『Thinking LSAT』のカバーアート

Thinking LSAT

Thinking LSAT

著者: Nathan Fox and Ben Olson
無料で聴く

このコンテンツについて

Ben Olson and Nathan Fox started the Thinking LSAT Podcast to become better LSAT teachers and have some fun. Please 1) subscribe, 2) rate and review, and 3) send us questions: help@thinkinglsat.com. Don't pay for law school! Learn more at lsatdemon.comNathan Fox and Ben Olson
エピソード
  • Personal Statement Gong Show (Ep. 523)
    2025/09/08

    Ben and Nathan host a special marathon edition of the Personal Statement Gong Show. They kick things off by laying out the fundamentals of personal statements—what they are, what to write about, and when to start. Then, nine students face the gong, each vying to set a record and earn their place in Thinking LSAT Gong Show history.

    ⁠Study with our Free Plan⁠

    ⁠Download our iOS app⁠

    ⁠Watch Episode 523 on YouTube⁠

    3:33 – Personal Statement, Not Resume Recap

    Ben and Nathan introduce the starting point for a personal statement: bringing one bullet point on your resume to life. Your personal statement should show, not tell, how a particular experience from your resume is going to make you a successful law student and lawyer. One of the biggest mistakes you can make is trying to cover too many positions or experiences. The personal statement is a chance to illustrate your character, not an unnecessary resume recap.

    9:41 – When to Start Writing

    Isaac finds himself with several hours of free time every day, even after his LSAT studying. The guys give him the green light to start working on his personal statement, but the LSAT still has to come first. They also suggest spending time on professional development through networking and research to make informed decisions about his legal career.

    17:46 – Personal Statement on Running

    Just because you don’t have legal experience on your resume doesn’t mean you don’t have a valuable story to share. Riley asks about writing a personal statement about marathon running. While Ben and Nathan don’t dismiss the idea outright, they explain why it might not be the best option. Customer service, familiarity with regulation and compliance, and tenacity are among the lawyery attributes that Sean could highlight from his experience in retail and landscaping.

    22:37 – Personal Statement Gong Show Marathon

    In a special edition of the Personal Statement Gong Show, Ben and Nathan bring nine contestants who are looking to break Sophia’s record of 34 lines. The rules are simple: Ben and Nathan read until they find an unforgivable mistake—then ring the gong.

    Check out all of our Gong Show Segments!



    続きを読む 一部表示
    2 時間 20 分
  • Confusing Answers Are Wrong (Ep. 522)
    2025/09/01

    When you substitute understanding with gimmicks, you hamper your score now and in the long term. Tips like “10 questions in 10 minutes” or “If you don’t understand an answer, it’s probably correct” excuse poor reading and rushed test-taking. When you accept that the LSAT is easy and every question is solvable, you’re more likely to commit to a problem until you solve it. No shortcuts needed.

    ⁠Study with our Free plan⁠

    ⁠Download our iOS app⁠

    ⁠Watch Episode 522 on YouTube⁠

    0:40 – Structuring Study

    Mila started with a 150 and plans to study two to three hours a day while in school. Ben and Nathan suggest limiting LSAT time to one focused hour and prioritizing perfect grades. After she’s secured perfect grades for the semester, she can switch to LSAT prep. Mila and other candidates looking to boost their GPA could also consider enrolling in a few community college courses that offer A+ grades.

    5:21 – Undergrad Involvement in Pre-Law Clubs

    Kyle wonders whether joining pre-law clubs is necessary. The guys explain that clubs and extracurriculars are negligible compared to GPA and LSAT. A 4.0 GPA paired with a great LSAT score will always outweigh résumé fluff. Schools may pretend otherwise, but admissions officers prioritize numbers.

    15:17 – Graduate School Conundrum

    Carson asks if finishing grad school before law school makes sense. Ben and Nathan point out that lawyers learn what they need on the job—grad degrees won’t add value. Universities push unnecessary certificates and programs because they profit from them. Don’t pair bad LSAT prep with wasted tuition. Learn freely, but don’t pay for credentials you don’t need.

    26:53 – Pearls vs. Turds

    Demon team member Beatriz shares a questionable piece of advice that one of her students heard from another prep company: “If you don’t understand what the answer is saying, it’s probably correct.” Turd. This advice is antithetical to the Demon approach. Wrong answers don’t need to make sense, but right answers do. If you understand the passage, you should be able to understand why the right answer is right. The LSAT is easy if you approach it correctly.

    32:57 – UC Law San Francisco Welcome Email

    Nate reads a verbose welcome email from his alma mater, UC Law San Francisco (formerly Hastings). It’s a wall of text showing what students pay thousands for—law school administrators framing business interests as justice. The email is more about promoting the school’s image than welcoming students.

    39:50 – Choosing the Right Law School

    Sean wants advice on picking the right school. Step one: get your best LSAT. Step two: apply broadly and early. Step three: compare offers. Rule of thumb: rank schools by cost, not prestige. If a more expensive school is ranked higher, double its rank and see whether cheaper options fall within that range. Going cheaper often means graduating at the top of your class, with better job prospects and stronger networks.

    59:57 – Question Types

    McKenna asks whether she should study question types. The guys explain that focusing on question types is a distraction. Meaning is in the words on the page, not labels. Most struggling students overemphasize question types instead of careful reading.

    1:07:53 – Personal Statement Gong Show

    Celebrity contestant and Demon teacher Kaley shares a lived-experience essay.

    1:19:05 - Word of the Week - Inexorable

    Among them was a rigid belief in the inexorable power of logic to change the opinions of others.

    Get caught up with our ⁠Word of the Week⁠⁠ library.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    1 時間 21 分
  • ​You’re Never Early with a Bad Score (Ep. 521)
    2025/08/25

    Ben and Nate break down the measurable cost of applying late in the law school admissions cycle. Your LSAT score has the most value on the day that applications open. By rushing your LSAT or applying late in the cycle, you sacrifice points and leave money on the table. With AI poised to disrupt the legal market, it’s more important than ever to go to law school for free.

    ⁠Study with our Free plan⁠

    ⁠Download our iOS app⁠

    ⁠Watch Episode 521 on YouTube⁠

    0:32 – AI Making Law School Obsolete?

    Ben and Nate discuss an article from a former Google exec claiming AI will make law and medical degrees obsolete. The guys acknowledge that AI is improving, but it still makes mistakes. While they agree that a law degree isn’t a guaranteed gravy train, they also note that the law itself is a barrier to modernization, which will slow AI’s impact on legal education. The schools most at risk are bottom feeders churning out lawyers for grunt work. Their advice: don’t pay tuition at weak schools.

    14:50 – LSAT Suspended in Mainland China

    LSAC halts testing in China after evidence of cheating. A Reddit post earlier this year even advertised cheating services. While tough for honest test takers in China, applicants should appreciate LSAC’s effort to safeguard exam security.

    24:03 – Cost of Delaying Apps

    How late is too late? While early applications are stronger, it’s never worth rushing the LSAT. The best strategy is to get your best LSAT and then apply at the start of the next cycle. A University of Chicago Journal of Law and Economics article finds that delays weaken applications. Waiting 100 days is equivalent to dropping 2.1 LSAT points or 0.26 GPA points. Schools review applications in waves, and the earliest applicants are often the strongest. Missing the first wave, even by a day, can carry measurable costs.

    Dynamic Decision-Making under Rolling Admissions: Evidence from US Law School Applications

    47:43 – Main Point vs. Summary

    A summary lists information, but a main point answers “why.” It’s what the author is trying to convince you of, not just what they said.

    52:31 – Doing LR Backwards

    Listener Blair wants to work backward in Logical Reasoning to combat fatigue. Ben and Nathan’s answer: If you’re scoring under 175, you shouldn’t be finishing sections anyway, so working backward means skipping easier questions to do harder ones. If you’re at 175 or above, then fatigue isn’t an issue.

    59:28 – Score Plateaus

    Listeners Trevor and Ireland feel stuck. The guys caution against chasing a single breakthrough. Progress comes from carefully reviewing and learning from every mistake, one question at a time.

    1:04:42 – Personal Statement Gong Show

    Listener Elena is the next Gong Show contestant. Ben and Nathan read her personal statement until they reach an unforgivable mistake—they then ring the gong. The record is 34 lines, set by listener Sophia.

    Want in? Send in your statement by September 1, 2025, to be considered for the Gong Super Show.

    1:07:20 - Word of the Week - Truism

    The standard advice about writing is mostly truisms, like “Make a plan,” “Don’t use the passive,” or “Think of your audience.”

    Get caught up with our ⁠Word of the Week⁠⁠ library.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    1 時間 12 分
まだレビューはありません