『Screams & Streams』のカバーアート

Screams & Streams

Screams & Streams

著者: Chad Mike & Sam
無料で聴く

このコンテンツについて

What if you could get a front row seat on a journey through the best and worst horror movies of the past half-century, all rated on Rotten Tomatoes? Brace yourself for an eerie tour with your hosts, Chad Campbell, Mike Carron, and Sam Schreiner, as they dissect each film with a surgeon's precision and a fan's passion. Our story began on a mundane work day, when two colleagues, Chad and Mike, decided to start a podcast centered on their shared love for horror films. The search for a genre was a winding, convoluted exploration of possibilities, before we arrived at the chilling idea of horror films.

Our journey didn’t stop there. We had to figure out where to begin, how to categorize each film, and the scale to use for our rating system. We landed on a year-by-year review of the best and the worst films, starting from 1970 - the dawn of modern horror. Our shows come packed with a variety of categories like First Impressions, Tropes Hall of Shame, One-liners, and more. We also rate each film on a watchability scale, advising if it's worth your precious time. Join us as we sometimes agree, and other times disagree with Rotten Tomatoes' ratings. So, fasten your seat belts, it's going to be a spooky ride!

Head to www.screamsandstreams.com for links and information related to our episodes.

© 2025 Screams & Streams
アート
エピソード
  • Ep. 98: Luis Llosa’s "Anaconda" (1997)
    2025/10/04

    A film crew, a rogue hunter, and a snake that just won’t stop—we take on Anaconda (1997) with equal parts curiosity and side‑eye. We open with a quick plot setup and a themed “sinister sip” that goes spectacularly wrong (absinthe plus tequila, never again), then dive into why this movie feels bigger in memory than it does on rewatch. From the out‑of‑place British adventurer to the hitchhiker-turned-expert guide, we map the 90s trope trail and ask the only question that matters: does any of it still create real suspense?

    We break down the effects with clear eyes: when the practical puppet holds still, menace flickers; when the CGI coils and strikes, the illusion collapses. The sound design turns the jungle into a loudspeaker—snake screams, thunder with no storm—and leaves little room for the quiet dread that makes creature features legendary. There are wins: the snake-mouth camera shot remains gnarly, and the opaque water of the Amazon still triggers primal fear. But character beats struggle under dated writing, from forced flirtations to token comic relief, and Jon Voight’s accent becomes its own villain. Along the way, we sprinkle snake facts to separate myth from movie—regurgitation as stress response, nocturnal patterns, and why a real anaconda wouldn’t behave like a slasher on a vendetta.

    If you love monster movies, we place Anaconda on the map next to Jaws, Deep Blue Sea, and The Meg—what those films get right about tension, pacing, and rules. We also share standout trivia: the eye-watering CGI costs, surprising voicework, and the franchise’s improbable lifecycle. Our verdict is candid but fair; we can appreciate the campy spectacle, quote a few lines with a grin, and still say the craft can’t keep the stakes afloat.

    Enjoy the breakdown, grab a better drink than ours, and tell us your hot take. If you’re into horror deep dives, creature-feature history, and the art of suspense, hit follow, share with a friend, and leave a quick review—it helps more curious listeners find the show.

    Head to www.screamsandstreams.com for more information related to our episode.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    48 分
  • Ep. 97: Robert Rodriguez's "From Dusk Till Dawn" (1996)
    2025/09/27

    The unexpected brilliance of From Dusk Till Dawn lies in its fearless genre-bending approach. Starting as a gritty crime thriller following the Gecko brothers on a violent spree across Texas, the film morphs into a blood-soaked vampire extravaganza without warning – leaving audiences either thrilled or bewildered. This bold storytelling choice creates an unforgettable viewing experience that continues to captivate fans decades after its release.

    George Clooney shines as Seth Gecko, bringing a perfect balance of menace and charisma to his role as the professional criminal trying to keep his unstable brother Richie (Quentin Tarantino) in check. Harvey Keitel delivers a powerful performance as Jacob Fuller, a former pastor who lost his faith but finds purpose again when facing literal demons. When these unlikely allies end up at the "Titty Twister," a remote strip club that serves as a front for ancient vampires, they're forced to fight for survival until dawn.

    Robert Rodriguez's direction perfectly complements Tarantino's script, creating a film that's simultaneously disturbing, hilarious, and action-packed. The practical effects may seem dated by today's standards, but they give the film a tangible quality that CGI often lacks. From Salma Hayek's mesmerizing entrance as Santanico Pandemonium to the creative vampire kills throughout the final act, every moment feels both unexpected and inevitable.

    What makes From Dusk Till Dawn endure isn't just its shocking mid-film twist or its quotable dialogue – it's how it constantly subverts expectations while telling a surprisingly coherent story about redemption and survival. The film refuses to be categorized, blending crime thriller, horror, dark comedy, and action elements into something uniquely entertaining. Whether you're experiencing it for the first time or revisiting this cult classic, prepare for a blood-soaked journey that starts in a liquor store and ends in a temple of ancient vampire gods.

    Head to www.screamsandstreams.com for more information related to our episode.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    1 時間 5 分
  • Ep. 96: Rodman Flender’s “Leprechaun 2” (1994)
    2025/09/20

    Ever wondered what happens when folklore meets filmmaking failure? Look no further than our deep dive into 1994's "Leprechaun 2," a horror sequel so bizarre it might just leave you questioning everything you thought you knew about Irish mythology.

    When we first pressed play on this Saint Patrick's Day nightmare (which scored a dismal 6% on Rotten Tomatoes), we weren't prepared for the sheer absurdity awaiting us. The plot follows an evil leprechaun who must wait 1,000 years before claiming a bride, specifically targeting the descendant of a woman he previously failed to marry. What unfolds is a confusing mess of poorly executed horror tropes, offensive stereotypes, and production values that would make a high school drama department blush.

    The conversation takes us through endless questions about leprechaun reproduction (a Google rabbit hole you never knew existed), the baffling underground lair that appears to be constructed from paper mâché with visible lighting showing through, and death scenes that consistently happen off-screen just when they might actually become interesting. We can't help but laugh at the unintentionally hilarious moments, like a death involving what appears to be breasts but turns out to be lawnmower blades, or the leprechaun's constant failed attempts at menacing one-liners.

    Beyond the technical failures, we explore the film's problematic elements, including its rampant misogyny and uncomfortable sexual undertones. Did you know Jennifer Aniston turned down returning for this sequel to focus on Friends? After watching, we'd say she made the right career choice. We also share fascinating trivia about alternative plots considered for the film (including Warwick Davis in drag as the leprechaun's wife) and bizarre international titles like Ireland's "One Wedding and Lots of Funerals."

    Whether you're a horror aficionado, a fan of spectacularly bad movies, or simply curious about the depths to which a franchise can sink, this episode offers plenty of laughs and insights. Subscribe now, follow us on Instagram @screamstreampod, and visit our website to recommend the next horror disaster you'd like us to endure for your entertainment.

    Head to www.screamsandstreams.com for more information related to our episode.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    48 分
まだレビューはありません