See Source HereWe analyze a biblical narrative concerning a plague and Aharon's role in stopping it. Multiple commentators examine God's command to Moshe and Aharon's swift action, particularly the use of incense. Rashi suggests that Aharon was given a secret to stop the plague, or that the use of incense demonstrated it was not inherently deadly, but rather sin that caused death. Other sources highlight Aharon's willingness to risk his life, viewing his actions as heroic and a testament to his leadership, especially since he interceded for those who had challenged his authority. The placement of Aharon "between the dead and the living" is interpreted in various ways, from a literal physical position to a symbolic act of halting the destructive force. Ultimately, these interpretations underscore Aharon's divinely sanctioned role and the significance of his intercession in saving the Israelites.

Source Sheet Here This Shiur explores the concept of Divine forgiveness, focusing on its meaning and implications in the context of the Israelites' journey from Egypt.

Various commentators, including Ibn Ezra, Ramban, R' Y.S. Riggio, Rashar Hirsch, and Prof. Isaac Mozeson, analyze the Hebrew word "סלח" (salach), often translating it as letting go, extending patience, or alleviating punishment rather than complete absolution.

The sources also discuss Moses's plea for his people after the incident with the spies, differentiating this from his intercession following the Golden Calf, and contemplating whether God's forgiveness was total or partial, as evidenced by the ten times the Israelites tested God.

Ultimately, the discussions clarify the nuances of God's compassion and the consequences of the Israelites' actions.

Source sheet here This Shiur is an exegetical analysis of the biblical passage concerning the Israelites' "murmuring" (כְּמִתְאֹנְנִים) in Numbers 11. The commentators explore the precise meaning of this term, debating whether it refers to a baseless accusation, suffering due to travel, or a rejection of God's plan, with some sources, like Rashi and Midrash Aggadah, suggesting it implies seeking a pretext to abandon God. The text also examines the nature of the sin and the justification for the divine punishment of fire, pondering who exactly was afflicted and why.

These commentaries explore the meaning of the Priestly Blessing, particularly the initial phrase, "May the Lord bless you and keep you." Different interpretations are offered, with some focusing on blessings related to material possessions and physical well-being, and the need for divine protection to guard these blessings from loss or harm, both physical and spiritual. Other interpretations see the blessing extending to wisdom, spiritual insight, and long life, emphasizing that God is both the giver and the protector of these various forms of good fortune

We discuss the meaning of the phrase "מִמׇּחֳרַת הַשַּׁבָּת" (the morrow of the Shabbat) in Leviticus 23, which dictates the timing of the Omer offering and the counting of fifty days to Shavuot. Various interpretations are presented: the Karaite perspective argues it refers to the day after the weekly Shabbat, resulting in a flexible date for Shavuot and an overlap with the Festival of Unleavened Bread. The Qumran community also interpreted it as the day after the weekly Shabbat, but their fixed 364-day calendar meant both the Omer and Shavuot had set dates. Rabbinic tradition, represented by Rashi and Saadia Gaon, understands "Shabbat" here to mean the first day of the festival of Unleavened Bread, thus dating the Omer to the 16th of Nisan.

See source sheet here

We discuss the concept of קֶרִי in the context of one's relationship with God.

Commentaries explore the meaning of קֶרִי, interpreting it primarily as an attitude of treating divine matters as incidental or a posture of obstinacy, rather than a consistent, deliberate way of life. The texts explain that acting with קֶרִי involves a lack of willingness to truly heed divine instruction, and this leads to a series of escalating divine punishments, which are themselves described as God acting with קֶרִי, reflecting the people's approach back upon them.

Ultimately, these consequences are meant to prompt introspection and repentance, as ignoring warnings is seen as a greater offense, highlighting the importance of recognizing divine intervention in both good and bad events and avoiding the belief that suffering is merely random or accidental.

See sources here

These texts discuss a biblical account from Leviticus concerning the son of an Israelite woman and an Egyptian man who quarreled with an Israelite and subsequently cursed God. Various rabbinic commentators offer different interpretations of the man's origins, the reasons for the quarrel, and the event's significance.

Some suggest the man was the son of the Egyptian Moses killed, while others propose the conflict arose over issues of tribal lineage or religious practice, exploring the potential spiritual meaning of the man's actions. Ultimately, the sources highlight the severity of blasphemy and the punishment for such an offense.

See source here

We discuss the interpretation of a verse from Leviticus regarding not hating another in one's heart and the commandment to rebuke one's neighbor.

Several commentators explain that hiding hatred in the heart is a severe transgression, and the appropriate response to a neighbor's transgression is rebuke. However, they emphasize that this rebuke must be delivered properly, specifically not in public or in a way that shames the other person, unless they are persistently wicked and refuse to accept the rebuke.

The sources also connect this concept to the idea of mutual responsibility within the community and highlight that baseless hatred is a significant sin.