エピソード

  • The Nest, The Forger, and the Missing Reclining Woman

    The Nest, The Forger, and the Missing Reclining Woman
    2026/07/26
    The Nest, The Forger, and the Missing Reclining Woman

    A meter reader stopped mid-route to photograph a house finch nest tucked into a coffee-mug-sized hollow on the left shoulder of a bronze torso - a concavity that should not have existed and that exposed a forgery scheme tied to a trusted museum registrar. How did a retained casting mold, a nine-year professional relationship, and a key to a maintenance gate turn fifteen promised sculptures into copies and one reclining woman into a missing original?

    In this episode, we tell how a routine meter reading and intake photographs became the crucial evidence in a theft from a public garden collection, and we follow the chronology from Elspeth Crane’s bequest to the discovery that at least three of her fifteen bronzes had been replaced - where did the originals go?

    Person: Elspeth Crane
    Date: March 2019 (death)
    Event: Bequest of fifteen Howard Webb bronzes to the Portsmith public garden
    Person: Donna Pryce (registrar and conservator)
    Date: November 14, 2019 (discovery by Carl Zimmerman)

    - Carl Zimmerman stopped and photographed the nest at 9:17 AM on November 14, 2019, while on the Haverford Heights route.
    - Elspeth Crane owned fifteen Howard Webb bronzes and died at age 78 in March 2019.
    - The installation was completed by late August 2019 and a dedication was scheduled for November 16, 2019.
    - Donna Pryce had a nine-year professional relationship with Howard Webb and signed off on the fifteen bronzes at intake in August, photographing and recording their condition.
    - By the morning of November 14, 2019, at least three of Crane’s fifteen pieces had been replaced with copies made from retained molds, and one original reclining female figure already had a buyer.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    21 分
  • The Conservator's Sticky Note That Revealed a Stolen Abell

    The Conservator's Sticky Note That Revealed a Stolen Abell
    2026/07/25
    The Conservator's Sticky Note That Revealed a Stolen Abell

    The moment a volunteer found a small taped yellow note saying "The varnish on this one is seventeen years wrong," a modest 16x20 oil attributed to Thomas Abell stopped being ordinary - insured for $48,000, on loan for 22 years, and quietly altered. How did a conservator's handwriting and a UV lamp expose a switch that left the original missing for about 14 months?

    In this episode, we follow the sequence of events revealed by conservator notes, UV and raking-light findings, invoices, and missing reports to trace how one professional's observation changed the painting's documented history - and why the Abell on the church wall was not what records and custodians believed.

    Person: Gail Kowalski
    Date: October 14, 2009
    Person: Lisa Weaver
    Size: approximately 16 by 20 inches
    Insurance: $48,000

    - The sticky note was yellow, small, taped to the lower-right corner, and read "The varnish on this one is seventeen years wrong."
    - The painting had hung on the wall for 22 years on loan from the Hester Estate.
    - Under UV light, the upper two-thirds fluoresced greenish-gold while the lower area was nearly dark with faint blueish-white fluorescence.
    - Lisa Weaver had previously worked on the painting in 2001 for two days at the request of dealer Frank Aldridge.
    - By the time the FBI knocked, the original Abell had been missing for roughly 14 months.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    20 分
  • The Replica in the Reeds: How a €1.4M Boel Disappeared

    The Replica in the Reeds: How a €1.4M Boel Disappeared
    2026/07/24
    The Replica in the Reeds: How a €1.4M Boel Disappeared

    A purpose-built art crate marked "REPRODUCTION - NO COMMERCIAL VALUE" sat in levee grass near Stockton with a blue moisture strip and a painting inside valued at €1.4M - how did a masterwork end up abandoned two hundred miles from where it was stolen, and who ordered a years-long replica to cover the theft?

    In this episode, we follow the sequence of events from a Houston River Oaks living room to a crate found by a terrier on September 9, 2019, tracing the missing seventeenth-century Flemish painting, the convincing giclée left in its place, and the cleared customs stamp that arrived days before the theft was reported; how could an operation run both directions at once?

    Person: Ted Norris
    Date (theft reported): September 5, 2019
    Date (crate found): September 9, 2019
    Valuation: €1.4 million
    Agent: Dawn Bauer, FBI Art Crime Team

    - The crate was found on the eastern levee of Blackwater Slough just outside Stockton, California.
    - The moisture indicator strip inside the crate was blue, indicating it had remained dry.
    - The original canvas measured 31 inches by 44 inches and depicted a reclining allegorical figure with a peacock.
    - The crate had cleared United States Customs at the Port of Los Angeles on September 2, 2019.
    - The reproduction label stenciled on the outside of the crate read: REPRODUCTION - NO COMMERCIAL VALUE.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    18 分
  • The Frame That Held an Empty Wall: How a Painting Vanished

    The Frame That Held an Empty Wall: How a Painting Vanished
    2026/07/24
    The Frame That Held an Empty Wall: How a Painting Vanished

    A frame hung perfectly on a gallery wall for nearly eleven months while the painting it once held sat quietly in a private home-insured for $68,000 and missing from plain sight. How did a careful substitution, a deliberately chipped replica, and a Tuesday evening phone call conspire to hide a heist for almost a year?

    In this episode, we follow the timeline from a retired postal supervisor’s photo to the six-week investigation that reconstructed a plan built over twelve months, asking how institutional routines and one replicated flaw allowed a theft to go unnoticed.

    Person: Warren Harris
    Person: Donna Fike
    Person: George Whitaker
    Date: January 14, 2019
    Value: $68,000

    - The painting Meadow Study No. 4 was absent from Gallery Four for nearly eleven months before being noticed.
    - The original frame measured thirty-one by twenty-five inches and had a documented chip at the lower-left corner.
    - A replica frame was ordered in January 2018 from the Delmont Workshop in Cincinnati and picked up in February 2018.
    - The Dellbrook Civic Collection’s most recent appraisal used for the replica photographs was completed in 2014.
    - The collection’s formal inventory was conducted annually with physical checks concentrated in the spring, and the north wall sat outside the sightline of two security cameras.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    20 分
  • A Painting Appears on Cold Concrete: The Pfeiffer Still Life

    A Painting Appears on Cold Concrete: The Pfeiffer Still Life
    2026/07/23
    A Painting Appears on Cold Concrete: The Pfeiffer Still Life

    A discarded painting appears on a bare garage floor at 6:40 a.m. despite an estate sale record showing it sold; a fragment of worn gilding and a swapped frame reveal a theft planned across state lines - who drove through the night for that picture, and why? This episode centers on a single painting that vanished from a locked house and reappeared where it should not have been.

    In this episode, we follow the sequence of events from appraisal to estate sale to the morning a paperboy found the painting, and we trace the choices that connected a picker in Ohio to a garage in Dunmore, Pennsylvania. How did a $400 listing and a $35 substitute create the perfect cover for a theft?

    Person: Ralph Simpson
    Date: December 11, 2019
    Location: Elm Trace Road, Dunmore, Pennsylvania
    Status: Found on garage floor despite prior sale record
    Event: Estate sale listed November 22, 2019

    - The painting was first photographed by appraiser Vic Norris during a four-hour visit in November 2019 and valued at $400.
    - Donna Pelham posted the estate sale online on November 22, 2019, showing the painting in a different room and a subtly different gilded frame.
    - Wendy Vaughn, a 44-year-old picker from Columbus, Ohio, purchased a substitute floral still life in Ohio for approximately $35.
    - The garage keypad code printed on the buyer information sheet was Connie Pfeiffer’s birthdate and was used by a registered buyer to access the property.
    - Ralph Simpson, age 15, found the framed oil painting propped against the interior garage wall at 6:40 a.m, on December 11, 2019.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    22 分
  • Wet Paint at 17°F: The Museum Slot That Lied

    Wet Paint at 17°F: The Museum Slot That Lied
    2026/07/23
    Wet Paint at 17°F: The Museum Slot That Lied

    Cold, early-morning discovery: a canvas still wet at 17°F found in an Ohio alley started a chain that exposed a painted-in-place deception inside a museum storage bay-how did a work stored for fourteen years end up replaced by a different canvas with new hardware, and what was left in its original slot?

    In this episode, we follow the sequence of facts from discovery to investigation, laying out who handled the painting, where it was kept, and the exact anomalies that tipped off the investigator. Listen to learn how condition reports, accession tags, and fasteners became the clues that raised the central question: what sat in the slot when the original was gone?

    Person: Frances Jenkins
    Date: November 9, 2021
    Location: Portsmith, Ohio
    Object: November Furrow (canvas, 30 in x 24 in)
    Value: $84,000

    - The canvas was found wedged between a dumpster enclosure and a cinder-block wall at 5:40 a.m.
    - The outdoor temperature at discovery was 17°F and the canvas was still wet.
    - November Furrow was donated in 2007 and had been stored in Storage Bay Four for 14 years.
    - The painting measures 30 inches by 24 inches and was assessed at $84,000 at intake.
    - An investigator found the frame corner fasteners in the slot were bright and months old, unlike the original oxidized hardware in the 2007 intake photo.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    18 分
  • The Warm Mug on a Fake: How a Priceless Painting Vanished

    The Warm Mug on a Fake: How a Priceless Painting Vanished
    2026/07/23
    The Warm Mug on a Fake: How a Priceless Painting Vanished

    A small, warm coffee mug becomes the smoking gun in a deception that left a four-million-dollar painting replaced by a fake. A conservator redeemed loyalty points at a diner 37 times, copied a registrar’s keycard in a four-minute window, and set in motion off-hour entries that lasted 20-40 minutes-so who staged the switch and why does a mug from a single diner matter?

    In this episode, we follow the timeline of access logs, museum procedures, and the conservator networks that connected the people involved, laying out how routine museum practices were exploited and what investigators found when the substitute canvas was discovered; how was the original removed months earlier without immediate detection?

    Person: Sherry Boyd
    Location: Vossler Center, Dunmore, Pennsylvania
    Date: Examination scheduled August 29, 2019
    Event: Off-hours storage wing entries recorded 11 times between October 2018 and September 2019
    Item: Painting "Afternoon at Dormer Cove," approx 30 x 42 inches, oil on linen, painted 1911

    - Boyd redeemed Patsy's Diner loyalty points 37 times over two years and was known to staff by her order.
    - Donna Peltz had been Vossler's registrar for 14 years and had a keycard that was physically with her when a copy was made.
    - A copied keycard began appearing in access logs for entries between 5-7 AM or 11 PM-1 AM on 11 occasions.
    - Each unauthorized storage wing entry lasted between 20 and 40 minutes and occurred when Peltz was traveling or at off-site meetings.
    - The supposedly original painting had been insured at one point for four million dollars and owned by the museum since 1988.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    20 分
  • Runner Finds the Door Open: The Field Study in Fallow Heist

    Runner Finds the Door Open: The Field Study in Fallow Heist
    2026/07/23
    Runner Finds the Door Open: The Field Study in Fallow Heist

    A humming HEPA air purifier was left running in an empty gallery at 6:15 AM, with a $40,000 painting gone and a sealed bin of 30 pounds of charcoal briquettes on the floor-how did someone with no forced entry take a climate-sensitive oil on linen without triggering alarms? Who used a known four-digit code to enter at 11:46 PM and leave at 1:52 AM, and why was the gallery’s conservation setup left exactly as the owner kept it?

    In this episode, we lay out the timeline and the concrete scene details from the morning the theft was discovered and the hours before it happened, presenting the people, the alarm log, and the objects that may point to how the theft was executed. Can the humming purifier, the charcoal, and the unchanged alarm code explain who walked out with Elwood Paske’s Field Study in Fallow?

    Person: Douglas Pelerin
    Person: Wendy Henderson
    Person: Al Voss
    Date: September 11, 2019
    Item: Field Study in Fallow (40 x 30-inch oil on linen)

    - Gallery loading bay door was found open at 6:15 AM by runner Chad Long.
    - 9-1-1 call placed at 6:27 AM; no lock forced, no glass broken, no alarm sounded.
    - Painting valued at $40,000 missing; empty label bracket and wall-text reading "private loan" remained.
    - Alarm log: disarmed at 11:46 PM and re-armed at 1:52 AM with code 7415; total inside time 1 hour 6 minutes.
    - Sealed clear plastic bin containing approximately 30 pounds of dry hardwood charcoal briquettes was left on a power strip under where the painting hung.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    18 分