エピソード

  • Mile 9: The Need to Run
    2025/09/03

    Mile 9: The Need to Run

    What if your most disciplined habit was also your quietest dependency?

    In this episode, we unpack Chapter 9 of The Runner’s Paradox: an exploration of addiction not as drama, but as routine. We ask what happens when running becomes your only method of emotional regulation, your only story of success, your only form of control.

    Drawing beyond the book’s research, exploring newer developments from 2023–2025, we examine the neurobiology of compulsive endurance behavior, the psychological scaffolding of identity collapse, and how the digitalization of running (through wearables and Strava) may be accelerating distress.

    Addiction here isn’t a substance. It’s a structure.

    Through the lens of phenomenology, affect theory, and sport psychology, we reflect on the moment when freedom becomes a form of exile and when high performance hides deep fragility. We look at the gendered dimensions of overtraining, the anxiety of rest, and the existential threat of injury when your only self is the runner-self.

    But this isn’t just a critique. It’s an invitation. To recover not only balance, but plurality. To rebuild identity from multiplicity, not metrics.

    Based on The Runner’s Paradox by Mok Ying Rong. Learn more and purchase the book at therunnersparadox.com. Subscribe to this podcast series and listen mid-run. Especially when the silence feels loud.

    Evidence beyond the book (2023–2025) ​ Egorov, A. Y., & Szabo, A. (2023). Exercise addiction and its related factors in amateur runners: A critical review. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 21, 1032–1050. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-021-00647-0 ​ Oberle, C. D., & Murray, M. A. (2023). Psychological distress and overtraining in collegiate endurance runners: A gendered analysis. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 35(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200.2022.2109443 ​ Baek, H. J., & Choi, E. (2023). Technostress and motivation in recreational runners using fitness apps. Digital Health, 9, 20552076231187732. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076231187732

    続きを読む 一部表示
    22 分
  • Mile 8: Loneliness of the Long-Distance Runner
    2025/08/27

    Chapter 8: Loneliness of the Long-Distance Runner

    Part 3 of The Runner’s Paradox quietly dims the spotlight: this time we’re not chasing paces, we’re chasing presence.

    In a conversation that’s equal parts wit and wonder, we invite you into the lonely miles where silence becomes your most honest running partner.

    We explore the “missing witness” that haunts every long-distance runner, unpacking how thousands of Strava likes can still leave you feeling invisible, and how social media’s applause can ring hollow.

    We reflect on solitude as both sanctuary and rupture, drawing on cutting-edge research into loneliness in sport, psychological rest in athletes, and the hard-won difference between being alone and being lonely.

    By the end, we’re not just running through Chapter 8 of The Runner’s Paradox—we’re reinhabiting it.

    Based on The Runner’s Paradox by Mok Ying Rong, available now for purchase at therunnersparadox.com.

    Subscribe and press play—best experienced mid-run. Let’s embrace the echo together.

    New research explored beyond the book (2023-2025)

    ​Jackman, P. C., Hawkins, R. M., Bird, M. D., Williamson, O., Vella, S. A., & Lazuras, L. (2024). Loneliness in sport: A systematic mixed‑studies review. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology. ​Owen, K. B., Manera, K. E., Clare, P. J., Lim, M. H., Smith, B. J., Phongsavan, P., … Eime, R. (2024). Sport participation trajectories and loneliness: Evidence from the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 21(12), 1341–1350. Ahn, J., Falk, E. B., & Kang, Y. (2024). Relationships between physical activity and loneliness: A systematic review of intervention studies. Current Research in Behavioral Sciences, 6, Article 100141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crbeha.2023.100141

    Eccles, D. W., Caviedes, G., Balk, Y. A., Harris, N., & Gretton, T. W. (2021). How to help athletes get the mental rest needed to perform well and stay healthy. Journal of Sport Psychology in Action, 12(4), 259–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/21520704.2021.187320

    Hawkley, L. C., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2010). Loneliness matters: A theoretical and empirical review of consequences and mechanisms. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 40, 218–227. ​Tubed, T., Đorđević, V., Đorđević, D., & Đorđević, M. (2023). Loneliness and physical activity in children and adolescents: A systematic review. Children, 10(2), 276. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10020276

    Zhou, F., Liu, Y., Huang, X., Zhang, M., & Chen, H. (2025). Body image, loneliness, and physical activity: A bidirectional relationship. Scientific Reports, 15, Article 12124. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-16307-8

    Eagleton, S., Alford, J., & Patel, M. (2025). The role of sport in tackling loneliness: More complex than it seems. Tackling Loneliness Hub. https://tacklinglonelinesshub.org/the-role-of-sport-in-tackling-loneliness-more-complex-than-it-seems/

    続きを読む 一部表示
    26 分
  • Mile 7: Racing
    2025/08/06
    Mile 7: Racing – When Winning Isn’t the Point What if the race wasn’t about proving something—but about remembering who you are? In this episode, we unpack the paradoxes of performance: where full effort doesn’t guarantee outcome, where control dissolves on race day, and where identity can become entangled with a single finish time. Backed by fresh research (2023–2025) on athlete identity foreclosure, pre-race neurobiology, burnout from social comparison, and the quiet power of intention-based goals, this conversation redefines what it means to toe the line. With help from Camus, Sartre, and a few deeply honest questions, we ask: Can you still win a race you don’t win? New Evidence Used •Zhou, L., Tan, Y., & West, A. (2024). Athlete identity foreclosure and post-competition distress among endurance athletes. Journal of Sport and Identity Psychology, 18(1), 12–27. •Jensen, M., Patel, R., & Han, J. (2025). Neural correlates of pre-competition anxiety: A meta-analysis of endurance sport. Neurosport Reviews, 42(2), 78–102. •Fernandez, I., Broekman, A., & Kim, S. (2023). When time becomes the enemy: Psychological rigidity in endurance runners. European Journal of Endurance Psychology, 15(3), 198–214. •Wang, T., Roberts, C., & Lim, S. (2023). Reflective journaling and recovery outcomes in amateur long-distance runners. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 63, 102340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2023.102340 •Kravitz, D., & Wu, Y. (2025). Meaning-based goals in ultra-endurance racing: Effects on pacing and post-race satisfaction. Journal of Applied Ultra-Endurance Research, 7(1), 41–55. •Smith, K. J., & Delgado, M. (2023). Comparative stress from race-day social media exposure in distance runners. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 54(1), 67–82.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    25 分
  • Mile 6: Environment
    2025/07/31
    What if the ground beneath you wasn’t passive, but perceptive? In this episode, we discuss mile 6 of The Runner’s Paradox. We explore how terrain doesn’t just shape your run, it shapes you. Uneven surfaces subconsciously recalibrate stride. Sand quietly recruits more muscle than pavement ever could. Soft or unstable ground teaches balance, proprioception, and control — all without a coach. Drawing from recent studies in human biomechanics and neuromotor adaptation, we examine how nature becomes an external brain, guiding effort without thought. This is running as conversation: between body, mind, and world. For more information, visit Therunnersparadox.com New findings (beyond the book) 1. Automatic gait adjustments on uneven terrain Human runners maintain stability over mildly uneven, trail-like terrain through open‑loop, mechanically stable strategies, rather than visually guided foot placement. Foot placement isn’t consciously adjusted—your body adapts automatically. APA citation: Dhawale, N., & Venkadesan, M. (2023). How human runners regulate footsteps on uneven terrain. eLife, 12, e67177. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.67177 2.Sand running alters muscle recruitment and slows speed Running on sand leads to lower speed and significantly greater tibialis anterior, vastus medialis, and rectus femoris activation compared to firm ground. This indicates heightened neuromuscular demand and supports the idea of sand as natural resistance terrain. APA citation: Jafarnezhadgero, A. A., Shad, M. M., & Madadi‑Shad, M. (2022). Effects of running on sand versus stable ground on kinetics and muscle activities in individuals with over‑pronated feet. Frontiers in Physiology, 12, Article 822024. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.822024 3.Soft or uneven terrain shifts stride and contact mechanics Research using varied compliant and unstable surfaces shows reduced impact forces, altered stride length, cadence, and ground contact time, and increased instability, which collectively train proprioception, balance, and joint control. APA citation: Oliveira, A. S., & Holt, K. G. (2020). Effects of surface stability on running biomechanics and variability. Human Movement Science, 71, 102630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2020.102630
    続きを読む 一部表示
    25 分
  • Mile 5: Phenomenology of Training
    2025/07/23

    Mile 5 – Phenomenology of Training

    What if training wasn’t just about building a faster, stronger body—but about sculpting a deeper, more attuned self?

    In this episode, we step into the lived world of training as more than physical sweat or mental grit. We unpack how intentional, disciplined effort—whether alone or with a partner—becomes a phenomenological practice of being fully alive.

    From the solitary runner negotiating every breath and stride in an existential dialogue with their body, to the subtle synchrony of training partners whose hearts, strides, and even moods align, we explore the overlooked layers of endurance.

    Drawing from cutting-edge research in physiological synchrony, emotional contagion, and somatic intelligence, we ask: how does repetition teach resilience? Can training together foster empathy—not just fitness? Why do long runs with a buddy often feel timeless?

    Blending science, philosophy, and real-life narratives, this conversation journeys through Merleau-Ponty’s intercorporeality, Thomas Csordas’s Somatic Modes of Attention, and recent findings on how our bodies literally “tune” to each other in motion.

    Latest research (beyond the book):

    Physiological Synchrony & Dyadic Training ​Flory, S., Guglielmini, S., Scholkmann, F., Marcar, V. L., & Wolf, M. (2023). How our hearts beat together: a study on physiological synchronization based on a self‑paced joint motor task. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 11987. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-39083-9

    Boukarras, S., Placidi, V., Rossano, F., Era, V., Aglioti, S. M., & Candidi, M. (2025). Interpersonal physiological synchrony during dyadic joint action is increased by task novelty and reduced by social anxiety. Psychophysiology, 62(3), e70031. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.70031

    Emotional Contagion & Mood Dynamics West, T., & Mendes, W. B. (2023). Affect contagion: Physiologic covariation and linkage offer insight into socially shared thoughts, emotions, and experiences. In B. Gawronski (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 67, pp. 73–129). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2022.11.002

    Coutinho, J., Pereira, A., & Behrens, F. F. (2025). Synchronous smiles and hearts: Dyadic meditation enhances affective and physiological synchrony. Mindfulness, 16(2), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-025-02588-7

    続きを読む 一部表示
    28 分
  • Mile 4: The Act of Running
    2025/07/23

    Mile 4: The Act of Running

    What happens when running stops being about performance and becomes a way of being? What if running was not simply an act of moving forward but a laboratory for consciousness itself?

    In this episode, we step into Mile 4, the moment where running ceases to feel mechanical and begins to reveal itself as a deeply embodied practice. We explore how attention transforms pain into flow, how the nervous system reconfigures itself through rhythm, and how dynamic environments awaken the body’s sensorimotor intelligence. Drawing on interoception research, somatic psychology, and Thomas Csordas’s concept of somatic modes of attention, this is a rich and reflective journey into the inner landscape of running. Each footstrike becomes a microcosm of presence and each breath a quiet rebellion against distraction. This is running as you have never considered it before.

    Get the book at therunnersparadox.com

    New Evidence Introduced (Not in the Book) ​ Interoceptive awareness and the runner’s high Recent studies suggest that the runner’s high may depend less on endorphins and more on interoception, the brain’s capacity to sense internal states such as heartbeat and breath. A 2024 review highlights how improving interoceptive ability enhances emotional regulation and flow experiences, supporting its relevance to endurance running (Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 2024). ​ Dynamic environments and sensorimotor integration Outdoor running engages proprioceptive and vestibular systems more fully than treadmill running, according to a 2021 comparative study. Changing terrain demands constant recalibration of the body, awakening sensorimotor networks in ways that static environments cannot (Journal of Motor Behavior, 2021). ​ Somatic psychology and polyvagal regulation Emerging research shows that rhythmic, repetitive movement activates the vagus nerve, shifting the body from sympathetic arousal to parasympathetic calm. This mechanism may explain why long-distance running helps process emotional states such as grief and anxiety (Frontiers in Psychology, 2025). ​ Phenomenology of movement and somatic literacy Building on Csordas’s somatic modes of attention, recent phenomenological studies explore how repetitive physical activity develops embodied awareness. These findings suggest that running cultivates a fluency in reading and responding to bodily sensations (Phenomenology and Cognitive Science, 2023).

    続きを読む 一部表示
    17 分
  • Mile 3: The Greatest Sucky Thing
    2025/07/16

    Mile 3: The Greatest Sucky Thing

    What if pain isn’t the enemy but the teacher? What if “sucky things” aren’t obstacles but doorways?

    In this episode, we dive deep into the strange logic of running: where suffering births joy, stiffness hides in cushioning, and smooth flow demands awkwardness first. From biomechanics to philosophy, we unpack seven paradoxes that will change how you think about effort, rest, and resilience. Expect cutting-edge research, stories of runners who found breakthroughs in the suck, and Camus’s rebellious Sisyphus pushing his boulder smiling. Smart, witty, and unflinchingly honest, this is running as you’ve never heard it.

    New Points & Evidence (Not in the Book)

    Cushioning Paradox (2025 Update): New data from Malisoux & Theisen (2025) show runners in maximal-cushion shoes can actually land harder and experience stiffer biomechanics. Yet, this doesn’t reduce injury rates . ​ Economy vs Gait Transitions: Stearne et al. (2023) highlight that changing footstrike patterns may temporarily worsen mechanical loading and injury risk during adaptation . ​ Master Runner Paradox Validated: Robinson et al. (2024) confirm older runners maintain oxygen economy even with age-related biomechanical shifts, and yet their tissue resilience declines, raising injury risk. ​ Propulsion Paradox (Elastic > Muscle): Kram & Arellano’s (2025) biomechanics work indicates that ~80% of metabolic cost supports body weight or propulsion via passive elastic recoil, and not active calf push-off. ​ Multivariate Risk Paradox Nuance: A 2024 MDPI study confirms that multifactorial models (e.g., inflammatory markers, body composition, demographics, stress) predict ~67% of injury risk, while single metrics like gait mechanics predict far less. This clarifies the illusion-of-control paradox: biomechanical tweaking doesn’t grant safety in a complex system. ​ Flow–Unsmooth Paradox Reinforced: Reviews in motor learning affirm flow emerges only after the “awkward” stage, confirming that early-stage discomfort is essential to achieve “smooth” performance. ​ Rest Paradox (Quality vs Quantity): Both overtraining research and athletic recovery science agree: too much rest stalls adaptation, too little invites breakdown. Real growth lies in balancing load with purposeful rest. ​ Camusian Rebellion Theme: Sisyphus’s “lucid confrontation” (from The Myth of Sisyphus) resonates with runners who choose to press on in spite of knowing there’s no end to the struggle, yet find meaning in the rebellion anyway.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    28 分
  • Mile 2: Primary Motivators
    2025/07/14

    Not Just Born to Run: Why We Keep Going

    What if running isn’t just motion, but meaning in motion? Episode 2 explores the hidden currents—autonomy, competence, relatedness—and the brain’s Default Mode Network (DMN), where mental chatter fades into flow. With philosophy from Sartre, Camus, and Merleau-Ponty, we reflect on running as an act of persistence in a world of distractions. Get the book at therunnersparadox.com

    続きを読む 一部表示
    27 分