• Retiring With $3 Million: How Much Can You Actually Spend?
    2026/11/10

    If you have $3 million and you’re ready to retire, how much can you actually afford to spend?

    $120,000 a year? $150,000? $180,000?

    It sounds like a straightforward question, but retirement planning rarely produces one perfect spending number.

    In this episode, Greg Welborn of First Financial Consulting explains why the better question isn’t “What is the maximum I can withdraw?” but rather, “What can I comfortably spend while maintaining enough flexibility if retirement doesn’t unfold exactly as planned?”

    Using the example of a 62-year-old retiring with $3 million invested, Greg walks through the assumptions behind a retirement-income projection. Investment returns are only one part of the equation. Inflation, Social Security, taxes, healthcare costs, longevity, major purchases, gifts, travel, and changes in spending over time can all influence how much a retiree can sustainably withdraw.

    One of the biggest risks is sequence-of-returns risk. A portfolio may earn a reasonable average return over a long period, but those returns won’t arrive evenly. Someone who experiences strong returns early in retirement can have a very different outcome from someone who experiences significant market losses in the first few years—even if both ultimately earn the same long-term average return.

    Greg also explains how Monte Carlo simulations and retirement stress testing can help account for this uncertainty. Instead of assuming one smooth investment return every year, these models test many possible sequences to see how a retirement strategy may perform across a range of outcomes.

    But investment returns aren’t the only thing worth stress testing. A retirement plan should also consider what happens if you retire earlier than expected, inflation stays higher than projected, you or your spouse experiences a long-term care event, you make a major purchase, or your spending and tax situation change.

    The composition of your $3 million matters too. Assets held in taxable accounts, traditional retirement accounts, Roth accounts, and other investments can create different tax consequences and levels of flexibility.

    Ultimately, retirement planning should not be about finding the largest number a spreadsheet says you can spend. The goal is to develop a reasonable spending range, build in guardrails, review the plan regularly, and maintain enough flexibility to make adjustments when life or the markets don’t go according to plan.

    Topics discussed:

    • Retiring with $3 million
    • Retirement spending and withdrawal rates
    • Sequence-of-returns risk
    • Monte Carlo simulations
    • Retirement stress testing
    • Inflation, taxes, and healthcare
    • Long-term care
    • Flexible spending and guardrails
    • Portfolio sustainability

    Related Reading
    How to Stress-Test Your Retirement Plan
    Why So Many Retirees Fear Outliving Their Money

    The information discussed in this episode is intended for educational purposes only and should not be considered individualized financial, investment, tax, or legal advice. Everyone’s financial situation is different, and the strategies discussed may not be appropriate for every investor.

    First Financial Consulting is an independent, fee-only fiduciary financial advisory firm providing comprehensive financial planning and investment management services.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    10 分
  • Longevity Risk in Retirement: How to Make Your Money Last
    2026/10/28
    What happens if your retirement lasts longer than you planned?Longevity risk is the possibility of outliving your retirement savings, and it becomes increasingly important as retirees face longer lifespans, rising healthcare expenses, inflation, and decades of withdrawals from their portfolios.In this episode, Greg Welborn of First Financial Consulting explains why longevity risk is about more than simply living longer. A retirement plan also needs to account for whether your income and investments can continue supporting your lifestyle throughout those additional years.One of the first challenges is the length of retirement itself. Many retirees may need their savings to support 20, 25, 30 years or more. The longer retirement lasts, the more time inflation, healthcare expenses, investment markets, and unexpected costs have to affect the plan.Healthcare and long-term care can add another layer of risk. Medical expenses may increase faster than general inflation, and a longer lifespan can increase the likelihood of needing more extensive care later in life. These costs can place additional pressure on a retirement portfolio at the same time that other living expenses continue to rise.Inflation also steadily reduces purchasing power. Even relatively modest inflation compounded over several decades can dramatically increase the amount of income needed to maintain the same lifestyle. That means a retirement portfolio may need to provide current income while also maintaining enough long-term growth to help keep pace with rising costs.Market volatility creates a different problem. A market decline doesn’t necessarily create a permanent loss for an investor who can remain invested and wait for a recovery. But retirees may need to make portfolio withdrawals regardless of what the market is doing. Selling investments during a significant downturn can turn temporary declines into permanent losses and increase sequence-of-returns risk.Greg discusses why retirement portfolios therefore need to balance several competing objectives. Being too conservative may leave a portfolio unable to keep pace with inflation, while being too aggressive can expose a retiree to significant volatility and liquidity problems during a market downturn.One way to think about retirement assets is across different time horizons. Some assets may be positioned for near-term expenses, others for income needs several years into retirement, and others for longer-term growth. The appropriate mix will vary depending on spending needs, risk tolerance, Social Security, pensions, and other sources of retirement income.Tax planning is another important part of managing longevity risk. Withdrawals from taxable, tax-deferred, and tax-free accounts can have different tax consequences, making the timing and source of retirement withdrawals an important part of a long-term income strategy.Greg also discusses Social Security claiming decisions. Delaying Social Security after full retirement age can increase the monthly benefit, but whether delaying makes sense depends on longevity expectations, health, other income sources, and the broader retirement plan.Ultimately, longevity risk cannot usually be addressed with one investment or one rule of thumb. It requires coordinating investments, income sources, taxes, liquidity, healthcare planning, and spending over what may be a retirement lasting several decades.Topics discussed in this episode include:What longevity risk means in retirementPlanning for a 20- to 30-year retirementInflation and purchasing powerHealthcare and long-term care costsMarket volatilitySequence-of-returns riskRetirement portfolio diversificationBalancing growth and liquidityShort-, intermediate-, and long-term retirement needsTax-efficient retirement withdrawalsSocial Security timingPensions and other retirement incomeBuilding a sustainable retirement income strategyTimestamps00:00 — What is longevity risk?01:00 — How living longer affects retirement finances03:26 — Healthcare and long-term care costs04:24 — Inflation and market volatility05:56 — Why market downturns can cause permanent retirement losses06:58 — Strategies for managing longevity risk07:52 — Structuring investments across different time horizons09:17 — Why one-size-fits-all retirement models fall short09:51 — Tax-efficient withdrawal strategies10:51 — Maximizing Social Security benefits11:46 — Integrating pensions and other income sources12:16 — Bringing the retirement strategy togetherRelated ReadingLongevity Risk in Retirementhttps://firstfinancial.is/longevity-risk-in-retirement/ The information discussed in this episode is intended for educational purposes only and should not be considered individualized financial, investment, tax, or legal advice. Everyone’s financial situation is different, and the strategies discussed may not be appropriate for every investor. First Financial Consulting is an independent, fee-only fiduciary financial ...
    続きを読む 一部表示
    14 分
  • Fiduciary vs. Broker: What’s the Difference?
    2026/10/09
    Financial advisors and brokers can operate under different regulatory standards, compensation structures, and service models. Greg Welborn explains what investors should understand about fiduciary advice, brokerage relationships, fees, conflicts of interest, and the questions to ask before choosing a financial professional.Episode NotesWhat does it really mean when someone says they’re a fiduciary—and how is that different from working with a broker?In this episode, Greg Welborn of First Financial Consulting looks at some of the important differences between investment advisers and brokers, including how they are regulated, how they may be compensated, the types of services they provide, and the potential conflicts investors should understand before choosing an advisor.A fiduciary investment adviser has a duty of care and a duty of loyalty that apply across the advisory relationship. That means the adviser must act in the client’s best interest and cannot subordinate the client’s interests to its own.Broker-dealers operate under a different regulatory framework. When making securities recommendations to retail customers, they are subject to Regulation Best Interest, which requires them to act in the customer’s best interest and address conflicts of interest. The scope and timing of those obligations, however, differ from the fiduciary duty governing an ongoing investment-advisory relationship.Greg also discusses why compensation matters. Financial professionals can be paid in several ways, including asset-based fees, hourly or flat planning fees, commissions, or combinations of these methods. Understanding exactly where an advisor’s compensation comes from can help you identify potential incentives and conflicts before entering into a relationship.The episode also explores the distinction between fee-only and fee-based advice. Fee-only firms are compensated directly by their clients and do not receive commissions for selling financial products. Fee-based firms may receive both advisory fees and certain forms of transaction- or product-related compensation. Understanding the difference can make it easier to evaluate how an advisor is paid and where potential conflicts may exist.Beyond compensation, Greg emphasizes the importance of understanding the depth of the relationship you are actually receiving. Investment management alone is different from comprehensive financial planning that considers retirement cash flow, taxes, Social Security, Roth conversions, estate planning, liquidity, risk management, and other areas of your financial life.Cost is another factor worth evaluating. Even relatively small differences in investment expenses can compound over long periods of time, so investors should understand both the cost of the investments being recommended and the compensation being received by the professional making those recommendations.Greg also discusses risk in broader terms than simply assigning someone a label such as “moderate” or “aggressive.” A good planning process should consider how an investor may actually react during significant market declines, what level of liquidity may be necessary, and whether the investment strategy is likely to remain sustainable during difficult periods.Toward the end of the episode, Greg provides several questions investors can ask when evaluating a financial professional:In what capacity will you be working with me?Are you acting as a fiduciary throughout our advisory relationship?How exactly will you and your firm be compensated?Do you receive commissions or other third-party compensation?How do you approach investment costs and taxes?How do you define and manage investment risk?What does “comprehensive financial planning” mean at your firm?Who will actually be responsible for my relationship and financial plan?What happens if my primary advisor retires or leaves?Can I review your Form ADV, Form CRS, fee schedule, and examples of the planning work you provide?Understanding these questions can make it easier to compare firms based on more than titles or marketing language and determine what type of advisory relationship best fits your needs.Topics discussed in this episode include:Fiduciary financial advisorsInvestment advisers vs. brokersRegulation Best InterestFiduciary dutyFee-only vs. fee-based financial advisorsAdvisor commissions and compensationFinancial advisor conflicts of interestInvestment fees and expensesComprehensive financial planningTax-aware financial planningInvestment risk and liquidityQuestions to ask a financial advisorForm ADV and Form CRSChoosing the right financial advisorTimestamps00:00 — Fiduciary advisors vs. brokers02:09 — How advisor compensation can affect advice03:58 — How fee-only financial advisors are compensated05:30 — Understanding fee-based advice07:35 — Questions to ask about compensation and conflicts08:29 — Why investment costs matter10:03 — Products, taxes, and planning depth11:38 ...
    続きを読む 一部表示
    18 分
  • When Is the Best Time to Do a Roth Conversion?
    2026/10/07

    When is the right time to do a Roth conversion?

    It’s a question that comes up frequently, but the answer isn’t as simple as waiting for a particular tax rate or assuming that a Roth is always better than a traditional retirement account.

    In this episode, Greg Welborn of First Financial Consulting explains how to think about Roth conversions as one part of a broader retirement and tax-planning strategy.

    Greg begins by comparing the different places investors can hold their savings: Roth accounts, traditional tax-deferred retirement accounts such as IRAs and 401(k)s, and regular taxable investment accounts. The decision isn’t simply whether to use a Roth—it’s how each type of account fits into your overall financial plan.

    A Roth conversion generally involves moving assets from a traditional IRA, 401(k), or other eligible pre-tax retirement account into a Roth account. The taxable portion of the conversion is generally included in income in the year of the conversion. In exchange, future qualified withdrawals from the Roth may be tax-free.

    That creates one of the central questions in Roth conversion planning: Is it preferable to pay taxes today or potentially pay them later?

    Greg explains that comparing your current tax situation with the tax situation you expect in the future is an important part of that decision. If you expect to face significantly higher tax rates later, paying tax on a conversion today may be attractive. If you expect your future tax rate to be substantially lower, converting today may be less compelling.

    But tax rates aren’t the only consideration.

    The amount of time the assets can remain invested in the Roth can also matter. A longer investment horizon provides more opportunity for assets to compound within the Roth structure, which can increase the potential value of the tax-free treatment over time.

    The broader investment strategy matters as well. Different accounts can play different roles within a retirement plan, and decisions about what assets to hold in each account should be coordinated with your time horizon, liquidity needs, risk tolerance, future income needs, and overall tax strategy.

    Ultimately, Roth conversion planning is not a one-dimensional decision. The appropriate strategy depends on your current and projected income, future tax exposure, investment horizon, retirement income needs, and the other accounts and planning tools available to you.

    Rather than making a Roth conversion simply because tax rates appear attractive today—or avoiding one because you hope rates may fall—the decision should be based on how the conversion affects your overall financial plan over time.

    Topics discussed in this episode include:

    • What a Roth conversion is
    • Roth vs. traditional retirement accounts
    • Paying taxes now versus later
    • Current and future tax rates
    • How investment horizon affects Roth planning
    • Tax-free growth and qualified Roth withdrawals
    • Roth conversions as part of retirement planning
    • Coordinating taxable, tax-deferred, and Roth accounts
    • Why Roth conversion timing is personal
    • Lifetime tax planning

    Timestamps

    00:01 — Why Roth conversion timing matters
    00:31 — Roth, IRA, or taxable account?
    01:29 — How a Roth conversion works
    02:20 — Paying taxes now versus later
    03:41 — Why your investment horizon matters
    05:17 — Why Roth conversion decisions are personal
    05:47 — Avoiding one-size-fits-all Roth advice

    Learn more about First Financial Consulting: Best order to Withdraw Assets for Retirees

    The information discussed in this episode is intended for educational purposes only and should not be considered individualized financial, investment, tax, or legal advice. Everyone’s financial situation is different, and the strategies discussed may not be appropriate for every investor.

    First Financial Consulting is an independent, fee-only fiduciary financial advisory firm providing comprehensive financial planning and investment management services.

    Learn more about First Financial Consulting:
    https://firstfinancial.is/

    続きを読む 一部表示
    6 分
  • What Is High Net Worth Financial Planning?
    2026/10/06
    High net worth financial planning involves more than simply managing a larger investment portfolio.As assets grow and financial situations become more complex, decisions involving investments, taxes, estate planning, businesses, real estate, and future generations can increasingly affect one another.In this episode, Greg Welborn of First Financial Consulting explains what high net worth financial planning is, how it differs from traditional financial planning, and some of the challenges families may encounter as their wealth grows.Greg begins by discussing who may benefit from a more comprehensive wealth-planning approach. This can include families with significant investment assets, business owners, executives with equity compensation, people with concentrated stock positions or multiple real estate holdings, and families facing increasingly complex estate-planning decisions.One of the most common problems is uncoordinated advice. High net worth families often work with several professionals, including financial advisors, accountants, estate attorneys, bankers, and insurance professionals. Each may provide valuable advice within a particular specialty, but recommendations made independently can sometimes conflict with decisions being made elsewhere in the financial plan.Greg explains why high net worth planning can benefit from having someone act as a financial “quarterback”—developing the overall strategy and helping coordinate the different professionals involved so that investment, tax, estate, retirement, and family decisions are working toward the same goals.The episode then looks at two real-world planning examples.In the first case study, a couple approaching retirement had approximately $6 million in investments. Their retirement projections indicated that only part of those assets would likely be necessary to maintain their lifestyle, while the remaining assets could potentially be positioned for children and grandchildren.Rather than treating everything as one investment portfolio, Greg discusses using an investment policy statement to identify different goals, time horizons, target returns, risk levels, and liquidity needs. Assets intended to support retirement could be invested differently from assets intended for children or grandchildren decades into the future.That distinction allowed the retirement assets to emphasize liquidity and risk management while longer-term family assets could pursue different growth objectives. It also opened opportunities for coordinating investment decisions with longer-term tax and Roth planning.The second case study involves a family with investment accounts, substantial real estate holdings, and a privately owned business. In this situation, the issue wasn’t simply generating enough retirement income—it was considering how continued growth of the business and real estate could affect the family’s future estate and their ability to eventually transfer those assets to their children.Greg discusses how advanced planning strategies, including family limited partnerships and dynasty trusts, may be considered when appropriate to help address estate-planning, asset-protection, and multi-generational goals. These strategies are highly dependent on the family’s circumstances and require careful coordination with legal and tax professionals.Ultimately, high net worth financial planning is about coordinating the different pieces of a complicated financial life. Investments, retirement income, taxes, businesses, real estate, estate planning, and future generations should not be treated as completely separate decisions.Topics discussed in this episode include:What high net worth financial planning meansWhen traditional financial planning becomes wealth planningCoordinating multiple financial professionalsLifetime tax planningEstate and legacy planningInvestment policy statementsMatching investments to different financial goalsRetirement liquidity and investment riskPlanning for children and grandchildrenBusiness and real estate ownershipMulti-generational wealth planningFamily limited partnershipsDynasty trustsChoosing a financial advisorThe role of a fiduciary wealth advisorTimestamps00:00 — What is high net worth financial planning?00:50 — Common high net worth planning mistakes02:04 — Coordinating multiple financial professionals03:38 — Tax planning and high net worth families07:09 — Case study: Planning investments for multiple generations09:39 — Using an investment policy statement13:00 — Case study: Business, real estate and estate planning15:00 — Family limited partnerships and dynasty trusts16:34 — Choosing objective financial advice18:38 — When high net worth planning may be appropriateLearn more about First Financial Consulting: High-Net-Worth Financial Planning The information discussed in this episode is intended for educational purposes only and should not be considered individualized financial, investment, tax, or legal ...
    続きを読む 一部表示
    21 分
  • How Trusts Can Help Reduce Estate Taxes
    2026/10/02
    Having a trust does not automatically mean your estate will avoid estate taxes.In this episode, Greg Welborn of First Financial Consulting explains how trusts work, why revocable living trusts and irrevocable trusts serve very different purposes, and how certain specialized trust strategies may help families reduce the amount of wealth ultimately exposed to estate taxes.Greg begins with the basic structure of a trust. A trust involves a grantor who creates the trust, a trustee who manages the assets according to its terms, and beneficiaries who ultimately receive the benefits of those assets. The amount of control retained by the person creating the trust can have a major impact on how the trust functions for estate-planning purposes.One important distinction is between a revocable living trust and an irrevocable trust. A revocable living trust can be extremely useful for managing assets, providing instructions for beneficiaries, and avoiding probate. However, because the creator generally retains control over the assets, a standard revocable living trust does not by itself remove those assets from the taxable estate.Greg then discusses three more specialized trust strategies that may be used in estate-tax planning:Irrevocable Life Insurance Trusts (ILITs)An ILIT can be structured to own life insurance outside of an individual’s taxable estate. This can make life insurance an important tool for families looking to create liquidity or transfer wealth to beneficiaries as part of a larger estate plan.Charitable Remainder Trusts (CRTs)A charitable remainder trust may be useful when someone owns highly appreciated assets and also has charitable goals. Greg discusses how appreciated assets can be transferred to a CRT, sold and reinvested within the trust, while creating an income stream for the donor and ultimately benefiting a charitable organization.Grantor Retained Annuity Trusts (GRATs)A GRAT can be particularly relevant when someone owns an asset they expect to appreciate significantly in the future. Greg explains how a GRAT can provide payments back to the grantor during the trust term while potentially transferring appreciation above certain IRS assumptions to beneficiaries in a more estate-tax-efficient manner.The larger lesson is that the specific trust matters. Life insurance, highly appreciated assets, rapidly appreciating investments, real estate, and family businesses may each call for different planning strategies.Just as important is the trade-off between tax planning and control. Different irrevocable trust structures require different levels of control to be given to a trustee, so estate planning isn’t simply about minimizing taxes. It also requires thinking carefully about cash flow, future asset growth, family goals, beneficiaries, and how much control you want to retain during your lifetime.Because these strategies involve complex legal and tax rules, they should be coordinated with qualified financial, tax, and estate-planning professionals and tailored to the specific circumstances of the family.Topics discussed in this episode include:Federal estate taxesHow trusts workGrantors, trustees, and beneficiariesRevocable vs. irrevocable trustsLiving trusts and probateIrrevocable Life Insurance Trusts (ILITs)Charitable Remainder Trusts (CRTs)Grantor Retained Annuity Trusts (GRATs)Highly appreciated assetsLife insurance and estate planningTransferring wealth to future generationsEstate-tax planningBalancing control, cash flow, and legacy goalsTimestamps00:00 — Why estate-tax planning matters05:06 — What is a trust?07:35 — Why a living trust does not reduce estate taxes08:04 — Three trusts used in estate-tax planning08:39 — Irrevocable Life Insurance Trusts12:17 — Charitable Remainder Trusts16:57 — Grantor Retained Annuity Trusts21:47 — Choosing the right trust for the right assets22:31 — Balancing tax benefits and controlLearn more about First Financial Consulting: How to Avoid Estate Tax with a Trust The information discussed in this episode is intended for educational purposes only and should not be considered individualized financial, investment, tax, or legal advice. Everyone’s financial situation is different, and the strategies discussed may not be appropriate for every investor. First Financial Consulting is an independent, fee-only fiduciary financial advisory firm providing comprehensive financial planning and investment management services. Learn more about First Financial Consulting:https://firstfinancial.is/
    続きを読む 一部表示
    24 分
  • The Investment Mistake of Putting Too Much in One Place
    2026/10/01

    One of the most common investment mistakes isn’t necessarily choosing the wrong investment—it’s putting too much money into a single one.

    In this episode, Greg Welborn of First Financial Consulting discusses concentration risk and why even an investment that appears attractive can become dangerous when too much of your portfolio depends on its success.

    Greg uses filmmaker Francis Ford Coppola and his investment in the movie Megalopolis as an example. Coppola had decades of experience, an extraordinary track record in the film industry, and invested heavily in a project within an industry he knew extremely well. Yet the project still resulted in significant financial losses. The broader lesson: expertise and past success do not eliminate risk.

    That leads to the central issue of the episode: concentration. Greg explains why putting a large percentage of your assets into a single stock, business, project, or other investment can expose your financial future to the outcome of one decision. Even experienced professionals make mistakes, which is why diversification can be so important.

    Greg also discusses some of the advantages professional money managers may have over individual investors, including dedicated research teams, industry specialization, greater access to information, economies of scale, risk-management tools, and a disciplined investment process.
    Diversification is about more than simply owning several different investments. Greg explains how a portfolio can be diversified across asset classes and investment categories—including large-cap growth, large-cap value, small-cap stocks, international investments, bonds, and other areas—with the goal of balancing expected return with the amount of risk an investor is willing and able to accept.

    The episode also looks at the difference between index and actively managed investment strategies. Index managers generally seek to replicate a particular market index, while active managers select a subset of investments they believe can outperform that benchmark. Greg explains that either approach can have a place in a diversified portfolio depending on the investor and the role that particular investment is intended to play.

    Ultimately, the lesson is straightforward: avoid allowing one investment to determine the success or failure of your financial future. Build a diversified portfolio designed around your goals, risk tolerance, and overall financial plan.

    Topics discussed in this episode include:

    • Concentration risk
    • Diversification
    • The risks of individual stock investing
    • Why experts can still make investment mistakes
    • Portfolio allocation
    • Risk management
    • Professional money managers
    • Investment research and specialization
    • Index investing
    • Active investment management
    • Asset classes and investment categories
    • Balancing investment risk and return

    Timestamps

    00:01 — One of the most common financial mistakes
    00:35 — Would you take investment advice from a friend?
    01:06 — The Francis Ford Coppola example
    02:52 — The real problem: concentration risk
    04:16 — Why even experts make mistakes
    04:51 — Advantages professional investors may have
    09:08 — The solution: diversify
    10:36 — Using professional money managers
    11:54 — Index management vs. active management
    14:14 — The role of a financial advisor
    14:42 — Avoiding concentration risk

    Learn more about First Financial Consulting: Eight Biggest Investing Mistakes

    The information discussed in this episode is intended for educational purposes only and should not be considered individualized financial, investment, tax, or legal advice. Everyone’s financial situation is different, and the strategies discussed may not be appropriate for every investor.

    First Financial Consulting is an independent, fee-only fiduciary financial advisory firm providing comprehensive financial planning and investment management services.

    Learn more about First Financial Consulting:
    https://firstfinancial.is/

    続きを読む 一部表示
    15 分
  • Mega Backdoor Roth: How It Works for High-Income Earners
    2026/09/30

    For high-income earners looking for additional ways to build tax-advantaged retirement assets, a Mega Backdoor Roth may be worth exploring.

    In this episode, Greg Welborn of First Financial Consulting explains the basic mechanics of the Mega Backdoor Roth strategy and why it can be especially useful for people who have already reached the standard contribution limits in their workplace retirement plan.

    Greg begins by reviewing the difference between traditional and Roth 401(k) contributions. Traditional 401(k) contributions may provide a tax benefit when the contribution is made, while qualified Roth withdrawals can provide tax-free income later in retirement.

    The Mega Backdoor Roth strategy takes the planning a step further. Greg explains how employees may be able to make additional after-tax contributions to their 401(k) after accounting for their regular contributions and any employer contributions, up to the plan’s overall contribution limit.

    Those after-tax contributions may then be converted into the Roth portion of the retirement plan, depending on what the employer’s plan allows. Greg walks through the basic process of making the additional contribution and then arranging for the funds to be converted to Roth.

    The potential benefit is the ability to move additional retirement savings into a Roth account, where future qualified growth and withdrawals may receive favorable tax treatment. For people already maximizing their regular retirement contributions, that can create another opportunity to build tax-advantaged assets for the future.

    However, not every workplace retirement plan supports this strategy. The plan generally needs to permit the necessary after-tax contributions and Roth conversion features, making the details of the employer’s 401(k) plan an important part of determining whether the strategy is available.

    As with any tax and retirement planning strategy, the Mega Backdoor Roth should be evaluated in the context of your overall financial situation, cash flow, tax strategy, and retirement goals.

    Topics discussed in this episode include:

    • What a Mega Backdoor Roth is
    • Traditional vs. Roth 401(k) contributions
    • Retirement plan contribution limits
    • After-tax 401(k) contributions
    • Converting after-tax contributions to Roth
    • Building additional tax-advantaged retirement assets
    • Workplace retirement plan requirements
    • Mega Backdoor Roth strategies for high-income earners
    • Coordinating Roth strategies with retirement planning

    Timestamps

    00:09 — Why high-income earners may consider a Mega Backdoor Roth
    00:34 — Traditional 401(k) vs. Roth 401(k)
    01:12 — Contribution limits and the Mega Backdoor Roth
    01:28 — Calculating available contribution room
    01:57 — How the Mega Backdoor Roth process works
    02:36 — Potential advantages of the strategy
    03:01 — Important employer-plan requirements
    03:11 — Integrating the strategy into your retirement plan

    Learn more about First Financial Consulting: Mega Backdoor Roth

    The information discussed in this episode is intended for educational purposes only and should not be considered individualized financial, investment, tax, or legal advice. Everyone’s financial situation is different, and the strategies discussed may not be appropriate for every investor.

    First Financial Consulting is an independent, fee-only fiduciary financial advisory firm providing comprehensive financial planning and investment management services.

    Learn more about First Financial Consulting:
    https://firstfinancial.is/

    続きを読む 一部表示
    4 分