This week's roundup covers commitment proceedings, felony murder, sentencing challenges, gun charges, and post-conviction practice from across Illinois's appellate districts. In re Commitment of D. — The First District held the State may voluntarily dismiss and same-day refile a mental health commitment petition, with the respondent bearing the burden to show case-specific good cause to block dismissal, and found the officer-identification requirement under section 3-606 was triggered — https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10976881/in-re-commitment-of-d/ People v. Williams — The First District held the new statutory amendment eliminating the cause requirement for successive postconviction petitions by emerging adults applies retroactively and that Williams made a sufficient prejudice showing to proceed — https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10976875/people-v-williams/ People v. Doolin — The Fifth District held that a shooting cannot serve as its own felony murder predicate for the intended target under the merger doctrine, but felony murder can still apply to an unintended victim killed in the same act — https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10976205/people-v-doolin/ People v. Chambers — The Fourth District affirmed dismissal of a postconviction petition, holding a 42-year sentence for a murder committed a month after turning eighteen does not violate the proportionate penalties clause despite expert evidence of cognitive impairment — https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10975420/people-v-chambers/ People v. Gerger — The First District held a concealed carry licensee is statutorily exempt from felony unlawful use of a weapon prosecution for carrying into a bar, and that a chaotic struggle over the gun defeated proof of reckless discharge — https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10974735/people-v-gerger/ People v. Plant — The Fifth District held that DNA testing continuances toll, rather than add to, the Pretrial Fairness Act's ninety-day detention clock, requiring a day-by-day tolling calculation — https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10970576/people-v-plant/ People v. Riddlespriger — The Fifth District held postconviction counsel is not required to retain a juvenile brain science expert for emerging-adult proportionate penalties claims, as lay testimony can satisfy the reasonable assistance standard — https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10970216/people-v-riddlespriger/ People v. Podcast is presented by DRD Law, LLC, Chicago | drdlawllc.com | (312) 909-6570. This podcast is attorney advertising and is not legal advice.
続きを読む
一部表示
10 分