『Remnant Finance - Infinite Banking (IBC) and Capital Control』のカバーアート

Remnant Finance - Infinite Banking (IBC) and Capital Control

Remnant Finance - Infinite Banking (IBC) and Capital Control

著者: Brian Moody & Hans Toohey
無料で聴く

Remnant Finance aims to revolutionize how you think about money. Join co-hosts Brian Moody and Hans Toohey, veteran military pilots and Authorized Infinite Banking Concept Practitioners of the NNI, as they dive deep into strategies that can transform your approach to personal finance. What’s Infinite Banking? It’s a financial movement about taking control of your future and creating a system that preserves and grows your wealth across generations. Join us as we challenge the conventional and build financial independence together. Subscribe to navigate your financial future with confidence!Brian Moody & Hans Toohey 個人ファイナンス 経済学
エピソード
  • E111 - Afterburners & Infinite Banking: A Fighter Pilot Becomes a Banker
    2026/08/07

    Book a call: https://remnantfinance.com/calendar

    Email us at info@remnantfinance.com or visit https://remnantfinance.com for more information

    FOLLOW REMNANT FINANCE

    Youtube: @RemnantFinance (https://www.youtube.com/@RemnantFinance)

    Facebook: @remnantfinance (https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61560694316588)

    Twitter: @remnantfinance (https://x.com/remnantfinance)

    TikTok: @RemnantFinance

    Don't forget to hit LIKE and SUBSCRIBE

    For the first time on the show, Hans sits down with a client. Major Jonathan Wright is an active duty Air Force F-35 pilot who started his first policy in December 2023 and has been listening since episode one. Before the financial conversation, he walks through how he got here: growing up in Knoxville, following his father to Embry-Riddle, earning a fighter track slot at ENJJPT, and then giving up the F-16 he had wanted since childhood when a 24 hour window opened to become one of the first Air Force pilots to fly the Navy's EA-18G Growler. Two deployments later, including a Christmas Day flight of nearly nine hours, he transitioned to the F-35 and now flies red air at Nellis.

    Major Wright is candid about the hesitations, including his first assumption that IBC was a grift and the shock of routing that much of a paycheck into base premium and PUA. Four years in, the family holds five policies, and he walks through the four turnkey rental properties and the options account he funded with policy loans, the dividend that grows each year, and why he weights death benefit heavily with three kids at home. Chapters

    00:00 – Opening segment

    05:05 – Embry-Riddle, ROTC, and building hours for a pilot slot

    09:50 – ENJJPT, NATO classmates, and selection for the F-16

    13:25 – Trading the Viper for the Growler on 24 hours notice

    16:10 – Al Udeid, jamming comms over Syria, and eight hour sorties

    19:40 – Misawa, and the start of 2020

    22:50 – The F-15C, F-22, F-16, and F-35 compared

    32:55 – Congress, the Fed, and the defense contracting loop

    35:00 – Navy versus Air Force squadron culture

    38:15 – Call signs, and the story behind Bundy

    43:45 – The 2019 flu shot and what happened that night

    50:40 – The COVID czar, quarantine, and four weeks in a room

    53:25 – Credibility, compliance, and what it cost

    58:15 – The F-35 transition course and arriving at Eielson

    59:25 – The mandate, the RAR, the LORs, and three months grounded

    01:02:45 – Meeting Cassidy, marriage, and three kids

    01:08:50 – Finding IBC and reading Nelson Nash

    01:12:45 – The hesitations: premium, PUA, and "is this a Ponzi scheme?"

    01:19:35 – Rental properties, options, and the dividend

    01:23:15 – What his finances looked like before

    01:26:00 – The gap between IBC and conventional planning

    01:28:50 – Closing segment

    Key Takeaways

    The debrief process is the through line of this episode. Fighter pilots take a problem, list every contributing factor, isolate the primary one, name a root cause, and produce a fix.

    Doors that open unexpectedly are worth walking through. Giving up the F-16 closed a lifelong goal but put him in a Navy squadron, then in the F-35 community, and eventually in the group chat where he met both his wife and this show.

    Being good with money by conventional standards is not the same as having a system. Before IBC, he maxed his TSP and his Roth IRA, carried no debt, and kept an emergency fund, and he would have passed any mainstream checkup with high marks.

    What he does now is layered rather than singular. The policies are the foundation, and the cash value funds rental properties and an options account while continuing to grow inside the contract.


    続きを読む 一部表示
    1 時間 33 分
  • E110 - Would You Raise Your Kids Like a 401(k)?
    2026/07/31

    Book a call: https://remnantfinance.com/calendar

    Email us at info@remnantfinance.com or visit https://remnantfinance.com for more information

    FOLLOW REMNANT FINANCE

    Youtube: @RemnantFinance (https://www.youtube.com/@RemnantFinance)

    Facebook: @remnantfinance (https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61560694316588)

    Twitter: @remnantfinance (https://x.com/remnantfinance)

    TikTok: @RemnantFinance

    Don't forget to hit LIKE and SUBSCRIBE

    Would you raise your children with the rules you accept for your 401(k)? Lock it away until 59 and a half. Pay a penalty to touch it early. Hand it to a manager you will never meet. Check in decades later and hope it worked out. Applied to a retirement account, that is just the default. Applied to a child, it is unthinkable. Before he takes it apart, Hans gives the 401(k) an honest steel man: the match really is part of your total compensation, the tax treatment is real, and for someone low on both financial literacy and discipline, forced savings may be the single best thing that ever happens to their balance sheet.

    Chapters:

    00:00 – Opening segment

    02:55 – The premise: would you raise a child like a 401(k)?

    06:45 – Why enter an industry this saturated

    11:30 – Defensive coordinator, offensive coordinator, head coach

    14:20 – Cash value as the buffer in a down market

    16:20 – Decumulation, Social Security timing, RMDs, and beneficiaries

    20:40 – The honest steel man for the 401(k)

    25:50 – Roth versus traditional and paying tax on the seed

    26:40 – The tax code as a map around income

    27:50 – Forced savings and where the 401(k) genuinely shines

    31:25 – Will 70% of your income really be enough?

    36:20 – The box, the penalty, and the friction that works both ways

    37:20 – Would you outsource raising your children?

    47:20 – Most of your time with your kids happens before they turn 18

    48:25 – Which rules will still exist when you turn 60?

    50:35 – Buy and hope dressed up as buy and hold

    54:15 – Net worth versus cash flow and the $3 million mansion

    57:00 – Contract wealth versus statement wealth

    59:15 – Closing segment

    Key Takeaways:

    The match is not free money in the way LinkedIn tells you it is. It is a piece of the economic value your employer already assigned to your labor, and you only unlock it by parting with your own capital first.

    The 401(k) works, and it shines for one profile: low financial literacy paired with low discipline. If money leaves your hands regardless of intent, automatic enrollment and a penalty for early access may be the only thing standing between you and nothing.

    Whether you choose Roth or traditional comes down to a bet about the future. The conventional plan assumes you will need roughly 70% of your current income and land in a lower bracket.

    Locking capital away for 30 years is also a bet on political stability. The access ages have been changed before, they will be changed again, and $40 trillion sitting in qualified plans is a resource the system is already leveraging..

    Money is not math. Behavior is the largest determinant of any outcome, more than knowledge and more than which strategy you choose. Protect, save, grow in that order. Your capital feeds the people you love, so stop treating it like a stranger's science project.


    続きを読む 一部表示
    1 時間 3 分
  • E109 - 25 Years of Watching People Die Changes How You Think About Money
    2026/07/24

    Connect with Dr. Paul: paul.mchale@factumfinancial.com

    Book a call: https://remnantfinance.com/calendar

    Out Print the Fed with a 1% target per week: https://remnantfinance.com/options

    Email us at info@remnantfinance.com or visit https://remnantfinance.com for more information

    FOLLOW REMNANT FINANCE

    Youtube: @RemnantFinance (https://www.youtube.com/@RemnantFinance)

    Facebook: @remnantfinance (https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61560694316588)

    Twitter: @remnantfinance (https://x.com/remnantfinance)

    TikTok: @RemnantFinance

    Don't forget to hit LIKE and SUBSCRIBE

    Dr. Paul McHale has spent over a quarter century in emergency medicine, and he'll tell you exactly what that does to a man: ER docs either get old, get tired, or get afraid. He's all three now. But it wasn't the ER that changed how he thinks about money. It was almost getting killed by an F350 in a grocery store parking lot, going home spooked, and realizing he had life insurance but not nearly enough.

    What Paul discovered after that near miss is the through-line of this entire conversation. He watched colleagues who had made serious money for years panic when COVID cut their shifts. Not one or two of them. A lot of them. Physicians pulling $20,000 a month who could not absorb losing five shifts for a single month. As Hans puts it, a teacher making $50,000 with a savings habit might weather that better than a doctor making a couple million a year. The problem was never income. It was that nobody, in 18-plus years of the most rigorous education in the country, ever taught them what to do with it.

    Chapters:

    00:00 – Opening Segment

    06:50 – Twenty-five years in: old, tired, or afraid

    07:40 – The grocery store near miss that started everything

    09:00 – Buying the first permanent policy and abusing it

    10:25 – Building an ER group 16:50 – How ER billing actually works

    18:40 – What's broken in healthcare, from an outsider's seat

    24:45 – A physician's honest reckoning with COVID

    30:40 – The credibility medicine lost and can't get back

    41:35 – The doctors who couldn't afford to lose five shifts

    49:35 – Max the 401(k) for thirty years, then what?

    52:45 – Liquidity as the single greatest portfolio decision

    55:10 – Sequence of returns and the average rate of return lie

    57:45 – What ultra high net worth families actually buy

    01:00:35 – Bonds, volatility, and the product advisors won't look at

    01:03:10 – Cutting off the compounding curve right when it gets good

    01:16:15 – Bastardized cancellation data

    01:26:35 – Why Paul's policy is death benefit heavy

    01:31:05 – The Mississippi River theory of money

    01:34:30 – The colleague who lost her husband in two months

    01:37:25 – "Don't ever leave your family without insurance"


    Key Takeaways:

    High income is not the same thing as financial stability. ER physicians earning $300 an hour called Paul looking for work when their hospitals cut five shifts. These were successful doctors, some of them former partners whose payouts he knew personally. They could not take a one-month cash flow hit. The treadmill runs at whatever speed your lifestyle sets, and a high salary just means the belt moves faster.

    Physicians stopped behaving like scientists. The willingness to change your mind when the data changes is the entire job description of a professional.

    Liquidity is the single highest-leverage decision in a portfolio. You cannot buy the dip without cash. When the market hemorrhages, the reason people freak out is that they've lost money and have nothing left to deploy at the bottom.

    Whole life lets your risk assets stay risk assets. The conventional move is to ratchet a 55-year-old down from equities into bonds, which have their own volatility and lose money roughly every six years.

    A fiduciary title is not a knowledge credential. There are bad doctors, bad pilots, and bad fiduciaries. If an advisor can't explain a policy loan, the fiduciary designation hasn't done anything for the client.


    続きを読む 一部表示
    1 時間 45 分
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
まだレビューはありません