Send us a text

Safety doesn’t take a holiday when budgets tighten or tempers flare. We open up about a tough season, the quiet grief many are carrying, and why small fractures in everyday connection can ripple into big risks at the bench. From cashierless cafeterias to self-checkout lanes, those missing micro-moments of human contact show up in the lab as thinner patience, weaker trust, and slower recovery when mistakes happen. That’s exactly where we focus: how to restore the muscle of respectful disagreement so safety and science can stand together.

We get practical about conflict in tight lab spaces. Think of “relationship first” as a core control, not a soft skill. You’ll hear ways to build credibility before you need it—quick check-ins, naming pressures without judgment, and framing safety asks around shared outcomes like fewer reworks and steadier turnaround times. We also share simple phrases that de-escalate heat on the spot: “help me understand,” “what risk are we accepting,” and “what makes this safe enough to try.” These tools turn disagreement from a productivity drain into a learning loop.

With the government shutdown squeezing support systems, we dig into resilience: dusting off emergency plans, verifying critical inventories, mapping backup suppliers, and protecting high-value controls like engineering barriers and biosafety equipment. We challenge the false trade-off that treats safety as optional when money is tight. Science is essential—and so is the safety that keeps it running. By separating hot-button talk from active procedures and parking disputes that distract from tasks, teams preserve attention where it matters most.

If you care about lab safety culture, conflict that doesn’t cost focus, and keeping operations steady under pressure, this conversation is for you. Subscribe, share with a colleague who needs fresh language for tough moments, and leave a review with one practice your team uses to disagree without risking the work.

Send us a text

The laboratory safety landscape has transformed dramatically over the decades, yet many challenges persist in creating truly safe working environments. This eye-opening conversation between Dan Scungio and Sean Kaufman delves into the startling history of laboratory practices that once seemed normal but would horrify modern safety professionals.

Dan shares shocking stories from his early career in the 1990s, when students were given "spit strings" to mouth-suction body fluids for testing, and laboratory technicians routinely worked without basic protective equipment. These historical snapshots reveal how far laboratory safety has progressed, while highlighting the persistent challenge: getting laboratory professionals to embrace current safety standards rather than being satisfied that practices are simply "better than before."

The conversation takes a thought-provoking turn when Sean challenges listeners to consider whether absolute rules always serve safety best. He introduces the concept of "practical safety" – acknowledging that laboratories in resource-limited settings may need flexible approaches that focus on risk mitigation rather than rigid adherence to standards designed for well-equipped facilities. This nuanced perspective doesn't excuse unsafe practices but recognizes that safety professionals must sometimes help laboratories do the best they can with available resources.

Both hosts emphasize the critical importance of human factors in laboratory safety, referencing the WHO's 2020 biosafety manual statement that "the best designed and most well-engineered laboratory is only as good as its least competent worker." This recognition shifts focus from engineering controls to behavior, training, and leadership accountability as the most crucial elements in preventing laboratory-associated infections and exposures. The discussion concludes with a heartfelt invitation for listeners facing safety leadership challenges to reach out for support in protecting their valuable laboratory professionals.

Send us a text

The weight of responsibility in laboratory safety can be crushing. Between emergencies disrupting your carefully planned day, colleagues who seem determined to argue with every safety measure, and the peculiar invisibility of successful prevention efforts, it's no wonder safety professionals often feel isolated and undervalued.

Sean opens this heartfelt episode by sharing the loss of his friend Ellen, a laboratory safety professional who was experiencing significant job-related distress shortly before her passing. This profound moment serves as a gateway into exploring the emotional and psychological challenges that safety professionals face daily. Dan adds his perspective, describing how safety work can feel thankless and lonely, especially when you feel like you're the only one who truly cares about preventing accidents and injuries.

A critical misconception many safety professionals carry is believing they must personally enforce all safety measures – essentially functioning as the "safety police." Sean emphasizes that this mindset is fundamentally flawed: "Safety professionals' job is to say I see something here that concerns me, I'm raising a flag, I'm raising an alert." The responsibility for driving organizational change rests with leadership, not with individual safety personnel. By reframing this understanding, safety professionals can shed unnecessary burden and focus on their true role as advisors and advocates.

Professional coaching emerges as a valuable solution for those navigating these challenges. Unlike counseling, which examines past events, coaching focuses on forward movement and goal achievement. Sean describes his approach of daily 15-minute sessions spread across four days each week, creating bite-sized opportunities for growth and reflection. This methodology recognizes that our thought patterns become habitual, just like behaviors, and that sustainable change requires consistent attention over time.

Reach out to us through our websites if you're struggling with safety challenges or feeling overwhelmed. We're committed to supporting laboratory safety professionals not just through information, but through personal connection and encouragement.