『Manual UI vs. AI Pages: Is Vibe Coding Worth It in 2025?』のカバーアート

Manual UI vs. AI Pages: Is Vibe Coding Worth It in 2025?

Manual UI vs. AI Pages: Is Vibe Coding Worth It in 2025?

無料で聴く

ポッドキャストの詳細を見る

このコンテンツについて

 The UI ParadoxYou’re still dragging rectangles around in Power Apps? Fascinating. It’s 2025, and half of you are still nudging buttons pixel by pixel like it’s 2019. The rest have discovered something far more sophisticated—describing their pages in plain English and letting AI build the layout. One group babysits pixels. The other supervises intelligence.Manual canvas apps are the digital equivalent of painting by hand—slow, strangely cathartic, and deeply impractical when you realize you need a hundred identical screens. Generative Pages, or what Microsoft endearingly calls vibe coding, flips that entirely. Instead of a developer carefully aligning text boxes, an AI agent reads your prompt—something as casual as “show order records as cards with customer name, payment type, and paid date”—and instantly spins up responsive React code tied to Dataverse.So the question is simple. Is vibe coding genuine progress or just performative laziness disguised as innovation? We’re about to dissect this with data rather than sentiment—efficiency in measurable hours, consistency across environments, and the ever‑present menace of technical debt. We’ll trace the pain of manual design, the promise of AI‑generation, the trade‑offs, governance realities, and finish with a ruthless cost‑benefit verdict. Buckle your logic, not your emotions.Section 1 – The Manual UI Era: Handcrafted ChaosTraditional Power Apps development has always felt noble at first glance—crafting a canvas app from scratch, carefully composing screens, colors, fonts, and forms. But that nobility fades the moment you build your tenth app and realize you’ve invented ten subtly different interfaces for doing the same job. Each layout a snowflake, each alignment a philosophical statement. It’s digital pottery: beautiful, singular, fragile, and profoundly inefficient the moment repetition enters.Every control you place carries risk—distance between two fields, inconsistent border radius, font mismatch. The average Power Apps builder spends more time massaging layouts than refining logic. Every pixel alignment session is a silent confession that the system lacks guardrails. Congratulations, you’ve handcrafted a masterpiece; now please hand‑craft it again fifty times.Maintenance becomes spiritual suffering. Change one form element in production, break two bindings in dev, and discover a third version drifted off entirely in the test environment. Multiply that across departments, and you’ve got cognitive overhead posing as creativity. Maintaining design consistency feels less like governance and more like archaeology—digging through layers of half‑remembered style decisions made by past selves who clearly hated you.Governance? A polite fiction. Some builders love monochrome palettes, some indulge in gradient crimes, and others proudly revive Comic Sans like it’s a brand statement. Multiply that freedom by a global tenant, and suddenly your enterprise app suite resembles a PowerPoint competition at an elementary school. Each builder’s taste becomes law within their corner of Dataverse, leaving IT helpless against an epidemic of mismatched buttons.The real tragedy isn’t aesthetic; it’s temporal. Hours vanish into alignment grids while core business logic waits in the backlog. The longer you stare at the pixel rulers, the more detached you get from the underlying data relationships you were supposed to optimize. Power Apps becomes less a low‑code solution and more a never‑ending internship in design futility.Developers often defend manual canvas apps on grounds of “creative freedom.” Please. That’s like defending handwriting when the printing press exists. The blank canvas looks empowering only until you realize you must populate it again tomorrow, maintain it next year, and refactor it five updates later. Real creativity lies in reuse, not reinvention.Version control is another melodrama. One environment differs by a shade of blue, another by an extra text column. Nobody can trace which build preceded which. Repackaging a manual app feels like repairing a clock with boxing gloves. And all that effort generates zero lasting standardization—only a growing library of inconsistent experiments.Yet despite this chaos, many cling to manual design as if precision alignment builds character. It doesn’t. It builds burnout. And while they boast about craftsmanship, the organization accumulates technical debt disguised as “design individuality.” Poorly documented layouts, untracked variants, and inflexible formulas metastasize across environments, making each update a gamble.The cognitive cost is staggering: precious focus spent on margin tweaking instead of performance, accessibility, or data security. Manual UI design transforms high‑value engineers into professional pixel wranglers. And no, adjusting shadow intensity isn’t strategic innovation. It’s aesthetic busywork the AI could ...
まだレビューはありません