Send us Fan Mail

What if you got everything you wanted and discovered that none of it was enough?

Money. Success. Recognition. Fame. Power. Health. Pleasure. Achievement.

More than seven hundred years ago, Thomas Aquinas asked a question that remains as urgent today as it was in the Middle Ages:

What can actually make a human being happy?

In this episode of The Examined Life, we walk through Aquinas’s remarkable investigation of the things people most commonly pursue as the key to happiness.

Aquinas does not argue that money, health, pleasure, achievement, or recognition are bad. Quite the opposite. They are genuine goods.

The problem begins when we ask a limited good to give us unlimited happiness.

We’ll examine why Aquinas rejects:

• Wealth
• Honor
• Fame
• Power
• Bodily goods and health
• Pleasure
• Even the highest goods of the soul

And we’ll see why Aquinas ultimately concludes that no finite good can completely satisfy the human desire for the good.

The lesson is not that we should stop loving the good things of this life.

It is that we must learn to love them in the right order.

These things are not too small to be loved.
They are too small to be loved as God.

The Examined Life
Philosophy for Real People

VITA EXAMINATA

Watch on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@DrScottMSullivan
Follow on X: https://x.com/DrScotMSullivan

Send us Fan Mail

How much money would it take for you to finally feel secure?

More income? A paid-off house? A certain number in the bank?

The problem is that the number keeps moving.

In this episode of The Examined Life, we turn to the Roman philosopher Seneca and his surprisingly modern reflections on wealth, anxiety, and freedom.

Seneca does not argue that money is bad or that we should reject financial success. Money solves real problems. It gives us options, comfort, and protection against many of life's difficulties.

But money cannot answer a more fundamental question:

How much is enough?

Seneca argues that there are two ways to become richer. We can increase what we possess, or we can decrease what we require.

That distinction changes everything.

We explore why luxury so easily becomes necessity, why greater wealth does not necessarily produce greater peace, why the wealthy can remain anxious about money, and why Seneca believed the great prize of philosophy was liberty.

Money can increase our control over circumstances.

Philosophy can decrease the control circumstances have over us.

And that may be the more important kind of freedom.

In this episode:

• Why "enough" keeps moving
• The difference between natural needs and manufactured desires
• Why wealth can create new forms of anxiety
• How preferences become necessities
• Why acquiring more does not necessarily make us more secure
• Seneca's idea of philosophical wealth
• Why wisdom is worth more than money
• How philosophy teaches us what "enough" actually means

Seneca's challenge is not to hate money.

Earn it. Use it. Enjoy what it can provide. But do not ask wealth to make you free.

That is the work of philosophy.

THE EXAMINED LIFE
Philosophy for Real People.

Vita Examinata.

#Seneca #Stoicism #Philosophy #Wealth #Money #Anxiety #TheExaminedLife #GoodLife

Watch on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@DrScottMSullivan
Follow on X: https://x.com/DrScotMSullivan

Send us Fan Mail

Why does social media so often leave us angrier, more envious, more distracted, and less satisfied with our own lives?

We usually blame the technology: the algorithms, endless scrolling, addictive design, and constant notifications.

But almost 2,000 years ago, the Roman philosopher Seneca identified a deeper problem.

The crowd.

Seneca warned that human beings are far more susceptible to the influence of other people than we like to admit. Their judgments influence our judgments. Their desires affect our desires. Their emotions spread to us. And what we repeatedly see celebrated, condemned, desired, or mocked can gradually change what seems normal.

Seneca had to physically enter the crowd.

We carry the crowd in our pockets.

In this episode of The Examined Life, we use Seneca’s Moral Letter 7 to examine what social media may be doing to our character, our desires, and even our ability to think for ourselves.

In this episode you’ll discover:

• Why Seneca believed the crowd could quietly change your character
• How repeated exposure changes what seems normal, desirable, and admirable
• Why anger, envy, vanity, mockery, and outrage can become socially contagious
• How likes, shares, views, and followers allow the crowd to reward the behavior it wants more of
• Why popularity is not evidence of truth or goodness
• The difference between a crowd and a genuine friend
• Why following someone online is a form of association
• How to audit your social-media feed using Seneca’s philosophy
• Why the answer is not necessarily abandoning social media, but choosing your crowd carefully

Your feed is not merely entertainment.

It is a list of people you have given permission to influence your character.

So perhaps the most important question about social media is not simply:

How much time am I spending on it?

But:

Who am I allowing into my mind?

The Examined Life explores the great philosophers and their answers to the questions that still matter: How should we live? What is worth pursuing? How do we build character, think clearly, and live well?

Vita Examinata.

Watch on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@DrScottMSullivan
Follow on X: https://x.com/DrScotMSullivan