『Statz Don't Lie』のカバーアート

Statz Don't Lie

Statz Don't Lie

著者: Sean Statzer
無料で聴く

このコンテンツについて

Statz Don’t Lie helps listeners make sense of the debates that divide us — weaving current events, history, and faith into the human experience. Essays, podcasts, and reflections that cut through the noise with clarity and compassion.

statz.substack.comSean Statzer
スピリチュアリティ 政治・政府 政治学
エピソード
  • Band-Aid's Don't Heal Critical Injuries: An Urgent Message For The Post-Kirk Church
    2025/10/13

    Disclaimer: This essay steps into complex and uncomfortable territory. I’ve linked key terms and claims to reputable sources for readers who want more context. You may not agree with every conclusion, and that’s okay. My aim isn’t to provoke anger but reflection—to help us think more deeply, especially when we differ. If you find anything I say here to be problematic, I’d like to encourage you to visit statz.substack.com where you can find this episode in essay form with all key terms and claims linked to reputable sources.



    Get full access to Statz Don't Lie at statz.substack.com/subscribe
    続きを読む 一部表示
    31 分
  • Ep. 3 - Performative Persecution: The American Church's Obsession With Oppression
    2025/09/22
    At the 2024 Paris Olympics, breakdancing made its debut as an official sport, to the excitement of older hip-hop heads like myself. Some of the best breakers in the world competed on a global stage—a huge moment, though one that won’t return in 2028 or 2032.Yet what most remember isn’t the exceptional creativity of b-boys and b-girls like Canada’s Philip Kim (Phil Wizard), who won gold. Few can name a medalist, but nearly everyone remembers one competitor: Rachel Gunn, aka Raygun.Raygun lost all three battles in the round-robin stage without scoring a point, and her routines didn’t resemble breakdancing in any traditional sense. Which would be fine—if she weren’t competing at the highest level of the sport. Breakdancing has a clear history of demanding power moves that take years of sacrifice. Raygun may be a good dancer, but her routines looked like something from a weekend workshop, not the culmination of years mastering hip-hop’s most athletic element.Her “kangaroo hop” and “sprinkler” went viral, overshadowing the athletes who earned their place on that stage. Soon after, Gunn retired from competition, citing the wave of negativity and its toll on her mental health.I’m not here to attack Rachel Gunn. Maybe her intentions were pure. But what the world saw looked like stolen valor—her inclusion cheapened the art form and robbed others of their moment.This essay is about that same effect in our public faith: American evangelicals often perform persecution while others endure it — and the performance cheapens real suffering.Clear DefinitionsTo talk seriously about persecution, we need clean definitions—specifically in the context of religious persecution, particularly of Christians.Persecution: the deliberate targeting of a person or group for their beliefs. Christian tradition holds that the apostles were martyred for preaching Christ—that’s persecution.Oppression: when structures, laws, and policies are weaponized to restrict the dignity and freedom of believers. Oppression turns persecution into policy.Cultural opposition: the natural clash of worldviews in a pluralistic society (like a Democratic Republic made up of a diverse group of people).People may reject Christian values, criticize them, or choose others—but that is not persecution.Granted, these categories can overlap and sometimes feel unclear. But even then, an objective look at the circumstances is usually enough to make the distinction.And now we can land the analogy: If there were an Olympic event awarding medals to the most persecuted and oppressed Christians worldwide, American evangelicals—white evangelicals especially—would show up front and center, eager to don their laurels and wave to an adoring crowd. But like Raygun, their performance would look like stolen valor. Their “persecution” would be exposed as little more than cultural opposition, staged on the same platform alongside brothers and sisters enduring actual persecution and oppression.The result? Their theatrics would cheapen genuine suffering, damage our Christian witness, and divert attention from those who deserve our solidarity the most. Not to mention, the backlash they recieved would become the newest controversy they weaponize to victimize themselves and their beliefs instead of seeing it for what it is.Manufactured MartyrdomIn the U.S., religious freedom and the separation of church and state are two pillars of our system. Remove either, and the other quickly collapses.Yet in recent years, politicians and celebrity pastors have increasingly portrayed Christianity as under siege. From Trump’s rallies (“They’re not after me, they’re after you”) (Reuters), to Franklin Graham warning that Christians are being pushed out of public life (PBS), to Paula White framing cultural disagreements as spiritual war (Christianity Today)—persecution has become a political talking point. Even federal agencies stumble into this narrative: when the Department of Homeland Security posted the 1872 painting American Progress, critics said it glorified Manifest Destiny and evoked white Christian nationalism (Los Angeles Times).Nationalism thrives on fear. To weaponize the church, leaders need believers to feel attacked, persecuted, oppressed—to see an enemy at the gates. That outrage can then be harnessed, not for Christ’s kingdom, but for political power.To be fair, Christians in America do sometimes encounter bias or exclusion—whether in media caricatures, workplace conflicts, or elite cultural spaces. Those experiences can sting, and they shouldn’t be brushed aside. But they aren’t systemic persecution. Too often, cultural opposition or loss of privilege is rebranded as martyrdom (The Atlantic).Organizations like the American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ) capitalize on this fear. They frame every courthouse nativity or school-prayer dispute as the first domino on the road to gulags. It’s effective fundraising, ...
    続きを読む 一部表示
    18 分
  • Ep 2: Escaping Society's Cardboard Prison
    2025/09/22
    The Problem With BoxesWe all do it. Across the spectrum, it doesn't matter where you stand—we've been conditioned to categorize. Putting a vast group of different people into the same box because of one shared label is obviously problematic. So why do we do it every day?America is a country of roughly 340 million people, and we're no monolith. I would argue—and often do—that diversity is our greatest strength. And this isn't just true of population, ethnicity, or culture. Diversity of opinion is crucial for genuine growth and development in reasoning skills and intellect. Diversity strengthens markets. Diversity strengthens communities. Diversity strengthens faith. Iron sharpens Iron. Boxes keep us from seeing that potential.When we reduce people to boxes, they lose their individuality in our eyes. It's hard to stand face to face with a person and speak your mind, but when you're addressing a box? You can dehumanize them all you want and walk away with a clear conscience.The more you put others in boxes, the more you box yourself in. That's because we use these boxes as building blocks to fortify our own narratives, but we create walls that cut us off from reality—and from the beauty of God's diverse creation.The Recession of TrustI don't think it's too much of a stretch to say that the political landscape in America has been a real clown show in recent years. At this point, I couldn't care less what your political affiliation is. I'm baffled that so many still blindly defend one side or the other after the lies and failures of both parties. And according to recent polling, nearly a third of Americans now reject both major parties.1Party "dealignment" is real: independents are growing,2 partisanship is weakening, and trust in both Democrats and Republicans is collapsing.3 People are waking up to the fact that they've been existing in boxes, and they're realizing the labels on those boxes don't reflect their convictions, actions, or beliefs.Gaza as a Shattering ExampleNowhere is this clearer than in the debate over Gaza. For decades, support for Israel has been a bipartisan rite of passage, a sacred cow in Washington. But the war has fractured partisan lines in ways few other issues have. Among Democrats, sympathy for Palestinians has surged,4 with majorities now opposing more aid to Israel—even as many Democratic leaders vote the other way.5 Independents lean the same direction, and even younger Republicans are questioning the official narrative.So while the fracture is most pronounced inside the "blue team," it's not exclusive to them. Gaza has exposed a deeper reality: across the board, Americans are tired of seeing their taxes leave our country to fund endless wars—and now a live-streamed genocide—while their own needs are ignored.678I watched Mehdi Hasan respond to a question that captured this tension. A woman said she was disoriented as a Democrat: her party had ignored its base to keep sending billions to Israel, while the only public figures she saw speaking against it were Marjorie Taylor Greene, Tucker Carlson, and Candace Owens—figures she's never agreed with about anything. Hasan acknowledged this paradox, and admitted they were "at least more correct than the rest" on this issue, but reminded her they still had their own agendas. He closed with: "I think we can see a free Palestine without aligning ourselves with white Christian nationalists."I understand the sentiment. But I firmly disagree. Hear me out.A Different Playing FieldWe're witnessing a massive ideological shift across the spectrum. It's being driven by economic pressure, political corruption, and moral clarity. People from all walks of life are waking up and asking: "Why are we unconditionally shielding Israel from accountability?"Their motivations are as diverse as the people themselves—ranging from Jewish Holocaust survivors determined to prevent another genocide in their name, to neo-Nazis exploiting the outrage to stoke antisemitism.Even here in the southern "Bible Belt", for the last two years I've stood shoulder to shoulder with Jewish, Muslim, and Christian brothers and sisters in demanding our elected officials work to stop arming Israel.And once it became a united policy in most western nations to dispose of any voice critical of Israel to the "antisemite" box—once used to shine a light on real hatred—that box has since burst from the weight of people calling out the evils they see with their own eyes.The Value of Coming TogetherComing together on this issue can push public policy away from cosigning the slaughter of civilians, but it can also produce dialogue between right and left, middle and margins, that just might knock down these prison walls.True progress starts with a willingness to wield the truth with the logic of love—not as a weapon to defeat "them." The simple, risky act of meeting people where they are, on whatever small patch of common ground can be found. That's where grace ...
    続きを読む 一部表示
    12 分
まだレビューはありません