『Real Estate Closing Arguments』のカバーアート

Real Estate Closing Arguments

Real Estate Closing Arguments

著者： Grant Clayton
無料で聴く

このコンテンツについて

 A podcast for real estate agents and brokers created and hosted by Grant Clayton Founder/CEO of 1 Percent Lists where we discuss and debate different real estate models and current events.© 2025 Real Estate Closing Arguments マネジメント・リーダーシップ マーケティング マーケティング・セールス リーダーシップ 出世 就職活動 経済学
エピソード
  • Drew Wyant - Mega Agent and Owner of 1 Percent Lists Indiana Real Estate

    Drew Wyant - Mega Agent and Owner of 1 Percent Lists Indiana Real Estate
    2025/10/06
    Fantastic conversation between Grant Clayton and Drew Wyant the owner of 1 Percent Lists Indiana Real Estate. Drew is an agent that has done at least 100 transactions as a solo agent in each of his first two years with 1 Percent Lists and is now scaling his brokerages by adding agents in surrounding markets.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    1分未満
  • Compass Buys Anywhere - Why Two Huge Sales Signal the End of Real Estate as We Know It

    Compass Buys Anywhere - Why Two Huge Sales Signal the End of Real Estate as We Know It
    2025/09/30
    Bought for Billions: Why Two Huge Sales Signal the End of Real Estate as We Know It The real estate world was shaken by a blockbuster headline recently: Compass, the nation's largest brokerage, acquired its next-biggest rival, Anywhere. This is the parent company of legacy giants like Coldwell Banker, Sotheby's International Realty, and Century 21. Yet, the real story isn't the sale itself—it's the price tag, especially when compared to another recent acquisition. Earlier this year, Rocket Mortgage bought the tech-focused brokerage Redfin. On the surface, these two companies are in different leagues. But a closer look at the numbers reveals a shocking truth about where the real estate industry is heading. A Tale of Two Valuations Let's break down the math. It tells a story that should make every agent and brokerage owner pay attention. Anywhere (the industry giant) was purchased for $1.6 billion. This is a company with over 300,000 agents, $5.7 billion in 2024 revenue, and 250,000 annual transactions. Redfin (the smaller tech player) was purchased for $1.75 billion—that’s $150 million more. This is a company with only around 5,700 agents and just over $1 billion in 2024 revenue. How does a company that's a fraction of the size in agents, revenue, and transactions command a higher price? The answer lies in their fundamentally different business models. The Market Bets on Leads, Not Legacy The stark difference in valuation comes down to one thing: how the businesses create value. Anywhere represents the traditional real estate model. Its business is built on supporting agents. This involves immense overhead: thousands of brick-and-mortar offices, receptionists, assistants, brokers, and staff. It’s an "impossibly expensive" model that relies on keeping a massive agent count happy. Redfin, on the other hand, is a technology company first and a brokerage second. Its value isn't in its physical footprint; it's in its powerful website. It’s a machine built for one primary purpose: generating leads. The market has placed its bet. It's saying that a company's ability to generate its own business online is more valuable than a legacy company's ability to support a large, decentralized army of agents. The Real "Race to the Bottom" For years, we've heard about a "race to the bottom" on commissions. But the real race to the bottom is happening inside the industry, in the fight to recruit and retain agents. Hundreds of new, cloud-based brokerages have emerged with virtually no overhead. They can offer agents incredibly attractive deals—letting them keep 90% or even 100% of their commission for a small flat fee. Legacy companies like those under the Anywhere umbrella simply cannot compete. Their high-cost structure, built around physical offices and layers of management, makes it impossible to match these aggressive commission splits. As a result, their top-producing agents are leaving in droves for a better deal. It's a slow bleed that is making their old business model obsolete. The Coming Consolidation: An Industry on the Brink This trend is pushing the traditional real estate industry toward a breaking point. According to a study by Account Tech, if average real estate commissions were to drop to just 2%, an astounding 88 out of 100 brokerages would fail. The webinar’s speaker predicts a massive wave of consolidation is on the horizon. We will see more legacy brands either go bankrupt, merge, or get bought out for pennies on the dollar. They are simply not built to survive in this new, lean environment. The longer they wait, the less they will be worth. The sales of Anywhere and Redfin are not isolated events. They are the first major tremors of an earthquake that will reshape the entire industry. The companies that thrive in the coming years will be the ones built for efficiency—those that leverage technology to generate business directly and operate without the crushin...
    続きを読む 一部表示
    15 分
  • Zillow Under Fire: What Every Homebuyer Needs to Know About the Latest Lawsuit

    Zillow Under Fire: What Every Homebuyer Needs to Know About the Latest Lawsuit
    2025/09/30
    Everything you need to know about Zillow getting sued. Grant Clayton, the founder and CEO of 1 Percent Lists, breaks down the recent class-action lawsuit filed against Zillow. He explains that the lawsuit accuses Zillow of anti-competitive practices that ultimately harm homebuyers. Clayton details how Zillow's "Flex" program, an agent referral system, plays a central role in these allegations. According to Clayton, when a potential homebuyer clicks to speak with an agent on Zillow, they are often connected with a "Zillow Flex" agent. These agents, he claims, are part of an exclusive program and are required to pay Zillow a significant referral fee, which can be as high as 40% of their commission upon a successful sale. Clayton argues that this fee structure creates a situation where real estate agents are incentivized to charge higher commission rates to offset the hefty fee paid to Zillow. This, in turn, can lead to inflated home prices for consumers. He further explains that the agents in the Flex program are often part of large, high-powered teams that can handle the volume of leads and afford the referral fees, which, he suggests, can stifle competition from smaller, independent agents or those who charge lower commissions. Clayton expresses his belief that this practice is not only unethical but also a violation of consumer protection laws. He highlights the lack of transparency in the process, as most homebuyers are unaware of the significant referral fees involved when they connect with an agent through Zillow. He concludes by stating that this lawsuit could have a major impact on the real estate industry by bringing these practices to light and potentially leading to more transparency and fairer competition.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    15 分
まだレビューはありません