
Program Evaluation Committee with Dr. Culican
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
ご購入は五十タイトルがカートに入っている場合のみです。
カートに追加できませんでした。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
-
ナレーター:
-
著者:
このコンテンツについて
Join Logan and Dr. Culican, Designated Institutional Official at the University of Minnesota Medical School, as they discuss the structure and function of the Program Evaluation Committee (PEC).
Links
- Podcast Website
- Program Director Website
- For the full transcript, click here
- Email gme@umn.edu for additional questions and/or help with your PEC
Question and Time
- What values or traits should the program director be looking for when appointing new members? 01:08
- Should faculty included on the PEC be just from core rotations? 02:19
- Is there a max number of people that you can appoint to a committee? 02:57
- What is the ideal number and type of people that should be on a PEC? 04:00
- If there's a disagreement among an equal amount of the committee, who has the final say? 05:33
- How do you get someone to join a PEC that you feel could be beneficial to it? 06:57
- Should a new committee be chosen every year, or once the members are appointed, do they just stay on for the entire time with their program? 08:30
- Have you ever had a problem? Or do you know of anybody that's ever had a problem with maybe a committee member, really not doing what they should be doing on the committee? 11:22
- Is it smart for the program director to be the chair or maybe even beyond the committee? 12:01
- Is there a specific focus that the program evaluation committee should always discuss when they meet? 13:00
- Is there a certain number of times that the program evaluation committee should meet throughout the year? 16:27
- How do you ensure that the program evaluation committee is doing what they're supposed to be doing? 17:41
- Being the DIO, do you get to review the Annual Program Evaluations? 19:21
- Does that Annual Institution Review (identical to APE) survey also have kind of smart logic in a way where it reminds them of things that they need to include in the APE? 21:46
- Do you find any deficiencies in the AIRs (APEs) when you get them? 22:00
- With the AIRs/APEs, are there common, maybe errors that you find a lot? 23:11
- Are there other resources that the Graduate Medical Education Office offers for program directors or program evaluation committees to utilize? 24:55
- Is there a way that they can get in touch with the GME? 26:45
- Anything else that you wanted to mention? 27:01
まだレビューはありません