『Oncology On The Go』のカバーアート

Oncology On The Go

Oncology On The Go

著者： CancerNetwork
無料で聴く

このコンテンツについて

 Oncology On The Go is a weekly podcast that talks to authors and experts to thoroughly examine featured articles in the journal ONCOLOGY and review other challenging treatment scenarios in the cancer field from a multidisciplinary perspective. Our discussions also offer timely insight into topics ranging from recent FDA approvals to relevant research presented at major oncology conferences.

As the home of the journal ONCOLOGY, CancerNetwork offers different perspectives on oncology/hematology through review articles, news, podcasts, blogs, and more.

To learn more, you can also visit us on Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn! 科学
エピソード
  • S1 Ep169: Best Practices for the Medical Oncology Boards

    S1 Ep169: Best Practices for the Medical Oncology Boards
    2025/07/07
    The medical oncology board examinations are a pivotal time in a clinician's career. However, preparing for and taking this exam comes as a crucial moment when residents/fellows begin their transition to attending.

    While in theory, the process of taking an exam and then beginning a new job sounds simple, it is quite complex. The hematology/oncology boards require rigorous preparation. The exam is followed by the new attending position, where clinicians, for the first time, are on their own, making treatment decisions and leading a team.

    ONCOLOGY® spoke with leading clinicians as well as those who are just beginning their careers about this time, and how they handled studying while experiencing personal and professional changes.

    Eric K. Singhi, MD, assistant professor in the Department of General Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, and assistant professor in the Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, focused on:

    · His transition from fellow to attending (0:58)

    · Where students should focus their efforts on studying (2:11)

    · Advice he would give to those currently studying (2:47)

    Nicholas James Hornstein, MD, PhD, assistant professor at Northwell Health Cancer Institute, discussed:

    · Studying for the boards while balancing a new career (3:18)

    · Specific study areas the exam focuses on (5:43)

    Marc J. Braunstein, MD, associate professor in the Department of Medicine at NYU Grossman Long Island School of Medicine, fellowship program director in hematology/oncology at NYU Langone Health - Long Island, and codirector of the Hematology-Oncology System at NYU Grossman Long Island School of Medicine, highlighted:

    · How to prepare fellows for the career transition (7:11)

    · Advice he gives about this transition (8:17)

    Nerea M. Lopetegui-Lia, MD, assistant professor in the College of Medicine at The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center-The James, spoke about:

    · Best review practices for the exam (9:01)

    · Advice she would give to those studying (10:15)

    MinhTri Nguyen, MD, a medical oncologist with Stanford Medicine, focused on:

    · As a leadership coach, helping prepare residents/fellows for the career transition (11:36)

    · Advice he would give to those studying (14:34)
    続きを読む 一部表示
    17 分
  • S1 Ep168: Harnessing PIPAC to Improve Outcomes in Peritoneal Carcinomatosis

    S1 Ep168: Harnessing PIPAC to Improve Outcomes in Peritoneal Carcinomatosis
    2025/06/30
    In a conversation with CancerNetwork®, Benjamin Golas, MD, spoke about the current treatment landscape for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis, discussing how the use of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosolized chemotherapy (PIPAC) may offer improvements in clinical outcomes.

    Golas is the chief of Surgical Oncology of the Central Region for Hackensack Meridian Health.

    According to Golas, standard therapeutic approaches include combining cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), which may cause collateral damage to healthy tissue while eliciting toxicities such as nausea, vomiting, and bone marrow suppression. Additionally, certain surgical procedures may last up to 14 hours and confer an extensive morbidity profile, thereby increasing complication rates.

    Golas described how PIPAC, a minimally invasive laparoscopic technique, may help avoid pain and other adverse effects associated with surgery while facilitating more direct delivery of chemotherapy in the peritoneal cavity. He noted that treatment with PIPAC typically takes 45 minutes to an hour, allowing some patients to return home on the same day of the procedure.

    Although clinicians are still learning the correct indications for PIPAC, Golas stated that any patient with peritoneal carcinomatosis should be a candidate to receive treatment with this strategy. Furthermore, he described how the next steps for improving outcomes in this population include finding new ways to incorporate PIPAC into more extensive treatment plans for patients.

    “PIPAC is a new treatment and a new potential option that doesn't replace systemic chemotherapy, but I do think it can work in conjunction with systemic chemotherapy. We can offer this bimodal approach where we're directly treating the peritoneal disease and offering [intravenous] chemotherapy,” Golas stated. “We clearly have a long way to go in terms of clinical trials and learning what the best ways are to use this. But there are patients out there who will benefit from that, so I think referral to a center that focuses and has expertise in PIPAC for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis is critical.”
    続きを読む 一部表示
    16 分
  • S1 Ep167: Practice-Changing Lung Cancer Data From The 2025 ASCO Annual Meeting

    S1 Ep167: Practice-Changing Lung Cancer Data From The 2025 ASCO Annual Meeting
    2025/06/23
    In the wake of the 2025 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting, CancerNetwork® put together an X Spaces discussion hosted by Stephen Liu, MD, and Joshua Sabari, MD, to highlight the most intriguing and practice-changing lung cancer abstracts. Discussed topics ranged from long-term follow-up with commonplace therapies to an analysis of what time of day is the best to administer immunochemotherapy.

    Liu, an associate professor of Medicine at Georgetown University, and the director of Thoracic Oncology and head of Developmental Therapeutics at the Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, and Sabari, an assistant professor in the Department of Medicine at the NYU Grossman School of Medicine, and the director of High Reliability Organization Initiatives at the Perlmutter Cancer Center, shared expert insights on the latest non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC) breakthroughs.

    Trials of note that they discussed included:

    The phase 3 DeLLphi-304 trial (NCT05740566) - Tarlatamab (Imdelltra) versus chemotherapy (CTx) as second-line (2L) treatment for small cell lung cancer (SCLC): primary analysis of Ph3 DeLLphi-304.1

    The phase 3 IMforte trial (NCT05091567) - Lurbinectedin (Zepzelca; lurbi) + atezolizumab (Tecentriq; atezo) as first-line (1L) maintenance treatment (tx) in patients (pts) with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC): primary results of the phase 3 IMforte trial.2

    The phase 3 CheckMate 816 trial (NCT02998528) - Overall survival with neoadjuvant nivolumab (Opdivo; NIVO) + chemotherapy (chemo) in patients with resectable NSCLC in CheckMate 816.3

    The phase 3 PACIFIC15 trial (NCT05549037) - Randomized trial of relevance of time-of-day of immunochemotherapy for progression-free and overall survival in patients with non–small cell lung cancer.4

    The phase 3 Beamion LUNG-1 trial (NCT04886804) - Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) evaluating physical functioning and symptoms in patients with pretreated HER2-mutant advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): results from the Beamion LUNG-1 trial.5

    The phase 3 ARTEMIA trial (NCT06472245) - Phase 3 trial of the therapeutic cancer vaccine OSE2101 versus docetaxel in patients with metastatic non–small cell lung cancer and secondary resistance to immunotherapy.

    References

    1. Rudin C, Mountzios G, Sun L, et al. Tarlatamab versus chemotherapy (CTx) as second-line (2L) treatment for small cell lung cancer (SCLC): primary analysis of Ph3 DeLLphi-304. J Clin Oncol. 2025;43(suppl 17):LBA8008. doi:10.1200/JCO.2025.43.17_suppl.LBA8008
    2. Paz-Ares L, Borghaei H, Liu SV, et al. Lurbinectedin (lurbi) + atezolizumab (atezo) as first-line (1L) maintenance treatment (tx) in patients (pts) with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC): primary results of the phase 3 IMforte trial. J Clin Oncol. 2025;43(suppl 16):8006. doi:10.1200/JCO.2025.43.16_suppl.8006
    3. Forde PM, Spicer JD, Provencio M, et al. Overall survival with neoadjuvant nivolumab + chemotherapy in patients with resectable NSCLC in CheckMate 816. J Clin Oncol. 2025;43(suppl 17):LBA8000. doi:10.1200/JCO.2025.43.17_suppl.LBA8000
    4. Zhang Y, Huang Z, Zeng L, et al. Randomized trial of relevance of time-of-day of immunochemotherapy for progression-free and overall survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2025;43(suppl 16):8516. doi:10.1200/JCO.2025.43.16_suppl.8516
    5. Sabari JK, Nadal E, Hendriks L, et al. Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) evaluating physical functioning and symptoms in patients with pretreated HER2-mutant advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): results from the Beamion LUNG-1 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2025;43(suppl 16):8620. doi:10.1200/JCO.2025.43.16_suppl.8620
    6. Liu SV, Guibert C, Tostivint EP, et al. Phase 3 trial of the therapeutic cancer vaccine OSE2101 versus docetaxel in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer and secondary resistance to immunotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2025;43(suppl 16):TPS8651. doi:10.1200/JCO.2025.43.16_suppl.TPS8651
    続きを読む 一部表示
    45 分

Oncology On The Goに寄せられたリスナーの声

カスタマーレビュー：以下のタブを選択することで、他のサイトのレビューをご覧になれます。

Audible.co.jp

Amazon.co.jp
レビューはまだありません。