『Program Evaluation Committee with Dr. Culican』のカバーアート

Program Evaluation Committee with Dr. Culican

Program Evaluation Committee with Dr. Culican

無料で聴く

ポッドキャストの詳細を見る

このコンテンツについて

Join Logan and Dr. Culican, Designated Institutional Official at the University of Minnesota Medical School, as they discuss the structure and function of the Program Evaluation Committee (PEC).

Links

  • Podcast Website
  • Program Director Website
  • For the full transcript, click here
  • Email gme@umn.edu for additional questions and/or help with your PEC

Question and Time

  • What values or traits should the program director be looking for when appointing new members?  01:08
  • Should faculty included on the PEC be just from core rotations? 02:19
  • Is there a max number of people that you can appoint to a committee? 02:57
  • What is the ideal number and type of people that should be on a PEC? 04:00
  • If there's a disagreement among an equal amount of the committee, who has the final say? 05:33
  • How do you get someone to join a PEC that you feel could be beneficial to it? 06:57
  • Should a new committee be chosen every year, or once the members are appointed, do they just stay on for the entire time with their program? 08:30
  • Have you ever had a problem? Or do you know of anybody that's ever had a problem with maybe a committee member, really not doing what they should be doing on the committee? 11:22
  • Is it smart for the program director to be the chair or maybe even beyond the committee? 12:01
  • Is there a specific focus that the program evaluation committee should always discuss when they meet? 13:00
  • Is there a certain number of times that the program evaluation committee should meet throughout the year? 16:27
  • How do you ensure that the program evaluation committee is doing what they're supposed to be doing? 17:41
  • Being the DIO, do you get to review the Annual Program Evaluations? 19:21
  • Does that Annual Institution Review (identical to APE) survey also have kind of smart logic in a way where it reminds them of things that they need to include in the APE? 21:46
  • Do you find any deficiencies in the AIRs (APEs) when you get them? 22:00
  • With the AIRs/APEs, are there common, maybe errors that you find a lot? 23:11
  • Are there other resources that the Graduate Medical Education Office offers for program directors or program evaluation committees to utilize? 24:55
  • Is there a way that they can get in touch with the GME? 26:45
  • Anything else that you wanted to mention? 27:01
まだレビューはありません