エピソード

  • Conservator Walks Into a Museum: The Farwell Painting Theft

    Conservator Walks Into a Museum: The Farwell Painting Theft
    2026/11/03
    Conservator Walks Into a Museum: The Farwell Painting Theft

    A plain invoice, a nine-minute scheduled alarm window, and 42 phone calls connect a missing 1872 Thomas Cord landscape insured for $1.4 million to a conservator - but how did a county surveyor find the painting leaning against an irrigation pipe eleven days later? Who knew the mounting specs and the maintenance schedule well enough to plan the theft?

    In this episode, we follow the timeline from the March 4 maintenance window through the March 15 discovery and the later arrests, unpacking the documents, phone records, and alibis that together pose the question: was this a random burglary or a theft executed with inside knowledge?

    Person: Curtis Armstrong
    Date: March 15, 2011
    Location: Halverson property, Garfield Township, Weld County, Colorado
    Object: Thomas Cord 1872 oil landscape
    Value: $1.4 million insurance coverage

    - The painting had been missing from the Farwell Regional Museum for 11 days when found.
    - The theft occurred during a 9-minute scheduled suppression window between 7:51 and 8:00 PM on March 4.
    - The Cord landscape had hung in the Cord Gallery for 22 years.
    - Diane Fulton made or received 42 phone calls to Roy Hunt in the six weeks before the theft.
    - Roy Hunt recommended the French cleat mounting system to the museum in 2009 on a one-page invoice.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    16 分
  • Museum Director Sells His Own Gallery's Painting: The Dusk at Forty Feet Case

    Museum Director Sells His Own Gallery's Painting: The Dusk at Forty Feet Case
    2026/11/02
    Museum Director Sells His Own Gallery's Painting: The Dusk at Forty Feet Case

    Fear that the person guarding a museum could be the one stealing from it - a wooden frame labeled with the Millhaven Institute of Art showed up in a septic-yard while the $94,000 painting it belonged to was simultaneously on the museum wall; how did one canvas become two photographs ten months apart, and who profited? What single procedural question finally unraveled the scheme?

    In this episode, we lay out the timeline from a routine septic pump-out discovery through the investigation led by an art-history-trained state investigator, and follow the paper trail that tied museum administration, deaccession records, and banked payments to the director himself. Could institutional paperwork and a forgotten frame reveal a deliberate internal theft?

    Person: Randy Burke
    Date (discovery): February 11, 2019
    Work: Dusk at Forty Feet
    Value: $94,000
    Investigator: Linda Griffin

    - The wooden frame with the Millhaven Institute of Art accession label was found leaning against a garage back wall during a septic pump-out on February 11, 2019.
    - The Institute’s two thousand eighteen appraisal valued Dusk at Forty Feet at $94,000.
    - Randy Burke had run the Millhaven Institute of Art for eleven years and was fifty-three when the investigation opened.
    - Between 2016 and 2018, $68,000 passed through a consulting LLC registered under the director’s wife's maiden name, and the LLC dissolved in 2018.
    - Two insurance photographs taken ten months apart (March 2017 and January 2018) showed canvases with different weaves both attributed to the same accessioned painting.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    18 分
  • Birdwatcher's Photo Exposes a Heist Three Years in the Making: The Hessler Forgery

    Birdwatcher's Photo Exposes a Heist Three Years in the Making: The Hessler Forgery
    2026/11/01
    Birdwatcher's Photo Exposes a Heist Three Years in the Making: The Hessler Forgery

    A lone birdwatcher with a telephoto lens accidentally revealed a duplicate of a four-hundred-and-twenty-thousand-dollar lithograph pressed against a museum window, creating a brief moment when two copies of the same artwork existed in one small Ohio city. How did Passage, Inverted number twelve vanish from the Hessler Museum without anyone noticing for years?

    In this episode, we follow the timeline from the January 9, 2011 photograph to the provenance review that uncovered a single transposed word in condition reports and the transport driver tied to eight loans; the episode traces how those details opened the question of where the museum's copy went and why no one realized it was missing.

    Person: Bruce Stroud
    Date: January 9, 2011
    Work: Passage, Inverted by Clement Vore
    Edition: 1 of 200 (Hessler's copy number 12)
    Location: Hessler Museum of Regional Arts, Corrigan, Ohio

    - The photograph showing a second copy was taken with a telephoto lens while the photographer was looking for cedar waxwings.
    - Clement Vore created Passage, Inverted in 1953 and printed an edition of two hundred.
    - The Hessler acquired number twelve in 1988 through the Fenwick bequest.
    - Four condition reports between 1988 and 2003 noted foxing on the lower left margin; a 2008 report noted foxing on the lower right.
    - Dawn Peterson drove eight separate loans over fourteen months, all routes passing through Morrow, Ohio, where she rented a house with a detached garage.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    17 分
  • A Glove Threads the Wire: The Hartley-Cross Forgery

    A Glove Threads the Wire: The Hartley-Cross Forgery
    2026/10/31
    A Glove Threads the Wire: The Hartley-Cross Forgery

    A single white archival glove threaded with a wire lot tag, found on a cold December morning, pointed straight at a theft that seemed impossible: a flawless-looking seventeenth-century panel gone and an indistinguishable replacement hanging in its place. The original had already been sold two days earlier for $18,000-so who built the fake, who sold the real one, and why would a conservator risk a tiny anachronism that would unravel the scheme?

    In this episode, we walk through the timeline from the paper carrier’s discovery to the notes that cracked the case, tracing every step of the swap and the small clues left behind that forced experts to ask the question: how was a regional auction house outmaneuvered by a forgery engineered to deceive professionals?

    Person: Douglas Petersen
    Date: December 11, 2019
    Person: Melvin Underwood
    Person: Wendy Cooper
    Event: Lot 214 sold for $18,000

    - The glove was discovered at 6:00 AM on December 11, 2019 by a fifteen-year-old paper carrier.
    - Lot 214, a painting attributed to the circle of Pieter de Hooch, sold on December 9, 2019 for $18,000 in absentia.
    - Melvin Underwood began constructing the replacement panel by October 2019, about six weeks before the theft.
    - Wendy Cooper noted “lead white in shadow - check ratio” in her private notebook when cataloguing lot 214 in late November 2019.
    - Underwood’s reproduced back included a character from an encoding system not in use until a decade after the painting’s supposed date.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    16 分
  • The Bronze Hand That Blew Open an Impeccable Art Theft Scheme

    The Bronze Hand That Blew Open an Impeccable Art Theft Scheme
    2026/10/30
    The Bronze Hand That Blew Open an Impeccable Art Theft Scheme

    A single bronze hand found on a snowplow route exposed a scheme built around a $240,000 sculpture and a paper trail so airtight three conservators called it genuine. The fragment was clean, severed at the wrist, and contradicted inspections that claimed the statue's patination was only weeks old - so who planted the hand, and why would a donor insist on a November dedication?

    In this episode, you will hear how a facilities worker, a conservator's note, and a provenance specialist's slow, methodical read-through of documents unraveled the story. The episode covers the discovery, the acquisition paperwork, the transport timeline, and the single phrase that made the case pivot - could one condition report hide a swapped object?

    Person: Wendell Pryce
    Date: October 2013 (casting); February 2014 (patination); November 4, 2014 (discovery)
    Location: Metzger Sculpture Sculpture
    Person: Marvin O'Brien
    Person: Rhonda Johnson

    - The bronze hand was found just before 6:00 a.m. on November 4, 2014, by Eugene York while running a snowplow route.
    - The sculpture Resting Atlas was cast in a single pour in October 2013 and patinated in February 2014.
    - Marvin O'Brien paid $240,000 by wire transfer and signed a deed of gift donating the sculpture in March 2014.
    - Chris Waverly's condition report dated September 13, 2014 stated "patination recently stabilized… application within preceding eight to twelve weeks."
    - The sculpture spent five days at Vantage Cincinnati (Thursday through Monday) with one condition inspection on Saturday, September 13, 2014.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    16 分
  • The Smell That Unmasked a Priceless Art Swap

    The Smell That Unmasked a Priceless Art Swap
    2026/10/29
    The Smell That Unmasked a Priceless Art Swap

    A single nose and an anomalous utility bill exposed a months-long art substitution at a small Ohio museum: a nineteenth-century portrait valued at $240,000 was quietly replaced and hung for eleven weeks while dehumidifiers ran at roughly three times normal electrical load. How did an inspector’s sense of smell, a private image archive, and one unlogged contractor create a perfect cover-up that only a utility audit could reveal?

    In this episode, we follow the timeline from the 2011 imaging of the portrait through the undetected substitution and the October 11, 2017 utility inspection that cracked the case, laying out who had access, what technical evidence mattered, and why the forgery was, by one measurable standard, superior to the original. What detail in the records and in the paint itself finally proved the switch?

    Person: Neil Snyder
    Date: October 11, 2017
    Location: Caldwell-Peake House, Breckton, Ohio
    Value: $240,000
    Person: Craig Harrison

    - The original portrait was imaged in 2011 by Dunmore Technical Services and high-resolution files were retained.
    - The building’s electrical consumption increased to approximately three times normal for eleven weeks due to a dehumidifier array.
    - The forgery replaced the original sometime in late July 2017 and remained in the frame for eleven weeks before discovery.
    - Conservator Debra Thorpe noted three anomalies: an overly even ground layer, a ~3 cm² lower-left retouching cleaner than a 1992 repair, and a sharp chemical smell of fresh polymerized medium.
    - The portrait had been cleaned twice in its documented history, with the second cleaning thinning paint in the face and upper background-damage absent from the forgery.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    16 分
  • Left on Christie's Dock: The Perfect Fake That Tricked Museums

    Left on Christie's Dock: The Perfect Fake That Tricked Museums
    2026/10/28
    Left on Christie's Dock: The Perfect Fake That Tricked Museums

    A seemingly abandoned crate at Christie's dock held an original 30x40 oil labeled "DECORATIVE REPRODUCTION - NO COMMERCIAL VALUE" and the painting inside matched auction photos - except the original with the same image had hung in Cincinnati for 16 years. How did two experts engineer a decade-long swapping machine of frames, provenance and pigment that fooled buyers and institutions?

    In this episode, we follow the discovery on September 9, 2019 and trace the process used by two men to move originals and aged forgeries through different markets, reconstructing the steps that let a copy sell for more than twice the original's earlier price and leaving one unanswered question: how many other works rode this same system?

    Person: Paul Clark
    Date: September 9, 2019
    Artist: Gerald Oates
    Work: "Morning, Reardon County"
    Sale price (2003): $47,000

    - The crate was found at 6:20 AM on September 9, 2019 on Christie's auxiliary loading dock.
    - The painting in the crate was an original oil on canvas, 30 by 40 inches, described as chalky impasto mid-century realism.
    - Gerald Oates painted "Morning, Reardon County" in 1961 and died in 1988.
    - The Cincinnati sale in 2003 sold the original for $47,000 to Dennis Albright, who kept it for 16 years.
    - A copy made by John Sharp sold in Philadelphia in 2005 through Robert Finch for $112,000.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    18 分
  • Left in the Alley: How a Master Forger Returned a Stolen Marsh

    Left in the Alley: How a Master Forger Returned a Stolen Marsh
    2026/10/27
    Left in the Alley: How a Master Forger Returned a Stolen Marsh

    A stumbling discovery: a masterful 1887 Marsh painting left face-down in an alley, valued at $84,000, found by a meter reader who'd worked the block for eleven years - and the original frame still hung on the museum wall. Who took Hillside at Carver Creek, why was a near-perfect copy placed back, and how did the thief leave no alarm or badge trace to explain the swap?

    In this episode, we follow the sequence of discoveries from the alley to the museum director's alarm checks, the badge log entry, and a conservator's locked studio with a full-scale reference photo pinned to the table. The episode traces how one badge-swipe pointed investigators to a contracted conservator and the questions that badge record could - or couldn't - answer.

    Person: Todd Bishop
    Person: Philip Okafor
    Person: Teresa Coleman
    Date: August 15, 2014
    Value: $84,000

    - The painting was discovered at 9:15 AM on a Thursday in August 2014.
    - Todd Bishop had worked the service alley for eleven years before finding the canvas.
    - Edmund Marsh's Hillside at Carver Creek was dated 1887 on the signature.
    - The Clover Ridge Museum's permanent collection totals about 400 works.
    - A badge entry on August 7 at 8:52 PM showed a single after-hours swipe with no corresponding exit.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    17 分