Veronique de Rugy speaks with Thomas Howes and James Patterson about their book, Why Postliberalism Failed. The authors examine the growing post-liberal movement, particularly Catholic integralism, which rejects representative government and religious neutrality in favor of a powerful executive guided by a state-supported conception of the common good.

Drawing on examples from interwar Europe and Latin America—including Franco's Spain, Salazar's Portugal, Vichy France, Slovakia, Croatia, Brazil, and Argentina—they argue that these ideas have already been tested. Rather than restoring religious faith or social order, post-liberal regimes became authoritarian, persecuted minorities, and compromised the churches that supported them. Political leaders used religious institutions for legitimacy while steadily subordinating them to the state, ultimately contributing to religious disaffiliation.

The conversation also explores postliberalism's influence on today's American right, its relationship to protectionism and Christian nationalism, and its failure to resist antisemitism within its broader coalition. Howes and Patterson conclude that religious communities would achieve more through liberal institutions—religious liberty, limited government, school choice, and voluntary association—than by attempting to capture the power of the state.

Welcome back to Qualified Opinions. This week, we tackle the revived debate on redistribution versus growth following the release of the 2026 World Inequality Report. To help us slice through the noise, we sit down with Dr. Phil Magness (Independence Institute) and Dr. Vincent Geloso (George Mason University). Together, they expose the flaws in contemporary inequality metrics, discuss how robust institutions and open markets destroy barriers to upward mobility, and explain why a country's institutional health matters far more than its wealth distribution.

"The issue is never the issue—the issue is the revolution."

When we talk about political violence in America, the public conversation is overwhelmingly dominated by the threat of the far-right. But is that tracking the whole reality? In this episode, Veronique de Rugy sits down with author and commentator Noah Rothman to discuss his new book, Blood and Progress: A Century of Left-Wing Violence in America.

Noah breaks down the three massive historical waves of left-wing extremism that most Americans have completely forgotten—from the deadly anarchist bombings of the 1910s and 1920s to the thousands of domestic bombings in the 1970s. Together, Vero and Noah explore the excuses that politicians and media figures use to excuse left-wing violence, the manipulation of domestic extremism databases, and the dangerous modern mirroring where the right and left are beginning to adopt each other's most radical tactics. It's a candid, data-driven look at why political violence is a reciprocal problem—and why looking away from one side only guarantees the other will follow.

What happens when a fiscal watchdog and a government official start as fierce public rivals and end up as friends?

In this episode of Qualified Opinions, host Veronique de Rugy sits down with her long-time friend Matt Mayer—former Bush administration Homeland Security official and current President of Opportunity Ohio—to dissect the massive disconnect between bureaucratic intent and real-world policy outcomes.

They pull back the curtain on why simple government formulas fail to allocate security grants efficiently and share a candid look at the nuance behind infamous government spending anecdotes (like the $10,000 jet toilet and the 9/11 garbage trucks). Moving to current policy debates, they tackle the exploding costs of state programs like Medicaid in historically "red" states like Ohio. Mayer argues that the standard political battle cry of rooting out "waste, fraud, and abuse" is a lazy soundbite; the real fiscal driver is the aggressive expansion of legal eligibility standards pushed by politicians who lack the courage to make tough choices.

Finally, they discuss Mayer's new experiment in tech and fiction: writing his fifth book, an action-packed novel titled The Architect Rises, using generative AI to turn a decade-old national security war-game plot into a full-length book in under eight minutes.

Host Veronique De Rugy is joined by Jessica Melugin, Director of the Center for Technology and Innovation at the Competitive Enterprise Institute, for a deep dive into the shifting landscape of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

The conversation explores:

• The Legacy of Lina Khan: How the Biden-era FTC expanded merger filing rules (HSR Act) to increase compliance burdens, and why a Texas federal court recently struck them down.

• The Horseshoe (or "Shoe Horse"?) Theory: A discussion on the surprising ideological overlap between the populist left and populist right, specifically regarding "America First" antitrust policies and increased government intervention.

• A Changing Commission: An analysis of current FTC Chair Ferguson, his ties to Vice President JD Vance, and the agency's unprecedented level of direct White House influence.

Constitutional Shifts: The impact of recent Supreme Court decisions like Loper Bright (overturning Chevron deference) and the ongoing debate over the President's power to fire independent agency commissioners at will.

Vero is joined by colleagues Rebecca Lowe, a political philosopher, and Henry Oliver, a literary critic, to discuss their new project, The Pursuit of Liberalism.

While the liberal order—built on free markets, free speech, and the rule of law—has delivered more for human flourishing than any other system, many feel it is currently "losing the argument". The trio explores whether this is because the defense of liberalism has been narrowed down to economics and legal theory, neglecting the deeper questions of meaning, dignity, and the human soul.

Key topics discussed include:

• The "Vibe Contest": Why liberalism often sounds "stuffy and old-fashioned" compared to the rising influence of post-liberal and "New Right" movements.

• The Legacy of Adam Smith: A debate on whether Smith was a better economist or philosopher, and how his original breadth of thought (covering everything from astronomy to moral sentiments) has been lost to modern academic specialization.

• Specialists vs. Generalists: The costs of over-specialization in economics and why we need more thinkers who can bridge the gap between policy and culture.

• Pluralism and Choice: Drawing on Isaiah Berlin's idea that there are many "good" ways to live and that liberalism's true value lies in the freedom to choose between them.

• The Future of Freedom: Why politics is downstream of culture and the challenge of passing liberal values on to a new generation.

About the Guests: Rebecca Lowe is a political philosopher and Henry Oliver is a literary critic. Both are based at the Mercatus Center and are the founders of the Substack project, The Pursuit of Liberalism.

In this episode, Vero De Rugy sits down with Paul Mueller and Dave Hebert, senior research fellows at AIER, to discuss trade and national security.

The conversation dives deep into the complex—and often manipulated—tension between market efficiency and national defense. While free traders acknowledge legitimate security exceptions, the trio explores how "national security" is frequently used as a pretext for protectionist policies that come with a steep, often hidden, economic price tag.

Key highlights of the discussion include:

• Vigilante Justice on the World Stage: Paul and Dave discuss their "Batman" analogy for current trade policy—exploring the consequences of bypassing international norms like the WTO to "dole out justice" through unilateral tariffs.

• The China Dilemma: A look at whether "decoupling" from the Chinese economy is a realistic goal or a demographic and logistical impossibility.

• The Net Assessment of the Current Administration: Vero proposes a provocative theory: Could the "background" wins in energy deregulation, AI framework, and crypto policy outweigh the "foreground" chaos of trade wars and market uncertainty?

• The Cost of Credibility: Why market uncertainty and capricious policy shifts might be more damaging to long-term growth than the actual tariffs themselves.

Whether you are interested in the granular details of the WTO enforcement mechanisms or the broader philosophical questions of individualism versus the new collectivism, this episode offers a candid look at the trade-offs required for American prosperity in a globalized world.

As Social Security approaches its 90th anniversary, the program faces a looming identity crisis and a massive fiscal deadline. In this episode, host Veronique De Rugy sits down with Romina Boccia, Director of Budget and Entitlement Policy at the Cato Institute and co-author of Reimagining Social Security: Global Lessons for Retirement Policy Changes.

Together, they dismantle the most persistent myths surrounding the U.S. retirement system, from the "lockbox" illusion to the reality of the 2032 trust fund depletion. Romina explains why a program designed in the era of the Great Depression is struggling to keep pace with modern capital markets and 21st-century life expectancy.

Key topics discussed in this episode include:

• The Pay-As-You-Go Reality: Why 1 in 4 Americans believe they have a personal account, and the truth about intergovernmental IOUs.

• The 2032 Deadline: How recent legislative changes have accelerated the timeline for automatic benefit cuts.

• Lessons from Abroad: How countries like Sweden and Canada successfully modernized their systems by leaning into private accounts and flexible savings.

• Universal Savings Accounts (USAs): A proposal to fix the "double taxation" on savings and empower lower-income workers without the sting of early withdrawal penalties.

This conversation offers a candid look at how we can move beyond "tweaks" to build a more secure financial future.