『The Generalist』のカバーアート

The Generalist

The Generalist

著者: Mario Gabriele
無料で聴く

【Amazonプライム会員限定】今ならプレミアムプランが4か月 月額99円。

10月19日まで。※適用条件あり
“The future is already here. It’s just not evenly distributed.” The Generalist Podcast brings you weekly conversations with the people who live in these pockets of the future – visionary founders, prescient investors, and original thinkers. Each episode is designed to introduce you to new ideas, technologies, and markets and help you prepare for the world of tomorrow.Mario Gabriele
エピソード
  • Jaan Tallinn would like us to survive
    2026/10/08
    Jaan Tallinn is a founding engineer of Skype and Kazaa, and a co-founder of the Cambridge Centre for the Study of Existential Risk and Future of Life Institute. For more than fifteen years, he has been among the most consistent voices arguing that advanced AI poses an extinction-level risk to humanity.Jaan became interested in AI risk in 2008 after reading the work of Eliezer Yudkowsky, a founding researcher of the field of AI alignment. In 2009, after a four-hour meeting with Yudkowsky, he made his first donation to what became the Machine Intelligence Research Institute (MIRI). He went on to become an early investor in DeepMind and led the first round into Anthropic – despite believing that AI development, if unchecked, could kill us all. His reasoning: his money displaced VC money rather than bringing Anthropic into existence, and the influence and proceeds that come with it help fund safety work.In this conversation, we explore what Jaan believes the OpenAI/Hugging Face attack revealed about AI motivation and why he was less surprised than most. We discuss his evolving risk estimate, his case for an immediate moratorium on frontier model training, the technical and geopolitical case for hardware-based verification as a foundation for global AI governance, and why he asked Dario Amodei to collect competing term sheets before accepting his own investment.—Transcript: https://www.generalist.com/i/218944380/transcript—Every timestamp(00:00) Intro(02:28) Growing up in Soviet-occupied Estonia(05:54) How Jaan assesses AI risk and why he’s more optimistic now(07:16) AI’s preferences and motivations(12:44) The OpenAI Hugging Face incident(16:12) Meeting with Eliezer Yudkowsky(18:20) Everything as computation(20:22) The Coxon moment(23:05) Who dismisses AI alignment risks(26:17) The AI race, the case for a pause, and safer alternatives(32:47) AI 2027(33:44) Investing in DeepMind and Anthropic(40:03) The “big blob of compute” and competing approaches to AI(44:42) What effective AI safeguards could look like(48:15) Verifying countries’ compliance with AI safeguards(50:15) AI kill switches and their limits(52:11) Jaan’s love of dance and musical influences(59:50) Jaan’s favorite movies(1:01:41) What Jaan likes about AI—Jaan’s complete reading listShadows of the Mind: A Search for the Missing Science of Consciousness: https://www.amazon.com/dp/0195106466—Other resourcesSkype: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SkypeLife is NOT a Journey - Alan Watts: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rBpaUICxEhk&t=10sAI Billionaire on Existential Risk: Jaan Tallinn – #112: https://www.manifold1.com/episodes/ai-billionaire-on-existential-risk-jaan-tallinnThe Basic AI Drives: https://selfawaresystems.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/ai_drives_final.pdfThe Hugging Face incident and the road ahead: https://openai.com/index/hugging-face-incident-and-the-road-aheadRogue AI didn’t breach Hugging Face, human decisions did: https://thebulletin.org/2026/09/rogue-ai-didnt-breach-hugging-face-human-decisions-didMIRI: https://intelligence.orgJacob Coxon on X, “I resigned from Anthropic today.”: https://x.com/hilbertspaess/status/2097476196791709843AI 2027: https://ai-2027.comGoogle DeepMind: https://deepmind.googleInside the Biggest Feud in Artificial Intelligence: https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/2026/09/openai-v-anthropic-inside-biggest-rivalry-tech/688819The Bitter Lesson: http://www.incompleteideas.net/IncIdeas/BitterLesson.htmlAI 2040: https://ai-2040.comThe Glass Bead Game: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00DO994WYJaan’s favorite movies: https://jaan.info/favmoviesThe Odyssey: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt33764258On the Edge: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0221559Limitless: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1219289—Where to find Jaan TallinnWebsite: https://jaan.info—Production and marketing by penname.co. For inquiries about sponsoring the podcast, email jordan@penname.co.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    1 時間 7 分
  • Periodic Labs: A chatbot walks into a laboratory
    2026/09/29

    Liam Fedus and Dogus Cubuk are the co-founders and co-CEOs of Periodic Labs, a startup building “synthesis superintelligence.” In practice, that means an AI system that closes the loop between hypothesis, experiment, and learning.


    Liam previously led post-training at OpenAI, where he was one of the creators of ChatGPT. Dogus spent years at Google DeepMind leading a large team of chemists and materials scientists. Together, they’ve brought those two trajectories to bear on a problem that has stymied science for decades: not just discovering new materials, but making them reliably and at scale.


    In this conversation, we explore the limits of language models, the commercialization bottleneck in materials science, why Periodic chose high-temperature superconductors as its first target, and what Liam learned from watching ChatGPT go from an internal product to one of the most successful products of all time.

    —

    Every timestamp

    (00:00) Intro

    (02:05) Periodic’s mission

    (03:14) What it takes to build a synthetic superintelligence

    (04:48) Why “thinkism” falls short

    (05:46) Why Periodic is pursuing high-temperature superconductors

    (07:21) How Heike Kamerlingh Onnes discovered superconductivity

    (09:36) Why synthesizing new materials is so difficult

    (16:44) Dogus’s path to AI

    (20:18) Liam’s path to AI

    (23:28) Lessons from launching ChatGPT

    (25:24) Why Dogus and Liam chose each other

    (27:01) How Periodic attracts top talent

    (29:50) Inside an experimental loop at Periodic

    (35:10) What AI learns across experiments

    (40:10) What Periodic builds versus buys

    (44:37) Balancing diversity and depth across experiments

    (49:23) The difference in LLM performance on math vs. science

    (51:26) Why Periodic doesn’t depend on better models

    (53:20) Periodic’s short-term goals

    (54:09) The competitive landscape

    (55:39) Final meditations

    —

    Liam and Dogus’s complete reading list

    • The Beginning of Infinity: Explanations That Transform the World (recommended by Liam): https://www.amazon.com/Beginning-Infinity-Explanations-Transform-World/dp/0143121359
    • Subtle Is the Lord: The Science and the Life of Albert Einstein (recommended by Dogus): https://www.amazon.com/Subtle-Lord-Science-Albert-Einstein/dp/0192806726

    —

    Other resources

    • Periodic Labs: https://periodic.com
    • Bell Labs: https://www.nokia.com/bell-labs
    • QBasic: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QBasic
    • Google DeepMind: https://deepmind.google
    • Google Brain: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Brain
    • OpenAI: https://openai.com

    —

    Where to find Liam Fedus

    LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/liam-fedus-26547811

    X: https://x.com/LiamFedus

    —

    Where to find Dogus Cubuk

    LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ekin-dogus-cubuk-9148b8114

    X: https://x.com/ekindogus

    —

    Production and marketing by penname.co. For inquiries about sponsoring the podcast, email jordan@penname.co.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    1 時間
  • An Ex-SpaceX Engineer on Elon Musk, Starship, and Building a $1B-Valued Startup (Scott Morton, Founder & CEO of Revel)
    2026/09/08

    Scott Morton is the founder and CEO of Revel, a software platform for testing and controlling complex hardware systems. Before founding the company in 2024, Scott spent nearly a decade at SpaceX building control software for Falcon 9 and Starship. That experience helped him recognize a broader problem: while rockets, nuclear systems, supersonic aircraft, and other advanced machines have grown increasingly sophisticated, the software used to test and control them is often fragmented and decades old. Revel was created to close that gap. The company has raised $180 million, was reportedly valued at just over $1 billion, and counts Impulse Space and Radiant Nuclear among its customers. Its platform scales from small benchtop tests to industrial systems with hundreds of thousands of telemetry channels. Revel has also created its own programming language, RevelCode, designed to combine performance and accessibility with the runtime safety required for high-stakes physical systems.


    In our conversation, we explore:

    • How AI can accelerate high-consequence software teams without replacing rigorous testing and review
    • Why hardware test and industrial-control software still relies on tools created in the 1980s and 1990s
    • What Scott took from Elon Musk about betting on teams before you know the answers
    • Why Revel created its own programming language
    • The “runtime safe” philosophy: what it means and why it matters
    • Revel’s one-to-many model and the hardware frontiers it’s touching
    • The strategic case behind Revel’s $150 million Series B
    • How Revel’s edge showed up in an industrial-control bake-off
    • How Scott hopes to preserve Revel’s engineering culture as it scales toward 500 people
    • Revel’s long-term mission – and what it means for the hardware renaissance

    —

    Timestamps

    (00:00) Intro

    (02:04) Why no one will vibe-code a nuclear reactor

    (04:15) Revel’s engineering edge

    (05:27) What Revel actually does

    (06:34) Why industrial software has stagnated

    (07:52) Why previous startups couldn’t crack it

    (10:26) The limits of building control software in-house at SpaceX

    (15:20) Lessons from nearly a decade at SpaceX

    (20:22) Why Revel built RevelCode

    (24:46) Will Revel open-source the language?

    (25:25) Scott’s early projects and builder mentality

    (32:28) Where his drive comes from

    (33:50) What Scott took from Elon – and what he chose to leave behind

    (36:02) Scott’s standards as CEO

    (38:56) Scaling from small tests to industrial systems

    (43:40) Deploying Revel and the hiring bottleneck

    (45:23) How Revel finds and assesses talent

    (46:21) Emerging frontiers in hardware

    (49:36) Revel’s unusually smooth trajectory

    (51:05) How AI fits into Revel’s platform

    (52:42) Revel’s long-term vision

    (54:18) Final meditations

    —

    Follow Scott Morton

    LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/scott-morton-68334a15

    X: https://x.com/scottgmorton

    —

    Resources and episode mentions: https://www.generalist.com/p/an-ex-spacex-engineer-on-elon-musk

    —

    Production and marketing by penname.co. For inquiries about sponsoring the podcast, email jordan@penname.co.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    57 分
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
まだレビューはありません