A tough listener question pushed us to the heart of a growing divide: should Christians support Israel when many Jews don’t confess Christ and when Israel’s government, like any government, can act wrongly? We roll up our sleeves and trace the argument from bedrock Scripture to real-world policy, aiming for clarity without clichés.

We start where the Bible starts: God’s covenant with Abraham in Genesis 12 and the striking moment in Numbers 22–23 when Balaam cannot curse what God has blessed. From there, we turn to Romans 11, where Paul rejects the idea that God cast off Israel. He calls the church a wild branch grafted into a Jewish root and warns us not to grow proud. Galatians 3 affirms that those in Christ are Abraham’s heirs, yet it never uproots Israel from the story; the picture is a family where we pray for an estranged sibling to come home, not a courtroom where we celebrate a disinheritance.

Then we look at the map. Israel remains America’s most capable ally in the Middle East, a flawed but vital democracy with deep intelligence partnerships and shared security interests. October 7 clarified moral contours that slogans try to blur. Supporting Israel isn’t a blank check; it’s principled alignment with accountability. We can hold leaders to just-war standards, reject terror, and still honor the covenant thread that runs from Abraham to the church without slipping into replacement rhetoric.

If you’ve felt pulled between theology and headlines, this conversation is for you. We dig into Scripture, confront popular narratives, and make space for conscience while defending core truths. If the root is holy, so are the branches—and humility is the right posture for every branch. Listen, share with a friend who’s wrestling with these questions, and if our work helps you think more clearly, follow the show, leave a rating, and tell us where you agree or disagree. Your voice sharpens the conversation.

Support the show

Want a front-row seat to how states can shape the future of freedom? We bring lawmakers and policy pros together for a candid, strategy-rich look at AI guardrails, parental rights, energy security, civics reform, and the life debate—then pair it with spiritual renewal that keeps leaders grounded and brave. This is where model bills, clear frameworks, and practical tactics are forged, tested, and shared across red and blue states alike.

We dig into the AI choices before us: wait for distant bureaucrats to dictate the rules, or lead with American values like privacy, consent, and transparency. From biometric data protections and algorithm accountability to the grid demands of AI growth and the rising push for digital IDs abroad, we map out concrete tools statehouses can use right now. We also explore the civics reset students need—moving beyond trivia to constitutional thinking—and the pro-life framework that anchors complex questions to first principles without losing compassion or legal precision.

Parental rights return as a defining issue, with real implications for curricula, medical consent, and the boundary between families and bureaucracy. We offer drafting tips and policy safeguards that prevent backdoor reversals and keep authority where it belongs. Alongside the hard policy, we speak to the human side of public service: lawmakers working long sessions for little pay, absorbing the heat, and still showing up to defend core liberties. That’s why our conference blends expert briefings with nightly worship and teaching—because courage lasts longer when conviction is nourished.

If you care about AI ethics, constitutional civics, energy resilience, life-affirming policy, and the rights of parents to guide their children, this conversation will equip you to act. Share this with a friend who cares about state leadership, and leave a review with the one issue you think your state must tackle next.

Support the show

A shutdown that no one seems to feel is a political story begging for a plot twist. We sit down with Congressman Barry Loudermilk to unpack why this standoff looks different, how a “clean” continuing resolution became a flashpoint, and what happens when SNAP deadlines collide with Senate filibuster math. The headline isn’t just funding—it’s leverage. When policy riders hitch a ride on short-term spending, the real fight shifts to who controls the agenda months from now and who gets blamed when the lights stay on but trust runs out.

From there we move to the border and a bold claim: treat fentanyl trafficking like an invasion. Barry argues that if a boat carried a nuclear device, we’d intercept it without hesitation; fentanyl kills at a mass scale and funds hostile networks, so interdiction should be just as decisive. That stance raises big questions about presidential authority, authorizations for force, and the risk of escalation. Venezuela enters the frame as both a regime under pressure and a linchpin in the illicit economy, with hints that interdiction is working if offers to trade gold for relief are real. Any deal, he warns, must be verified relentlessly or it’s just a pause button for traffickers.

We close with new angles on January 6. Previously hidden intelligence points to expectations of Antifa embedding, alongside revelations that more than 200 FBI agents were present after the breach—facts not disclosed to courts or defense teams even as some agents contributed to prosecutions. That gap raises serious discovery and credibility issues. The core question becomes unavoidable: with so much intelligence, why wasn’t the Capitol secured? Accountability should land on every actor who failed—violent offenders, yes, but also officials who misled Congress or withheld material facts.

If you care about how budgets shape borders, how borders shape overdose deaths, and how transparency shapes trust, this conversation connects the dots. Share with a friend who follows policy closely, and send us your questions—we may feature it on a future show.

Support the show

A privately funded White House expansion shouldn’t be a five-alarm fire, yet the headlines say otherwise. We dig into the facts behind a proposed East Wing ballroom, why capacity and ceremony matter for diplomacy, and how the people’s house has changed many times before. From Monroe’s portico and Taft’s Oval Office to Truman’s steel-reinforced rebuild, the White House has always evolved to meet new demands. That history matters when judging what’s preservation, what’s progress, and what’s political theater.

We also unpack the spending narrative. Why did taxpayer-funded upgrades in recent years generate little pushback while private dollars for additional capacity spark outrage now? The contrast exposes how media framing shapes public perception. Beyond décor, we focus on function: hosting Congress, governors, and foreign delegations requires space, security, and a setting that reflects American leadership. Scale isn’t vanity when it elevates statecraft and strengthens our diplomatic posture.

Then we turn to the shutdown. With appropriations stalled, a private donor stepped in with $130 million to keep military pay flowing—an extraordinary moment that spotlights priorities and process. We explain how shutdowns reprioritize spending by statute, why defense often remains protected, and how omnibus bills muddy accountability. The founders required Army funding to be renewed every two years for a reason. Clean, single-subject appropriations would put choices on the record and reduce crisis politics.

We close by previewing an upcoming conversation on Venezuela and drug smuggling, connecting national security, executive authority, and fiscal stewardship. If you value clear history, honest budgeting, and practical leadership, this conversation is for you. Follow the show, share it with a friend, and leave a review with your take: preservation, progress, or both?

Support the show

What if our culture’s hottest causes are colliding with the Bible’s clearest assignments? We dive into the contested space where faith meets public life and ask a sharper question: who did God actually task with justice, mercy, and protection—and what happens when we hand those duties to the wrong institution?

We start by mapping jurisdiction. Romans 13 gives government the sword to punish evil and defend the innocent; Scripture gives charity to individuals, families, and the church. That simple divide changes everything about social justice. From the Tower of Babel’s bricks to the image of living stones, we push back on one-size-fits-all systems that flatten human dignity. Then we zoom out to the 613 biblical laws and the Ten Commandments—the tenor of God’s law—to ground public priorities: acknowledge God, protect innocent life, and safeguard property against theft and coveting.

With that foundation, we test modern claims. On poverty, we compare government delivery rates with private charity and surface research connecting higher state welfare with declining church engagement. We highlight a local, relational model of aid that mirrors biblical gleaning: mercy with dignity, participation, and paths out of poverty. On the environment, we separate wise stewardship from policies that elevate creation over people. We examine shifting climate projections and the staggering tradeoffs of spending hundreds of billions for marginal temperature changes while clean water could save millions now.

Throughout, we explain why life and marriage remain top-tier issues—not because other concerns are trivial, but because God’s priorities shape how we order everything else. The takeaway is a roadmap for engaged believers: keep compassion high, keep government within its lane, and keep biblical hierarchy at the center of voting and civic action.

Support the show

Pray, act, endure—three simple words that upend almost everything we’re told about cultural change. We take a hard look at what revival really means in American history and Scripture, and it’s not a weekend tent meeting or an emotional spike. It’s decades of work, sacrifice that leaves a mark, and a public impact you can measure in families, cities, and laws.

We trace the long arc of the Great Awakenings and spotlight George Whitefield’s relentless schedule—thousands of sermons across colonies, a portable pulpit, and a stubborn refusal to quit even when his health broke. That kind of commitment didn’t just fill fields; it formed consciences, inspired soldiers, and even shaped early American policy debates. Revival, we argue, always stirs old-versus-new tensions in the church, crosses denominational lines, and pushes faith into the streets where it changes habits, standards, and expectations.

From there, we get practical. Prayer is the starting line: Scripture calls us to pray first for leaders, and doing that by name turns concern into action. We share simple tools like prayer calendars, strategies for interceding for staff and counselors, and examples of how consistent prayer leads to hands-on engagement. We also tackle measurement: if renewal never moves the needle on public virtue, crime, or integrity in office, it’s not revival—it’s sentiment. And we confront the urge to give up, reminding ourselves that every generation has expected the end, while the command remains to “occupy” with courage and hope.

If you’re ready to trade quick fixes for faithful presence, you’ll find a roadmap here: long-haul prayer, visible action, and mentoring the next generation so convictions outlast us.

Support the show

What if the textbook your child reads in fifth grade quietly rewires how they’ll vote at forty-five? We pull back the curtain on who actually shapes classroom content, why two states can steer a national market, and how a long game—not a last-minute lobby—decides what millions of students learn about America, free enterprise, and the Constitution.

We walk you through the real mechanics of education: state boards setting standards, publishers investing millions, and the ripple effects that follow. Texas and California educate a quarter of the nation’s students, so their standards become the template for everyone else. When California’s budgets and regulations stalled new adoptions, Texas became the main driver. Inside that vacuum, a fierce fight unfolded over what history should emphasize: group identity and constant critique, or a balanced story that includes failures, celebrates individual achievement, and teaches why free markets lifted more people out of poverty than any command economy ever did.

Here’s the part most people miss: votes on standards are won years before the meeting starts. We share the 15-year strategy that flipped a state board from losing 1–14 to winning 10–5, and how that shift restored heroes like Nathan Hale and General Patton, kept Christmas alongside other holidays, and required teaching free enterprise. The takeaway is practical and urgent. If you want better outcomes, go upstream: recruit candidates for school boards and state boards, show up with quality civics materials for Constitution Day and Freedom Week, and use your taxpayer standing to review what gets taught. Homeschool and private school families still have skin in the game—88 percent of future leaders come through public schools.

Support the show

British generals feared their sermons, and John Adams credited them by name. We open the door to a forgotten story: how American pastors shaped the ideas that fueled independence, guided legislators, and ultimately informed the First Amendment’s protections—then connect that legacy to the questions pastors and voters face today.

We walk through the tangible links from pulpit to policy: reprinted sermons that taught equality under God, consent of the governed, and taxation limits long before 1776; clergy who counseled governors, served in congresses, and even held the Speaker’s gavel. From there, we cut through modern confusion about “separation of church and state,” clarifying that the First Amendment restrains Congress, not churches, and was never meant to secularize society. Along the way, we explore why early state bans on clergy in office were short-lived, how Jefferson and Witherspoon defended ministers’ civil rights, and why free exercise means robust moral teaching in public life.

Grounding the conversation in Scripture, we show how Romans 13 names civil rulers as “ministers of God,” how prophets confronted kings with truth, and how Jesus addressed issues we’d now call policy—contracts, marriage, justice. We offer a practical hierarchy for conscience-driven citizenship: public acknowledgment of God, protection of innocent life, preservation of marriage, and respect for private property, with additional biblical guidance on taxes, labor, and courts. We also tackle the IRS chill effect with facts and legal strategy that protect pulpit freedom, encouraging pastors to disciple believers for Monday—not just Sunday.

If you value clear thinking where faith meets freedom, press play and share this with a friend. Tell us which topic your pastor should tackle next.

Support the show