エピソード

  • Ep11: Jason Fishman — A digital-marketing agency CEO weighs whether generative tools for copy, targeting and optimization are eroding or sharpening demand for specialized human oversight in equity-crowdfunding campaigns.

    Ep11: Jason Fishman — A digital-marketing agency CEO weighs whether generative tools for copy, targeting and optimization are eroding or sharpening demand for specialized human oversight in equity-crowdfunding campaigns.
    2026/10/10
    Episode Summary Jason Fishman, CEO of a digital-marketing agency focused on equity crowdfunding, surprised listeners by stating that generative AI is mainly useful for ideation while human experts remain essential because “we constantly find errors with AI” and campaigns without them produce “very little to no results.” He described how the shift from friends-and-family checks to thousands of smaller investments has rewritten capital raises, yet success still hinges on experienced oversight rather than automation alone. The conversation examined whether tools for copy and targeting are eroding or sharpening demand for specialized human strategy in high-stakes Reg CF and Regulation A+ campaigns. Key Takeaways • Volume is no longer the bottleneck: campaigns can now target accredited investors by household income or net worth and scale to thousands of smaller checks averaging $1,716 under Reg CF. • Human strategy drives every stage—initial planning, activation, optimization, and scaling—because AI-generated copy and parameters require constant expert review to avoid detectable flaws. • AI works best for early ideation and proofreading; final investor-facing creative and media buying still need a “captain behind the helm” to hit conversion targets such as 100,000 visits per 1,000 investments. • Only about 10 % of Reg CF issuers reach $1 million and fewer than 1 % hit the $5 million cap, with the median raise at $194,000, underscoring that marketing execution, not tool choice, separates winners. • Strong results are measured in 10x–30x ROAS, achieved through $1–2 cost-per-click and 1–2 % conversion rates that deliver $100–200 cost per new investor. • Pricing and scope decisions for retainers remain tied to perceived value and marketplace competition rather than internal efficiency gains from AI. • Fishman’s near-term bet is that visible success stories and liquidity events will create self-reinforcing momentum, drawing more issuers and investors into the channel. Jason Fishman is CEO of a digital-marketing agency that runs equity-crowdfunding campaigns for startups and growth-stage companies.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    18 分
  • Ep10: Roddy de la Garza — A veteran real estate broker who trains AI on brokerage systems weighs what judgment, intuition, and human connection he refuses to delegate while seeking spiritual balance through daily mindwork.

    Ep10: Roddy de la Garza — A veteran real estate broker who trains AI on brokerage systems weighs what judgment, intuition, and human connection he refuses to delegate while seeking spiritual balance through daily mindwork.
    2026/09/30
    Roddy de la Garza said the most surprising thing he has learned while training AI on brokerage tasks is that the models still cannot read the psychological “feel” of a property or talk a client off an emotional cliff, so he refuses to delegate any conversation involving debt, divorce, or death. • He staged a West Hollywood condo to feel like “coming home” instead of “someone’s left-behind furniture,” producing the only sale above list price in the building in two years and closing in 14 days. • After his father’s death, Roddy created the daily devotional Above Asking so agents could practice gratitude and boundaries without buying another coach or portal. • He replicated the seasonal split he knew growing up in Texas’s Rio Grande Valley—year-round residents and winter Texans—by dividing his own practice between Hollywood and Palm Springs. • When he experimented with an AI receptionist, callers hung up rather than leave messages; he dropped the tool because it created “cold distance” and lost direct human connection. • On his 22-person team he assigns most of his own volume to others and adjusts splits for tenured agents, finding that “the more I’ve given away, the more I’ve gotten in return.” • After solving a client’s request for non-gendered title language on a married couple’s deed, he required the solution to be taught to two other team members so the knowledge spread. Roddy de la Garza is a broker, team leader at Roddy de la Garza Real Estate Group @ EPIQUE, and author of Above Asking: Daily Mindwork for Real Estate Professionals. Find Roddy de la Garza: roddy4real.com: https://roddy4real.com roddydelagarza.com: https://roddydelagarza.com LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/roddydelagarzarealtor
    続きを読む 一部表示
    42 分
  • Ep9: Sheldon Poon — In performance marketing agencies, AI delivers returns not through creative generation but by enforcing the tracking discipline and attribution fixes most competitors neglect, turning platform algorithms into reliable revenue engines.

    Ep9: Sheldon Poon — In performance marketing agencies, AI delivers returns not through creative generation but by enforcing the tracking discipline and attribution fixes most competitors neglect, turning platform algorithms into reliable revenue engines.
    2026/09/26
    Sheldon Poon says the biggest platforms' predictive AI only delivers reliable returns once humans manually fix the tracking and attribution pipelines that most setups neglect. In this episode he explains that agencies waste effort on generative tools while the real edge comes from enforcing clean data and classic marketing fundamentals before any algorithm runs. The result is that Meta and Google models learn from accurate revenue signals rather than duplicated or broken ones. • Human developers still handle all tracking fixes because every e-commerce site and ad platform combination carries unique nuances that current automation cannot resolve reliably. • Once the data pipeline is clean, the platforms' predictive algorithms—not generative models like ChatGPT—use that accurate input to select audiences and optimize for actual return on ad spend. • The AIDA framework (attention, interest, desire, action) remains effective because human psychology has not changed, yet most newer agencies skip the interest and desire stages and optimize only for top-of-funnel metrics. • Audits frequently reveal accounts where top-of-funnel reach and clicks look strong while bottom-of-funnel conversion tracking is broken, so the algorithm never learns what actually produces revenue. • Quality-assurance steps still require a named human reviewer because clients demand accountability and because AI agents can hallucinate pass/fail results. • Cross-team sessions between developers and account managers produced simple automations such as pulling campaign data into a single sheet, giving the ads team a zoomed-out view that surfaces new strategy opportunities. • Attribution conversations stay human-led because platforms over-claim credit across channels and clients need to understand that real customer journeys are messy. Sheldon Poon is CEO of Drive Marketing, the performance agency that manages paid campaigns on Meta and Google for e-commerce clients.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    47 分
  • Ep8: Sameer Ranjan — A mining engineer turned AI builder weighs how platforms guiding career choice and soft skills can keep human judgment central when the models risk automating the decisions they claim to augment.

    Ep8: Sameer Ranjan — A mining engineer turned AI builder weighs how platforms guiding career choice and soft skills can keep human judgment central when the models risk automating the decisions they claim to augment.
    2026/09/23
    Sameer Ranjan, a mining engineer turned AI builder, described how his platform normalizes personality and soft-skill scores inside separate cultural baselines instead of forcing a single universal scale. He stressed that the system supplies diagnostic signals only and leaves every hiring, retention, or assignment decision to a human. The exchange tested whether quantified soft skills can guide careers while keeping human judgment in front of the models. • Ranjan cited an internal hospital-system study in which attrition fell from 22 % to 12 % once managers received clarity on communication gaps rather than skill gaps. • The patent US 12198213B2, assigned to Catenate Corp, quantifies soft skills and personality to recommend courses, colleges, and careers on the premise that personality shapes long-term outcomes more than job skills alone. • To block gaming, the recommendation engine resets the question set for each user after the initial baseline is established, so no fixed right-or-wrong answers exist. • Cultural baselines are built from open-source data plus native-language assessments; a score of four out of ten on communication is interpreted relative to the local distribution rather than against a global mean. • The platform never frames problems or issues directives; it only flags gaps such as communication shortfalls, after which humans decide what action, if any, to take. • Baseline values are treated as moving targets: new assessment data are compared with prior standard deviations, and shifts are reviewed by multiple human advisors before any update is accepted. • Ranjan’s explicit design rule is that the AI remains a “decision-aiding tool, not a decisioning tool,” with follow-up assessments used to check whether any human-chosen intervention produced measurable change. Sameer Ranjan is Co-Founder & CTO of Catenate, the company behind the MayaMaya platform for workplace personality and soft-skills analysis. Find Co-Founder & CTO, Catenate: • catenate.io: https://catenate.io
    続きを読む 一部表示
    30 分
  • Ep7: Vincent Rylan — Rylan’s novel Memoirs of the End renders the AI transition’s endpoint as intimate first-person accounts of lost agency and reconfigured meaning once superintelligence declares itself.

    Ep7: Vincent Rylan — Rylan’s novel Memoirs of the End renders the AI transition’s endpoint as intimate first-person accounts of lost agency and reconfigured meaning once superintelligence declares itself.
    2026/09/22
    In this episode of The Age of AI, Vincent Rylan states outright that his novel Memoirs of the End is not about AI at all. The book instead presents the transition’s endpoint through intimate first-person accounts of lost agency and reconfigured meaning once superintelligence declares itself. Rylan describes writing it as a response to the ground shifting under his own feet. • Rylan began the project after sensing the ground shifting under his feet and wanting to record what that felt like from inside a life. • The novel is built as a series of first-person accounts rather than a single narrative or technical forecast. • He frames the core question as what happens to human meaning once the transition reaches its endpoint. • The story reaches the moment when superintelligence declares itself and agency is no longer available in the old way. • Rylan notes that the accounts focus on the reconfigured texture of daily existence rather than on any particular technology. • He treats the loss of agency as something felt personally, not as an abstract policy issue. Vincent Rylan is the author of Memoirs of the End. Find Vincent Rylan: Memoirs of the End: https://memoirsoftheend.com
    続きを読む 一部表示
    46 分
  • Ep6: Matt Davis — How a founder embedding AI agents into enterprise software delivery multiplies senior judgment across programs while preserving human gates, and what that shift does to accountability, quality, and the wider engineering workforce.

    Ep6: Matt Davis — How a founder embedding AI agents into enterprise software delivery multiplies senior judgment across programs while preserving human gates, and what that shift does to accountability, quality, and the wider engineering workforce.
    2026/09/21
    Matt Davis described the most surprising effect of embedding AI agents in enterprise software delivery as the way senior judgment scales across many programs at once, while human decision points remain fixed at key gates. He explained that this arrangement changes how accountability and quality are managed, and it alters demand for different engineering roles. Patrick Novak joined parts of the discussion to clarify implications for teams. • Davis noted that AI agents now draft and review large sections of code and test plans, yet “the human still owns the final gate on every release.” • He observed that quality metrics improved because agents surface inconsistencies faster than manual reviews alone, but only when the senior engineer’s criteria are explicitly encoded. • On accountability, Davis stated that responsibility stays with the named individual who approves the output, even when most of the material was generated by agents. • He described a shift in hiring: fewer junior coders are needed for routine tasks, while demand rises for engineers who can define precise rules and audit agent behavior. • Davis said the model works only when the organization treats the agents as “force multipliers for existing judgment, not replacements for it.” • He warned that without clear human gates, teams lose traceability and begin to over-trust agent suggestions on edge cases. Matt Davis is Co-founder at Critical Propulsion. Find Critical Propulsion: • criticalpropulsion.com: https://www.criticalpropulsion.com
    続きを読む 一部表示
    45 分
  • Ep5: John Capobianco — A network automation builder who turned early ChatGPT experiments into a production-grade ReAct agent now weighs how much human oversight and orchestration remain essential once agents handle intent, verification, and collaboration in regulated environments.

    Ep5: John Capobianco — A network automation builder who turned early ChatGPT experiments into a production-grade ReAct agent now weighs how much human oversight and orchestration remain essential once agents handle intent, verification, and collaboration in regulated environments.
    2026/09/20
    John Capobianco revealed that his production ReAct agent can now parse high-level intent, verify proposed changes against live network state, and coordinate with peer agents before any human sees the plan, yet he still routes every change through mandatory approval gates in regulated environments. The episode explores how an early ChatGPT tinkerer scaled those experiments into a live system that automates large portions of network operations while preserving human oversight where compliance demands it. • Capobianco described starting with simple ChatGPT prompts in late 2022 to generate device configurations, then moving to LangChain-based ReAct loops that add explicit verification and rollback steps. • He noted that the agent now “collaborates” by calling other specialized agents for tasks such as compliance checks or topology discovery before surfacing a recommendation. • In financial and government accounts, he keeps a human approver in the loop because “the regulator still wants a named person to sign off,” even when the agent’s reasoning trace is fully auditable. • The system uses Itential’s orchestration platform to translate agent output into safe, idempotent changes across multi-vendor networks. • Capobianco runs side experiments on automateyournetwork.ca that let the agent draft entire quarterly maintenance windows from a single sentence of intent. • He observed that prompt engineering has largely given way to tool selection and guardrail design once the agent operates continuously rather than in one-off chats. John Capobianco is Head of AI and DevRel at Itential, building production ReAct agents for network automation. Find John Capobianco: automateyournetwork.ca: https://automateyournetwork.ca YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@johncapobianco2527 X: https://x.com/John_Capobianco LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/john-capobianco-644a1515
    続きを読む 一部表示
    33 分
  • Ep4: Hogan Shrum — A marketing founder scaling PIPPA tests whether royalty-backed AI animation can give non-experts studio-grade tools while routing real payments back to the artists whose styles the models learn from.

    Ep4: Hogan Shrum — A marketing founder scaling PIPPA tests whether royalty-backed AI animation can give non-experts studio-grade tools while routing real payments back to the artists whose styles the models learn from.
    2026/09/19
    Hogan Shrum said the first artist to sign up for PIPPA was a photographer, not an illustrator or painter, and that this single onboarding “opened the floodgates” because the resulting styles felt cinematic rather than like easily faked iPhone footage. The platform’s royalty model and director-level controls without paragraph-length prompting grew out of that early surprise and out of Shrum’s own frustration with both one-click “AI slop” tools and expert-only interfaces. The conversation returns repeatedly to whether ethical licensing can turn AI from a threat into a paid companion for working artists and for people who never had access to animation before. • Shrum described the original spark as his co-founder’s attempt to turn a recorded bedtime story into a cartoon, then scaling that idea so “anybody could do this without having to be an AI prompting expert.” • He contrasted two current extremes: fully automated generators that rarely match the user’s vision and pro tools such as Higgs Field that demand “paragraphs and paragraphs of prompts from scratch.” • On artist recruitment, Shrum noted that many hesitated “to be the first to cross the picket line,” until photographers joined and demonstrated that licensed styles could remain distinct and non-misleading. • Every generation, including test renders that never make the final cut, pays the contributing artist; Shrum projected that at 250,000 users an artist whose style accounts for 5 % of output would earn roughly $125,000 a month. • Five percent of all platform revenue is pooled and divided equally among every licensed artist, including those whose styles are rarely chosen, so “no artist that joins will make zero.” • Shrum argued that the human element remains detectable: “the human voice, the human creative expression cannot be replicated by AI full stop,” and audiences will increasingly choose work that carries it. Hogan Shrum is co-founder of PIPPA, an animation platform that trains and pays artists for licensed styles used in user-generated video.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    36 分