エピソード

  • DNA Mutation Rates Expose the Myth of Ancient Earth – Radiometric Dating Debunked - SC2527
    2025/09/13

    Groundbreaking DNA research is shattering the evolutionary timeline! In this eye-opening episode of Science Conversations, Dr. John Ashton reveals explosive scientific evidence showing life on Earth simply cannot be millions of years old.

    What You’ll Discover:

    • DNA’s Time Limit: Human DNA accumulates 90,000 errors in just 6,000 years. By 6 million years, 3% of our genetic code would be damaged—making long-term survival impossible.
    • Genetic Decay Accelerates: Over 10,000 genetic diseases now catalogued, and the number keeps rising.
    • Soft Tissue Shockers: Collagen, muscle fiber, and DNA fragments found in dinosaur fossils supposedly 70 million years old—biologically impossible!
    • Living Bacteria in Ancient Salt: Viable bacteria discovered in “250 million year old” salt crystals—contradicting evolutionary dating.
    • Mitochondrial Mayhem: Just 1% of genes control 10% of our DNA’s function, and errors here rapidly lead to organism failure.
    • Mutation Rates Confirm Young Life: Dr. John Sanford (Cornell University) calculates a maximum realistic age for life on Earth: 10,000–100,000 years, more closely matching the biblical creation timeline.

    Why You Haven’t Heard This in School:

    Mainstream science textbooks rarely mention these findings, but top journals like Nature are publishing the data. The evidence is converging on a young Earth, supporting the Bible’s account and challenging the radiometric dating methods taught as fact.

    Don’t miss the finale of our radiometric dating series! Subscribe for more faith-affirming, evidence-based science that reveals God’s truth.

    Check out our other podcasts:

    Browse all playlists here www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/playlists

    続きを読む 一部表示
    15 分
  • Age of the Earth part2 - 2526
    2025/09/06

    The evidence is overwhelming: radiometric dating methods simply don’t match up with real-world geological data. In part 2 of this explosive series, Kaysie Vokurka and Dr. John Ashton dig even deeper into the evidence that’s shaking the foundations of evolutionary timelines.
    What You’ll Discover in This Episode:

    • Why erosion rates prove continents couldn’t possibly survive for billions of years
    • Ocean sediment thickness reveals Earth’s true age (not the claimed 2.5 billion years)
    • Volcanic evidence that completely upends evolutionary dating
    • Where all the missing sediment went—according to biblical flood geology
    • How Grand Canyon rocks show impossible preservation over supposed millions of years

    Dr. Ashton shares jaw-dropping calculations: at current volcanic output rates (1 cubic mile per year), Earth should be buried under 12 miles of volcanic material if it were truly billions of years old. Instead, measurements show only 34 million years’ worth—a massive discrepancy that mainstream science can’t explain.

    The Biblical Flood Model Explains the Evidence:

    • Rapid sedimentation during catastrophic global events
    • Massive volcanic activity during the “fountains of the deep”
    • Mountain uplift explains marine fossils found at high elevations
    • Fossil preservation demands rapid, large-scale burial

    Key Evidence Highlighted:

    • Tambora volcano (1815): 25–70 cubic miles ejected in a single event
    • Lake Taupo: 260 cubic miles of material released
    • Historical lava flows radiometrically dated at millions of years when actually decades old

    This is part 2 of 3 in our radiometric dating investigation. Subscribe for more faith-affirming science content that challenges evolutionary assumptions with real evidence.

    Check out our other podcasts:
    Browse all playlists here www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/playlists

    続きを読む 一部表示
    12 分
  • Age of the Earth part 1 - SC2525
    2025/08/30

    The age of the earth and radiometric dating. Evolutionary theory depends on assumed long ages of the earth, with fossil bearing strata estimated to be hundreds of millions of years old. Radiometric dating results appear to support and validate these long timeframes. Does all available data converge with this? Other evidence, such as continental and mountain erosion rates, does not align with these long time-periods and instead presents a much younger earth. How does this impact evolutionary assumptions?

    Check out our other podcasts:

    https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/playlists



    続きを読む 一部表示
    15 分
  • The Great Flood of Noah part 3 - SC2524
    2025/08/23

    The great flood of Noah. The book of Genesis records the lifespan of key individuals that lived on earth before the flood. It also accurately records when the flood occurred and the age of key individuals after the flood. While the age of those who lived before the flood averaged 900 years, the ages of those living after the flood dropped dramatically to 100-200 years within a few generations. How realistic are these lifespan records? Is there any evidence that supports these ages, along with a dramatic age reduction in a post-flood world scenario?

    Check out our other podcasts:
    studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts

    続きを読む 一部表示
    15 分
  • The Great Flood of Noah part 2- SC2523
    2025/08/16

    The great flood of Noah.The flood story tells us that humanity was destroyed by the floodwaters except for 8 people who were spared on the ark. These people multiplied and spread out over the earth after the flood. The Bible records the genealogies of the first generations to be born after the flood, and notes that at a certain point, they spread out extensively over the earth. Is the historical evidence for the founders and starting points of ancient nations consistent with the Biblical record?

    Check out our other podcasts:
    studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts

    続きを読む 一部表示
    15 分
  • The Great Flood of Noah part 1 - SC2522
    2025/08/09

    The great flood of Noah.The Biblical flood story has been passed off as mythical by many. While there is no doubt that the story is miraculous, extra-biblical records of an ancient "flood story" are incredibly consistent with the Bible's account. These additional flood stories are found in cultures all over the world. What does all this mean for the story of a global flood? Is the story realistic? Is the historical evidence consistent?

    Check out our other podcasts: https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts

    続きを読む 一部表示
    14 分
  • Evidence for the Flood Part 3 - SC2521
    2025/08/02

    Evidence for the flood. Fossils in sedimentary layers provide clues regarding the nature and dynamics of rock formation conditions. Fossil footprint trackways provide significant evidence for catastrophic conditions. They paint a picture of all kinds of animals fleeing to higher ground while wading through fast moving water. Polystrate fossil trees also point to a dramatic past. Stripped of their tops and roots, these logs floated in an upright position and were buried in the same orientation through multiple different layers of sediment. These logs often contain fossils of animals and sea creatures mixed together. All of this evidence is most consistent with a global catastropic flood...an event which even explains the Ice-Age!

    Check out our other podcasts:
    studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts

    続きを読む 一部表示
    16 分
  • Evidence for the Flood Part 2 - SC2520
    2025/07/26

    Evidence for the flood. Sedimentary rock layers lie conformably over each other, without evidence of erosion between them. This is the case even when the layers are unconventional. For example, entire sections of layers are missing in some locations, which represents gaps of tens to hundreds of millions of years, according to the conventional geologic column. Yet there is no evidence of erosion where the missing layers should be. In other instances, older rocks are situated on top of younger rocks, and do so over dozens of square kilometres. Once more, the layers sit perfectly over one another without surface disturbance. What explains this kind of evidence best? Long-age processes or a single global flood event?

    Check out our other podcasts:
    studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts

    続きを読む 一部表示
    15 分