
March 24-28: Leaks, Ceasefire Agreements & Earthquakes – Crisis and Contrast in the Coverage of the News
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
カートに追加できませんでした。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
-
ナレーター:
-
著者:
このコンテンツについて
This week (March 24-28), the headlines were anything but predictable. From a jaw-dropping US security breach to a fragile Black Sea ceasefire and a devastating earthquake, the news cycle swung between chaos and cautious diplomacy.
I break down how each broadcaster’s style - sensational, skeptical, neutral or empathetic - shaped the week’s biggest stories.
On Monday, Sky News set the tone with its explosive framing of the Pentagon’s accidental leak ("Astonishing, catastrophic, and fundamentally alarming”). How did Sky amp up the drama? Channel 4 countered on Tuesday with sober skepticism over Ukraine’s shaky truce. But how did Channel 4 turn diplomacy into a masterclass in doubt? By Wednesday, ITV turned inward, dissecting the UK’s economic gloom with trademark dry wit, while BBC News on Thursday navigated royal health updates with trademark restraint. Finally, Channel 5 closed the week with raw, emotional coverage of Myanmar’s earthquake, blending eyewitness terror with expert urgency. But when does emotional reporting cross into sensationalism?