The Moment a Catholic Apologist Destroyed His Own Argument | Weighed in the Balance Ep. 36
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
カートに追加できませんでした。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
The Moment a Catholic Apologist Destroyed His Own Argument | Weighed in the Balance Ep. 36
-
ナレーター：
-
著者：
このコンテンツについて
Send us a text
Catholic apologist Joe Heschmeyer just made a stunning admission — and he probably didn’t even realize it. In this episode of Weighed in the Balance, Jonathan Brooks reacts to Heschmeyer’s claim that the Bible’s canon was known long before it was ever “infallibly defined.” What does that mean for Rome’s argument that Protestants need an infallible Magisterium to know which books belong in Scripture? Jonathan breaks it all down with sharp analysis, historical insight, and a bit of irony that you won’t want to miss.
Timestamps
00:00 – The “Worst” Catholic arguments ranked
03:15 – Assurance of salvation and confusion with “once saved, always saved”
08:00 – Why Protestants say “Roman Catholic” instead of “Catholic”
13:00 – The real meaning of the Whore of Babylon
16:00 – Did Rome really kill millions in the Dark Ages?
20:00 – Did Catholics add books to the Bible?
26:00 – The line Joe Heschmeyer shouldn’t have said
27:15 – Why his admission undercuts Rome’s entire canon argument
Support the show
Do you think this claim is found wanting? Let us know on social!!
Click here to find us everywhere!!