in a few minutes, clearly showing significant improvements in style. I built it also to compare prices, all the 3 flagship models are trying to catch up to Gemini in 1M context window, and it’s important to note, that GPT 5.4 even at double the price after the 272K tokens cutoff is still.... cheaper than Opus 4.6. OpenAI is really going for broke here, specifically as many enterprises are adopting Anthropic at a faster and faster pace (it was reported that Anthropic is approaching 19B ARR this month, doubling from 8B just a few months ago!) Frontier math wizThe highlight from the 5.4 feedback came from a Polish mathematician Bartosz Naskręcki (@nasqret on X), who said GPT-5.4 solved a research-level FrontierMath problem he had been working on for roughly 20 years. He called it his “personal singularity,” and as overused as that word has become, I get why he said it. I’ve told you about this last week, we’re on the cusp. Coding efficiencyThere’s tons of metrics in this release, but I wanted to highlight this one, where it may seem on first glance that on SWE-bench Pro, this model is on par with the previous SOTA GPT 5.3 codex, but these dots here are thinking efforts. And a medium thinking effort, GPT 5.4 matches 5.3 on hard thinking! This is quite remarkable, as lower thinking efforts have less tokens, which means they are cheaper and faster ultimately! Fast mode arrives at OpenAI as wellI think this one is a direct “this worked for Anthropic, lets steal this”, OpenAI enabled /fast mode that.. burns the tokens at 2x the rate, and prioritizes your tokens at 1.5x the speed. So, essentially getting you responses faster (which was one of the main complains about GPT 5.3 Codex). I can’t wait to bring the fast mode to OpenClaw with 5.4, which will absolutely come as OpenClaw is part of OpenAI now. There’s also a really under-appreciated feature here that I think other labs are going to copy quickly: mid-thought steering. OpenAI now lets you interrupt the model while it’s thinking and redirect it in real time in ChatGPT and iOS. This is a godsend if you’re like me, sent a prompt, seeing the model go down the wrong path in thinking... and want to just.. steer it without stopping! Anthropic is now designated as supply-chain risk by DoWLast week I left you with a cliffhanger: Anthropic had received an ultimatum from the Department of War (previously the Department of Defense) to remove their two remaining restrictions on Claude — no autonomous kill chain without human intervention, and no surveillance of US citizens. Anthropic’s response? “we cannot in good conscience acceede to their request” So much has happened since then; US President Trump said “I fired Anthropic” ...
    続きを読む 一部表示
    1 時間 36 分
  • 📅 ThursdAI - Feb 26 - Approaching singularity

    📅 ThursdAI - Feb 26 - Approaching singularity
    2026/02/27
    Hey, it’s Alex, let me tell you why I think this week is an inflection point.Just this week: Everyone is launching autonomous agents or features inspired by OpenClaw (Devin 2.2, Cursor, Claude Cowork, Microsoft, Perplexity and Nous announced theirs), METR and ArcAGI 2,3 benchmarks are getting saturated, 1 person companies nearing 1M ARR within months of operation by running AI agents 24/7 (we chatted with one of them on the show today, live as he broke $700K ARR barrier) and the US Department of War gives Anthropic an ultimatum to remove nearly all restrictions on Claude for war and Anthropic says NO. I’ve been covering AI for 3 years every week, and this week feels, different. So if we are nearing the singularity, let me at least keep you up to date 😅 Today on the show, we covered most of the news in the first hour + breaking news from Google, Nano Banana 2 is here, and then had 3 interviews back to back. Ben Broca with Polsia, Nader Dabit with Cognition and Philip Kiely with BaseTen. Don’t miss those conversations starting at 1 hour in. Thanks for reading ThursdAI - Highest signal weekly AI news show! This post is public so feel free to share it.Anthropic vs Department of WarEarlier this week, the US “Department of War” invited Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic to a meeting, where-in Anthropic was given an ultimatum. “Remove the restrictions on Claude or Anthropic will be designated as a ‘supply chain risk’ company” and the DoD will potentially go as far as using the Defence Production Act to force Anthropic to ... comply. The two restrictions that Anthropic has in place for their models are: No use for domestic surveillance of American citizens and NO fully autonomous lethal weapens decisions given to Claude. For context, Claude is the only model that’s deployed on AWS top secret GovCloud and is used through Palantir’s AI platform. As I’m writing this, Anthropic issued a statement from Dario statement saying they will not budge on this, and will not comply. I fully commend Dario and Anthropic for this very strong backbone, but I fear that this matter is far from over, and we’ll continue to see what is the government response. EDIT: Apparently the DoD is pressuring Google and OpenAI to agree to the stipulations and employees from both companies are signing this petition https://notdivided.org/ to protest against dividing the major AI labs on this topic. Anthropic and OpenAI vs upcoming DeepseekIt’s baffling just how many balls are in the air for Anthropic, as just this week also, they have publicly named 3 Chinese AI makers in “Distillation Attacks”, claiming that they have broke Terms of Service to generate over 16M conversations with Claude to improve their own models, while using proxy networks to avoid detection. This marks the first time a major AI company publicly attributed distillation attacks to specific entities by name.The most telling thing to me is not the distillation, given that Anthropic has just recently settled one of the largest copyright payouts in U.S history, paying authors about $3000/book, which was bought, trained on and destroyed by Anthropic to make Claude better. No, the most telling thing here is the fact that Anthropic chose to put DeepSeek on top of the accusation list with merely 140K conversations, where the other labs created millions. This, plus OpenAI formal memo to Congress about a similar matter, shows that the US labs are trying to prepare for Deepseek new model to drop, by saying “Every innovation they have, they stole from us”. Apparently Deepseek V4 is nearly here, it’s potentially multimodal and has been allegedly trained on Nvidia chips somewhere in Mongolia despite the export restrictions and it’s about to SLAP! Benchmark? What benchmarks? How will we know that we’re approaching the singularity? Will there be signs? Well, this week it seems that the signs are here. First, Agentica claimed that they solved all publicly available “hard for AI” tasks of the upcoming ArcAGI 3, then Confluence Labs announced that they got an unprecedented 97.9% on ArcAGI2 and finally METR published their results on the long-horizon tasks, which measure AI’s capability to solve task that take humans a certain amount of hours to do. And that graph is going parabolic, with Claude Opus 4.6 able to solve tasks of 14.6h (doubling every 49 days) with 50% success rateWhy is this important? Well, this is just the benchmarks telling the story that everyone else in the industry is seeing, that approximately since December of 2025, and definitely fueled by early Feb drop of Opus 4.6 and Codex 5.3, something major shifted. Developers no longer write code, but ship 10x more features.This became such a talking point, Swyx Latent.Space coined this with https://wtfhappened2025.com/ where he collects evidence of a shelling point, something that happened in December and I think continued throughout February. Speaking of benchmarks no longer being ...
    続きを読む 一部表示
    1 時間 50 分
  • 📅 ThursdAI - Feb 19 - Gemini 3.1 Pro Drops LIVE, Sonnet 4.6 Closes Gap, OpenClaw Goes to OpenAI

    📅 ThursdAI - Feb 19 - Gemini 3.1 Pro Drops LIVE, Sonnet 4.6 Closes Gap, OpenClaw Goes to OpenAI
    2026/02/20
    Hey, it’s Alex, let me catch you up! Since last week, OpenAI convinced OpenClaw founder Peter Steinberger to join them, while keeping OpenClaw.. well... open. Anthropic dropped Sonnet 4.6 which nearly outperforms the previous Opus and is much cheaper, Qwen released 3.5 on Chinese New Year’s Eve, while DeepSeek was silent and Elon and XAI folks deployed Grok 4.20 without any benchmarks, and it’s 4 500B models in a trenchcoat? Also, Anthropic updated rules state that it’s breaking ToS to use their plans for anything except Claude Code & Claude SDK (and then clarified that it’s OK? we’re not sure) Then Google decided to drop their Gemini 3.1 Pro preview right at the start of our show, and it’s very nearly the best LLM folks can use right now (though it didn’t pass Nisten’s vibe checks) Also, Google released Lyria 3 for music gen (though only 30 seconds?) and our own Ryan Carson blew up on X again with over 1M views for his Code Factory article, Wolfram did a deep dive into Terminal Bench and .. we have a brand new website: https://thursdai.news 🎉Great week all in all, let’s dive in! ThursdAI - Subscribe to never feel like you’re behind. Share with your friends if you’re already subscribed!Big Companies & API updatesGoogle releases Gemini 3.1 Pro with 77.1% on ARC-AGI-2 (X, Blog, Announcement)In a release that surprised no-one, Google decided to drop their latest update to Gemini models, and it’s quite a big update too! We’ve now seen all major labs ship big model updates in the first two months of 2026. With 77.1% on ARC-AGI 2, and 80.6% on SWE-bench verified, Gemini is not complete SOTA across the board but it’s damn near close. The kicker is, it’s VERY competitive on the pricing, with 1M context, $2 / $12 (<200k tokens), and Google’s TPU speeds, this is now the model to beat! Initial vibe checks live on stage did not seem amazing, Nisten wasn’t super impressed, Ryan took one glance at the SWE-bench pro not being SOTA and decided to skip, and he’s added that, at some point, it is benefitting to pick a model and stick to it, the constant context switching is really hard for folks who want to keep shipping. But if you look at the trajectory, it’s really notable how quickly we’re moving, with this model being 82% better on abstract reasoning than the 3 pro released just a few months ago! The 1 Million Context Discrepancy, who’s better at long context? The most fascinating catch of the live broadcast came from LDJ, who has an eagle eye for evaluation tables. He immediately noticed something weird in Google’s reported benchmarks regarding long-context recall. On the MRCR v2 8-needle benchmark (which tests retrieval quality deep inside a massive context window), Google’s table showed Gemini 3.1 Pro getting a 26% recall score at 1 million tokens. Curiously, they marked Claude Opus 4.6 as “not supported” in that exact tier.LDJ quickly pulled up the actual receipts: Opus 4.6 at a 1-million context window gets a staggering 76% recall score. That is a massive discrepancy! It was addressed by a member of DeepMind on X in a response to me, saying that Anthropic used an internal model for evaluating this (with receipts he pulled from the Anthropic model card) Live Vibe-Coding Test for Gemini 3.1 ProWe couldn’t just stare at numbers, so Nisten immediately fired up AI Studio for a live vibe check. He threw our standard “build a mars driver simulation game” prompt at the new Gemini.The speed was absolutely breathtaking. The model generated the entire single-file HTML/JS codebase in about 20 seconds. However, when he booted it up, the result was a bit mixed. The first run actually failed to render entirely. A quick refresh got a version working, and it rendered a neat little orbital launch UI, but it completely lacked the deep physics trajectories and working simulation elements that models like OpenAI’s Codex 5.3 or Claude Opus 4.6 managed to output on the exact same prompt last week. As Nisten put it, “It’s not bad at all, but I’m not impressed compared to what Opus and Codex did. They had a fully working one with trajectories, and this one I’m just stuck.”It’s a great reminder that raw benchmarks aren’t everything. A lot of this comes down to the harness—the specific set of system prompts and sandboxes that the labs use to wrap their models. Anthropic launches Claude Sonnet 4.6, with 1M token context and near-Opus intelligence at Sonnet pricingThe above Gemini release comes just a few days after Anthropic has shipped an update to the middle child of their lineup, Sonnet 4.6. With much improved Computer Use skills, updated Beta mode for 1M tokens, it achieves 79.6% on SWE-bench verified eval, showing good coding performance, while maintaining that “anthropic trained model” vibes that many people seem to prefer. Apparently in blind testing inside Claude Code, folks preferred this new model outputs to the latest Opus 4.5 around ~60% of the ...
    続きを読む 一部表示
    1 時間 32 分
まだレビューはありません