『The TELSIG Podcast』のカバーアート

The TELSIG Podcast

The TELSIG Podcast

著者: Phil Martin
無料で聴く

【Amazonプライム会員限定】今ならプレミアムプランが4か月 月額99円。

10月19日まで。※適用条件あり
Does technology help or hinder learning? How can we make better use of digital tools in teaching? Phil Martin from the University of York dives into the neon-lit underworld of technology enhanced learning through conversations with experts in teaching and learning design. Each episode looks at how educators can stay current with their use of learning tech in this ever-changing landscape.Copyright 2024 All rights reserved.
エピソード
  • Corpus Linguistics and AI Literacy: Reconfiguring Language Learning Ecologies. With Pascual Pérez-Paredes.
    2026/09/23

    What does a reconfigured language learning ecology look like? My guest today, Professor Pascual Pérez-Paredes, argues that AI-driven environments can “expand opportunities for language learning while creating risks related to opacity and over-reliance”.

    We discuss the continued importance of studying real, attested language use through well-designed corpora, enabling evidence-based comparisons and supporting traceable, reproducible research. This, Pérez-Paredes claims, is more important than ever when unreliable, non-evidenced answers from chat bots are just a mouse click away.

    We also discuss corpora in teaching, how AI can make corpus tools more user friendly, costs and local models, and the need for critical AI literacy, open-box pedagogies, and transparency amid increasing synthetic language.

    Further reading

    Pérez-Paredes, P., Curry, N. and Aguado Jiménez, P. (2025) 'Integrating critical corpus and AI literacies in applied linguistics: a mixed-methods study', Computer Assisted Language Learning, pp. 1–27. doi: 10.1080/09588221.2025.2569351.

    Pérez-Paredes, P. (2026) 'Corpus linguistics and AI in the reconfiguration of language learning ecologies', Language Teaching, pp. 1–13. doi: 10.1017/S0261444825101109

    Guest bio

    Pascual Pérez-Paredes is a Professor of Applied Linguistics at Universidad de Murcia, and former Lecturer in Research in Second Language Education at the University of Cambridge. His main research interests are the use of corpus linguistics methods in applied linguistics, corpora and digital resources in language education, learner language variation, and corpus-assisted discourse analysis. He was the Overall Coordinator of the MEd Research Methods Strand at the Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge (2016-2019).

    His most recent books are Corpus Linguistics for Language Learning Research, John Benjamins Research Methods in Applied Linguistics series with co-authors Geraldine Mark & Anne O’Keeffe; Data-driven Learning in and out of the Language Classroom, Cambridge University Press, co-authored with Prof Alex Boulton and //Corpus Linguistics for education. A guide for research// in the Routledge Corpus Linguistics series.

    He is currently PI of the ERASMUS+ project “Freedom of movement at play: EU citizens’ identity and transnational discourses” (2023-2025) funded by the European Commission and PI in the Spanish Research Agency -funded project Broadening the scope of Data-driven learning: a multi-site & multi-data approach.

    Twitter @perezparedes and Bluesky @perez-paredes.bsky.social

    Google Scholar Profile Research Gate Profile

    ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2796-338X

    SCOPUS: https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=26038713600#

    WOS: https://www.webofscience.com/wos/author/record/G-6496-2011

    続きを読む 一部表示
    1 時間 1 分
  • Using GenAI in educational research. With Jasper Roe and Stephen Gow
    2026/08/27
    Today we take a critical look at the promises and pitfalls of using GenAI in educational research. I'm joined by Jasper Roe, Assistant Professor in Digital Pedagogies at Durham University, and Stephen Gow, former Leverhulme Research Fellow at Edinburgh Napier University and lead author of the Student Experiences on Generative AI Project. We discuss Jasper's recent book, How to Use Generative AI in Educational Research, and Stephen's work on an AI assisted scoping review. We talk through the importance of foundational knowledge, how we talk to students about research, opportunities for classroom-based scholarship, efficiency trade-offs, concerns around AI detection, the need for 'humans in the loop', and other topics. Key reading Gow S, Illingworth S (2026), "Dynamic tensions: an AI-assisted critical scoping review of university students' qualitative experiences of GenAI". Artificial Intelligence in Education, Vol. 2 No. 1 pp. 67–89, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/AIIE-06-2025-0151 Roe, J. (2025). How to Use Generative AI in Educational Research. Cambridge: CUP. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009675338 Texts referred to in the conversation Jansson, D.G. & Smith, S.M. (1991) ‘Design fixation’, Design Studies, 12(1), pp. 3–11. doi: 10.1016/0142-694X(91)90003-F. Perkins M, Roe J (2024), "Academic publisher guidelines on AI usage: A ChatGPT supported thematic analysis". F1000Research, Vol. 12 No. 1398, doi: https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.142411.2 Pinochet, L.H.C., Miadaira Hamza, K. & Dwivedi, Y.K. (2026) ‘Editorial: Generative AI, human authorship and the transformation of scholarly communication’, Revista de Gestao, 33, pp. 31–40. doi: 10.1108/REGE-04-2026-0058. Your Undivided Attention (2025) ‘AI and Cancer: Why Superintelligence Won’t Get Us to a Cure’ [Podcast]. Available at: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/ai-and-cancer-why-superintelligence-wont-get-us-to-a-cure/id1460030305?i=1000764657602 (Accessed: 19 August 2026). Guest bios Dr Jasper Roe is a leading scholar in educational technology, artificial intelligence, and academic integrity. He has worked internationally, holding senior leadership positions at universities in Vietnam and Singapore, where he spent over a decade. His mixed-methods research is deeply interdisciplinary, drawing on applied linguistics, corpus and discourse analysis, sociology, and anthropology. Jasper is the author of How to Use Generative AI in Educational Research (Cambridge University Press) and has published over 30 peer-reviewed journal articles in prestigious outlets. He is best known as co-creator of the AI Assessment Scale (AIAS) and is a regularly invited keynote speaker at international conferences and for intergovernmental organisations, including for UNESCO. Some of his work in news media is available at the below links: Channel News Asia https://www.channelnewsasia.com/author/jasper-roe Times Higher Education Campus https://www.timeshighereducation.com/campus/authors/jasper-roe For academic publications please visit his Google Scholar Connect on Linkedin Dr Stephen Gow was the Leverhulme Research Fellow at the Department of Learning and Teaching Enhancement (DLTE) at Edinburgh Napier University. During this role he led the Student Experiences on Generative AI Project (StudentXGenAI), this project carried out the StudentXGenAI Survey with a response rate of over 7,000 students at UK institutions and interviews with students across the UK in addition to integrating GenAI into the research process. He is an expert on academic integrity, assessment and GenAI, and the Chair of the Northern Academic Integrity Forum. He is now associate staff with Department of Education, University of York and available for consultation and research projects related to GenAI in education. He can be contacted at stephen.gow@york.ac.uk or via Linkedin: Stephen Gow | LinkedIn Corrections and clarifications At 44:05, Phil mentions a Linkedin post by Andrew Maynard which describes the production of an academic article from a single-sentence prompt using Claude Opus. Please note: the model used was actually Claude Fable, and the prompt, although short, was more than one sentence. Stephen mentions a paper that cited Jasper about declarations negatively impacting people's trust of research - actually, it is not Jasper but a different Rowe. Full reference for this paper is: Ngwenyama, O. & Rowe, F. (2024) ‘Should we collaborate with AI to conduct literature reviews? Changing epistemic values in a flattening world’, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 25(1), pp. 37–181. doi: 10.17705/1jais.00869. Timecodes 00:00 Introduction 02:10 Jasper’s background and introduction to his book 03:42 Jasper’s Book Focus 05:23 Stephen Gow on GenAI in the scoping review 10:31 Is GenAI helpful, neutral or a hindrance? 14:29 How has Jasper’s approach to ed research changed? 19:05 Impacts on the way we teach research 22:03...
    続きを読む 一部表示
    1 時間 2 分
  • AI assisted writing: Beyond fear and hype. With Sophia Mavridi.
    2026/08/06

    I’m joined by Dr Sophia Mavridi to talk about her doctoral research: Second language students’ experiences of AI-assisted writing in higher education: A phenomenographic perspective. Sophia identifies six broad categories that emerge when observing students’ use of AI assisted writing, and in this podcast we dive into these categories: achieving better grades, expressing ideas more clearly, managing time/workload, habituating academic writing norms (e.g., criticality/reflective writing), increasing interaction, and increasing sophistication.

    We go over inferences and implications of GenAI in student writing, how talk to students about developing a voice, and how we do this ourselves in our own writing, the tension between making your writing distinctive while adhering to academic norms, where we should set expectations for undergrads versus PhD students. Plus: AI slop on Linkedin.

    We also cover Sophia’s paper published last year in Technology in Language Teaching & Learning that critiques institutional responses to GenAI in education including prohibition, avoidance, teacher support, technological enthusiasm, and critical engagement. We discuss directions for language teacher education, including rethinking writing pedagogy, discernment, transparency, teacher educator development, and ethical dilemmas.

    Speaker Bio

    Dr Sophia Mavridi is a Senior Lecturer in Educational Technology and TESOL at De Montfort University (UK). She specialises in digital pedagogy, online learning, and AI in education. She has extensive experience in language teacher education, working with organisations such as the British Council, NILE, and Bell Foundation, and is committed to bridging research and practice.

    https://sophiamavridi.com/

    Further reading

    Watch Sophia’s keynote form the TELSIG symposium earlier this year: Behind the scenes: How students use AI (and what we can learn from it).

    The survey Sophia alludes to at approximately 55 minutes in is the HEPI Student Generative AI Survey.

    Mavridi, S. (2025). Hype, Fear, and Everything in Between: A Critical Typology of Responses to AI and their Implications for Language Teacher Education. Technology in Language Teaching & Learning, 7(2), 103219 Available at: https://doi.org/10.29140/tltl.v7n2.103219

    Timecodes

    00:00 Podcast intro

    01:41 Reflections on the PhD Viva

    04:55 Teacher identity

    08:19 Overview of the PhD research

    09:26 Six AI writing categories

    11:03 Integrity and voice

    14:33 Participants and context

    16:55 Self regulating AI use in writing

    19:33 Students surprising sophistication

    24:45 Struggle in L2 writing

    32:12 Why writing still matters

    38:19 Academic norms versus authorial voice

    44:11 AI and the loss of voice

    49:09 Institutional AI typology

    51:51 Teacher education directions

    57:05 AI detectors and in-class writing

    01:07:30 Tech hype vs pedagogy

    01:11:53 Reading AI research critically

    続きを読む 一部表示
    1 時間 18 分
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
まだレビューはありません