Ratcliffe's CIA Tenure Marked by Signal Use and COVID-19 Origin Reassessment
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
ご購入は五十タイトルがカートに入っている場合のみです。
カートに追加できませんでした。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
Ratcliffe's CIA Tenure Marked by Signal Use and COVID-19 Origin Reassessment
-
ナレーター：
-
著者：
このコンテンツについて
Recently, Ratcliffe has faced intense questioning on Capitol Hill following revelations that he, along with other senior national security officials, used the encrypted messaging app Signal to discuss sensitive military strategies regarding pending U.S. strikes on Houthi targets in Yemen. The use of Signal, which is intended to provide robust encryption and privacy, drew national attention after it was discovered that Jeffrey Goldberg, the editor-in-chief of The Atlantic, was inadvertently included in the group chat alongside Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Vice President JD Vance. Goldberg only realized the significance of the messages once the military action began, prompting questions about the potential exposure of classified or operationally sensitive information.
During a session with the Senate Intelligence Committee, Ratcliffe defended the use of Signal, asserting that discussions did not contain classified data and that the app has been part of CIA communications since before his tenure. He explained that the decision to use Signal was backed by agency policy, provided that all decisions and directives resulting from these communications were properly memorialized in formal records. Ratcliffe emphasized that conversation content on Signal was set to auto-delete after one to four weeks, further reducing risks but raising concerns about compliance with federal record-keeping laws.
Critics, including several senators, raised alarms about the implications for national security and proper oversight. Senator Mark Warner warned that the accidental disclosure of such tactical information could have endangered American lives. Despite these concerns, Ratcliffe maintained that no major breach occurred, stating unequivocally during questioning that he did not consider the episode a significant blunder.
Apart from the Signal controversy, Ratcliffe’s initial months as CIA Director have included significant internal operations. Shortly after his confirmation, the CIA revised its assessment regarding the origins of COVID-19, moving from an undecided stance to expressing low confidence in the theory that the virus originated from a laboratory in Wuhan. Ratcliffe also oversaw early agency buyouts to streamline operations and comply with executive orders from President Trump’s administration, including an order that required unclassified reporting to the White House about recent CIA hires. This move was criticized by former intelligence officials who argued it risked compromising agent identities and U.S. counterintelligence capabilities.
Throughout these developments, Ratcliffe’s leadership has been characterized by a strong emphasis on legal compliance and a stated commitment to keeping intelligence work free of partisan influence. His handling of both sensitive communications and broader agency reforms continues to shape the national debate on intelligence oversight and information security.