『The Un-Diplomatic Podcast』のカバーアート

The Un-Diplomatic Podcast

The Un-Diplomatic Podcast

著者: Van Jackson
無料で聴く

このコンテンツについて

Global power politics, for the people. Hosted by Van Jackson, Julia Gledhill, and Matt Duss. The views expressed are theirs alone (not those of any institution or employer).2019 Un-Diplomatic 哲学 政治・政府 政治学 社会科学
エピソード
  • Did Trump End Great-Power Rivalry with China? Tactical Economic Detente Explained | Ep. 269
    2025/11/01

    Xi Jinping and Donald Trump just met in South Korea, agreeing to suspend the most acute aspects of economic warfare for 12 months, lowering US tariffs on Chinese goods, and resuming Chinese purchases of US soybeans. But Dr. Van Jackson explains why the inter-imperialist rivalry between China and the US endures, why talk of a G2 is premature, and what needs to be done to address the structural sources of great-power competition.

    Subscribe to the Un-Diplomatic Newsletter: https://www.un-diplomatic.com/

    Watch Un-Diplomatic Podcast on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@un-diplomaticpodcast

    Disclaimer: The views expressed are those of the individuals and not of any institutions.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    32 分
  • WarGames (part II) w/ Sam Ratner and Andy Facini | Ep. 268
    2025/10/31

    Part II of our crossover episode with The Bang-Bang Podcast! Van and Lyle are joined by Sam Ratner, Policy Director at Win Without War, and Andy Facini, Communications Director at the Council on Strategic Risks, to discuss WarGames, John Badham’s Cold-War techno-thriller that accidentally foresaw the age of algorithmic warfare. What begins as a teenage prank—Matthew Broderick’s David Lightman breaking into what he thinks is a computer game—quickly becomes a meditation on automation, deterrence, and human judgment in systems built to annihilate. Together, the group unpacks how WarGames’ “WOPR” supercomputer prefigures today’s AI decision-making, where machines learn to “take men out of the loop.” They trace how the film’s closing revelation (“The only winning move is not to play”) echoes across four decades of nuclear strategy and modern debates over escalation, autonomy, and control. The conversation ranges from NORAD and machine learning to the moral limits of deterrence, the psychology of Cold-War adolescence, and the comic absurdity of believing one can win an unwinnable game. Like Dr. Strangelove before it, WarGames shows us a military machine that runs on fear, faith, and code, and a civilization learning to live with its own programmed self-destruction.

    Subscribe to the Un-Diplomatic Newsletter: https://www.un-diplomatic.com

    Subscribe to The Bang-Bang Podcast: https://www.bangbangpod.com/

    Further Reading

    Sam’s professional page

    Andy’s professional page

    “Strategy & Conscience (The Book Review We Need),” by Van

    Telehack, a retro internet simulator recommended by Andy

    The Imagineers of War: The Untold Story of DARPA, by Sharon Weinberger

    The Closed World: Computers and the Politics of Discourse in Cold War America, by Paul N. Edwards

    The Doomsday Machine: Confessions of a Nuclear War Planner, by Daniel Ellsberg

    続きを読む 一部表示
    11 分
  • WarGames w/ Sam Ratner and Andy Facini | Ep. 267
    2025/10/28

    Free crossover episode with The Bang-Bang Podcast! Van and Lyle are joined by Sam Ratner, Policy Director at Win Without War, and Andy Facini, Communications Director at the Council on Strategic Risks, to discuss WarGames, John Badham’s Cold-War techno-thriller that accidentally foresaw the age of algorithmic warfare.

    What begins as a teenage prank—Matthew Broderick’s David Lightman breaking into what he thinks is a computer game—quickly becomes a meditation on automation, deterrence, and human judgment in systems built to annihilate. Together, the group unpacks how WarGames’ “WOPR” supercomputer prefigures today’s AI decision-making, where machines learn to “take men out of the loop.” They trace how the film’s closing revelation (“The only winning move is not to play”) echoes across four decades of nuclear strategy and modern debates over escalation, autonomy, and control.

    The conversation ranges from NORAD and machine learning to the moral limits of deterrence, the psychology of Cold-War adolescence, and the comic absurdity of believing one can win an unwinnable game. Like Dr. Strangelove before it, WarGames shows us a military machine that runs on fear, faith, and code, and a civilization learning to live with its own programmed self-destruction.

    Subscribe to the Un-Diplomatic Newsletter: https://www.un-diplomatic.com

    Subscribe to The Bang-Bang Podcast: https://www.bangbangpod.com/

    Further Reading

    Sam’s professional page

    Andy’s professional page

    “Strategy & Conscience (The Book Review We Need),” by Van

    Telehack, a retro internet simulator recommended by Andy

    The Imagineers of War: The Untold Story of DARPA, by Sharon Weinberger

    The Closed World: Computers and the Politics of Discourse in Cold War America, by Paul N. Edwards

    The Doomsday Machine: Confessions of a Nuclear War Planner, by Daniel Ellsberg

    続きを読む 一部表示
    1 時間 13 分
まだレビューはありません