『People v. Podcast: This Week in Illinois Criminal Caselaw』のカバーアート

People v. Podcast: This Week in Illinois Criminal Caselaw

People v. Podcast: This Week in Illinois Criminal Caselaw

著者: David R. Drwencke
無料で聴く

Every week, the Illinois Supreme Court and Illinois Appellate Court hand down criminal decisions that change how cases are defended, charged, and tried across the state. People v. Podcast breaks down each new published criminal decision in plain English — what happened, what the court held, and why it matters — in about three minutes per case. Hosted by David Drwencke, Chicago criminal defense attorney, founder of DRD Law, LLC, and author on Illinois criminal defense. Built for Illinois defense attorneys, prosecutors, judges, law students, and anyone who wants to stay current on Illinois criminal law without reading every slip opinion. New episodes weekly. This podcast is for informational purposes only — it is not legal advice.© 2026 David R. Drwencke 政治・政府 政治学
エピソード
  • Week of October 24, 2026: 3 New Illinois Criminal Decisions
    2026/10/24
    This week's roundup covers post-conviction pleading standards, pretrial release revocation, and the limits of appellate jurisdiction over electronic monitoring conditions. People v. Sullivan — The Fourth District held that a post-conviction ineffective assistance claim based on a victim impact statement is cognizable, but Sullivan's petition failed first stage because he never identified an actual false statement available to counsel before sentencing — https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/11043312/people-v-sullivan/ People v. Henry — The First District held that at a pretrial release revocation hearing, the State need only prove the defendant was charged with a qualifying new offense and that no conditions will prevent future charges, not that the new crime actually occurred — https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/11043150/people-v-henry/ People v. Broyles — The First District held that a circuit court's refusal to modify an existing electronic monitoring condition is not an appealable order under Supreme Court Rule 604(h) — https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/11042098/people-v-broyles/ People v. Podcast is presented by DRD Law, LLC, Chicago | drdlawllc.com | (312) 909-6570. This podcast is attorney advertising and is not legal advice.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    10 分
  • Week of October 17, 2026: 4 New Illinois Criminal Decisions
    2026/10/17
    This week: hearsay confessions, roadside confusion, emerging adults, and a juvenile plea waiver. People v. Scott — Fourth District reversed a murder conviction because counsel failed to object to a witness's secondhand hearsay being admitted as a substantive confession — https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/11037125/people-v-scott/ People v. Schneringer — Fifth District reversed an obstruction conviction, holding brief roadside confusion without proof of actual impediment to police is insufficient — https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/11037033/people-v-schneringer/ People v. Landerman — Third District held a mandatory natural life sentence claim for an emerging adult can't be dismissed at the second stage despite brutal facts, reversing for an evidentiary hearing — https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/11035168/people-v-landerman/ People v. Shief — First District held a fully negotiated juvenile guilty plea waives a later Graham-based de facto life sentencing challenge, over a dissent — https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/11035167/people-v-shief/ People v. Podcast is presented by DRD Law, LLC, Chicago | drdlawllc.com | (312) 909-6570. This podcast is attorney advertising and is not legal advice.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    13 分
  • Week of October 10, 2026: 3 New Illinois Criminal Decisions
    2026/10/10
    This week's roundup covers ineffective assistance claims in plea deals, restitution orders, and self-defense theories across three Illinois appellate decisions. People v. Manuel — The Third District held that proper judicial plea admonishments do not cure counsel's specific misrepresentation about the State's actual sentencing recommendation, reversing denial of a motion to withdraw plea — https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/11019258/people-v-manuel/ People v. Rachall — The Fourth District vacated a restitution award because it included losses not proximately tied to the convicted offense and lacked evidentiary support, finding counsel's failure to object constituted ineffective assistance — https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/11019256/people-v-rachall/ People v. Rutigliano — A divided First District panel found sufficient evidence of ineffective assistance, based on counsel's failure to call an expert witness and clearly argue a second degree murder theory, warranting a full evidentiary hearing — https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/11019255/people-v-rutigliano/ People v. Podcast is presented by DRD Law, LLC, Chicago | drdlawllc.com | (312) 909-6570. This podcast is attorney advertising and is not legal advice.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    9 分
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
まだレビューはありません