エピソード

  • Merchants Versus The MATCH List: Why The Threat Of A Lawsuit May Now Be Your Best Approach | PEP083
    2025/11/21

    Imagine being barred from accepting cards overnight—and no one will tell you why. That’s the reality for many merchants placed on MasterCard’s MATCH list, a risk registry that can sink a business while support teams stay silent. We brought managing partner James Huber and senior associate Bryce Vandemore into the studio to unpack what really moves the needle: skipping the endless email chains and going straight to a well-drafted complaint that forces banks and processors to respond.

    We take apart the power dynamics behind the MasterCard MATCH list and explain why a litigation-first strategy now gets merchants faster answers than inquiry letters. We share case patterns, how banks and processors pass the buck, and what it takes to pressure real protocol change.

    • why inquiry letters stall while complaints trigger action
    • how banks, processors and ISOs split duties and avoid blame
    • why MATCH listings cluster by category and tool-driven flags
    • the costs, timelines and leverage of litigation versus waiting
    • how fines and retroactive rule shifts punish compliant merchants
    • the cardholder protection narrative versus merchant reality
    • service gaps between cardholder support and merchant silence
    • risks of cashless policies concentrating control in card rails
    • practical steps to show compliance and push for removal

    We walk through the turning points that led us to a sue-first strategy, why it accelerates dialogue, and how these cases are simpler than most people think. The aim isn’t courtroom theatrics; it’s a clear yes or no so a merchant can reopen accounts and stop the cash burn. Along the way, we map the responsibility maze—banks hold the authority, processors run the operations, and both often cite “internal policies” or “ongoing investigations” while providing no reason code. We also call out category-wide crackdowns and retroactive fines, from peptide vendors to weight-loss products, where compliant businesses are swept up in blanket MATCHing with little transparency.

    You’ll hear how the “we protect cardholders” message can mask a deeper incentive to protect the networks themselves, creating a stark service gap: cardholders get fast remediation and live help, while merchants hire counsel just to learn what happened. We dive into the rise of cashless policies and what it means when the only way to transact funnels through private rails that can exclude you without a hearing. Our goal is practical and focused—push for protocol change, document compliance, pressure timely reviews, and establish a credible path off MATCH when errors occur.

    If you’re a merchant, ISO, or in-house counsel navigating MATCH, this conversation gives you the current playbook: where to start, how to apply pressure, and what outcomes are realistic. Subscribe for more merchant-first insights, share this with a colleague who’s stuck on MATCH, and leave a review with your questions so we can tackle them next.

    **Matters discussed are all opinions and do not constitute legal advice. All events or likeness to real people and events is a coincidence.**

    Visit us today: https://www.globallegallawfirm.com/podcasts/

    A payments podcast of Global Legal Law Firm

    続きを読む 一部表示
    25 分
  • M&A Tech Diligence for Payments: The “Technical Carfax” You Need | Meet Traceless.com | PEP082
    2025/11/17

    Social Engineering Beats Your Stack: Fix Identity or Get Breached

    A single phone call to a help desk shouldn’t sink a global brand—yet it happens. We dig into how social engineering bypasses expensive tools, why identity verification matters at the exact human moments work gets done, and how to measure cyber risk before it becomes tomorrow’s headline. With Peter Segerstrom of Traceless (https://traceless.com/) —a CTO turned advisor who’s audited stacks for acquisitions and built teams from a spare bedroom to scale—we unpack the messy reality of software in payments and fintech: open‑source dependencies, brittle architectures, migrations that stall, and the quiet warts you inherit when you buy code along with revenue.

    Christopher Dryden, Esq., traces with Peter how a simple phone call can topple complex systems and why identity verification sits at the heart of modern security. Peter shares a CTO’s view on auditing tech in payments M&A, grading risk, and building Traceless to protect real transactions in real time.

    • social engineering as a primary breach vector
    • why tech diligence now drives payments and fintech M&A
    • lessons from scaling a startup to operational maturity
    • auditing architecture, dependencies and maintainability
    • open source as foundation and risk surface
    • risk grading frameworks buyers can act on
    • what cyber risk means for vendors and SaaS reliance
    • real‑time identity verification for help desks and workflows
    • AI as force multiplier for attackers and defenders

    We walk through the practical M&A playbook: inventory the stack, map data flows, assess maintainability, and grade risks so executives can decide what to fix, mitigate, insure, or avoid. Peter explains how a “technical Carfax” reframes negotiations, saving buyers from hidden liabilities and helping sellers prepare cleanly. We also talk vendor risk and why relying on major SaaS platforms can be safer than running your own server—while still demanding least privilege, strong logging, and incident plans that assume someone will eventually pick the wrong link or trust the wrong voice.

    Then we widen the lens to Traceless and the identity problem at the core of modern breaches. Real‑time verification for customers, partners, and employees closes the easiest door attackers use: impersonation. From teenager pranksters to nation‑state zero‑days, the threat spectrum is wide, and AI now powers both sides—faster phishing and reconnaissance for attackers, smarter analysis and stress testing for defenders. The takeaway is clear: build verification into business workflows, treat architecture as a living system, and make risk visible with honest grading.

    If this conversation helps you think differently about due diligence and operational resilience, follow the show, share it with a colleague, and leave a quick review so more people can find it.

    **Matters discussed are all opinions and do not constitute legal advice. All events or likeness to real people and events is a coincidence.**

    Visit Global Legal Law Firm today: https://www.globallegallawfirm.com/podcasts/

    A payments podcast of Global Legal Law Firm

    続きを読む 一部表示
    29 分
  • Hemp Ban Shockwave: Why A Quiet Hemp Rule Could Upend Electronic Payments Overnight | PEP081
    2025/11/14

    Hemp Ban Fallout: How Policy Whiplash Hits Payments, Portfolios, and Merchants. Hosted by Global Legal Law Firm Managing Partner James Huber and Senior Associate Attorney Bryce Van De Moere

    A sudden hemp or cannabinoid ban doesn’t just change SKUs—it detonates risk models, freezes reserves, and scrambles underwriting across entire portfolios. In this episode, we unpack how shifting federal–state rules, card-brand policies, and retailer enforcement create a perfect storm for ISOs, PayFacs, acquirers, and merchants operating anywhere near hemp, CBD, delta-8/10, or “functional” products.

    We move past the headlines to the operational reality: MCC assignments that suddenly look “high-risk,” sponsor banks tightening controls, BIN-level pressure driving early enforcement, and offboarding protocols that leave merchants without token access or refund options. If you own portfolio exposure—or sell into these verticals—this conversation gives you a realistic way to protect revenue without inviting regulatory heat.

    What’s at stake

    Portfolio shock: Rapid policy shifts drive reserve hikes, rolling holds, and frozen payouts that cascade across portfolios.

    Regulatory overlap: Farm Bill ambiguity, state AG actions, and network rules collide—leaving merchants compliant in one lane and out of bounds in another.

    Processor posture: Heightened KYC/KYB, product-level reviews, and SKU scanning that turn “low-touch” boarding into ongoing surveillance.

    Litigation vectors: Deceptive practices claims, labeling variance, age-gating failures, and unfair competition allegations—often leveraged after a payment cutoff.

    What we cover (practical and tactical)

    Mapping the risk perimeter: Hemp vs CBD vs delta-8/10; how labeling, THC thresholds, and packaging claims change your risk category overnight.

    Underwriting changes you’ll actually see: Document asks, site/photo audits, ingredient attestations, SKU-level approvals, and re-verification cadences.

    Card-brand rules in practice: What “permitted with restrictions” means for your receipts, disclosures, and refund timelines; when MCC re-codes are necessary.

    Offboarding without chaos: Token portability, refund runways, age-verified customer lists, and inventory liquidation strategies that reduce complaints and chargebacks.

    Dispute defense in gray zones: Evidence sets that win (COAs, batch IDs, age verification logs, delivery confirmation) and when “refund first” beats “fight first.”

    Ops knobs you can turn today: BIN rules, shipping blacklists by state, adult-signature requirements, SKU-specific routing, and refund automation triggers.

    Alternative rails, done right: Where ACH/pay-by-bank and wallets help—and where they create new compliance workstreams and reconciliation debt.

    Field stories and failure modes

    MATCH and mislabeling: How a single mislabeled product can trigger portfolio-wide scrutiny and a five-year hangover if records aren’t corrected fast.

    Secret-shopper reality: Entry signage, web product pages, cart disclosures, and line-level receipts—why “register-only” notice is a fine magnet.

    Stacked fines and common ownership: How assessments replicate across related entities when documentation and SKU controls are inconsistent.

    A usable playbook for payments teams

    Re-verify your book: Run a hemp/cannabinoid sweep—SKU lists, labeling, COAs, age gates, shipping lanes, and ad claims.

    Board with attestations: Product-category, labeling compliance, age-gating, shipping lanes, and refund policies—signed and renewed on cadence.



    **Matters discussed are all opinions and do not constitute legal advice. All events or likeness to real people and events is a coincidence.**

    Visit us today: https://www.globallegallawfirm.com/

    A payments podcast of Global Legal Law Firm

    続きを読む 一部表示
    18 分
  • Debit Is Not Credit (But Is It Cash?) | The Compliance Rule ISOs & Merchants Keep Missing | PEP080
    2025/11/11

    From Surcharging To Dual Pricing: How Small Businesses Stay Compliant And Keep Customers

    Hidden fees at checkout aren’t just frustrating—they’re risky. We dive straight into the real-world mechanics of pricing programs that merchants use to offset card costs and explain why the lines between surcharging, cash discounting, and dual pricing aren’t as blurry as they seem. The rule of thumb is simple: debit changes everything. We break down how debit restrictions affect convenience retail, why state deceptive trade practices laws can trump card brand tolerance, and how New York and New Jersey have become the practical playbook for clear, compliant disclosure.

    Compliance Is A Service: Make Pricing Clear, Protect Margins, Earn Trust

    Join Leo Arzumanyan, Esq., and Jeremy Stock, Director of Operations of Global Legal Law Firm host Hahdi Hussein of Supersonic POS (https://supersonicpos.com/) unpack how dual pricing, surcharging, and cash discounting differ, why debit cards change the rules, and how state laws like New York’s 518 make clear shelf labeling non-negotiable. We also explore AI’s real impact on POS, inventory, and L3 data, and why ethical, community-first selling beats poaching through complaints.

    • differences between surcharging, cash discounting, and dual pricing
    • why debit rules make or break compliance in C-stores
    • state deceptive trade practices and junk fee scrutiny
    • New York and New Jersey as practical compliance baselines
    • shelf labeling, signage, menus, and customer-facing displays
    • ethical sales versus secret shopper poaching
    • gas stations as the dual pricing template
    • AI for inventory ingestion, pricing, and level 3 data
    • guardrails for AI to prevent hallucinations and errors
    • Supersonic POS capabilities, industries, and US/Canada reach
    • roadmap highlights: pay at the pump and e-commerce

    From there, we get tactical. You’ll hear how to implement dual pricing the right way: post two prices where buying decisions happen, align shelf labels and menus with receipts, and avoid last-second surprises disguised as “service fees.” We talk through the messy realities of C-stores with thousands of SKUs, the limits of customer-facing displays, and the operational discipline needed to keep labels current. We also confront an ugly trend—agents soft-reporting noncompliant merchants to poach accounts—and offer a better path: fix the issues, earn trust, and grow your book by protecting small businesses from fines.

    We also explore how AI is reshaping POS and compliance. From ingesting invoices to auto-build product catalogs to translating receipts into valid Level 3 data and supporting underwriting and website monitoring, AI can make teams faster and more accurate—if you set guardrails to avoid hallucinations. Our guest from Supersonic POS shares what’s live today, what’s next—pay at the pump, e-commerce, age-restricted delivery—and why being processor-agnostic and ISO-friendly matters for long-term partnerships.

    If you care about transparent pricing, customer trust, and durable margins, this conversation gives you a clear roadmap. Subscribe, share with a peer who needs a compliance reset, and leave a review with your toughest pricing question so we can tackle it next.

    **Matters discussed are all opinions and do not constitute legal advice. All events or likeness to real people and events is a coincidence.**

    Visit us today: https://www.globallegallawfirm.com/

    A payments podcast of Global Legal Law Firm

    続きを読む 一部表示
    25 分
  • Dual Pricing v Cash Discount: Surcharging Mistakes That Trigger Fines | with Supersonic POS | PEP079
    2025/11/05

    Cash Discount ≠ Compliance: Dual Pricing, Debit, and the MATCH Hangover (with Mahdi Hussein, Supersonic POS) (https://supersonicpos.com/)

    Ever been told “it’s just a cash discount” only to have a secret shopper’s photos tell a different story? This episode strips the buzzwords down to the brass tacks payments professionals actually live with: the legal and operational differences between dual pricing, cash discounting, and surcharging—and why debit sits in its own lane under Durbin whether your signage acknowledges it or not.

    Our guest Mahdi Hussein (Supersonic POS) joins Leo Arzumanyan, Esq., and Jeremy Stock of Global Legal Law Firm, in-studio to connect the dots from family-run C-stores, to building Petro Outlet for cloud price changes and pump-side loyalty, to launching a POS designed to make modern compliance operationally repeatable across everyday merchants.

    What really happens when compliance meets the real world

    The “cash discount” claim vs. the camera roll: What auditors and secret shoppers actually capture—entry signs, shelf/menu pricing, register signage, and line-level receipts—and why “register-only disclosure” fails.

    Debit is not credit: How Durbin and network rules isolate debit from surcharging, common BIN-misclassification pitfalls, and the terminal settings that prevent frontline overrides.

    Dual pricing done correctly: Two posted prices everywhere the customer sees a price, consistent with receipts and POS programming—not a fee bolted on at checkout.

    Cash discounting done correctly: Posted card price as the standard price; true discount for cash; disclosure where it matters (not just fine print).

    MATCH, fraud, and the five-year shadow

    Mahdi walks through a hard lesson: a fraudulent merchant account opened in his company’s name triggered a MATCH placement that shut processing down overnight. We unpack:

    The paper trail that fixes records (police reports, identity theft affidavits, ISO/acquirer correspondence) and why diligence must be relentless.

    How some fraudsters re-file as soon as the five-year term expires, and what monitoring and controls you need to detect and preempt repeat abuse.

    Why automated notices and “we’re looking into it” updates don’t undo operational damage when acceptance disappears for weeks.

    The new risk stack: compliance risk beside credit risk

    State law curveballs vs. network rules: Examples like Minnesota’s higher caps or New York’s two-tier requirements colliding with Visa/Mastercard caps and signage expectations. The default: operate to the strictest overlapping standard.

    Fines that stack and escalate: How separate entities with common ownership see assessments multiply; why remediation lag can push penalties from $1,000 to $5,000+ rapidly.

    Opaque reporting and “enforcement by screenshot”: How incomplete data invites abuse, and what evidence packets actually de-escalate a case.

    POS and program design that actually holds up

    BIN-aware configuration: Enforce debit exclusion, hard-cap surcharge percentages by brand, and fail-safe rules that a clerk can’t override.

    Receipt and signage automation: Default, non-deletable receipt footers; location-specific sign templates tied to the active pricing model; menu/shelf labels that reflect cash vs. card pricing.

    Cost-of-acceptance discipline: Align surcharge/dual pricing amounts to provable acceptance costs; audit monthly so amounts don’t drift out of compliance.



    **Matters discussed are all opinions and do not constitute legal advice. All events or likeness to real people and events is a coincidence.**

    Visit us today: https://www.globallegallawfirm.com/podcasts/

    A payments podcast of Global Legal Law Firm

    続きを読む 一部表示
    23 分
  • Taming Chargebacks With Real AI Agentics | Special Industry Insider ChargeFlow & Ben Herut | PEP078
    2025/11/03

    Taming Chargebacks With Real AI Agentics

    Too many merchants breathe easy under legacy chargeback ratios, only to be blindsided when their PSP tightens the screws. We sit down with Ben Herut, co-founder at ChargeFlow, (https://www.chargeflow.io/) to unpack the shift toward post-payment risk and why Visa’s VAMP is forcing acquirers and processors to act earlier—and harder—on portfolio-level exposure. If you rely on card rails for growth, this conversation shows how to protect revenue without clobbering conversions.

    We trace Ben Harut’s path from engineering to payments risk and dig into how ChargeFlow uses post-payment data, alerts, and AI-driven workflows to cut chargebacks and protect revenue. We also break down Visa’s VAMP, why PSP thresholds change the game, and how merchants should respond.

    • career path from engineering to payments risk
    • bank-side underwriting, KYC, fraud and chargebacks
    • founding in high-risk and lessons learned
    • what ChargeFlow does post-payment and pre-fulfillment
    • risk scoring using cross-merchant and outcome data
    • handling alerts including TC40 and RDR
    • strategies to refund or fight disputes
    • AI agents for representment and QA feedback loops
    • what VAMP changes for acquirers and PSP thresholds
    • portfolio-level risk, BIN pressure, and early enforcement
    • why proactive prevention protects processing access

    We start with Ben’s journey from electronics engineering to bank-side risk, through launching an EMI in the high-risk space. That experience shapes a practical view: fraud prevention cannot end at authorization. ChargeFlow focuses on the critical window after approval and before fulfillment, where merchants can use post-payment data, cross-merchant signals, and scheme alerts like TC40 and RDR to flag risky orders, request verification, or cancel before losses mount. For digital goods and financial products, we explore how delayed access flows and behavioral patterns unlock smarter decisions than blanket declines.

    When disputes hit, evidence wins. Ben explains how AI agents compress months of training into days, assembling compliant, precise representments and feeding results back into models. The goal isn’t buzzword AI; it’s a genetic workflow with guardrails, explainability, and QA loops that cut manual work and raise win rates. We also compare refund-first versus fight-first strategies, and where high-value transactions justify the extra effort.

    Then we tackle VAMP’s impact. Even “safe” merchants can trigger portfolio pressure at the BIN level, prompting PSPs to hold payouts, request mitigation plans, or offboard accounts. Understanding tighter PSP thresholds, modeling risk appetite, and staying current with card scheme changes are now core operating skills. Whether you sell physical products or digital access, the path forward is clear: centralize post-payment risk scoring, handle alerts with discipline, and standardize dispute workflows so your team can focus on growth.

    If this episode helps clarify your approach to chargebacks, subscribe, share with your ops or finance team, and leave a quick review—what’s your stance today: refund or fight?

    **Matters discussed are all opinions and do not constitute legal advice. All events or likeness to real people and events is a coincidence.**

    Visit Global Legal Law Firm today:
    https://www.globallegallawfirm.com/podcasts/

    A payments podcast of Global Legal Law Firm

    続きを読む 一部表示
    15 分
  • Why Your “Cash Discount” Program Might Be Illegal | Surcharging Dual Pricing and Debit | PEP077
    2025/10/30

    Surcharging, Dual Pricing, and Debit: The Compliance Traps No One Warns You About

    Hidden fees, stacked fines, and a maze of rules—merchant pricing isn’t just a line on a receipt, it’s a legal and operational minefield. We dive into the real differences between dual pricing and cash discounting, why debit transactions should not be treated like credit, and how a simple surcharge can trigger state law violations, card brand penalties, and even deceptive practices claims. Along the way, we share field stories: demand letters over 45 cents, opaque reporting that invites abuse, and fines that stack across separate entities with common ownership.

    Global Legal Law Firm team members Christopher Dryden, Leo Arzumanyan, and Jeremy Stock, unpack how dual pricing, cash discounting, and surcharging collide with card brand rules and state laws, and why debit often gets treated unfairly. We share real cases of opaque fines, stacked penalties, and deceptive practices demand letters, then lay out a practical playbook to get compliant and stay there.

    • dual pricing versus cash discounting and consumer clarity
    • state-by-state rules and conflicting caps
    • debit costs and the “actual cost” requirement
    • opaque enforcement and reporter abuse
    • deceptive practices laws and demand letters
    • small merchant burden and stacked fines
    • technology limits in POS compliance
    • a practical compliance playbook and documentation
    • why proactive guidance reduces risk

    We walk through a clear framework to cut through the confusion. First, understand what your state actually permits and where those permissions conflict with card brand caps. Second, build a pricing model that reflects “actual cost,” especially for debit, and make sure your disclosures are clear and conspicuous on menus, signs, and receipts. Third, pressure test your POS settings: can it identify card types and apply rules correctly, or will your “simple” setup create non-compliance at scale? Documentation, staff training, and routine audits matter as much as the pricing model itself.

    Our goal is to replace guesswork with a practical playbook that reduces risk while maintaining customer trust. Whether you run a single restaurant or manage multiple entities, you’ll learn how to choose between dual pricing and cash discounting, align with the strictest overlapping standard, and prepare for scrutiny from card brands, regulators, and plaintiffs’ attorneys. If you have a story about unclear enforcement or surprising fines, share it with us—we’re collecting real-world cases to push for clarity. If this conversation helps, subscribe, leave a review, and pass it to someone who handles pricing or compliance on your team.

    **Matters discussed are all opinions and do not constitute legal advice. All events or likeness to real people and events is a coincidence.**

    Visit us today: https://www.globallegallawfirm.com/podcasts/

    A payments podcast of Global Legal Law Firm

    続きを読む 一部表示
    22 分
  • Candor Over Clever: The Sales Edge Most In Payments Ignore | Field Guide for ISOs & Agents | PEP076
    2025/10/28

    Candor Over Clever: How Honesty, Software, and Solid Contracts Build Real Payments Businesses

    In a market where scripts and “solutions” blur together, candor is the unfair advantage. This episode features JJ Sedor of Paymint Solutions (https://www.paymintinc.com/)—a former construction-business owner turned ISO CEO—who wins by telling the truth, learning faster than rivals, and leading with software that actually fixes merchant problems. Join Christopher Dryden, and Jeremy Stock hosting JJ to break down how saying “I don’t know, but I’ll find out” disarms resistance, opens real discovery, and builds trust that survives pricing pressure. This is a field guide for agents, ISOs, PayFacs, and fintech operators who want durable growth, not churn.

    From Job Sites to Merchant Counters: Transferable Skills That Win Deals

    JJ maps the surprising overlap between running remodels and running payments projects: scoping, sequencing, clear milestones, and proactive communication. Door-knocking anxiety nearly derailed him; what saved him was acting before he felt “ready,” then operationalizing every lesson. Confidence followed competence—and competence came from doing installs, touching terminals, and walking the workflow with the merchant.

    If You’re Not Selling Software, You’re Selling a Commodity

    Modern acquiring is software-led. JJ shows how integrations with accounting, inventory, and POS unlock time savings merchants can feel: reconciliation, real reporting, faster cash, cleaner training. Lead with outcomes, not features. Translate “API” into “fewer clicks and fewer callbacks.” The result: stickier portfolios, lower support drag, and margins that survive rate-shopping.

    Contracts Decide Tomorrow’s Revenue—Not Just Today’s Close

    Newcomers miss the fine print. We unpack the traps that bury future earnings:

    Residuals: Watch for clawbacks, one-sided true-up language, and vague net definitions.

    Exclusivity and non-solicit: Keep them narrow, time-boxed, and tied to real consideration.

    Reporting: Monthly, line-item detail that lets you verify your split—no “trust us” clauses.

    Termination: Define cause, cure periods, data hand-off, and residual survivability.

    Legal review isn’t overhead—it’s risk control. The right ISO alignment protects both sides and prevents relationship drift when people change or priorities shift.

    The Sales Operating System: Practical Tactics You Can Use Today

    Lead with candor: “Here’s what this does, here’s what it doesn’t, here’s the tradeoff.” Credibility beats clever.

    Do the work on-site: Touch the hardware, map the workflow, document the current stack. Solve a real pain in the first week.

    Sell the integration, not the widget: Demo the end state—“close batch, auto-post, reconcile”—not the menu tree.

    Standardize discovery: Ten questions that surface risk, compliance gaps, and must-have integrations before you quote.

    Instrument your portfolio: Track install-to-activation lag, support ticket drivers, and save reasons. Close the loop monthly.

    Confidence Without the Spin: A Culture That Compounds

    Knowledge compounds when you share it. JJ’s rule: teach the playbook, build a bench of mentors, and reward the person who asked the tough question—because that question saved ten others. Teams that hoard information burn out; teams that publish internal “how-to”s and run weekly debriefs scale.

    What You’ll Learn in This Episode

    Moving from construction to payments and transferring customer skills into process and project management

    Overcoming doorknocking fear and building “Teflon” confidence through reps and real merchant work



    **Matters discussed are all opinions and do not constitute legal advice. All events or likeness to real people and events is a coincide

    A payments podcast of Global Legal Law Firm

    続きを読む 一部表示
    22 分