Episode Description

In this powerful and highly practical episode, Eric Bauer is joined by Dr. Scott Weingart for a deep dive into mechanical ventilation strategy, critical thinking in metabolic acidosis, and the nuanced management of obstructive lung disease. You’ll hear honest, experience-driven insights that challenge outdated protocols and provide a real-world framework for decision-making in high-acuity transport and emergency environments.

Together, Eric and Scott unpack what matters when setting minute ventilation for acidotic patients, when and why to abandon rigid tidal volume formulas, and how to navigate the delicate dance of airway management without causing more harm than good. You’ll also hear an unfiltered discussion about ventilation in DKA, PEEP misconceptions, and how to safely manage the crashing COPD or asthmatic patient when time and tolerance are in short supply.

Key Takeaways

• Minute ventilation must be tailored to context: “one-size-fits-all” protocols often fail in real-world acidotic patients.
• A tidal volume of 8–10 mL/kg is not only SAFE, it’s often necessary in early transport, especially when facing deadly acidosis.
• Not all PEEP is good PEEP! Learn when zero is the right number.
• In obstructive lung patients, the “expiratory phase” isn’t the whole story. Inspiratory flow rate and sedation play crucial roles.
• End-tidal CO₂ readings must be interpreted in a clinical context. Chasing normalization can kill.
• Sometimes the best vent setting… is no vent at all. Preserving spontaneous respiration in compensated DKA may save lives.
• DON'T default to 100% FiO₂. Understand how oxygen strategy influences alveolar recruitment and long-term outcomes.

Listen anywhere you get your podcasts or at flightbridgeed.com. While you're there, explore our award-winning critical care courses, trusted by thousands of providers to prepare for advanced certification exams, or to recertify advanced, national, state, and local certifications and licenses.

In this episode of the FlightBridgeED Podcast, Dr. Mike Lauria welcomes back Dr. Nick George to dissect a topic that’s long overdue for critical discussion: airway management in critical care transport—and whether your background matters.

Does being a paramedic or a nurse predict first-pass success rate? Does prior training or clinical experience truly change how well you manage airways in high-stakes situations?

Drawing from new research involving over 7,800 intubations at a major HEMS program, Dr. George presents data that challenges long-held assumptions and explores the impact of training, experience, and clinical culture on airway outcomes. From the historical roots of EMS to the realities of modern-day prehospital practice, this episode bridges the past, present, and future of one of the most defining and debated skills in critical care.

Whether you're placing tubes daily or just entering the field, this episode delivers real insights for every provider level.

Listen anywhere you stream podcasts, or at FlightBridgeED.com. While you're there, explore our award-winning, trusted courses, specifically designed for critical care professionals like you.

Key Takeaways

• Success in airway management isn't about your credentials—it’s about training, experience, and repetition.
• In a study of 7,812 intubations, there was no statistically significant difference in first-pass or last-pass success between nurses and paramedics.
• A slight initial gap in first-year performance disappears by year three, suggesting a washout effect driven by experience, not title.
• Historical models and current cultures (like “owning the airway”) influence skill allocation, sometimes more than evidence.
• Airway success is more than just getting the tube—metrics like DASH-1A aim to measure outcomes that matter (hypoxia, hypotension), even if imperfect.
• High-quality, consistent training programs—like annual OR intubations and in-situ simulation—are the real equalizers in skill development.
• The origin of airway obsession in EMS traces back to Peter Safar, whose daughter’s death from an asthma attack helped spark the creation of modern paramedicine.

References
George, Nicholas H et al. “Prehospital Endotracheal Intubation Success Rates for Critical Care Nurses Versus Paramedics.” Prehospital emergency care, 1-7. 23 Jan. 2025, doi:10.1080/10903127.2024.2448246

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39786721/

In this episode of the FlightBridgeED Podcast, Dr. Mike Lauria is joined by Dr. Nick George, a retrieval and EMS physician currently practicing full-time in Darwin, Australia. Together, they break down the often-overwhelming topic of aortic emergencies in a way that’s brilliantly simple, practical, and immediately applicable for all providers—whether you’re in the ICU, on the flight line, or working your way up in emergency medicine.

Dr. George introduces a clean mental model—1 tube, 2 major problems, 3 causes—to guide listeners through the classification, diagnosis, and critical transport considerations for aortic dissections and aneurysms. From understanding penetrating ulcers to navigating hypertensive vs hypotensive presentations, this episode dives deep without drowning you in jargon.

We also explore the science behind anti-impulse therapy, challenge long-held dogmas about esmolol vs nicardipine, and reveal eye-opening findings from a two-decade analysis of over 1,000 aortic emergency transports. Whether you’re flying patients to tertiary care, working in rural EDs, or prepping for boards, this episode will sharpen your edge.

Available anywhere you listen to podcasts or at FlightBridgeED.com. While you’re there, explore our highly successful, award-winning courses trusted by critical care providers around the world.

Key Takeaways

• The aorta can be simplified into “1 tube, 2 problems (tearing or weakening), caused by 3 forces: pressure, pulsatility, and geometry.”
• Distinguishing between dissection and aneurysm—and whether it’s hypertensive or hypotensive—can guide safe transport decisions, even if you're not making the diagnosis.
• Dissections may present without pain in up to 30% of cases, underscoring the importance of clinical vigilance and recognizing subtle signs.
• Classic signs (pulse deficits, BP differentials) are often unreliable. Don’t dismiss vague or mismatched symptoms.
• Ultrasound, although not definitive, can provide useful data en route—especially in cases of hypotension or ambiguity.
• Anti-impulse therapy isn't as evidence-backed as we've been taught. Recent studies show nicardipine may be just as effective—and possibly safer—than esmolol.
• Transport crews must be empowered to advocate for patients when findings don’t line up with the presumed diagnosis.