エピソード

  • Kids First: Rethinking Marriage Policy - with Katy Faust
    2026/03/10

    What if the way we define marriage is quietly reshaping childhood—for worse? We open the conversation with a child-first lens and ask the question most debates avoid: does public policy exist to validate adult desires, or to protect a child’s right to both mother and father? Katie Faust, founder of Them Before Us, joins us to explain how the 2015 redefinition of marriage flattened biological reality and turned parenthood into a credential adults acquire, often without the adoption safeguards designed to protect kids. From IVF mandates to loosened parentage rules, she traces how systems now subsidize motherless or fatherless homes by design, measuring success by adult fulfillment rather than child well-being.

    We dig into the data and the vibe shift. Approval among conservatives has dropped as people connect the dots: if sex differences matter on the field and in the clinic, they matter even more at home. Pastors are finding their voice, too—teaching clearly that marriage is a child-serving institution rooted in the complementary gifts of men and women. Katie charts a three-part plan: reframe the public conversation around children’s rights, mobilize the church into a child-centered force, and pursue a legal strategy that changes the court’s question from “Do adults have dignity?”—yes—to “Do children need their own mother and father?” That pivot anchors policy in biology, safeguards adoption as child protection, and resists pathways that bypass rigorous screening.

    Together we spotlight a growing coalition of scholars, faith leaders, and policy groups aligned on one message: don’t touch the kids. We share practical ways to get involved, equip your church, and speak with clarity at home, online, and in your community. If you’re ready to move beyond slogans and defend the smallest stakeholders with facts, conviction, and compassion, this is your roadmap. Subscribe, share with a friend who cares about family and child safety, and leave a review to help more listeners find the show.

    Support the show

    続きを読む 一部表示
    27 分
  • How A Revival Sparked A Revolution - With Joshua Enck
    2026/03/09

    Liberty didn’t start with a vote. It started with a voice. We sit down with Josh Enck of Sight & Sound to explore A Great Awakening, a feature film that puts George Whitfield back in the pulpit and Benjamin Franklin at his press to show how revival prepared the ground for revolution. Rather than retell battlefield moments, we follow an unlikely friendship that helped shape the American mind—pairing Whitfield’s electrifying sermons with Franklin’s genius for print and persuasion—to reveal why cultural change must precede political change.

    Josh shares how a ministry known for epic, immersive stage productions stepped into cinema without losing its soul. The COVID shutdown became a catalyst: a filmed stage show reached more people in a long weekend than two years of sold-out theaters, pushing the team to bring stories to audiences wherever they are. That shift comes with a promise—no shortcuts, no sentimentality—just careful acting, tight scripting, and historically grounded scenes that honor the intelligence of the audience. The result is a throwback to classic, story-first filmmaking that still feels urgent and new.

    We also dig into the film’s core idea of liberty. Not a slogan, not a partisan badge, but a conviction with biblical roots and civic consequences. By tracing Whitfield’s influence across the colonies and Franklin’s role in amplifying it, we connect the Great Awakening to the habits of self-government that made the American experiment possible. Along the way, we talk about reviving the voices of past pastors, the power of print, and why opening-week support matters if we want more films that meet faith and history with excellence.

    Grab tickets at agreatawakening.com and share the trailer with someone who loves bold, character-driven stories about America’s origins. If this conversation moves you, subscribe, leave a review, and tell a friend—let’s put these voices back in the public square.

    Support the show

    続きを読む 一部表示
    27 分
  • Revival Or Awakening
    2026/03/06

    A surge of spiritual interest is sweeping the country, but will it last long enough to change anything? We dig into the hard truth: revivals inspire; awakenings transform. That transformation only happens when people are discipled to live out Jesus’ full teaching, the kind that speaks plainly about marriage, gender, and the purpose of covenant—without losing sight of grace, redemption, and the path back.

    We share encouraging shifts from the pulpit as national voices tackle no-fault divorce and explain why God’s commands are for our flourishing. Then we zoom out to culture and policy. Scouting America announces a slate of reforms—dropping DEI mandates, restoring membership by biological sex, and honoring military families—after high-level pressure to reclaim clarity and standards. Across the Atlantic, Marco Rubio earns applause in Europe by calling leaders back to the shared roots of Western civilization, Christian identity, and actionable security. At home, a key court win in Vermont protects foster families’ religious freedom and common-sense boundaries in a system that desperately needs willing parents.

    Finally, we confront the education paradox: nearly a million more students have left public schools for private, Christian, and homeschool options, even as districts add staff and pass higher costs to taxpayers. We break down what this means for families, classrooms, and local budgets—and how citizens can act. If you’ve been asking how faith can move from Sunday morning to everyday life, this conversation offers a roadmap: discipleship that forms character, engagement that shapes policy, and courage that tells the truth in love.

    If this resonated, share the show with a friend, subscribe for more Good News Fridays, and leave a review to help others find the conversation.

    Support the show

    続きを読む 一部表示
    27 分
  • Why State Of The Union “Responses” Feel Scripted And What History Says About It
    2026/03/05

    A courtroom drama played out in a committee room, and we got a front‑row seat. We break down why Tennessee’s push to post the Ten Commandments in public schools is framed as restoration, not invention, and how a single Supreme Court ruling—Coach Kennedy—quietly dismantled the decades‑old Lemon test that kept faith at arm’s length in public institutions. From Moses carved into the Supreme Court frieze to McGuffey’s Readers in the classroom, we connect the historical dots most civics courses skip.

    Then we pivot to the modern spectacle of the State of the Union and ask a simple question: if the rebuttals are live, why do they feel prerecorded? The answer runs through shrinking sound bites, risk‑averse scripting, and a media environment that punishes context. We dig into the surprisingly short history of formal SOTU responses, the experiments that worked (including conversational formats), and what it would take to make these moments useful again.

    Finally, we explore why members of Congress split by party inside the chamber without any rule requiring it. Human nature, scarce face time, and caucus culture drive the seating map more than procedure does. Drawing on statehouse experience, we look at how mixed seating, mentorship, and daily contact can lower the temperature and raise the quality of debate.

    If you care about constitutional history, religious liberty, legislative culture, and how media incentives shape public life, this is your guide to the moving pieces. Listen, share with a friend who loves policy as much as history, and leave a review so we can keep building smarter conversations together.

    Support the show

    続きを読む 一部表示
    27 分
  • Iran’s Theocracy And The Ballot Box
    2026/03/04

    Headlines about Iran can feel like a blur of missiles, ministers, and moving targets—until you connect the dots between what leaders believe and what nations do. We dive into how Shiite end-times theology influences Iran’s pursuit of power, why “the great Satan” rhetoric matters for strategy, and how surgical strikes against military and clerical leadership could open a narrow window for change. When ideology prizes escalation, containment looks different—and so do the choices free nations face.

    Back home, we unpack a Texas primary night that says a lot about where voters want guardrails. Prop 10’s blowout against Sharia law becomes a pivot point to discuss the deeper role of worldview in public life. We then break down key races across Arkansas, North Carolina, and Texas, contrasting a steady voting record with a lack of fight, and a fighter’s zeal with heavy baggage. Add a polished progressive pastor with strong media chops, and you get a masterclass in electability: narrative, competence, and character colliding in real time.

    The throughline is power you can use today. Primaries are where leverage lives, with lower turnout and higher impact per vote. We share practical ways to research candidates, compare records, and build simple voter guides for your church and neighborhood. If you want better choices in November, start months earlier—clarify your values, study the field, and bring two friends with you to the polls. Subscribe, share this episode with someone who needs a nudge to vote in the primary, and leave a review telling us which race you’ll track most closely this year.

    Support the show

    続きを読む 一部表示
    27 分
  • School Prayer Returns To The Spotlight - with Kelly Shackelford
    2026/03/03

    What changes when a single Supreme Court case rewrites the playbook on faith in public life? We dig into the ripple effects of Coach Joe Kennedy’s victory, which not only vindicated a high school coach’s right to pray but also swept aside the Lemon test that fed government hostility to religion for decades. With that barrier gone, schools and communities now have clearer ground to protect student religious expression, respect teachers’ personal faith, and honor America’s history and traditions without fear or confusion.

    We talk with Kelly Shackelford of First Liberty Institute about the legal momentum reshaping the landscape: Ten Commandments displays returning to public spaces, appellate courts signaling a new era for religious liberty, and updated Department of Education guidance that finally reflects the modern case law. Kelly explains how these changes empower local leaders to act confidently, why historical practice matters in constitutional analysis, and how misinformation about “separation of church and state” still clouds basic rights in classrooms and boardrooms.

    Beyond the courtroom, we spotlight a national call to prayer—an hour a week with ten friends—to re-center hearts and communities. Then we turn to the nuts and bolts of civic influence: strategic voting in low‑turnout primaries, where choosing a viable values-aligned candidate can block bad outcomes and advance lasting change. If you want practical steps, we point you to resources like FirstLiberty.org and RFIA.org, where citizens can find model language, legal backing, and real-world projects to restore faith in their hometowns.

    If this conversation helps clarify your rights or sparks an idea for your school or city, share it with a friend, subscribe for more, and leave a review with your biggest takeaway. Your voice—and your vote—can move the needle.

    Support the show

    続きを読む 一部表示
    27 分
  • How A Preemptive Strike Aims To End A Forever War
    2026/03/02

    Headlines popped, timelines blew up, and a joint operation against Iran became the weekend’s defining story. We dive straight into what actually happened and why it matters: the legal thresholds that govern rapid action, the Gang of Eight briefings, and the intelligence that pushed leaders toward a preemptive strike. Our goal is simple—cut through noise, track the facts, and ask the hard questions about deterrence, proportionality, and whether swift force can prevent a longer war.

    We unpack why some Iranians cheered while Western commentators split, and how selective outrage online can warp public judgment. From reported hits on hundreds of targets to the immediate regional reactions, we connect the operational dots to the broader strategy: neutralize launch sites, degrade terror financing, and avoid the trap of open-ended ground wars. We also revisit a consistent pattern—targeted actions that dismantle hubs of harm, whether tied to state terror or fentanyl pipelines that kill Americans—while keeping the U.S. footprint lean and time-bound.

    But tactics live under bigger ideas. We grapple with the tension between removing leaders and confronting ideologies that recruit replacements. Drawing a line from the Barbary pirates to modern jihadist networks, we explore why force can reset the board yet cannot rewrite the beliefs that motivate violence. That’s where diplomacy, financial pressure, and information efforts must carry weight, turning deterrence into durable stability. If you care about constitutional process, national security, and the difference between decisive action and reckless escalation, this conversation lays out the moving pieces without the spin.

    If this helped you see the story more clearly, follow the show, share it with a friend, and leave a quick review so others can find it too. Your feedback shapes future episodes—what question should we tackle next?

    Support the show

    続きを読む 一部表示
    27 分
  • How Common Sense Is Making A Comeback Across Courts, Sports, And Politics
    2026/02/27

    What if the headlines you’ve been waiting for finally started to land—quietly, firmly, and with a dose of common sense? We walk through a week where the executive branch said “stay in your lane” to the judiciary, a hockey team skated to gold while pointing to faith, and a British voice laid out a plain-spoken roadmap to national renewal. Different stories, same current: courage with boundaries.

    We start with a constitutional gut check. Two federal prosecutors were appointed by judges and immediately let go by the executive—an overdue reminder that prosecutors are executive officers, not judicial staff. That sparks a deeper dive into how Marbury v. Madison is taught versus how Jefferson and Madison actually handled judicial overreach. Instead of treating courts as super-legislatures, we argue for a return to the founders’ design: branches that respect each other’s roles and push back when lines blur. It’s not theory; it’s how a republic stays honest.

    Then the ice heats up. The USA men’s hockey team clinches gold and several players, led by veteran Jacob Slavin, point openly to their Christian faith. Their message is simple and rare: excellence is stewardship, not self-worship. Purpose anchors performance. For parents, coaches, and young athletes, it’s a case study in what happens when conviction meets discipline.

    We wrap with two jolts of practical clarity. Across the pond, a new “Restore Britain” platform calls for enforceable borders, cultural confidence, and a return to Christian heritage—proof that millions crave policies that match reality. And at home, English-only testing for commercial driver’s licenses puts safety over politics; if you’re driving 40 tons on American roads, you should read the signs. If you’ve been looking for signals that institutions can still work, that faith still inspires, and that straight talk still resonates, this one’s for you.

    If this conversation sparked new questions—or a little hope—tap follow, share it with a friend, and leave a quick review. Your feedback helps more listeners find the show and keeps these good stories rising.

    Support the show

    続きを読む 一部表示
    27 分