When seven American B-2 bombers dropped fourteen 3,000-pound bunker-busting bombs on Iranian nuclear facilities, the world witnessed more than just a military strike. Behind the operation codenamed "Midnight Hammer" lies a troubling story of foreign influence and constitutional overreach that demands closer examination.

At the heart of this crisis is Benjamin Netanyahu's calculated manipulation of American foreign policy. According to Jerusalem Post reports, Israeli officials actively convinced Trump to expand the attack beyond its original scope, with Netanyahu and his aide Ron Dermer characterizing it as a "historic opportunity" to deliver a knockout blow against Iran. Even more disturbing, these same reports reveal that Israel's initial aggression toward Iran was specifically designed to prevent Trump from reaching a potential nuclear deal with Tehran – a deal that would have required Iran to eliminate its 60% enriched uranium stockpile.

The intelligence justifying this attack originated with Mossad and was delivered to Trump by CIA Chief John Ratcliffe, claiming Iran could build a nuclear weapon within 15 days. This assessment grossly mischaracterizes Iran's capabilities and intentions, as no evidence has emerged that Iran had decided to pursue nuclear weapons. Meanwhile, Tulsi Gabbard – once viewed as a potential moderating voice against unnecessary wars – failed to push back against this misleading intelligence.

Judge Andrew Napolitano didn't mince words about the constitutional implications, calling the attack "profoundly unconstitutional, absolutely unlawful, an impeachable offense and a war crime." With no congressional authorization or declaration of war, and no imminent threat to American security, this offensive military action violated both U.S. and international law. The potential consequences are severe: Iranian retaliation against U.S. troops, activation of regional militias, and possible closure of the Strait of Hormuz, which would devastate global energy markets and Western economies.

Perhaps most telling is Trump's apparent embrace of regime change in Iran – the very interventionist policy he once criticized and campaigned against. This dramatic reversal exposes how completely his "America First" promises have given way to policies that place Israeli interests ahead of American ones. As tensions continue to escalate, we must question who truly controls our military decisions and whether our constitutional safeguards against unnecessary wars still function at all.